USA news on Youtube Jul 29 2018

[Music]

On!

Holy crap!

Holy crap!

Look at that, how beautiful the colors are,

look at the patterning on it,

look at its tail!

Wow.

[Speaking Cantonese] Do we want this?

Sashimi on the beach?

...and we're going to slice this guy up and eat him raw!

Right now!

[Music]

Ready?

Lift up that backpack.

[All] Woah! Woah.

This is called a giant hawk fish.

[Woman] Woah. [Girl] Yucky.

See that?

Look at the color on it.

Especially, look at the tail right here.

[Girl] Wow. Yeah.

[Boy] Is it dead?

Yeah, it's dead.

[Erin] We're going to eat it for lunch.

When we-when you catch it

if you decide to keep it

you kill it really quickly

so it doesn't- it doesn't suffer by flopping around in the hot sand.

So we killed it, quickly,

and we're going to eat this tonight.

Otherwise you don't keep the fish

if you don't want to eat the fish don't keep the fish.

You let it go.

[Woman] How are you going to prepare it?

Well, I'm going to make sashimi out of it right now.

[Woman] Oh, wow. [Laughing]

Um, last night we caught two big ones

and we brought it to a restaurant and they deep fried the whole thing.

[Woman] Cool.

[Mom] Yeah, it was really good.

[Baby] Momma!

[Woman] What is it, Chelsea?

And then we've got-- [Erin] We've got crabs in here too.

I don't know what this one is.

[Erin] Wait, what is that one?

My Dad caught this one.

[Woman] Cool.

[Erin] and a lot of crabs.

Wanna touch it?

[Laughing] Yes. [Woman] Eden is my hands-on.

[Woman] I took a video of her the other day-- Hold it.

[Woman] She was like "I want to show you how to"

"make bait out of a snail--" and I videoed her doing it-- [Erin] Aw!

[Woman] So she was like, "first you take--" like exactly how you were doing it-- [Girl] Shhhh!!!!

[Erin] Oh my gosh! [Laughing]

[Erin] That's awesome!

[Mom] It's very cool! [Erin] You're going to be a YouTuber.

Here, hold this.

Hold it.

From under here, oh actually--

[Erin] It's kind of scary.

If you're--if it's too gross for you you don't have to hold it.

[Woman] You want to hold it? But feel how heavy it is.

[Woman] How about with a stick? Here. [Erin] Did you see the teeth?

It's got really sharp teeth, you know why?

[Boy] Why?

Because

it likes to eat

these hard crabs.

So if you open up its belly

you'll see a bunch of crabs in it

look how fat--it's very full right now.

[Woman] Wow.

[Boy] Open up the belly.

We're about to.

This is pretty much the freshest fish you're going to eat raw.

I don't usually eat raw fish, especially in America,

because I don't really know where it comes from. [Erin] Right.

and a lot of times,

sometimes, they could lie about it,

this, I've caught myself,

I know where it comes from,

and it was swimming probably 10-15 minutes ago.

So I feel safe eating this.

I know that this water is

this water has no factories or anything around here,

so this is very clean water,

[Erin] Right. There's not like

it's not like Baltimore water, like where we're from, [Erin] Right!

that--I would never eat anything raw from it,

I don't even eat anything cooked from Baltimore,

this is paradise because everything you catch from here you pretty much can eat

[Erin] Uh huh. Unless it's, like, venomous.

[Erin laughing]

I'm no sushi expert, okay?

But...

I think I'll be able to do this.

This is not a sharp knife.

I'm going to have to start right here. [Erin] Not very sharp?

No, the scales are just very thick on this guy.

See the scales?

Huge.

[Erin] Wow.

The skin is really thick on this guy, I just got through...

and that's the belly and ribs right here.

Okay, so when I filet this,

and I'm not an expert on fileting,

but first, you make a cut right here,

there's a spine right here

and you don't want to cut

directly on the spine, you want to cut as close to the spine but not on the spine.

[Erin] Uh huh. To get as much meat as possible.

and then as you go down

you start cutting the meat like that.

That's one filet right there.

[Boy] Poke its eyeball out.

[ Boy ] Poke its eyeball out.

Poke the eyeball out?

[Boy] Yeah.

I'm not going to poke the eyeball out.

There, I'm getting it in one motion now. [Erin] Yes, I see.

There. [Erin] Nice.

I'm going to take the skin off.

Leaving just the meat.

See?

Look at that.

Wow.

Looks pretty nice.

I'm going to put it on this side so it doesn't fall.

[Boy[ Are you going to catch as bass?

Hmm?

[Boy] Are you going to catch a bass?

No, I don't know if there's any basses here.

This called a hawk fish.

[Woman] Did you bring your wasabi powder in your pocket?

That's upstairs, we'll eat that later.

[Woman] Mix it with a little ocean water?

[laughing]

Yesterday we-we took the raw fish and made sushi rolls, we brought the seaweed and rice.

[Woman] Oh, that's cool. Yeah.

We're just getting the skin off right now.

and again, I'm no sushi expert, guys, don't--

[Erin] Don't judge me, right?

Yeah, don't judge me, I'm not the best

filet-er. [Erin] Don't judge.

I just want to eat some

fish right now.

[Boy] How do you kill that?

Hmm?

[Boy] How do you kill that?

You cut its gills...

and it dies very, very quickly after that.

You don't wanna

you don't want to let it suffocate

just give it a quick kill and its done.

[Boy] Do hawk fish eat coral?

They eat crabs.

A lot of crabs.

[Erin] We'll find out right now.

[Boy] I want to see the crabs that it ate.

Do you like eating crabs?

[Boy] No!

No? You don't like eating crabs?

[Woman] Do you like eating shrimp?

[Boy] Yes.

Shrimp, huh?

Here, here's the skin.

Woah, look!

[Erin] That's crazy.

[Girl] It's really bendy. That's weird, you want to hold it?

Go like this.

See the scales on it?

Okay, now there's still bones right here, you see that bloodline?

This is a bloodline.

This is why you cut the gill.

When you cut the gill,

the blood leaves the body

and, uh, if you leave-if you leave the

if you leave the blood in there,

that's what makes it kind of fishy.

[Erin] Oily.

Oily.

So I'm going to cut that bloodline out.

[Girl] So you're going to have blood all over your hands?

Hmm?

[Girl] You're going to have blood all over your hands?

Alright, I cut the bloodline out,

which is also lined with bones,

[girl] we want to catch a crab!

These are bones in here.

You don't want to eat that.

Fresh sashimi.

It doesn't get more fresh than this.

So I washed these off with some fresh bottles of water,

and now we're going to try some.

A little piece, here Auntie Kim.

[Boy] Why do you have that thing on your head?

Right? Not bad, right? It's pretty good.

[Auntie Kim] I'd just like salt and lime in it.

Little bit of soy sauce would be better.

So let's--we'll take it back to the hotel room.

[Erin] Soy sauce and wasabi, huh?

[Mom] Mmm, yummy.

[Laughing]

Erin, your turn.

[Erin] I've never done this, I don't think.

Well, there's no wasabi or soy sauce so you're going to have to really understand

you're going to have to really appreciate

just sashimi in general.

[Erin] Hmm, woah.

This fish gave its life for you.

To eat right now.

[Erin] Tastes a lot like

[Boy] What about, what about crabs? Tastes a lot like what?

[Erin] Almost like, like yellow tail.

Yellow tail?

Okay.

[Boy] We want some crabs.

[Boy] There's a crab right there.

[Mom] No.

Come on, eat one more piece!

[Mom] No, it's like, really fishy.

That's--! How is it really--? It's not really fishy! [Mom] I can taste the fish.

It's--can you really?

[Mom] Yeah.

[Mom] If you--I think if you put it in the refrigerator it's better.

[Erin] With wasabi and salt. No, I like it just like this. [Erin and mom agreeing with eachother] Yeah.

[Mom] You go ahead and you can eat it, alright?

Comment below, would you try it yourself?

Not bad.

It would be better with soy sauce.

It would be better with wasabi.

But the meat tastes really nice just like this.

Alright, here's what's inside its stomach.

You ready?

[Erin] Yeah, I'm ready.

Oh my god.

[erin] Oh my gosh.

A full crab!

[Erin] Oh my gosh!

[laughing]

[Erin[ That's why it was so fat.

[Mom] What is that?

A crab!

[Woman] Oh, what is that?

That's what they like to eat. [Erin] The contents of its stomach.

[Mom] They eat crabs, see that? There's a bunch of crabs there?

That was in its stomach. [Mom] Ew.

[Girl] Yucky. [Erin] All crabs. This is its stomach.

[Mom] What is that?

Its stomach.

[Mom] Oh, that's his stomach.

[Erin] Just full of crabs! All crabs. [Mom] That's what they eat?

[Erin] Yeah. [Mom] Crabs.

Look, even inside here, crab.

[Mom] Let's bring it upstairs and clean it up and sashimi it.

[Mom] That's it, right?

Yeah.

Look at this skinnnnuh!

It's like armour plating.

[Mom] How about the fish? You want to cut the--? This is probably

to protect from predators--well, definitely to protect from predators,

it's like armour plating, look.

It's very thick

and look how big the scales are

that come off of it.

I can't even get it off.

Oh, here.

Look at those scales.

[Erin] Woah. The size of my pinky fingernail.

[Erin] Ew.

Alright guys, we're going to take this home and cook it

a bunch of different ways,

thank you all for watching

I really enjoyed

I really enjoyed eating the fish on the beach just like this,

you can't beat the atmosphere here,

um, and you can't beat the freshness of the fish

that we just ate

uh, comment below!

Are we crazy or what?

I'm not too worried about worms

I had only just a little bit

and the water here is very, very clean,

um,

very undisturbed waters here

so I feel, I feel okay eating

a few pieces of sushi here.

But let me know what you think. Would you try it yourself?

We've got a website, senkoskipper.com

got a bunch of products on there to help you guys out

we've got a pier kit, surf kit, jetty kit,

super salty squid,

super salty tentacles,

thank you all for watching,

our job here at Senko Skipper

is to help inspire

and teach as many people who want to learn how to fish

how to fish!

[Music]

For more infomation >> FRESH SASHIMI Catch on the Beach (Japanese RAW FISH) Rock Fishing in Mexico - Duration: 13:45.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Barack Hussein Obama Just Made MAJOR Announcement - Duration: 12:35.

BREAKING Barack Hussein Obama Just Made MAJOR Announcement

CNN took it on the chin in a big way, after they ignorantly wondered about the "last

time" a U.S. President sided with an enemy.

Have liberals been snoozing for the past 8 years?

Needless to say, they were set straight about Barack Obama, whose favorite past time was

to support and finance our enemies.

From Town Hall

It's as if the past eight years never happened.

In the wake of the Russia collusion hysteria engulfing the Democratic Party and the liberal

media, the Left is becoming obsessed with this notion that Donald Trump committed treason.

It reached a boiling point after Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin

in Helsinki.

It was not Trump's best moment.

There could have been legitimate criticism lobbed his way.

Instead, we got a meltdown of epic proportions.

The outrage machine was set to 11.

So, as Russia-Trump-Treason Theater reached its 90th Act, in which not a shred of solid

evidence to corroborate collusion has been found, CNN decided to ask "what happened

the last time a President chose America's enemies over its friends?"

The piece discusses Reconstruction and Andrew Johnson, as if we have to go that far to find

what this person thinks is an example of an American president chose our enemies over

our allies.

Uh, do you remember Barack Obama and the Iran deal?

Yeah, that seems like a prime example: Yeah, that's another stepping of the rake

right there, but let's go into this piece for a little bit.

It's quite…entertaining:

Donald Trump likes to compare himself to Andrew Jackson, but the Andrew he really resembles

is Andrew Johnson.

What they have in common are delusions of personal grandeur and a tainted ascent to

the presidency.

Trump was elected by a minority of the American electorate, with help from the vagaries of

the Electoral College system and from considerable Russian interference.

Johnson became president thanks to an assassin's bullet.

While Johnson immodestly compared himself to Jesus and Moses, Trump claims he is the

best at everything, even boasting recently on Twitter that his popularity among Republicans

exceeds that of Abraham Lincoln.

Indeed, pundits have likened today's partisan divisions to those of the Civil War era.

But they more closely resemble the politics of Reconstruction, the period after the war

when for the first time in history, an American president, Johnson, was impeached by the House

of Representatives.

But the resemblance between the two men goes deeper.

Johnson's white-supremacist views were blatant and his policies precipitated a constitutional

crisis that put the President at loggerheads with Congress and his own party, the Republicans.

(Remember that everything you know about Republicans and Democrats today should simply be flipped

for the 19th century.

The Republican Party then was the liberal party of anti-slavery, big government and

Lincoln.

The Democrats were the party of white supremacy, Southern slaveholders and states' rights.

In the 20th century, after the New Deal and civil rights movement, the parties exchanged

ideological roles.)

When Johnson became president in 1865, he jeopardized the Union victory and the Republican

platform by issuing wholesale pardons to former Confederates and recognizing Southern state

governments with repressive "black codes" that pushed African-Americans close to a renewed

state of slavery.

First, let's kill this narrative right here.

Did Hillary Clinton win more popular votes than Trump?

Yes, around three million more thanks to the insufferable legions of progressive voters

in California.

Did she win the popular vote?

No.

Unless 48 percent is greater than 50 percent, Clinton didn't win the popular vote.

In our entire history, we've had five elections where the winner of the race won the Electoral

College but lost the popular vote.

It's a system that favors those who can win all over, and just the coast and cities;

Trump had that, not Hillary.

He also won more states than she did.

That's how our Constitution works.

This process has worked.

And this nation will continue under that system so far, though there have been debates about

reforming the Electoral College.

We're still here; that's the point.

We're not in a crisis every time liberals lose

at

the ballot box.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Barack Hussein Obama Just Made MAJOR Announcement - Duration: 12:35.

-------------------------------------------

Congress Blindsides Democrats, Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Victory - Duration: 12:35.

Congress Blindsides Democrats, Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Victory

Since the beginning of this year, President Trump has fought to fix our immigration system

and build the border wall.

Well, we're finally seeing his persistence pay off.

You might remember how he compelled Congress (especially Democrats) to put forward a plan

to fix DACA.

That resulted in a government shutdown.

We know that Democrats don't care about DACA, or illegal immigrants.

They are only using them as pawns to oppose the president.

President Trump has made it very clear what he wants to do.

He wants a permanent solution to DACA, which includes a rigorous, but clear, path to citizenship.

But only for people of merit.

He wants to end the illegal immigration that burdens our country.

Democrats exploit the fear and desperation of illegals for political power.

Liberals don't seem to care that millions of people suffer under the current situation

(and are harmed by vile drug cartels).

After months of fighting, though, it seems things are about to change.

Republicans in Congress have come up with a bill that seeks to fix the last administrations'

many errors.

Not everything about it is great, but there is one major victory: to the tune of $25 billion.

From Axios:

The Republican compromise immigration bill in the House would prevent children from being

separated from their parents at the border, provide legal status for DACA recipients and

authorize funding for a border wall, according to the bill's summary.

This is a complex bill that touches on border security, DACA, family migration and employment-based

green cards.

It's uncertain whether the bill has the votes to pass the House, but Rep. Steve Scalise's

office announced that Republicans will start whipping votes tomorrow ahead of next week's

vote.

…

The bill provides special legal status for DACA recipients who have been in the U.S.

at least 10 years, were under 16 years of age when they arrived and are enrolled in

school or have a high school diploma.

The protection is renewable every 6 years — not a special path to citizenship…

The bill puts $25 billion toward Trump's wall along the southern border as well as

a few other border security measures.

In addition to the funds for the border wall, the bill will authorize the National Guard

to assist in border security.

The bill will also eliminate green cards for children of U.S. citizens, replacing it with

a merit-based program.

This has been one of Trump's major goals.

Instead of change migration, or a lottery-system, immigrants will have to prove merit to stay

in the country.

All will be welcome, who prove they are willing to work hard to make the United States a better

place.

This will weed out welfare leeches and people who want to exploit America through crime.

The 55,000 visas currently given out via the lottery will now be a part of the merit-based

system.

Not every conservative is going to love this bill.

Many feel that DACA recipients shouldn't be given a pass.

They are here illegally, after all.

But considering Congress has done nothing—despite Trump's urging—this bill is a massive

step forward.

We will learn of its fate next week, as Republicans prepare to vote.

Be sure that—despite the bill's compromises—Democrats will not support it.

Proving once again that they care more about party politics than the good

of

the country.

For more infomation >> Congress Blindsides Democrats, Delivers Trump $25B Border Wall Victory - Duration: 12:35.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING OBAMA BUSTED!!! Look What He Did! - Duration: 11:35.

BREAKING OBAMA BUSTED!!!

Look What He Did!

Our nation's brave men and women that serve in the police force have lived through some

devastating, traumatic, and deadly attacks the last few years.

It seems that these brave men and women are being targeted more than ever before, both

physically and through the use of slander and defamation.

However, Donald Trump promised something on Monday…a promise so big and so bold that

Barack Obama never would have been able to make it.

During an event held at the National Peace Officer's Memorial Service, President Trump

encouraged the nation's law enforcement by making a strong promise to protect them

from these attacks moving forward.

According to The Hill:

"Our police have been subject to unfair defamation and vilification and — really,

you see what's going on — even worse, hostility and violence," Trump said.

"You are entitled to leadership at the highest level that will draw a bright line in the

sand, not a red line in the sand that isn't gone over, but a bright line in the sand,

and we will protect you."

The president called it a "personal priority" to help foster respect for law enforcement

in America, criticizing those who use the "reckless words of incitement that give

rise to danger and give rise to incitement" and arguing that some people might not believe

it's politically correct to stand with the police.

That's similar to the language that he used during his presidential campaign, when he

lamented a "war on police" and defended officers against accusations of police misconduct

in high-profile officer-involved shootings.

"True social justice means a future where every child in every neighborhood can play

outside without fear, can walk home safely from school and live out the beautiful dreams

that build their heart," Trump said, a clear callout to conservatives who chide "social

justice warriors" that have questioned police conduct in controversial incidents.

Framing an attack on officers as a "wound inflicted on the whole country," Trump praised

the sacrifices made by police officers around the country.

He called out to 6-year-old Micah Glasser, whose father, David, died last year in the

line of duty as a Phoenix police officer.

Removing a white "USA" hat from the podium, Trump called out to Micah and threw him the

hat.

"He has my hat and he's now with us," Trump said as he asked Micah and his mother,

Kristen, to stand up to be recognized.

Trump mentioned the support he received from police unions during the presidential race.

The Fraternal Order of Police endorsed Trump in 2016, while criticizing Democrat Hillary

Clinton for not seeking its endorsement.

"You'll always find an open door at the White House, and you've already found it,

believe me," he said after highlighting FOP leadership.

"I will always support the incredible men and women of law enforcement as much as you

have always supported me, and you did, big league," he added.

Trump's encouraging speech was delivered on Monday – a day that he had earlier decided

to name, "Peace Officer Memorial Day."

He commemorated his promise by ensuring that the White House would be lit by blue lights

in support of police men and women.

He also asked for flags to be flown at half-mast in response to the event.

In addition, the speech was delivered just in time for Trump's "Police Week" – an

entire seven days he dedicated to our nation's brave men and women who serve in law enforcement.

In dark times such as these, Trump's speech and motions thereafter seem to provide hope,

comfort, and future safety

for

the nation's police force.

For more infomation >> BREAKING OBAMA BUSTED!!! Look What He Did! - Duration: 11:35.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump Releases His 'Hit List' – All 6 Served Under Obama - Duration: 14:10.

President Trump Releases His 'Hit List' – All 6 Served Under Obama

As the bombshells keep dropping in the wake of the release of the FBI's heavily redacted

FISA warrant application for Carter Page reveals almost as much as it conceals regarding the

Obama administration, and none of it good.

Fervent in their quest to make a case against what they viewed as the "enemy," the Obama

administration made a case to spy on a US citizen and the Trump campaign, reducing their

fourth amendment rights to little more than words on paper.

As they continue to attempt to justify their heinous, illegal, and highly unethical actions,

President Donald Trump is considering his own response and that of the nation to what

has been revealed.

At the White House press briefing, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders stated President

Trump is considering revoking the security clearances from former intelligence officials

who served under former President Barack Obama.

Responding to a question about comments tweeted earlier in the day by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)

that former CIA Director John Brennan should have his clearance stripped Sanders replied,

reading from a prepared statement –

"Not only is the President looking to take away Brennan's security clearance, he's

also looking into the clearances of Comey, Clapper, Hayden, Rice, and McCabe because

they've politicized, and in some cases, monetized their public service and security

clearances.

Making baseless accusations of improper contact with Russia or being influenced by Russia,

against the President, is extremely inappropriate.

The fact that people with security clearances are making these baseless charges provides

inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence."

The list of individuals facing the potential revocation of their security clearance features

prominent critics from former President Barrack Obama's administration who had access to

top-secret intelligence information.

According to Sanders, there is significant concern from the president and other members

of his administration that these former officials are currently monetizing and politicizing

their institutional knowledge from the country's top intelligence agencies.

The current short list includes –

Former FBI Director James Comey Former CIA Director John Brennan

Former Director of the National Security Agency Michael Hayden

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe Former National Security Advisor Susan Rice

Paul tweeted earlier the same day asking – "Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance?

Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media

with his attacks on @realDonaldTrump ?" v After being fired by President Trump, leaking

memos to the media via his "friend" and perjuring himself in Congressional testimony,

Comey is now traveling the country peddling his book, telling people to vote Democrat

– just not "Socialist Democrat."

It was under Hayden's leadership that the NSA's massive metadata surveillance program

was born which was done without a court order and an initial circumventing of the Foreign

Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), in direct violation of the Foreign Intelligence

Surveillance Act (FISA).

This laid the groundwork for the surveillance to former Trump aide Carter Page and the Trump

campaign.

Clapper now works for CNN as a contributor.

Also of import regarding Clapper, following a document leak in June 2013 detailing NSA

practices of collecting telephone metadata on millions of Americans, Clapper was accused

of perjury due to testimony earlier the same year stating the NSA does not collect any

type of data on millions of Americans.

McCabe was fired as Deputy Director of the FBI for unauthorized disclosures to the news

media and lacking candor – including under oath – on multiple occasions, as well as

his wife taking a significant amount in campaign contributions from Clinton proxy pal, Terry

McAuliffe.

Rice is noted for her lying in the aftermath of the Benghazi scandal, peddling the fiction

that the attack was caused by a YouTube video.

She also was an instrumental part of the "unmasking" of various members of the Trump campaign on

behalf of the Obama administration and she specifically requested that the NSA provide

her with "detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates."

Yet words like treason are being thrown around, with Brennan leading the pack screaming from

the rooftops for President Trump's head on a platter merely for the "crime" of

being elected in a country that loudly proclaims to be "for the people, by the people."

However, to Brennan that is clearly irrelevant as he tweeted of "high crimes & misdemeanors"

in the wake of President Trump's press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin following

an approximately two-hour closed-door meeting between the two world leaders.

It is important to note that it was Brennan specifically that from April 2016 to July

2016 that assembled a multi-agency task force that effectively turned the CIA into Hillary

Clinton's own personal opposition research outfit.

During these months, Brennan was personally briefing former President Barrack Obama as

to the events taking place.

As Kimberley Strassel of theWall Street Journal so clearly notes –

"The Trump-Russia sleuthers have been back in the news, again giving Americans cause

to doubt their claims of nonpartisanship.

Last week it was Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Peter Strzok testifying to Congress

that he harbored no bias against a president he still describes as "horrible" and "disgusting."

This week it was former FBI Director Jim Comey tweet-lecturing Americans on their duty to

vote Democratic in November.

But the man who deserves a belated bit of scrutiny is former Central Intelligence Agency

Director John Brennan.

He's accused President Trump of "venality, moral turpitude and political corruption,"

and berated GOP investigations of the FBI.

This week he claimed on Twitter that Mr. Trump's press conference in Helsinki was "nothing

short of treasonous."

This is rough stuff, even for an Obama partisan.

That's what Mr. Brennan is—a partisan—and it is why his role in the 2016 scandal is

in some ways more concerning than the FBI's.

Mr. Comey stands accused of flouting the rules, breaking the chain of command, abusing investigatory

powers.

Yet it seems far likelier that the FBI's Trump investigation was a function of arrogance

and overconfidence than some partisan plot.

No such case can be made for Mr. Brennan.

Before his nomination as CIA director, he served as a close Obama adviser.

And the record shows he went on to use his position—as head of the most powerful spy

agency in the world—to assist Hillary Clinton's campaign (and keep his job).

Mr. Brennan has taken credit for launching the Trump investigation.

At a House Intelligence Committee hearing in May 2017, he explained that he became "aware

of intelligence and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons."

The CIA can't investigate U.S. citizens, but he made sure that "every information

and bit of intelligence" was "shared with the bureau," meaning the FBI.

This information, he said, "served as the basis for the FBI investigation."

My sources suggest Mr. Brennan was overstating his initial role, but either way, by his own

testimony, he was an Obama-Clinton partisan was pushing information to the FBI and pressuring

it to act.

More notable, Mr. Brennan then took the lead on shaping the narrative that Russia was interfering

in the election specifically to help Mr. Trump – which quickly evolved into the Trump-collusion

narrative.

Team Clinton was eager to make the claim, especially in light of the Democratic National

Committee server hack.

Numerous reports show Mr. Brennan aggressively pushing the same line internally.

Their problem was that as of July 2016 even then-Director of National Intelligence James

Clapper didn't buy it.

He publicly refused to say who was responsible for the hack, or ascribe motivation.

Mr. Brennan also couldn't get the FBI to sign on to the view; the bureau continued

to believe Russian cyber attacks were aimed at disrupting the U.S. political system generally,

not aiding Mr. Trump.

The CIA director couldn't himself go public with his Clinton spin—he lacked the support

of the intelligence community and had to be careful not to be seen interfering in U.S.

politics.

So what to do?

He called Harry Reid.

In a late August briefing, he told the Senate minority leader that Russia was trying to

help Mr. Trump win the election and that Trump advisers might be colluding with Russia.

(Two years later, no public evidence has emerged to support such a claim.)

But the truth was irrelevant.

On cue, within a few days of the briefing, Mr. Reid wrote a letter to Mr. Comey, which

of course immediately became public.

"The evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald Trump's

presidential campaign continues to mount," wrote Mr. Reid, going on to float Team Clinton's

Russians-are-helping-Trump theory.

Mr. Reid publicly divulged at least one of the allegations contained in the infamous

Steele dossier, insisting that the FBI use "every resource available to investigate

this matter."

The Reid letter marked the first official blast of the Brennan-Clinton collusion narrative

into the open.

Clinton opposition-research firm Fusion GPS followed up by briefing its media allies about

the dossier it had dropped off at the FBI.

On Sept. 23, Yahoo News's Michael Isikoff ran the headline: "U.S. intel officials

probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin."

Voilà.

Not only was the collusion narrative out there, but so was evidence that the FBI was investigating.

In their recent book "Russian Roulette," Mr. Isikoff and David Corn say even Mr. Reid

believed Mr. Brennan had an "ulterior motive" with the briefing, and "concluded the CIA

chief believed the public needed to know about the Russia operation, including the information

about the possible links to the Trump campaign."

(Brennan allies have denied his aim was to leak damaging information.)

Clinton supporters have a plausible case that Mr. Comey's late-October announcement that

the FBI had reopened its investigation into the candidate affected the election.

But Trump supporters have a claim that the public outing of the collusion narrative and

FBI investigation took a toll on their candidate."

Strassel simply and succinctly concludes with this – "Politics was at the center of

that outing, and Mr. Brennan was a ringmaster.

Remember that when reading his next 'treason' tweet."

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute

our content.

Please

take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> President Trump Releases His 'Hit List' – All 6 Served Under Obama - Duration: 14:10.

-------------------------------------------

Just In Obama is Hiding After His SICK Secret Gets Out - Duration: 13:21.

Just In Obama is Hiding After His SICK Secret Gets Out

The Obama secrets are tumbling out like a ripped bag of cat litter.

In recent weeks, we have discovered unbelievable revelations about what the Obama White House

did during the 2016 election.

And it's only getting worse.

It's clear that Obama's DOJ and FBI were abusing their power to stop Trump.

They hatched schemes that were aimed at discovering dirt on his campaign; their goal was to expose

Trump as some kind of fraud, destroying his chances at becoming president.

The only problem? Trump was no fraud.

The accusations that he was working with Russia were never true.

What really happened?

Obama's Department of Justice violated laws and the Constitutional rights of Americans

for political purposes.

Even worse, they knew what they were doing was wrong, but assumed it could be covered

up—once Hillary took the White House.

Now we are discovering the conspiracy might have been much worse than we thought.

Turns out, Obama himself might have been leading the bogus investigation.

From Conservative Tribune:

"The latest muddiness comes from a series of text messages sent in early August of 2016

which indicate that the Obama administration was trying to take over the FBI's investigation

into alleged links between low-level Trump campaign staffers and Russia.

The messages were also revealed as part of a longer report by The Hill's John Solomon

which detailed an unsettling pattern of an FBI that may have violated its own rules in

regard to contacts with informants during the Trump investigation, and which hasn't

been completely forthcoming about the timeline of the probe.

'They voiced alarm when an FBI colleague — 'Liz' — suggested the Obama White

House was about to hijack the investigation,' Solomon wrote.

'Went well, best we could have expected,' Strzok texted Page after an Aug. 5, 2016,

meeting.

'Other than Liz quote 'the White House is running this.'

Page then texted to assure Strzok of a paper trail showing the FBI in charge: 'We got

emails that say otherwise.'"

The FBI and DOJ do fall under the president's authority, but their work and investigations

operate independently of the White House.

That's by design.

Although the president oversees what they do, he's not supposed to interfere.

But from what Strzok texted to Page in August 2016, it seems like Obama had much more control

over their attempts to undermine Trump.

More and more is coming out that shows us just what the last administration was trying

to do: they seemed to violate a variety of laws and safeguards, just to steal the election.

Obama was so determined to prevent Trump from winning, he'd do anything to stop that from

happening.

The White House was leading the DOJ and FBI to greater and greater extremes; they pushed

the boundaries of what they are legally allowed to do.

For what?

To infiltrate and destroy a campaign over unproven allegations, and the real reason:

to stop a Republican from becoming president.

Now's the time for every American to wake up.

The Democratic Party does not believe in our government, democracy, or freedom; they almost

destroyed our way of life, just to win an election.

Think on that, fellow Americans.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Just In Obama is Hiding After His SICK Secret Gets Out - Duration: 13:21.

-------------------------------------------

David Hogg Under Investigation After Threatening Violence Against Trump - Duration: 14:11.

David Hogg Under Investigation After Threatening Violence Against Trump

David Hogg is being investigated by the United States Secret Service after making public

threats of violence against President Trump.

The Parkland student tweeted the threat to Trump on Monday, warning that our POTUS should

"be cautious" or "suffer the consequences."

Warning a sitting president that he will "suffer the consequences" is something that will

most likely end with a visit from SS agents.

Westernjournal.com reports: Hogg has expanded his political franchising into issues that

have nothing to do with gun control.

He's attacked money in politics, gender issues and pretty much anything involving

President Donald Trump.

If you don't believe me, let's take his ham-fisted rejoinder to Trump's all-caps

tweet against Iran, which could theoretically earn him a visit from the Secret Service.

First, let's have another look at Trump's tweet: Quoth the grinning Rage Comics face:

"I see what you did there."

The problem, as with so many things, is context.

Trump's tweet came after comments from the Iran President Hassan Rouhani that intimated

war and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz were both possibilities for the United States

exiting the Iran deal and threatening sanctions against Iran for its ongoing ramping-up of

its nuclear program(which, last I checked, they swore on a stack of Qurans they were

vigorously dismantling).

"Mr. Trump, don't play with the lion's tail, this would only lead to regret," Rouhani

said during his Sunday remarks.

"America should know that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace, and war with Iran

is the mother of all wars."

That's clearly a threat by a foreign power that's potentially working on a nuclear

weapon.

Whether or not you agree with the caps-lock tweet is another issue, but it's certainly

within bounds after a nation threatens you with war.

Meanwhile, let's look at Hogg.

There's not actually any political point in his snowclone tweet.

Trump didn't threaten the United States with "DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH"

at any point; there's no amount of verbal gymnastics that can accomplish that.

It was just an opportunity to get a bunch of retweets from liberal followers who probably

thought there was something deep about it.

Here's where it becomes problematic: Hogg is threatening Trump with "CONSEQUENCES

THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE" and telling him

to "BE CAUTIOUS."

This is a little less giggly.

Since Trump hasn't actually threatened Hogg with death or war, Hogg's words could be

seen as an incitement to violence against the president.

It's certainly a threat.

That's the sort of thing that gets you a visit from the Secret Service, as Kathy Griffin

discovered.

Perhaps what's most telling is that Hogg draws an equivalency between Rouhani — who

presides over a bellicose Islamist despotism where women are sentenced to prison for dancing

— and Trump.

I needn't point out that Hogg's criticism of the authorities wouldn't quite be so

welcome in Iran, but that's rather beside the point.

It's a bit like William F. Buckley's old quote that "to say that the CIA and the

KGB engage in similar practices is the equivalent of saying that the man who pushes an old lady

into the path of a hurtling bus is not to be distinguished from the man who pushes an

old lady out of the path of a hurtling bus: on the grounds that, after all, in both cases

someone is pushing old ladies around."

Perhaps I'm taking this too seriously.

I'm fairly certain I've given more analytical thought to this than Hogg put into the tweet,

which is indicative of just one of Hogg's many issues.

Why this man is a public figure is beyond me.

The point is, the sooner we forget about him, the better.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.