Caller: Somebody called and uttered that the scholars who you confirm said that the damages that this Iranian government does
were much more and worse than these of the Wahhabis and America towards Islam and tashayyu (Shi´ism).
Shaykh Allahyari: That´s right. That´s my opinion too.
Caller: I wanted to see if was possible that I hang up and you mention some of these fields.
What do these damages and errors which occur consist of?
What kind of problems have they (the Iranian government) caused?
Shaykh Allahyari: Exactly where I´ve already mentioned it, I´ve summed up the argumentation and explained it.
Now I´m going to explain it to you again.
For example, I´ve told them (viewers) that the danger of this deceptive government for tashayyu
was much more serious and significant than the threat that has been caused by America or that Wahhabism has caused.
But the truth is that I don´t consider America a threat for tashayyu in reality.
Unless the Shi´as themselves - due to their own stupidity - emerged and messed frontally with America.
And the Iranian regime did exactly that.
Namely, if you Shi´as were truly righteous,
you Muslims, if you´re listening to my words. If you´re really impartial.
What does the constitution of most Western countries say?
The absolute free exercise of religion, no matter how one wishes to worship his God. In complete freedom.
They have freedom in proselytizing, they have freedom of speech.
Regardless which faith one has, whether their conviction was that there were 20 Gods or only one God.
If they wanted to worship the fire and do missionary work that this fire was God.
If they wanted to advertise that "Allahu wahdahu la sharika lah" was God.
If they wanted to advertise for the Qur´an or for facism.
In total freedom, free exercise of religion, freedom of speech.
Okay, we don´t want to have anything to do with that, praying like them, fasting like them, if their women are covered or not.
If they eat pork, drink alcohol or eat halal meat only or don´t drink alcohol, they´re completely exempted (it´s their choice). We absolutely don´t want to have anything to do with that.
On the other hand, until they haven´t committed crimes, haven´t murdered people,
our government doesn´t want anything from them.
So, I don´t want to say that it was an infallible system but it´s still (or much) better than the Communist system which existed in the Soviet Union.
Because it was prohibited to them to go to the mosque, they weren´t allowed to wear beards, they´ve compulsory shaven their beards off.
They weren´t allowed to observe the hijab (veil) and cover themselves.
That means, my dear viewers, if the man truly thinks for himself, that system of the kafir (disbeliever) which is presented by the Western World
with all it´s problems, though they´re cruel too at some places where there interests are represented.
If it´s about killing then they kill people, I don´t want to deny that.
If they need something somewhere, then they act as well. We don´t want to deny that.
But in general, amongst all other governments in comparison with the ´Abbassid government,
where they (Muslims) weren´t allowed to say: "Ashhadu anna ´Aliyyan waliyullah." ("I bear witness that ´Ali is God´s chosen leader")
If they still said it, they were slaughtered all together with all their little children.
Not to compare with the Umayyad dynasty or the current government of Saudi Arabia, it´s much better than these.
It´s thousand times better than these.
And anyway, respected viewers,
it´s no fundamental enmity and no fundamental conflict.
I mean such a great conflict that would portray a true threat for our religion.
It´s true that our youngster become irreligious. That means, the Western culture makes our youth irreligious. I´m not denying this fact.
The Western mindset, meaning if the part of our youth whose religious education isn´t correct attend Western universities, they´ll become irreligious.
The Western culture supports that careless (concernless) life(-style).
That people should be free drinking alcohol, free to be uncovered, those assumptions are all correct.
We belive that too. There are negative sides. I do also accept that.
But it´s not a true threat that wants to destroy the Shi´a religion, resp. wants to change the Shi´a belief. Unless the Shi´as themselves act in such way.
The Iranian government for example has willingly messed frontally with America.
So that we want to fight America in the whole world. That the enmity towards America was our Usul-ud-Din (foundation of faith).
That the enmity towards Israel was the core of our religion and our life.
The West in it´s nature doesn´t have something like enmity towards tashayyu and contrary to it Wahhabism has it.
Look for yourselves how much they´ve benefitted from their friendship with America and the Western world.
The Wahhabi countries like the Emirates as e.g. Qatar, Saudi Arabia have friendly relations with all countries in the world.
With America they have such relations, with Europe they have such, though Wahhabism ended as terrorism.
The Western countries themselves don´t know how to deal with the phenomenon of terrorism.
Despite their amicable relations they have with the West, they´ve whether bowed to the West
nor have become Christians (Nasara) and though they have benefitted a lot
for the progress of their economy so that they are able to proselytize for Wahhabism in the whole world in the best way.
And that they´ve spread in all other countries, beginning from countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, India,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Muslims in China. They were able to spread in a very extensive and basal way worldwide.
And took advantage of it for 30, 40 years.
On the other hand the Wahhabis have found in America and the West an excellent partner for anti-tashayyu,
for the reason that the Iranian government took the leadership of the Shi´as in it´s hands.
A government whose politicians don´t have sympathy for tashayyu.
Now what the real motives of Mr Khamenei are that he´s frontally messing with America, what his true motives are, I don´t know.
Maybe he´s an agent of the Soviet Union (Russia) as it is mentioned at some places.
That he studied in the Soviet Union, in the years before the revolution, in his youth.
I´ve seen some reports in Western media that he was trained for several years at the centre of the KGB.
What the true reasons are, Allah knows best. Maybe these reports are bogus.
I don´t know his true motives.
What´s his true motivation? We don´t have a religious motive, a reational reason doesn´t exist also.
Does that mean that Iran was a country that was able to subdue America?! Never.
America and the West could trample Iran and destroy it in a way that even if they´d struggled,
they wouldn´t be able to return to the state of development today in even a hundred years.
What´s the reason now and the motivation of Mr Khamenei for the enmity with America,
has to be investigated where he takes advantages for himself that he does such a thing.
Because the Wahhabis have seen, dear viewers,
that the leadership in Iran which took the lead of tashayyu in their own hands,
gave the Wahhabis the best present, which is the support from the West.
So that the West has become a friend, that the West became a companion and helper of the Wahhabis.
And the Wahhabis benefitted by that for 30, 40 years really well.
In reality does the wahhabi mindset share absolutely no similarities with the secular Western way of thinking. Their values are completely the opposite of each other.
But the West reached it´s hand to the Wahhabis because they saw in Iran a gruesome enemy.
They didn´t know how to deal with such an enemy.
And the Wahhabis took advantage of this friendship.
So, my dear friends, in the first place that one tells that America was a threat for tashayyu is correct.
That the Western values, the Western democarcy, Western liberalism and the Western secularism misguide our youth,
but it ends here.
That that was the foundation and main pillar of our faith, isn´t the case.
Israel and the Palestinians have their own conflict among themselves, but for us Shi´as it´s not essential for life.
That´s right, we as Muslims, and because Palestine is an Islamic country and they´re our brothers in Islam
if we can help them somewhere, we´ll do and I don´t want to deny that.
But that´s no key issue that we should go into our destruction for the sake of Palestine.
That´s not our task here.
So that was the threat which comes from the West.
Now about the threat of Wahhabism that our youth became Wahhabis. The chance is very little.
Or that they´d become ´Umaris ("Sunnis"). That´s not going to happen.
Right, at a place where´s no Shi´ite proselytizing, the motuhs of the Shi´ite missionaries are closed
if for example a station like Ahl-e-Bait TV (a.s.) doesn´t exist.
If the missionaries of the Shi´as were only people who studied at Hawzah ´Ilmiyyah Qum (religious university in Qum), studied in official madrasas (schools).
Which teach revolutionary thinking. Yes, in such a state it´s possible that Shi´a teenagers will get attracted to Wahhabism.
That means that Wahhabism as a mindset and inspiration becomes a threat for the Shi´as.
So that our youth goes there and becomes Wahhabis or ´Umaris. That´s a very weak and banal scenario.
True, the "Islamic" Republic can turn it into a real threat, why?
Because it wrests the tools of missionary against Wahhabism from the missionaries of tashayyu.
We are being forced to not say anything against Abu Bakr and ´Umar, even against ´Aisha one isn´t allowed to speak against.
That means 90%, yes 90%, of the missionary power of tashayyu is blocked at this point.
And those who study at Hazwah ´Ilmiyyah in Qum or study at the official madrasas - and their opinion is a made opinion -
these people will never be able to resist against Wahhabism.
Even the Iranian government itself is the reason. Why ´Umarism ("Sunnism") and the affliction
towards the caliphs and ´Aisha and love towards enters the hearts of some Shi´ites.
Because of the Iranian government and the things which they utter that they (enemies of rasulullah (s.a.w.s.)) were caliphs and sahaba, no matter what happened
and that ´Aisha was still the wife of the prophet (s.a.w.s.). They lie and say
that Amir-ul-Mu´minin (commander of the faithful, Imam ´Ali (a.s.)) respected ´Aisha.
Although those are all lies. So much for the forming an opinion. Now let´s come to praxis.
That the Wahhabi groups could threaten tashayyu. My dear viewers, the threat itself are those terrorist
Wahhabi groups. They´re the result of the Iranian revolution.
In Pakistan before the Iranian revolution the Wahhabis didn´t kill Shi´as.
But after the Iranian revolution, about four or five years after, the Wahhabi terror
has slowly started and become more and more and more until it reached the extent of today.
Saudi Arabia and the West have invested much in Wahhabi Qur´an schools in Pakistan and other countries
and that was only a reaction on the Iranian revolution. It was only a reflex on the Iranian revolution.
Because when Mr Khomeini exercised the revolution the ´Umaris liked it very much and they took a fancy to Mr Khomeini.
That means Mr Khomeini was that much popular amongst the ´Umaris as he was under the "Shi´ites".
And they (´Umaris) viewed their leaders as puppets of the West. They regarded them as traitors and in Mr Khomeini they saw an old religious scholar,
a pious man, a revolutionary who doesn´t want to hold on the enemies in the West nor in the East.
Someone who´s brave and practises the laws of Islam.
Exactly that spoke out of the ´Umaris hearts and soul. Their only problem was that Mr Khomeini was a "Shi´ite" and they were ´Umaris.
So Mr Khomeini gained popularity under the ´Umaris and many sympathised with the Iranian revolution.
And back then the ´Umaris weren´t as much anti Shi´a as they´re today. Since Khomeini was a "Shi´a" and they were ´Umaris, it didn´t matter at all.
Despite the fact him being a Shi´ite they liked him and wanted to follow him.
And at that point you should pay attention. Such things as the revolution are basically
Ikhwani (Muslim Brotherhood) and ´Umari inspirations that the respect and deference of Islam shoud be rebuild again.
Earlier Muslims were a world power with that said are the Umayyad dynasty and after them the ´Abbasids meant.
There were times when the kuffar (disbelievers) of Europe were disgraced and weak.
If they wanted to study medicine they had to travel to Islamic countries.
There were times when the armies of the Muslims accomplished conquests in the heart of Europe.
One time the Muslims from Andalusia accomplished captures just before Paris, our Paris today.
But whose army was it? It was the Umayyad army! Haha.
The Umayyad army just before Paris. You know that France and Andalusia shared borders.
They´ve captured everything just before Paris but there they were defeated and retreated until Andalusia completely fell.
There were those times when the Muslims had such a high number and strength! That´s one kind of Islamic nationalism.
That means the repatriation of world power of the Muslims as it used to be.
And Mr Khomeini emphasized such topics and expressed that the Muslims had such a high number. What´s America? What´s the Soviet Union?
The Muslims have to be a world power. But that´s an ´Umari idea. I´ll explain it to you better in the future,
that recreating the might and power of the Muslims that they should be a global power again.
In the first instance there´s no recommendation of the Imams (a.s.) for achieving that.
There´s absolutely no recommendation for such a thing. Even back then when the Muslims were strong.
When the Muslims were a global power, these times were the darkest times for tashayyu.
And in those times where one Imam (a.s.) after another became a martyr.
In prisons the Shi´as and ´Alawiyyun (descendants of Imams (a.s.)) were buried alive.
And even if a great Islamic empire was founded in our time today then it´d be a big day of mourning for tashayyu. Why?
Because that Islamic empire if it´s gonna be established, if in it´s centre and core doesn´t a ma´sum (infallible) Imam exist,
it´ll become another ´Abbasid government and another Umayyad dynasty. Maybe with some little differents.
And there´ll cruelty in the highest level take place. The nefarious has only changed his costume.
For example later the Soviet Union or America was a global power now it´s some other ruthless.
And be aware that if the Muslim becomes a global power his cruelty will be much worse than that of the kuffar (disbelievers).
So, for God´s sake may that day won´t come when a great Islamic empire is established.
Where all Muslims gather and build a big empire.
Because the first thing which will happen will be the ethnic cleansing and murder of all Shi´as until the last one.
Apart from that that there´ll be no hope for a spark of justice and practise of the Islamic rulings.
It´ll be another ´Abbasid dynasty.
These words uttered by Mr Khomeini gained much popularity among the ´Umaris. These were the words of the Iranian revolutionists.
And these are the exact same words the ´Umaris had on their mind.
That´s exactly what´s called Ikhwanism (Muslim Brotherhood).
So respected viewers the leaders of the Arab and ´Umari countries heavily got afraid of.
That all were gonna leave and become followers of Mr Khomeini. So what did they do (spread)? Fear from the Shi´as and the takfir (exkommunication) of tashayyu.
Of course takfir of the Shi´as was present under the ´Umaris. There were books which were written by Ibn Taymiyyah.
But when it got revived as a keynote, an inspiration and movement in a great extent amongst the ´Umaris and
was in harmony and got spread, that was the result of the Iranian revolution and the deeds of Mr Khomeini.
So dear friends and viewers, that nowadays the Wahhabis are hostile, this exact enmity in that way it exists today, is itself a trace of the Iranian revolution.
If Wahhabism has become such a danger for us, so it is only a reaction on the foolishness of those who executed the revolution in Iran.
Otherwise such anti tashayyu movement hadn´t developed. If they hadn´t threatened the ´Umari governments constantly and
if such a revolution in that form and in the name of tashayyu hadn´t existed it wouldn´t be like today.
So these three movements, Israel, America and Wahhabism are my respected friends no threat.
It´s true that the Wahhabis as jihadist groups threaten the Shi´as.
Especially where the Shi´as are a minority like in Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Iraqi Shi´ites, here and there.
For these people they´re a threat and for those people in Iran they´re a threat too.
And it will be a very serious danger in the near future if Mr Khamenei continues his politics.
For me this topic is absolutely clear and obvious that Saudi Arabia is actually on
making preparations that Iran is gonna be the new Syria.
And the Jihadists will be hundred times more than the number who are in Syria now. And on that day,
when the Jihad begins in Iran, according to the ´Umaris concept of Jihad,
on that day they´ll see even if the Wahhabis need one million, they´ll bring them to Iran.
They´ll smuggle many participants from Bangladesh, from Arabic countries, Pakistan and other countries into Iran,
for the jihad against the Rawafid (Shi´as), as much as they like.
And that´s the result of Mr Khamenei´s deeds. If Mr Khamenei continues his politics as before.
That he makes himself the enemy of the West and the enemy of Wahhabism.
But why is the Iranian government itself a threat for the Shi´as? Because the Iranian government, my respected viewers, deviates from the belief.
And they´ll take advtantage of the faith of the Shi´as and the furuat (branches) of tashayyu in their worldy affairs, wherever they can and take advantage of it wherever necessary,
and you know it very well, Mr Khamenei knows it exactly, before him Mr Khomeini
knew it well. They would beg that they would be the leaders of the Muslims, that Iran
became the leadership of the Islamic world and Mr Khamenei became the ruling cleric of the Islamic world.
That the next leader would get the guardianship of all Muslims in the world.
And they know very well that the ´Umaris will never accept him as a leader.
The scholars of ´Umarism will never accept him. Mr Khamenei himself organises every year one seminary for the unity of the Muslims.
And some years ago there was the conference of the Islamic unity taken place and they´ve brought
many scholars from the ´Umariyyah from Tunisia, from Libya, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh.
Mr Khamenei held a speech there and after his speech when it was time for prayer,
he wanted to be the Imam (prayer leader) and suddenly he sees that all ´Umaris position themselves as one separate group
in order to pray their congregational prayer by themselves. In the seminary of Islamic unity.
In Teheran Mr Khamenei held a speech before the prayer and for unity
and during prayer he sees that they´ve arranged their own congregational prayer.
Then Muhammad Golpayegani goes there and starts insulting their mothers and sisters and says: "You damn kuffar."
"Now we´re here at the unity conference and that´s the leader and guardian of the Muslims of the world and he
has come and wants to pray here the congregational prayer and you go there and want to pray your own separate prayer?!"
You know yourselves that the ´Umaris won´t accept him.
So they´re forced to strengthen the way of approximation (Shi´ism towards ´Umarism) and the way of unity.
And relinquish the belief of tashayyu and retreat where it´s necessary.
They´ll give up the topic of Imamah (Imamate). Of course they cannot do it immediately and all in once.
Mr Khamenei cannot backdown immediately at many topics.
But the mourning ceremonies for Imam Husayn (a.s.) in Iran got significantly weakened by Mr Khamenei.
You people in Iran know very well that in hay´ats, azadari (mourning ceremonies),
the platform had become really weak and the reputation of the clergy was completely extinguished.
They don´t allow some things, forbid other things completely and use various excuses.
That that was a bid´a (innovation) and that ritual was inhiraf (deviation)
and don´t rituals let happen. And they exercise much pressure in terms of Wilayat (Wilayat Faqih).
And that´s only the beginning. If you visualise that for a long time
in 30, 40, 50, 70 sequenced years. So Wahhabism, America and Israel don´t have anything to do with the faith of the Shi´ites.
They´ll never be able to make our youth Jews or our families Christian (Nasrani).
But the Iranian government is able to, they´re able to. They have now and today 80% of the Shi´ite scholarship in their hands.
From the reputation and influence of the Shi´ite clergy nothing has left. Only a little, maybe 10% of that that used to be is still there.
About the influence of the Shi´ite scholars in Iran one can only say: "I seek refuge in Allah, goodbye, have a good trip." I´ve seen it myself.
How rude religious people were towards scholars. Religious people don´t see in scholars persons to be respected anymore, leaving the irreligious people aside.
Ha ha! They´ll take the whole scholarship in the future.
The entire Shi´ite scholarship. If the current generation of scholars leaves this world
and the order of the scholars is like that they´ll get replaced after 20,30 years until the next generation comes.
And they (Iranian intelligence and government) have placed their puppets everywhere.
For the next periods which will dawn after Mr Sistani, Mr Khorasani.
So that they can activate their puppets and sleepers in order to take the whole clergy in their hands.
And that´s only the near future, in a few years it´s only the next step.
If it continues for 20, 30 years they´ll take take it completely in possession.
The religion universities are completely under their control and only their ideas are getting taught.
They´ve filled up the holy Najaf with their lecturers.
So the next generation of scholars which comes up will carry their rotten ideas.
Except for a little number. And if this continues for 20, 30, 50 years with all means in their hands,
the media in their hands, the religion universities in their hands, the mosques in their hands,
the platform in their hands, then everything will be under their control.
My dear respected friends and viewers, they´re ready to take advantage of the Shi´a faith and use it.
So my dear friends, until now their deviations are little. They´re not as they should be.
But certainly if this trend continues the deviations will become bigger. Now there are a few traditional scholars left.
One part of the traditional grand scholars still exists. But in fifty years,
when the scholars will have been screened, only scholars of the Iranian government will be left.
With their belief in wahdat-ul-wujud (pantheism) and Ibn ´Arabism (Sufism).
A true believer shouldn´t be able to sleep anymore.
That means if a believing person thinks about that shouldn´t be able to sleep normally,
what these people will do to the faith.
So dear respected viewers, finding a solution for that is really hard.
Only Imam Asr will be able to fix it. Should this trend continue like before.
Some think if Mr Khamenei dies Wilayat-ul-Faqih will also extent,
but it´s not like that. Don´t be too confident my dear respected viewers. Those people are satanic.
It´s true that Mr Khamenei lost his influence nowadays,
he doesn´t have reputation anymore and that what´s left from Wilayat-ul-Faqih is only it´s name and title.
All people know meanwhile that it´s only a big fraud and a trick and a deception.
But those Jama´at Dajjali (Khamenei´s followers) are real shayatin (Satans) and truly diabolic.
Don´t let them fool you. When Mr Khomeini died, Mr Khamenei was a nobody.
All people knew that Khamenei was only a religion student. Actually he wasn´t a talaba (religion student really but an illiterate.
How was this jama´at (Dajjaliyyah) able to produce and plant him? By which ways, by which satanic tricks?
Mr Kho´ei was alive at this point - subhanAllah - Mr Golpayegani, (may Allah have mercy and be pleased with him) was still alive,
weren´t they?! They were all alive!
But they´ve made this poor victim to their Wali Faqih and tinkered him.
Because they had the means to, the platforms were in their hands,
the media was in their possession and after that they tinkered his Marja´iyyah
and now they brought him into the position of the Imamah (Imamate) and these days they call him "Imam Khamenei".
So it´s not something that can be belittled. All those who care about tashayyu have to think about that,
that in this issue the traditional tashayyu is the only way to truth.
It must be protected and passed to the next generation.
If all religion universities will stay under their influence and all platforms and all seminaries will be under their influence,
the speeches will be delivered by their people, then my dear viewers,
I don´t know what will happen next. That´s the biggest and most serious danger for our faith.
It´s the biggest danger from different aspects. It´s the biggest tragedy in our faith´s history.
That Iranian government, this Iranian regime. But what´s the solution? My dear viewers, finding the solution is pretty hard.
But Imam Asr (a.s.) is the saviour. The Imam of our time (a.s.) is our saviour.
But that doesn´t mean that we don´t have any responsibilities to carry.
That the Shi´ites don´t take responsibilities, that the scholars don´t take responsibility. No, we and them carry responsibility. Indeed.
When rasulullah (s.a.w.s.) departed from this world,
all people knew that Amir-ul-Mu´minin (a.s.) was the righteous Imam.
All knew it! But the hands of the shayatin succeeded after only 20, 30 years that
on the platforms in the East and the West of the world Amir-ul-Mu´minin (a.s.) was cursed!
They cursed and insulted Amir-ul-Mu´minin (a.s.).
So dear friends, if time passes, ten years, twenty, thirty, forty years pass
and all the media is controlled by a deviant ideology,
don´t you think that this deviated ideology wouldn´t find it´s legitimation in the hearts and heads of the people.
It´s not like that. Yes, indeed. Now you Shi´as yourselves have to think about that.
If the Iranian government stays under control of Mr Khamenei, he´ll turn the Shi´ites into ´Umaris for the sake of his rule.
Khamenei is afraid of publicising it. But in the case of Rafsanjani we see
that he held a public speech some time ago in Tehran and said that
it was absolutely unimportant who was the first Imam, whether Abu Bakr or ´Amir-ul-Mu´minin (a.s.).
"What kind of importance does that issue have?" So, my respected viewers, they´re ready to give up everything for the sake of their reign.
So that they win the hearts of the ´Umaris and become their leaders. If Mr Khamenei didn´t worry about his rule
he would have put a scarf on his head as the Wahhabi scholars.
And would role up his trousers and would pray with folded arms.
Yes. They´re ready to do everything. But they can´t do it right now because the Shi´ites would leave him and he would lose his rule.
So they want to go step by step. But look at the time after 40, 50, 70, 100 years. So friends,
If we exercise a damage analysis and enemy analysis we will detect that this movement is the worst enemy of tashayyu.
For more infomation >> Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 2018-02-22 12:18:26 I-40, Connelly Springs, NC 28612, USA - Duration: 40:01. 
For more infomation >> Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 02-21-2018 17:37:50 1648-1698 Weigel Dr, Marrero, LA 70072, USA - Duration: 10:00. 
No comments:
Post a Comment