USA news on Youtube Jul 31 2018

James Comey Is Terrified This Piece Of Paper Will Prove He Told One Awful Lie

The FBI's cover-up about the covert spying operations on the Trump campaign continues

to unravel.

Former FBI Director James Comey claims the investigation began on July 31st, 2016.

But this one piece of paper blows the scandal wide open and proves Comey told one awful

lie.

The FBI claims the current origin story for the Trump-Russia collusion investigation is

that it began after George Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat – who had connections

to the Clinton Foundation – that he met with a Maltese professor who claimed the Russians

had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton.

The Australians supposedly passed this information on the FBI months after the conversation took

place once WikiLeaks began releasing emails obtained from the Democratic National Committee.

This story was leaked to the New York Times in December 2017.

But months earlier, in an April story, the Times reported that it was Carter Page's

July 2016 trip to Moscow that initially kick-started the FBI's interest in investigating the

Trump campaign for collusion.

Congress is trying to get to the bottom of the FBI's ever-shifting story but they are

being stonewalled by the Department of Justice and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz appeared on America's Newsroom on Fox News and stated

that the Department of Justice is covering up facts that would show the American people

the spying scheme was even worse than they thought.

Gaetz was asked by host Bill Hemmer if Trump could step in and help Congress in their oversight

requests by simply declassifying documents that the FBI redacts.

The Florida Congressman stated "I would call on him to do that.

Specifically, the documents that would reflect on investigative activity before July 31st."

Gaetz singled out this date because the FBI spy who approached Trump campaign officials

in August and September 2016 also was in contact with Carter Page weeks before the investigation

began.

This has led many critics to question if the FBI was telling the truth when Bureau officials

claimed they began investigating the Trump campaign for contacts with Russians on July

31st, Gaetz continued "But suspiciously, Peter Strzok and Rod Rosenstein wouldn't

answer questions about potential intelligence collection or spying before that date."

Finally, Hemmer pressed on Gaetz on what he thought the Department of Justice was hiding.

"I believe money was paid to people to collect intelligence on the Trump campaign.

And that crosses a line in this country.

When you've got folks that are collecting intelligence, not as a consequence of a true

investigative basis but instead based on this dirty dossier – this DNC information – and

then going and spying on a rival political campaign.

I think the records will evidence that did happen."

Critics believe the FBI and Department of Justice have not been acting in good faith.

The information that has been redacted in the documents turned over to Congress does

not threaten national security.

It threatens the reputation of the FBI and its leaders like Comey because the documents

will show the FBI launched a politically motivated spying campaign against Donald Trump and then

lied about the scope of the operation.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in

this story.

For more infomation >> James Comey Is Terrified This Piece Of Paper Will Prove He Told One Awful Lie - Duration: 13:03.

-------------------------------------------

FLASHBACK Bill Clinton BANNED Fox News Reporter From WH for Asking 'Tough Questions' - Duration: 13:02.

FLASHBACK Bill Clinton BANNED Fox News Reporter From WH for Asking 'Tough Questions'

Well, speaking of "silencing" journalists, and removing them from events, here's a

blast from the past that Democrats and our lying liberal media would like for you to

conveniently forget.

Paul Sperry, the former Washington Bureau Chief of "Investors Business Daily" reminded

everyone of that time disgraced former President Bill Clinton kicked him out of a White House

event simply for asking a tough question on the Clintons involvement

in the "Chinagate" campaign-finance scandal.

For more infomation >> FLASHBACK Bill Clinton BANNED Fox News Reporter From WH for Asking 'Tough Questions' - Duration: 13:02.

-------------------------------------------

HAPPENING NOW Schumer CRUMBLES as Another Senator Flips for Kavanaugh - Duration: 13:02.

HAPPENING NOW Schumer CRUMBLES as Another Senator Flips for Kavanaugh

Things have gone bad to worse, for Chuck Schumer and his feeble attempts to stop President

Trump's second SCOTUS nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.

Now, Senator Rand Paul, who was originally on the fence, has announced he will indeed

support Kavanaugh's nomination.

Chucky's not having a good day.

From The Hill

GOP Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) on Monday said that he will support President Trump's Supreme

Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"After meeting Judge Kavanaugh and reviewing his record, I have decided to support his

nomination," Paul said in a statement.

He added that while no one will "ever completely agree with a nominee," they "must be judged

on the totality of their views, character, and opinions."

Paul, who previously described himself as "honestly undecided," has remained tight-lipped

since his meeting with Kavanaugh last week, which lasted for more than an hour.

But a person familiar with the discussions previously told The Hill that Paul raised

concerns about Kavanaugh as Trump was weighing who to select to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy.

And Paul was widely considered a potential swing vote because of his positions on the

Fourth Amendment, which established the constitutional right to privacy.

"I have expressed my concern over Judge Kavanaugh's record on warrantless bulk collection

of data and how that might apply to very important privacy cases before the Supreme Court,"

Paul said on Monday.

He added he hoped Kavanaugh would be "more open" to protections on digital records

and property in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that found, in most cases, law enforcement

has to obtain a warrant in order to search and seize long-term cell phone records that

would show a person's location.

"Of course, my vote is not a single-issue vote, and much of my reading and conversation

has been in trying to figure out exactly how good Judge Kavanaugh will be on other issues

before the Court," Paul added.

Democrats had also hoped that Kavanaugh's work in the Bush administration could be used

to sway Paul, who has previously broken with his parties on issues like surveillance and

torture.

But senators in both parties were skeptical that Paul would ultimately be willing to buck

Trump, whom he has worked to cultivate a relationship with, and cast the deciding vote against his

Supreme Court pick.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) called Paul a "perennial tease."

"They get a lot of press attention but rarely, if ever, will break from their party," Durbin

told The Hill when asked about the chances that Paul would vote against Kavanaugh.

Paul previously threatened to vote against Mike Pompeo's secretary of State nomination

before reversing course minutes before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was scheduled

to hold a vote.

With Paul's decision to support Kavanaugh, the already uphill path for Democrats to block

his nomination gets even narrower.

Republicans nixed the 60-vote procedural threshold for Supreme Court nominees last year, meaning

Democrats can't stop Trump's pick on their own.

Republicans have a 51-49 advantage in the Upper Chamber, but it is unknown if ailing

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) would be able to make a vote, meaning if all the Democrats

vote against confirmation, they would need at least one Republican to join them to block

Kavanaugh.

Democratic leadership is hoping to replicate the strategy they used last year to successfully

block ObamaCare repeal legislation by keeping their caucus united and focusing on one or

two GOP senators.

With Paul supporting Kavanaugh, the pressure will intensify on GOP Sens. Susan Collins

(Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska).

But Democrats could face challenges in keeping their own caucus united.

Three Democrats vulnerable in the midterms — Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Joe Donnelly

(Ind.) and Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) — previously voted for Neil Gorsuch, Trump's first Supreme

Court nominee.

Manchin is scheduled to meet with Kavanaugh on Monday afternoon, marking his first known

meeting with

a

Democratic senator.

For more infomation >> HAPPENING NOW Schumer CRUMBLES as Another Senator Flips for Kavanaugh - Duration: 13:02.

-------------------------------------------

WWE 'Monday Night RAW' Spoilers & Match Results July 30th | Heavy.com - Duration: 5:34.

WWE 'Monday Night RAW' Spoilers & Match Results July 30th | Heavy.com

The latest episode of Monday Night RAW is currently airing on the USA Network.

Here's what's happened so far:.

8:08 – Reigns grabs the microphone and tries to get the crowd to cheer for him.

He talks about how Lesnar never shows up and that he doesn't respect the fans.

Lesnar's representative Paul Heyman comes out to defend him. Heyman says Lesnar is in the arena but that he won't come out until he feels like it.

Reigns insults both men before the segment ends.

8:04 – The episode opens with a pair of title cards that pay tribute to the late wrestlers Nikolai Volkoff and Brian Christopher.

We then cut to a shot of Brock Lesnar backstage before Roman Reigns comes out to the ring.

Preview.

The biggest story heading into tonight's episode is the rivalry between Roman Reigns and Universal Champion Brock Lesnar.

After being denied Lesnar's title at WrestleMania and WWE Greatest Royal Rumble, Reigns has finally earned another opportunity to take him down at SummerSlam.

Lesnar's representative Paul Heyman has confirmed that the Champion will bring his his title to Cincinnati for RAW.

Recently, WrestleVotes reported there would change to one of the high profile bouts before SummerSlam: "Texting With A Source: don't be surprised to see one of the SummerSlam match ups already confirmed changed," they tweeted.

"Don't get your hopes up, it's not Reigns & Lesnar.

Hearing the IC title match may not end up being Rollins v Ziggler one on one.".

The other big news is that Ronda Rousey's suspension comes to an end tonight, and she will be able to intimidate Alexa Bliss for the first time in weeks.

Rousey and Bliss are scheduled to compete for the RAW Women's Championship at SummerSlam, and its likely that Rousey will spend the time leading up to her title match scaring Bliss silly.

Rousey featured in one of her best WWE segments yet when she powerbombed Bliss through a table last month.

We can only assume that Bliss will gain some credibility before SummerSlam courtesy of her friend Mickie James.

Last week, Seth Rollins & Finn Bálor defeated Intercontinental Champion Dolph Ziggler & Drew McIntyre, which earned Rollins a rematch for the title at SummerSlam.

That said, before he can compete for the title, he will have to take on McIntyre again tonight.

It remains to be seen whether Rollins has what it takes to keep the momentum or McIntyre will be able to put a stop to his Championship plans.

Another story to look out for is the growing rivalry between Constable Baron Corbin and Finn Bálor.

Corbin has made it no secret that he's bitter about Balor beating him at WWE Extreme Rules, and he's gone as far as to relocate Balor's dressing room to a children's playhouse to prove it.

Balor took the insult in stride last week, and the frustration on Corbin's face showed.

Tonight, Corbin and Balor will get a rematch of that Extreme Rules match, and time will tell which wrestler will be the victor.

Given the relative lack of popularity surrounding Corbin and Balor's feud, we can't imagine WWE would stretch it all the way out to SummerSlam.

The more likely scenario is that this feud wraps up quickly and sets up another, more popular one along the way.