The USA Made a Stupid Mistake
"Killing the INF Treaty was a gift for Russia,"
says the title of the material published last week by the American magazine, The National Interest.
This score is fundamentally different from the triumphant reports that are generated by the mainstream American media.
Who then wrote this headline? And everything that's under it.
Maybe some secret agent of Putin?
In all, no my friends. The actions of the White House was criticized by Jon Wolfsthal.
Who was seated as the special assistant to the President under Barack Obama,
and was also the senior Director of the US National Security Council.
In other words, a typical representative of the American ruling class.
What's surprising in this publication is not that Donald Trump is being criticized by a person belonging to his political opponents.
But that instead of a stamp set about the "Kremlin's hand", Wolfsthal is using sane and pretty good arguments.
In short, they go along with the fact the US had not the slightest military benefit from leaving the Medium and Short-Range Missile Treaty (INF).
That is, the motives and actions of Trump were purely political, insists Wolfsthal.
But for Russia, the benefits from the American withdrawal are straightforward, which the publication tells us.
"As long as the INF Treaty is in force, the US can use it for worldwide coordination and support to confront Moscow's violation.
The treaty also provides a basis for the United States to impose financial and political sanctions on Russia. The demise of the deal means both of these levers go away.
In many ways, U.S. withdrawal gives Russia a get out of jail free card since the loss of the treaty removes any basis for the United States to claim Russia is not meeting its obligations."
It's impossible to not notice that the words of Wolfsthal have logic, look at this.
While the treaty was active, Washington for years was accusing Moscow of violation of this treaty.
As you understand,
bringing any form of evidence was not necessary. It was enough to loudly declare to their vassals in NATO
that Putin violated it. And they would immediately take the bill.
This mechanism has been used by the US as a grade instrument for rallying their military alliance.
"But we have secret evidence that Russia is violating it, so it's meant to be against you!
Very quickly send us the money needed for military expenses.
And start training the cannon fodder, in case tomorrow there will be war."
Now this instrument has vanished.
And an answer to any accusations from Moscow will be reaching a spiteful voice that will say:
the Americans themselves left this treaty and no more excuses should be made.
The same thing will be said by the Euro vassals of the US.
"But we survived this way for 10 years, holding back treacherous Russia.
But then *whoosh* and the main protector launched the boat in the water. Leaving behind everybody to the arbitrariness of fate.
And since it's that way, don't ask us for any more money!"
The picture comes out logical and not contradictory.
All that's left is to simply explain why did Trump made this questionable event by leaving the INF Treaty.
The answer traditionally is contained in one of the fragments of the cult film by Aleksei Balabanov.
*Clip from Brother 2 (2000) plays*
Hey, what is the English phrase "how are you?"
- You are asking them how are things.
And what, they're all interested in how I'm doing?
- No, they're not interested.
Then why do they ask?
Just because. Over here, everything is "just fine" except for money.
Without the withdrawal from the treaty, Trump couldn't justify the additional expenses of the US military industrial complex.
That very one that is called one of the main supporters existing for the head of the White House.
The MIC giants invested in Trump and will demand even more contracts.
But the Pentagon budget is already ballooned like a pufferfish.
How do you pull even more money from the degenerate president of congress if these scum can't provide money for the wall at the Mexico border?
There is a proven method.
During the Soviet times, they were shown with political caricatures. (Inflated balloon - "Soviet threat!")
It was made for confirming the amount of these fictional threats, which ended up ripping the previous century's active treaty. (Magazine - Leningrad stories about the Soviet threat.)
(Balloon - Soviet threat.)
What will Russia get from this all? The regular.
Our country sticks out from an elevated adaptability to external circumstances.
Knowing how to adapt it to their needs.
It would be thought that after the failure of the sanctions pressure and the so-called "political isolation" [of Russia], the US has to understand this.
But no, they don't understand. And let them, it'll be worse for them.
For more infomation >> Bowie coach resigns following alleged altercation with student - Duration: 0:48. 
No comments:
Post a Comment