USA news on Youtube Jun 28 2018

JUST IN MAXINE WATERS HIT WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES – FACING PRISON

Over the weekend, California Representative Maxine Waters called on

her supporters to launch attacks on those who support Donald Trump.

Now, this has come back to bite her in a huge way.

The Gateway Pundit reported that conservative reporter Laura Loomer has

filed assault charges against Waters after the congresswoman swatted at her when she

tried to ask her about her offensive comments.

Loomer said that video footage shows Waters assault her three times.

"Today I filed a police report in Washington, D.C. to press charges against Congresswoman

Maxine Waters for assaulting me," Loomer said.

"When I confronted her regarding her call for targeted harassment of Trump administration

officials, Ms. Waters assaulted me 3 times.

She hit my hand to try to knock my phone out of my hand, and then she hit me in the face

with her papers twice."

This comes after Waters blatantly incited violence

against those who support Trump.

"For these members of his Cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they are not going

to be able to go to a restaurant, they are not going to be able to stop at a gas station,

they are not going to be able to shop in a department store," Waters said, according

to Mediaite.

"The people are going to turn on them, they are gonna protest, they are

gonna absolutely harass them."

We're glad to see

that this liberal idiot has finally been hit with

criminal charges!

SHARE

this

story if

you think Maxine Waters should rot in prison!

For more infomation >> JUST IN MAXINE WATERS HIT WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES – FACING PRISON - Duration: 15:06.

-------------------------------------------

TREY GOWDY DESTROYS OBAMA IN OFFICIAL HEARING - Duration: 15:06.

TREY GOWDY DESTROYS OBAMA IN OFFICIAL HEARING

Attorney General Sessions was put into a corner last Tuesday when he appeared before the House

Judiciary Committee to be questioned.

Many of the questions he received Tuesday have been reiterated many, many times before,

all seeking to understand his inaction on several key issues.

Via Christian News Alerts:

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), noted that the Department of Justice is an organization meant to be

independent, not used as a tool of politics by a sitting president.

"It is not appropriate.

It's not appropriate in 2017.

It wasn't appropriate when President Obama did it in the IRS targeting scandal.

It wasn't appropriate when President Obama did it in the ongoing investigation into Hillary

Clinton's server.

It is never appropriate for a president to tell a Department of Justice what outcome

it would reach.

I just wish my friends on the other side of the aisle would have the same kind of outrage

when President Obama did it as they do now."

Rep. Gowdy asked questions regarding former-FBI Director James Comey: "Why did you decide

to publicize one investigation but not another?

Why did you decide to appropriate a decision away from the Justice Department — which

is very unusual for the head of the FBI to serve as both the investigator and the decision

maker."

"I'm not interested in re-litigating the FBI's decision not to charge Secretary Clinton.

That decision's been made.

It's been explained.

And I'm not interested in re-litigating it.

I am, however, interested in reviewing 2016 and 2017 with respect to the Department of

Justice."

Mr. Gowdy added, "Mr. Attorney General, there was a time when my colleagues on the

other side of the aisle were interested in having some of these questions answered as

well."

His questions come in the face of Americans and members of Congress having lost their

trust in the DOJ due to improper investigative measures, bias, conflicts of interest, and

seemingly different protocols based on who is in power.

From Mr. Comey improperly announcing an investigation to making his decision prior to the completion

of the investigation, and much more evidence, it is clear that the DOJ has been mishandled

for some time.

"I get — I guess — that certain departments are inherently political, but the Department

of Justice should not be," Rep. Gowdy stated, adding that he and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA),

"are going to be looking into the decisions made in 2016 and 2017."

"My motivation is a love for that department, and a love for the concept of blind justice

that doesn't care whether it's an even-numbered year or an odd-numbered year," Rep. Gowdy

said.

He went on to ask Mr. Sessions how he plans to restore trust in the DOJ given all of the

misdeeds.

Sessions replied, "We intend to do our work, according to the established principles of

the Department of Justice.

We will not be infected by politics or bias.

We will only make decisions we believe are right and just.

We're not going to use the department to unlawfully advance a political agenda … I

am determined that when the years go by, that people will say this Department of Justice

did not crumble."

Perhaps part of that promised objective work will entail intense investigative efforts

into the past conduct of the FBI and DOJ.

Mr. Sessions, however, has previously admitted his potentially compromised objectivity regarding

a Hillary Clinton investigation and said that he would recuse himself from such an investigation.

It's obvious that the questions toward AG Sessions are far from over.

Members of Congress have a pile of unresolved issues with the current and former administrations

and the performance of the FBI and DOJ.

One thing is clear, bias and conflicts of interest have no place in these departments,

as Gowdy himself noted.

Attorney General Sessions has received quite some backlash in recent times due to his inability

to act in regards to the many Clinton scandals.

Many in the GOP have criticized him too.

However, according to a recent statement of AG Sessions, all that can be changed, as he

directed senior prosecutors to investigate Hillary Clinton and her private email server

scandal.

For more infomation >> TREY GOWDY DESTROYS OBAMA IN OFFICIAL HEARING - Duration: 15:06.

-------------------------------------------

MONICA LEWINSKY MAKES SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT – DROPS NUKE ON CLINTONS - Duration: 15:06.

MONICA LEWINSKY MAKES SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT – DROPS NUKE ON CLINTONS

Given the Me Too movement, the last thing that Bill and Hillary Clinton want is Monica

Lewinsky reemerging to talk to the press about what she suffered at their hands.

That's why they have undoubtedly gone into full panic mode about her latest interview…

Daily Mail reported that Lewinsky has opened up about how she still with the trauma of

Bill did to her.

"My newest thing is that I mutter mantras to myself.

Sometimes I mutter them aloud.

They're things like, 'I got this' and 'This matters,'" she said.

Lewinsky went on to say that she believes in "the effectiveness of crystals and color

energy.

I have a really beautiful deep fuchsia velvet ribbon that I carry in my wallet.

When I need a boost of confidence, I'll tuck it in a pocket or my bra and that color

brings me an energy, which will give me confidence.

And I have crystals in front of me right now."

"Despite the amount of trauma work I've done for the past 20 years, there's still

a pattern that gets tapped into or triggered," Lewinsky continued.

"I'm really lucky that I have tools I can use.

When that doesn't work, I'll resort to calling someone or using one of the healing

modalities called EFT, or Emotional Freedom Technique."

This comes after Lewinsky wrote an oped in Vanity Fair's March issue in which she talked

about being excluded from the liberal Me Too movement.

"There are even some people who feel my White House experiences don't have a place

in this movement, as what transpired between Bill Clinton and myself was not sexual assault,

although we now recognize that it constituted a gross abuse of power," Lewinsky wrote.

There's no denying that Bill Clinton is a sexual predator, and it's time for the

left to stop protecting him.

SHARE this story if you stand with Monica Lewinsky

against

the Clintons!

For more infomation >> MONICA LEWINSKY MAKES SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT – DROPS NUKE ON CLINTONS - Duration: 15:06.

-------------------------------------------

Deplorables Love New Trump Nickname After Dan Rather Insult Backfires Big Time - Duration: 3:34.

Deplorables Love New Trump Nickname After Dan Rather Insult Backfires Big Time.

Rolling out Dan Rather is never a good idea.

The disgraced former newsman, who's been rattling on the edges of television journalism

since he got drummed out of CBS for trying to take down Republican President George W.

Bush during the 2004 election, was back at it on Monday, trying to take down the current

Republican president.

But his shots are backfiring badly.

In an interview with CNN's Don Lemon, Rather tried to insult President Donald Trump by

comparing him to a wolverine, while blaming Trump in essence for the stunning decline

in civility in American politics since the 2016 presidential campaign.

"Looking at the whole sweep of American history, there were some very nasty periods

of incivility.

In the 1880s, for example.

In the 1920s.

But no, I don't think we've ever seen anything completely like this," Rather told

Lemon.

"And part of the reason is that, whether he is or is not, inside himself, President

Trump gives every indication by what he says and does and what he doesn't do, that he's

mean as a wolverine.

"And we've never had a president who had that reputation."

There are a couple of problems with this – what Rather, Lemon and the CNN suits would consider

an attack on Trump.

Aside from the fact that the wolverine is the mascot of the University of Michigan,

one of the Upper Midwest states that sealed Trump's victory in November, the plain fact

is that being associated with the word "wolverine" is simply not disgraceful.

(Unlike, say, using a journalistic position to smear an American president.)

Not only is "Wolverine" one of the coolest superheroes in the Marvel Comics universe,

the animal itself is best known as being absolutely fearless and ferocious if the need arises.

(They've been known to take on animals 10 times their weight in the wild.)

In other words, when it's necessary, a wolverine has the kind of qualities sane Americans know

the country needs in a president needs in a dangerous world.

(It's hard to remember now, but there was a time not so long ago when even Democrats

thought a president should be tough.)

Far from taking offense, Trump supporters – the type of people Hillary Clinton and

her crowd would think of as "deplorables" — got a kick out of Rather's words.

As Newsbusters reported, Rather's CNN interview was only one stop on a Monday night that included

an MSNBC interview with Chris Hayes where Rather claimed Trump is a budding dictator.

He "openly and without apology, as a matter of fact with some arrogance, says: 'I don't

care about the Constitution, I don't care about the laws,'" Rather said, according

to Newsbusters.

Actually, that was the last guy who was in the White House — the Democrat named Barack

Obama who did his best to subvert the Constitution while he was in office.

It's been 14 years since Rather's disgraceful exit from the top of a once-honorable profession,

but his crack about Donald Trump on Monday shows he hasn't lost his ability to screw

up when it comes to attacking a Republican president, and the "deplorables" are all

too happy to let him know it.

By now the mainstream media should have learned its lesson: Rolling out Dan Rather is never

a good idea.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

usa facts today

For more infomation >> Deplorables Love New Trump Nickname After Dan Rather Insult Backfires Big Time - Duration: 3:34.

-------------------------------------------

Building Your Fan Family on YouTube - Duration: 3:46.

Building your fan family on YouTube.

Music is often a journey artists and their fans take together.

After all, fans who feel a personal connection are more likely to share videos

and help expand the reach of your music.

YouTube can help you communicate with your fans more easily

Replying to your fans in the comments is a proven way to build an invested community.

That's why YouTube has tools to help manage the conversation.

Pinning a comment is a great way to do this.

As a first comment your fans see, something in a friendly or conversational tone

can make commenters feel more welcome and appreciated.

You can also pin your favorite comments

or the answer to a popular question at the top of your comment thread.

It can also help steer the conversation in a certain direction.

Of course, nothing beats replying back.

Fans love to hear from you directly.

You can use the Comments Report to see which videos are getting the most attention.

Too busy to reply from a computer?

The Creator Studio App allows you to respond on mobile.

If you don't have time to respond directly, Hearting a fan's comment can make their day.

Hearts can only be given by Channel admin, so fans will know it's from you.

It's a good strategy to reward your most loyal fans.

You can Like or Dislike comments, as well.

And they'll even get notified when you take one of these actions.

It can be helpful to set expectations within your community.

Like letting them know when you typically respond to comments.

Managing the comments is a big task, and we understand if you need some backup.

YouTube lets you set up different roles for others to help.

Channel Managers can reply to comments for you.

And Comment Moderators can flag and remove inappropriate comments.

Sometimes comments may not be right for your community

You can use a Block List to screen out certain words.

After being added to a Block List, any comments featuring those words

will need to be approved before appearing.

Want more control?

You can also remove, report or hide comments on your channel

that you believe violate YouTube's Community Guidelines.

Of course, interaction isn't limited to writing back.

A lot of artists generate engagement by asking fans specific questions at the end of a video.

You can take this even further by replying to comments in a Q&A.

Fans love when you answer their questions.

You can also spark discussion with a Poll Card.

Polls are fun and sometimes fans will have a lively conversation on the topic or results.

Finally, artists can encourage interaction by sharing fan-uploaded content in a playlist.

If you have a legal or management team handling your sound recordings,

you can work together to ensure covers and remixes are licensed properly

so they won't get blocked.

In addition to engaging with your current fans, we want to help your music find new ones.

You can help by keeping video titles, channel descriptions and other metadata up to date.

Taking those steps can help your music show up more accurately

in search results and recommended videos.

You can also help fans find your other songs by sharing playlists on social media

and wherever else you're promoting your music.

This helps extend listening sessions by making viewers aware of additional videos.

And finally, don't be afraid to collaborate.

Teaming up with other artists and creators

helps expand your collective fanbases by sharing traffic between channels.

Don't forget to cross-promote on both channels.

You can point potential new fans in the right direction

using cards, links in the video description, links in a pinned comment

or hosting the content in a popular playlist on both channels.

Have fun experimenting with these approaches.

Building and interacting with your fans can be one of the best parts of being an artist.

And YouTube makes it easy to give your fans more of what they want—You!

Thanks for watching.

Let us know if the comments how you communicate with your audience

or which of these tools you'll try out on your channel.

And don't forget to subscribe.

For more infomation >> Building Your Fan Family on YouTube - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Calls out Millennials, Liberals Everywhere Are Fuming - Duration: 4:41.

For more infomation >> President Trump Calls out Millennials, Liberals Everywhere Are Fuming - Duration: 4:41.

-------------------------------------------

'Year Of Spectacular Men's Zoey Deutch Raves Over Working With Sis Madelyn: 'She's So Gifted' - Dail - Duration: 4:09.

'The Year of Spectacular Men' was a family affair for Zoey Deutch, Madelyn Deutch, and Lea Thompson

HollywoodLife talked EXCLUSIVELY with Zoey about teaming up with her sister who wrote, starred, and scored the film!    The Year of Spectacular Men follows the story of Izzy Klein (Madelyn Deutch), a young woman just out of college who struggles to navigate post-college adulthood and also ignites and ruins relationships with several men

As she figures life out, she leans on her mother (Lea Thompson) and younger sister (Zoey Deutch) for support

The Klein family isn't just family onscreen. Madelyn and Zoey are Lea's daughters

Lea also directed the film.    HollywoodLife spoke EXCLUSIVELY with Zoey and Lea at The Cinema Society's premiere of MarVista Entertainment & Parkside Pictures' The Year of Spectacular Men about going on this journey with Madelyn

Zoey told us that she was so "honored" to have been asked by her sister to star in the movie

"She's so gifted, and I'm hoping she'll give me another job in the near future," she said

Zoey noted that Madelyn "specifically curated a lot of these parts and jobs for all of us to try out something we hadn't done before and parts I wasn't getting offered and parts she wasn't getting offered

"  The Year of Spectacular Men is a love letter to millennials, and if you are one, you'll undoubtedly connect to the film on so many levels

"I think that it's relatable in so many different facets, specifically that you're not alone if you're a millennial and you're not sure if you're doing the right thing, or if you're wandering, or if you're a little scared

I think there's a beautiful line in the film that Maddie wrote, 'The ends are just the beginning

' Sometimes it feels like the end is the end and we're asking, where do we go from here? I find that to be really encouraging and really beautiful and also slightly scary, but ends are just the beginning

There's so much more to come."  The movie also had Zoey and Madelyn under the helm of their mom

For Zoey, she was so impressed with her mom directing her first feature film. "Well, she's always been the boss because she's my mom, but I learned that she's the boss boss when she's my mom and director

I was so impressed by her, and she has 30-plus years of experience of being an actor and working with so many directors that she's able to pull all the pros and the cons and mesh it into this deeply compassionate director

"  Lea told us at the premiere that the whole experience working on the film was a dream

"I was super excited [that] I was kind of part of the inspiration to do it, and I felt really honored that she actually finished writing it

I just loved it and that she let me do it. We partnered up so we helped with the producing part, my husband helped

Maddie and I, we just picked each other up and kept each other going and moving forward

"  Lea love being brought into this millennial world and telling this story through a woman's perspective

"All I can say is every ingenue part that I did was written by a man," she continued

"I was kind of designed to be their ideal girlfriend. This was a whole different thing

I had to retrain my brain to direct that." She added that her daughters gave her "a lot of strength

They empowered me and made me think about myself in a way that I had been trained to not think about myself

"    The Year of Spectacular Men is now in select theaters and OnDemand. The after-party was held at Legacy Records

For more infomation >> 'Year Of Spectacular Men's Zoey Deutch Raves Over Working With Sis Madelyn: 'She's So Gifted' - Dail - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

5 Famous Celebrities Banned From America - Duration: 5:25.

That is a clip of Boy Georges music video do you really want to hurt me- and we will

be seeing him again further down on this list.

Hey guys im Court McGinley and welcome back to the most amazing top 5.

Lets just right into our video today of the top 5 Famous celebrities banned from America.

Coming in at our number 5 spot--Amy Winehouse- Unfortunately Amy is no longer with us as

she passed away in 2011.

But she was an extremely talented British Singer and songwriter who was known for her

deep expressive vocals.

Its also noted that in 2009 she was banned from entering the states.

The reason she was banned was due to drug convictions and for assault.

Which led to her being arrested in Norway.

Also In 2007 she had been barred from entering the country to attend the grammys due to a

drug rap.

Then again in 2009 US authorities refused to grant her a work visa to preform at the

Coachella festival.

She was then ordered on March 17 2009 to appear at the City of Westminster Magistrates Court

to face a common assault charge- which was filed back in September of 2008.

As you can see there were many events hosted in America that her fans wanted her at and

that she tried to get permission to attend but it was no use.

In at number 4--Mark Thatcher- Mark is a very well known 64 year old British business man.

Hes also the son of former British Prime minister Margaret Thatcher.

Mark married a US citizen but was denied a green card.

This was due to a guilty plea from January 2005 in South Africa after breaking anti-mercenary

legislation by investing in an aircraft without taking proper investigations into what it

would be used for.

Mark admitted in court that he had paid the money but was under the impression it was

to be invested in an air craft ambulance service to help impoverished Africans.

The judge rejected his explanation and he fined Marks 3 million Rand and he received

a 4 year suspended jail sentence.

Yeah all that for trying to help out.

Then a few months later in April of 2005 Mark announced that his family home would be in

Europe after he was refused a residence visa to live in the US due to his guilty plea.

At number 3--Lily Allen- Lily Allen is a famous 33 year old English singer and song writer.

She is also an actress and television presenter.

Yes shes dabbled in a lot of things.

And apparently fighting is one of them.

In 2007 Lily had her American working visa revoked and was banned from the States after

she was arrested that same year in England on charges of assault after she beat up a

photographer.

When all of this was going down Lily tried to fly from Australia to the US and was actually

stopped at the Los Angeles International airport and was detained and questioned for 5 hours.

She was then banned from working in the country by the US government- and this was just 4

week ahead of her North American Tour.

Its never ok to put your hands on somebody but this one I kind of get.

If you getting hounded constantly by paparazzi who are getting in your face then your going

to want them to back off.

Its not like she hit a random photographer she was working with.

It was obviously someone who was invading her personal space and getting so close to

her that they were at an arm swinging distance.

Clearly this person should've backed up a bit.

Coming in at number 2--Nelson Mandela- Nelson is the former President of South Africa.

He was the president from 1994 to 1999.

And sadly he is no longer with us as he passed away in 2013.

But during his time-Yeah he was kind of a big deal.

He was also an author, philanthropist and political leader.

So why would a sweet man like this be banned from the US?

Well Nelson Mandela was actually banned from entering the US all the way up to 2008 because

he was classified as a terrorist.

He was on the US terrorism watch list.

So let me explain a little bit.

Back in the 80s both president Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher viewed

Nelson Mandela in connection with his role in the African National Congress.

And the ANC participated in warfare in their fight against apartheid -a part ied- in South

Africa.

So Mandela was officially labelled a terrorist and this label stuck for decades.

And in at number 1--Boy George- Boy George is a popular English singer- song writer-

DJ and fashion designer.

He is mostly known for being the lead singer of the pop band Culture Club.

Hes also been a judge on the voice Australia and UK.

And he was a finalist on Celebrity apprentice.

He came in second after he was beat out from the first place spot by Matt Iseman.

So as it stands now Boy George is allowed to be in the States.

But it wasn't always like that.

In 2008 George was denied a visa by US immigration officials while facing a trial in the UK in

November of that year for the assault and false imprisonment of a male escort.

At the time his management released this statement- At the moment Boy George cannot come to the

United States of America because he has been refused permission to enter by the USA Administration.

This is not in respect of anything he has done in the past but because he is facing

a trial in November in London for something that happened in April of last year".

So they said it wasn't from anything he had done in the past but it was because of

something that happened last April.

Yeah pretty sure that would be the past.

But anyways.

Tghen on December 5th 2008 the trial took place and George was convicted at a court

in London of the assault and false imprisonment of a paid sex partner- a male escort- in the

singers apartment on their first encounter.

Then in January of 2009 he was sentenced to 15 months in prison for these offences.

However once that trial was settled- he did his time- and some years passed the ban was

lifted- and he was allowed back into the country in 2014.

Alright guys that was our list of the Top 5 famous celebrities banned from America.

Thank you all so much for watching.

Don't forget to leave your questions and comments down below as I will be responding

to them.

Also don't forget to show us some love by giving this video a big thumbs up and subscribing

to our channel if you havnt already and as always I will catch you guys in the next one.

For more infomation >> 5 Famous Celebrities Banned From America - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

Fox News Live Stream HD - Duration: 33:01.

For more infomation >> Fox News Live Stream HD - Duration: 33:01.

-------------------------------------------

(AT) Ilumináti zatvárajú Ameriku - Duration: 10:03.

For more infomation >> (AT) Ilumináti zatvárajú Ameriku - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

Na Wspólnej odcinek 2716: Damian uwięzi Monikę! Zaknebluje i zwiąże żonę - Duration: 4:29.

Szok w serialu "Na Wspólnej"! W 2716 odcinku "Na Wspólnej" Damian (Waldemar Błaszczyk) razem z Patrycją (Marta Ścisłowicz) rzucą się na Monikę (Sylwia Gliwa).

O poranku zakradną się do sypialni z taśmą i sznurem, żeby ją uwięzić i zakneblować.

Dlaczego Cieślik zrobi to żonie?! Co wydarzy się w 2716 odcinku "Na Wspólnej"?

W przyszłych odcinkach serialu "Na Wspólnej" konflikt między Cieślikami zdecydowanie się zaostrzy.

Patrycja kompletnie odsunie Monikę od męża, żeby ta nie psuła jego wizerunku.

Dodatkowo specjalistka będzie dyskredytowała żonę polityka na każdym kroku!

W końcu w 2715 odcinku "Na Wspólnej" Cieślikowa nie wytrzyma i pożali się Żanecie (Anna Guzik-Tylka).

Przyjaciółka poradzi jej, żeby postarała się poprawić swój wizerunek niemądrej pięknisi, na nieco poważniejszy, godny naśladowania.

W międzyczasie plan rozwojowy Patrycji zadziała i Damian w nowych odcinkach serialu "Na Wspólnej" po "pozbyciu się" żony z życia publicznego zacznie odnosić coraz większe sukcesy.

Oczywiście menedżerka zaproponuje politykowi oblanie zwycięstwa...

Monika w 2715 odcinku "Na Wspólnej" skontaktuje się z redakcją, która wcześniej chciała przeprowadzić z nią wywiad.

Wtedy musiała z niego zrezygnować przez nacisk Patrycji.

Cieślikowa zgodzi się na rozmowę, ale poinformuje jednak dziennikarza, że dosłownie nikt nie może o niej wiedzieć, aż do samego końca.

A już w 2716 odcinku "Na Wspólnej" Monika zostanie związana i zakneblowana we własnym łóżku przez Damiana i jego asystentkę!

Czy dowiedzą się o wywiadzie i będą chcieli ją powstrzymać?

A może to ze złości, bo nierozsądna żona wpakuje ich wszystkich w ogromne tarapaty mówiąc prasie rzeczy, o których nie powinna wspominać?

Jedno jest pewne - blondynka będzie mieć spory problem!

For more infomation >> Na Wspólnej odcinek 2716: Damian uwięzi Monikę! Zaknebluje i zwiąże żonę - Duration: 4:29.

-------------------------------------------

6/28/18 9:25 AM (4000 Table Mesa Dr, Boulder, CO 80305, USA) - Duration: 14:58.

For more infomation >> 6/28/18 9:25 AM (4000 Table Mesa Dr, Boulder, CO 80305, USA) - Duration: 14:58.

-------------------------------------------

Congress Just Blindsided Democrats And Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Win - Duration: 11:36.

Congress Just Blindsided Democrats And Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Win

President Trump has fought from the beginning to fix the United States immigration system

and build a border wall to help protect the laws.

He has even compromised with the Democrats on DACA.

Instead of working with Trump and Republicans to help illegal immigrants, the left has sabotaged

every move made in the effort.

Democrats claim that Republicans want to separate parents and children on the border but it

was former President Barack Obama's policies that were doing that, particularly referring

to pictures released from 2014 when a child was seen in what appeared to be a cage-like

structure.

House Republicans have just put forth a "discussion draft" of a sweeping immigration bill that

includes a path to citizenship for young immigrants (DACA), $25 billion in border security, which

includes advance funds for President Trump's wall with Mexico and a provision aimed at

addressing the crisis of family separations at the border.

It blindsided Democrats and delivers Trump a $25 billion border wall win.

It has something for everyone.

This measure sticks to Trump's Four Pillars on immigration while attempting to bring together

the two major political parties and moderate factions on an issue that has divided people

for years.

This is just the beginning and there is no guarantee it will succeed, but it's the

first step towards making progress on both granting citizenship while also protecting

the border from people who wish to break the law.

Speaker Paul Ryan is calling for a vote by next week, so it can be laid to rest before

the midterm elections.

He called it a "very good compromise."

Some conservatives called it amnesty.

No side will ever get everything they want, so this may be the path forward to get something

done for a change.

"Our members felt very, very passionate about having votes on policies they care about,

and that is what we are doing," Ryan said earlier Thursday.

"So we're bringing legislation that's been carefully crafted and negotiated to the

floor.

We won't guarantee passage."

The bill is 293 pages long.

It is a very ambitious overhaul of the immigration system.

It shifts away from the nation's longtime preference for family immigration to a new

system that prioritizes entry based on merits and skills.

It beefs up border security, clamps down on illegal entries and reinforces other immigration

laws.

The bill addresses concerns over the sharp rise of families being separated at the border.

It proposes keeping children in detention with their parents, undoing 2-decade-old rules

that limit the time minors can be held in custody.

The White House sought the change on this.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called the legislation "nothing more than

a cruel codification of President Trump's anti-immigrant agenda that abandons our nation's

heritage as a beacon of hope and opportunity."

Kerri Talbot, the policy director at Immigration Hub, called it a "wish list" from top

White House immigration adviser Stephen Miller that "would allow the Trump administration

to jail children for long periods of time."

That appears to be a very twisted version of what is the truth.

DACA is the primary element of the bill.

It provides a pathway to citizenship for as many as 1.8 million young people who have

been living in the U.S. illegally since childhood.

That's the provision that many might call amnesty.

These are the Dreamers that for so long the left cried over and have now abandoned.

Under the proposal, some 700,000 DACA recipients, as well as a broader group of young people

who didn't register for the program, could apply for legal status, which would be valid

for six years and would be renewable "indefinitely."

This benefits those on the Democrat side while still offering something for Republicans to

work within their own endeavors to strengthen border security.

Eventually, young people, who are under 31 and have been in the country since at least

June 2007, could begin to get green cards based on a point system.

It prioritizes education, English language proficiency, military service and continued

employment.

After that, they could apply for citizenship, as is the situation under current law for

those with permanent legal status.

The new visa program, which is also available to other immigrants, including approximately

200,000 children who were brought to the U.S. legally by their parents, is contingent on

the $25 billion in border security funding being fully provided.

This could be used to fund a border wall.

The program would do away with several existing visa programs.

Among them, family-related visas for the married children or adult siblings of U.S. citizens

as well as the 55,000 visas now available under the diversity lottery system for immigrants

from other represented countries, including many in Africa.

The $25 billion could be used for a wall structure, technology, roadways and enhanced security.

It authorizes National Guard troops at the U.S.-Mexico border.

It also calls for the deployment of a biometric entry-exit system for all entry ports that

has long been under debate.

The bill makes it easier for authorities to deport those here illegally (who have broken

the law), rather than allowing some to be released under certain circumstances.

In other words, it does away with what's referred to as a catch and release program.

This looks like a solid compromise and serious effort to provide greater security and freedom

for all Americans.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Congress Just Blindsided Democrats And Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Win - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

JUST IN Trump Gets Massive Revenge On Dems With Pick For Supreme Court Justice Replacement - Duration: 13:58.

JUST IN: Trump Gets Massive Revenge On Dems With Pick For Supreme Court Justice Replacement

We can now confirm that Justice Anthony Kennedy, Who is a conservative who provided key swing

votes for same-s*x marriage, abortion access, and even affirmative action, will be retiring

from the United States Supreme Court effective July 31st.

Kennedy's decision to step down now will transform the Supreme Court for generations

to come since President Trump will have his second opportunity to nominate a justice in

less than 2 years in office.

Here is some information of Justice Kennedy's rulings via azfamily:

"June 29, 1992 – Angers conservatives by coauthoring, with Justices Sandra Day O'Connor

and David Souter, the opinion of the court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, to uphold

Roe v. Wade.

March 1, 2005 – Writes the majority opinion for the 5-4 ruling in Roper v. Simmons stating

that executing killers who were under age 18 when they committed their crimes is unconstitutional.

April 18, 2007 – Voting with the conservatives in the 5-4 decision in Gonzales v. Carhart,

Justice Kennedy writes the majority opinion to uphold the nationwide ban on partial birth

abortions.

June 12, 2008 – In Boumediene v. Bush, Kennedy writes the majority 5-4 opinion, assessing

that the language of the Constitution grants the Guantanamo Bay prison detainees the right

to seek habeas corpus.

June 25, 2012 – Writes the opinion of the court in Arizona v. United States, overturning

three sections of Arizona's 2010 immigration law.

June 26, 2013 – Kennedy writes the majority opinion of the court in United States v. Windsor,

striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act.

June 26, 2015 – Kennedy writes the landmark majority opinion of the court in Obergefell

v. Hodges, making same-s*x marriage legal in all 50 US states.

June 23, 2016 – Kennedy writes the majority opinion in Fisher v. University of Texas,

upholding the right of universities to consider race as one factor in admissions."

Most likely the President will get some sweet revenge on the far left who has been constantly

and illogically attacking him since he won the Presidential election in 2016 by replacing

Kennedy, who is a right-leaning swing vote with a young, conservative jurist that will

make Justice Antonin Scalia look like a Liberal, and for our nation's sake, let's hope

he does.

If this is indeed the case it would create a bloc of five staunch conservative justices

who could move the court further to the right and cement a conservative majority for generations

to come.

President Trump will most likely push for a vote of confirmation before the midterm

elections in November.

Here is more on this breaking news via Fox News:

"Justice Anthony Kennedy announced Wednesday that he is retiring, giving President Trump

a critical opportunity to move the Supreme Court more solidly to the right in what promises

to be an epic confirmation fight.

The 81-year-old senior associate justice informed the White House in a letter of his intention

to step down from the high court after 30 years, effective July 31.

Rumors of another vacancy have reverberated across Washington in recent months, and it

comes a year after Kennedy's former law clerk Justice Neil Gorsuch, took over the

seat occupied by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Trump, reacting to the news, called Kennedy a "great justice" and said he'd begin

the search for a replacement immediately.

Arguably the most powerful member of the Supreme Court, Kennedy's moderate-conservative views

often left him the "swing" — or deciding — vote in hot-button cases ranging from

abortion to gay rights to political campaign spending.

A Supreme Court vacancy will likely become a key issue in a midterm congressional election

year, when control of the Senate is at stake.

That body will consider Trump's latest high court nominee, requiring only a simple majority

for confirmation.

GOP leaders changed the rules when Gorsuch was being considered, to get rid of the 60-vote

procedural filibuster threshold.

But Democrats are expected to try and transform the court opening into a broader political

referendum on Trump's leadership, and the future of social issues like immigration,

g*n rights and race.

Republicans, for their part, hope Kennedy's replacement helps them in the November elections.

Kennedy was nominated to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1987 and sworn in the following

year.

While often voting with the court's conservative bloc, he has been a key swing vote in a number

of cases and occasionally sided with the court's liberal wing, particularly on issues such

a gay rights an abortion.

Most notably, he wrote the 2015 ruling on Obergefell v Hodges, which found that a ban

on same-s*x marriage was unconstitutional.

His retirement had been rumored in recent years, with several of his former clerks having

said they thought he was considering stepping down.

While it is not clear whom Trump will nominate, the eventual nominee is likely to face resistance

from Senate Democrats — who are still bristling from Senate Republicans' blockade of Obama-pick

Merrick Garland in 2016 and would balk at the possibility of Trump hardening the conservative

bloc on the court.

Kennedy's retirement comes as both Gorsuch and Kennedy were key votes in two controversial

decisions this week — upholding Trump's 'travel ban' and ruling against union's

'fair share' fees.

Both decisions were 5-4."

This will give us conservatives the Supreme Court we have been dreaming of since Roe vs.

Wade.

We will have a strong majority of conservatives which will stop any craziness from the left

side of the political aisle.

And from what we have seen with Gorsuch, President Trump is no Bush and he knows perfectly well

how to nominate strong conservatives to the court.

But for now, we will need to buckle up because the left will take out their big g**s in the

mainstream media and all other methods they have in order to oppose whoever President

Trump nominates.

It will be one hell of a ride by the time this is all said and done and we have our

next Supreme Court Justice!

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> JUST IN Trump Gets Massive Revenge On Dems With Pick For Supreme Court Justice Replacement - Duration: 13:58.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Baby Granddaughter In Imminent Danger 15Hrs After Melania Got Extra Security For Barron - Duration: 12:18.

Trump's Baby Granddaughter In Imminent Danger 15Hrs After Melania Got Extra Security For

Barron

They say that "violence is the last refuge of the incompetent" and it seems that is

true in spades these days as the violent rhetoric of leftist progressives.

It is clearly getting out of hand and sadly it is likely to only get worse.

In this day and age, there seems to be little point in a discussion when most have not been

taught how to think, only merely what to think.

Talking points are recited verbatim and facts do not seem to matter.

Nothing is sacred and nothing is off limits.

Children are routinely attacked and mistreated by the very people that claim the entire source

of their anger is due to unwarranted attacks and the mistreatment of children.

Pat Dussault is a Canadian comedy writer with a Hollywood resume and he apparently thinks

threatening 4-year-old little girls with kidnapping and violence is a grand plan.

Dussault took to Twitter to channel his inner Peter Fonda and threaten the daughter of Donald

Trump, Jr. and the granddaughter of President Donald Trump.

Dussault sent out what any rational person would consider an alarming tweet, declaring

to the entire interwebz he and others were "coming for" the little girl next.

In the ensuing backlash, Dussault not only deleted the tweet but he took his entire Twitter

profile down.

It seems his mouth, or in this case, his fingers wrote checks he was not willing to personally

cash.

I guess it is different when the violence is directed against him, such is the case

with bullies.

This threat comes directly on the heels of vile and disgusting tweets sent from Fonda.

The actor called for the kidnapping of President Trump's youngest son, 12-year-old Barron.

As if that were not quite far enough, the "Easy Rider" star then took it a step

further to "put him in a cage with pedophiles."

Fonda's full and despicable tweet stated – "WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS

MOTHER'S ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES AND SEE IF MOTHER WILL WILL [sic]

STAND UP AGAINST THE GIANT A****** SHE IS MARRIED TO. 90 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STREETS

ON THE SAME WEEKEND IN THE COUNTRY.

F***."Shortly after he issued his repugnant tweet and threat, the office of the first

lady Melania Trump informed the Secret Service of Fonda's insane Twitter meltdown.

"The tweet is sick and irresponsible and USSS has been notified," Stephanie Grisham,

spokesperson for the first lady, told The Daily Caller.

Fonda also deleted his tweet and then publically "apologized" if one wants to call it that,

for his vile Twitter tirade where he publically advocated for the kidnapping and ultimate

violation of a 12-year-old boy all for the crime of being born into a family with whom

he politically and ideologically disagrees.

Fonda also called for the r**e and degradation of both White House Press Secretary Sarah

Huckabee Sanders and the kidnapping of her three children, as well as a similar sentiment

expressed towards Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.

Fonda tweeted – "Kristjen Nielsen is a lying gash that should be put in a cage and

poked at by passersby."

Fonda's disgusting verbal diarrhea, as well as that of Dussault, were cheered on by other

members of their violent gang of Hollywood imbeciles prior to being removed.

I find it hard to believe that such people can harbor such hatred for women and children

that have done nothing to them, people they do not even know, all in the name of saving

other children supposedly separated from their family as they illegally cross the border.

"I tweeted something highly inappropriate and vulgar about the president and his family

in response to the devastating images I was seeing on television," Fonda said in a statement

late Wednesday.

"Like many Americans, I am very impassioned and distraught over the situation with children

separated from their families at the border, but I went way too far.

It was wrong and I should not have done it.

I immediately regretted it and sincerely apologize to the family for what I said and any hurt

my words have caused."

Then there is the CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey.

A guy that apologized for any possible offense it caused the LBGTQ community all for the

"despicable crime" of eating a Chick-Fil-A sandwich during PRIDE.

Yet this same thin-skinned person seems to go radio silent in response to an actor threatening

at a 12-year-old child and a writer threatening a 4-year-old-child via tweet making Twitter

complicit and in tactic agreement.

I guess all that rhetoric about #MeToo and #TimesUp and "if you see something, say

something" were just words and that Hollywood hypocrisy was on full display with Dorsey

as a fully complicit participant in the events.

What?

What was that?

Hypocrisy?

Yeah, yours is hanging out.

You might want to tuck that back in.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Trump's Baby Granddaughter In Imminent Danger 15Hrs After Melania Got Extra Security For Barron - Duration: 12:18.

-------------------------------------------

Another Restaurant Just Put Up Shocking Message About Sarah People Are NOT Going To Like - Duration: 11:36.

Another Restaurant Just Put Up Shocking Message About Sarah People Are NOT Going To Like

In a state that's known for its leftism, lunacy and downright socialism, a local New

York business has shown all of us that just because you live and do business in a far

left state doesn't mean you have to be one of them and subscribe to their asinine ideas.

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee earlier this week gave praise to a restaurant in New

York after it posted a sign outside its building that read his daughter, Sarah Sanders, is

"welcome any time."

"OPEN!

BREAKFAST SARAH SANDERS WELCOME ANY TIME," the message read.

Lifezette reported:

"Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee on Tuesday praised a restaurant in New York after it

posted a sign outside its building that said Sarah Sanders — his daughter — was "welcome

any time."

The White House press secretary was kicked out of a Virginia-based restaurant on Friday

and tweeted about it on Saturday.

Her father has now shared a photo on Twitter of a sign that was posted outside Kipps Restaurant.

"OPEN!

BREAKFAST SARAH SANDERS WELCOME ANY TIME," the message said.

The former Arkansas governor, as Fox News reported, mused that the restaurant in South

Wales, New York, "looks like my kind of place!"

The press secretary was escorted off the premises last weekend by staff at The Red Hen in Lexington,

Virginia.

The former Arkansas governor told Laura Ingraham on her radio program Monday morning that his

daughter and her family — after they politely left the restaurant at the staff's request

— were then followed by restaurant employees as they made their way to a different restaurant.

"In fact, a little-known part of this story, is that after Sarah and her husband left and

the family relocated to a restaurant across the street, the owner of The Red Hen then

organized an effort to go and scream at them from the sidewalk at the other restaurant,"

said Huckabee.

The co-owner of the eatery, Stephanie Wilkerson, told The Washington Post that "this feels

like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions

to uphold their morals."

Wilkerson said she "explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to

uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation" — before ultimately asking

Sanders "to leave."

The owner has resigned from a local business organization.

As Sanders tweeted Saturday night about the incident, "Last night I was told by the

owner of the Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left.

Her actions say far more about her than about me.

I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will

continue to do so."

It was announced on Tuesday that the Secret Service will begin providing security for

the press secretary at her home on a temporary basis, as many news outlets are reporting.

In other late-breaking developments on Tuesday, The Red Hen restaurant will remain closed

until next week, and the owner has resigned from a local business organization, Fox News

has reported."

The Former Arkansas Governor told the Laura Ingraham show on Monday that after his daughter

Sarah and her family calmy left the Liberal owned Red Hen Restaurant after being asked

to leave because of who she works for they moved their party to a restaurant across the

street.

Only to be followed by restaurant employees as they strolled to the other establishment

where they continued to scream at her from the sidewalk.

He then confirmed that the far-left owner of the Red Hen actually organized the effort

to make her employees go and scream at them from the sidewalk of the other restaurant.

The owner of the Red Hen has since resigned from a local business organization and we

now have confirmation that her restaurant its self will be closed until sometime next

week, if not longer, which is a smart move since she gives all business owners a bad

name and has no business even running a taco cart outside the local flea market.

Although the owner in this incident went much further when she took it upon herself to organize

a mob to follow the Press Secretary across the street to scream at her and her family.

What the left doesn't seem to be capable of understanding is that any business should

have the right to deny service to anyone, for any reason.

But that goes both ways.

If the left wants to cheer this business owner on while she segregates conservatives that's

their right but they will also have to cheer the next time a Christian baker refuses to

bake a cake for a same-s*x wedding.

Isn't it funny how freedom actually works?

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Another Restaurant Just Put Up Shocking Message About Sarah People Are NOT Going To Like - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

APLIQUE DE CABELO 👉 Cabelos Longos Em 5 Minutos Com Aplique de Cabelo Removível Tic Tac - Duration: 2:03.

For more infomation >> APLIQUE DE CABELO 👉 Cabelos Longos Em 5 Minutos Com Aplique de Cabelo Removível Tic Tac - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

'Big Brother' estrena temporada por debajo de su anterior edición pero lidera en CBS - Duration: 4:02.

  Si la semana pasada tanto 'MasterChef USA' como 'Gordon Ramsay's 24 Hours to Hell and Back' asaltaban el liderato en FOX, ahora les ha tocado el turno de perderlo

Aunque ambos programas suben una décima (1,0 y 1,1 respectivamente) y mejoran en espectadores, se han visto eclipsados por el estreno de la vigésima edición de 'Big Brother'

El reality se estrena con 1,5 de rating y rozando los 5,3 millones de espectadores, dos décimas por debajo de su temporada 19

Además, hace mejorar ligeramente a 'Código negro' que iguala su máximo de la actual etapa y sigue liderando a última hora

 NBC consigue mejorar gracias a la reposición de 'Ellen's Game of Games', que sustituye a primera hora a 'World of Dance' y mejora tres décimas la franja

Peor suerte corre 'Reverie', que marca mínimo con 0,3 de rating y sigue por debajo de los dos millones de espectadores

En The CW, ambas reposiciones consiguen subir en espectadores aunque 'The Originals' pierde una décima (0,2) respecto a su capítulo de estreno hace siete días y los episodios repetidos de ABC se mantiene por debajo de los tres millones y solo mejoran ligeramente 'Los Goldberg' y 'Shark Tank'

Adultos 18-49 CBS: 1,3/ 6 FOX: 1,0/ 5 NBC: 0,6/ 3 ABC: 0,6/ 3 CW: 0,2/ 1 ABC 08:00 - 'The Goldbergs' (R): 2

980.000 [0,7/ 3] (4º) 08:30 - 'The Goldbergs' (R): 2.410.000 [0,6/ 3] (4º) 09:00 - 'Modern Family' (R): 2

420.000 [0,6/ 3] (4º) 09:30 - 'American Housewife' (R): 1.990.000 [0,4/ 2] (4º) 10:00 - 'Shark Tank' (R): 2

360.000 [0,6/ 3] (2º)   CBS 08:00 - 'Big Brother' (8-10 p.m.) (Estreno): 5.290.000 [1,5/ 7] (1º) 10:00 - 'Code Black': 5

680.000 [0,8/ 4] (1º) NBC 08:00 - 'Ellen's Game of Games' (R): 4.200.000 [0,8/ 4] (3º) 09:00 - 'World of Dance' (R): 2

770.000 [0,6/ 3] (3º) 10:00 - 'Reverie': 1.800.000 [0,3/ 1] (3º) Fox 08:00 - 'MasterChef': 3

720.000 [1,0/ 5] (2º) 09:00 - 'Gordon Ramsay's 24 Hours to Hell and Back': 3.530.000 [1,1/ 5] (2º) The CW 08:00 - 'Supergirl' (R): 1

190.000 [0,2/ 1] (5º) 09:00 - 'The Originals (R)': 840.000 [0,2/ 1] (5º)