USA news on Youtube Feb 22 2018

news

welcome to USA breaking news today please subscribe and click notification

box to get all breaking news alert breaking news today North Korea threat

Donald Trump will strike by the end of March

experts shock warning American Lawyer Jim Rickards warned Donald Trump will

strike and attacked in North Korea by the end of March 2018 to prevent

existential threats from Kim jong-un the American Lawyer and finance experts said

the progress made so far by Kim jong-un with his nuclear program suggests Donald

Trump will only have a five months window before North Korea could start

World War three speaking to as good as gold Australia mr. Rickard said that in

a meeting he had with CIA director Mike Pompeo and national security adviser to

the president general McMaster it emerged that the threat of a nuclear war

by the hands of North Korea was imminent he said I give a 70% probability to a

u.s. attack what we'd call a preventive war that we started but we're doing it

to prevent existential threats to us to the United States before the end of

March not the reason I can put a specific date on and I met in Washington

DC a couple of weeks ago with Mike Pompeo the director of the CIA and with

general McMaster the national security adviser to the president Mike Pompeo

said that it would be imprudent to assume that it would take North Korea

more than five months to have the ability to threaten the United States

we know he has atomic bombs hydrogen's bombs

we know he has immediate range missiles ballistic missiles and ICBM so those two

things are known dot there are still a few missing points but not many and he's

made progress faster than anyone expected so if they have five months and

that's the window and they can't have it but North Korea is persisting there is

no sign is either going to stand down or end his missile program therefore we're

heading for war speaking at the Munich Security Conference Senator Jim Risch

said a war between the two states would be one of the worst

catastrophic events in history Donald Trump's administration is not bluffing

when it threatens North Korea with the prospect of a nuclear strike senator Jim

Risch told the crowd in Germany dot Senator Risch said there is no more

dangerous place on earth than the Korean Peninsula right now the president of the

United States has said and he is committed to seeing that Kim jong-un is

not able to marry together a delivery system with a nuclear weapon that he can

deliver to the United States the consequences of that are breathtaking

when you think about how this could happen

if this thing starts it's going to be probably one of the worst catastrophic

events in the history of our civilization thanks for watch please

subscribe channel for latest news s news

For more infomation >> News : North Korea THREAT Donald Trump WILL strike 'by the end of March!' Expert's SHOCK warning - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

After the Show Show: Gold medal winners - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> After the Show Show: Gold medal winners - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

What Percentage Of Mass Shootings Happen In 'Gun Free Zones' The Number Is Stunning - Duration: 2:26.

What Percentage Of Mass Shootings Happen In 'Gun Free Zones'?

The Number Is Stunning.

After dozens of warning signs and alerts from concerned citizens went unnoticed, a shooter

walked into a South Florida high school and murdered 17 people.

In the wake of the tragic mass shooting, guns and "gun free zones" have become hot-button

issues.

The Left has since turned-up the volume on calls for a crackdown on Secondment Amendment

rights, quickly exploiting teens who attend the targeted school to makes the case for

them.

They have also slammed the suggestion that schools should have armed security, or perhaps

well-trained, voluntarily armed teachers.

But what does the evidence say about "gun free zones"?

According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, "gun free zones" (areas where guns

are prohibited) have been the target of more than 98% of all mass shootings.

This staggering number is why such designated areas are often referred to as "soft targets,"

meaning unprotected and vulnerable.

"According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, only a little more than 1% of mass

public shootings since 1950 have occurred in places that were not considered to be a

gun-free zone," reports The Blaze.

"In fact, as Crime Prevention Research Center President John Lott Jr. noted in October 2015,

only two mass shootings in the U.S. since 1950 have occurred in an area where citizens

were not prohibited from carrying a gun."

Former Vice President Joe Biden, a Democrat, introduced the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA)

to the U.S. Senate in 1990, and it was signed into law by then-President George H.W. Bush,

a Republican.

The act was clearly proposed with the intent to prevent mass shootings at such precious

areas as schools.

But the act, as the statistic prove, did not result in the desired outcome.

While mass shootings are a complex issue with more than one action needed to prevent them,

it seems unclear why gun control advocates would hold so tight to their well-intended,

but ultimately dangerous "gun free zones" even in the face of such a staggering reality.

Why is it kosher to protect our politicians, Hollywood celebrities, and federal currency

with guns but not our children?

source dailywire.com