Letchworth Park Middle Falls
-------------------------------------------
Democrat Party Apologizes for Doing the Unthinkable to Melania Trump - Duration: 2:36.
Democrat Party Apologizes for Doing the Unthinkable to Melania Trump.
Just when you think Democrats couldn't get more awful, they go and prove you wrong.
In a stunningly rude move, the Democrat Party in Lubbock, Texas, published a "group photo"
from the funeral of Barbara Bush, but they cropped out Melania Trump.
From Bizpacreview.com
As if we needed any more proof that Democrats lack scruples, a group of Texas Democrats
reportedly shared a doctored photo from the late former first lady Barbara Bush's funeral
to Facebook last week.
Members of the "Lubbock Democratic Party," as they call themselves, posted a photo to
their Facebook page a day after Bush's funeral Saturday that showed former presidents George
H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama posing alongside former first
ladies Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush and Michelle Obama:
Melania Trump cropped out of viral photo was 'an honest mistake' by Lubbock Co. Democratic
Party There was just one problem: The original picture
also featured first lady Melania Trump standing to the left of the Obamas, meaning the photo
the Democrats shared was doctored.
But why did they share a doctored photo? Perhaps because they wanted to make Melania and her
husband, President Donald Trump, look bad?
Nice photo of the Bushes, Clintons, Obamas, and First Lady Trump at the funeral of Barbara
Bush posted by @jgm41 (@PaulMorsePhoto – Office of George H. W. Bush)
When questioned by Waco station KXXV about this enormous discrepancy, the party's vice-chair,
Leo Flores, claimed it was just "an honest mistake."
He said that he grabbed the doctored photo from his Facebook feed and shared it without
doing his due diligence. He then left the photo up, despite a barrage of negative comments,
because he got caught up with other work.
Flores finally posted the correct photo three days later with an attempted apology: "I
apologize for the confusion. There were two pictures posted side by side and I must have
grabbed the wrong one. Melania was not purposely excluded nor was this meant to be a controversial
post. I meant to change it but became busy. Once again, I apologize."
what do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
USA facts today.
-------------------------------------------
Should President Trump REALLY Talk To Kim Jong Un After This Resurfaces? - Duration: 3:07.
Should President Trump REALLY Talk To Kim Jong Un After This Resurfaces?
President Donald Trump signaled optimism that he could achieve peace with North Korean dictator
Kim Jong-un, saying he felt he had a responsibility to succeed, Breitbart reports.
"It's certainly something that I hope I can do for the world," Trump said."This
is beyond the United States, this is a world problem."
After an historic meeting Friday, the leaders of North and South Korea signed an agreement
to officially end the Korean War after 65 years, which will be declared later this year,
and to work to denuclearize and establish a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula.
Moon Jae-in also stepped onto the North Korean side for a brief moment before the men walked
together to the Peace House, a conference building on the South Korean side of the border
village of Panmunjom where their much-anticipated meeting took place.
"It took a long time for the two Koreas to come together…
South and North Korea are the same people, the same blood, they cannot be separated,"
Kim Jong Un
Part of the peace agreement includes:
Quadrilateral meetings to be held with the Koreas, the US and China "with a view to
declaring and end to the War."
All hostile acts will be ceased, and the demilitarization zone will be turned into a "peace zone."
A commitment to reunite families separated by the war with family reunion programs to
resume on August 15 this year.
The establishment of a joint liaison office in Kaeseong, a shared economic zone near the
border.
Closer diplomatic relations between the two countries, at all levels of government.
Joint teams to be sent to international events, starting with the 2018 Asian Games.
President Trump said there are potential dates and locations for his highly anticipated summit
with North Korea, which is said to be slated for sometime before June.
President Trump stated, he feels an "responsibility" to succeed in achieving peace in the region,
adding that if he failed it would be a "tough time" for many people in the world.
Can a dictator become benevolent?
Generations of North Korea hatred towards the United States, genocide of the North Korean
People, killing American civilians by torturing and drugging, threats and demands against
the United States declaring they nuke us and watch us burn.
After several meetings with China, North Korea all of a sudden comes out and states they
are now South Korea's best friend and want a united Korea for peace and prosperity and
to be friends with the United States.
Is the world simply supposed to forgive the mass murder's and starvation of innocent
lives by Kim Jong Un?
In what reality is any of this acceptable by anyone?
what do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
USA facts today.
-------------------------------------------
Congressmen Drop 50 Page BOMB on Mueller's Desk – Dems FREAKING Out! - Duration: 17:31.
Congressmen Drop 50 Page BOMB on Mueller's Desk – Dems FREAKING Out!
They have received intel that if President Trump were to fire Robert Mueller, then there
could be a huge uprising and political unrest which would stem from the Central Business
District and spread from there.
The police department is said to have been warned that the protests could ignite within
a potential 24 hours.
After the termination of Mueller, so the police have been told to be in uniform and have riot
gear ready to go starting today until further notice.
According to what Gohmert has said this day may be coming sooner than we think:
"What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Mueller's
disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position
to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully elected President," writes GOP Congressman
Louie Gohmert.
Gohmert is referring to the exhaustive expose he just released called: Robert Mueller: Unmasked.
"While this may all sound a bit alarmist lets not forget the fridge left doesn't
have much to lose.
They didn't do like us on the right did when Obama and his Democrat Party shoved Obamacare
down our collective throats.
They didn't just fall back and work hard to get more Repubublicans elected.
They have become increasingly more intolerant and even violent at times.
Let's not forget what has been going on at college campuses around the nation as conservatives,
and even those not so conservative have tried to speak.
Antifa members show up in masks and start attacking people all beause they don't agree
with their policies.
Can anyone imagine what would have happened if the right would have done this when Barack
Hussein Obama was President.
And he was stretching the constitution to the point where it's a miracle that we didn't
have a "Constitutional Crisis?"
Here is more on the Mueller investigation via The National Review: "The country is
about to witness an investigatory train wreck.
In one direction, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation train is looking for any conceivable
thing that President Donald Trump's campaign team might have done wrong in 2016.
The oncoming train is slower but also larger.
It involves congressional investigations, Department of Justice referrals, and inspector
general's reports — mostly focused on improper or illegal FBI and DOJ behavior during
the 2016 election.
Why are the two now about to collide?
By charging former national-security adviser Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI, Mueller
emphasized that even the appearance of false testimony is felonious behavior.
If that is so, then the DOJ will probably have to charge former deputy FBI director
Andrew McCabe with perjury or related offenses.
A report from the Office of the Inspector General indicates that McCabe lied at least
four times to federal investigators.
Former FBI director James Comey may also have lied to Congress when he testified that he
had not written his report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal before interviewing
Clinton.
Former director of national intelligence James Clapper and former CIA director John Brennan
lied under oath to Congress on matters related to surveillance.
Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin probably lied when they told FBI investigators
they had no idea that their then-boss, Hillary Clinton, was using an illegal private email
server.
Both had communicated with Clinton about it.
Mueller is said to be investigating whether Trump obstructed justice by requesting that
Comey go easy on Flynn.
If so, then the DOJ will have to look at Comey himself and DOJ officials who obstructed a
federal court.
On at least four occasions, they were not honest about the deeply flawed Christopher
Steele dossier being the source of information used in applications to the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court.
Comey also has said that he predicated the nature of the Clinton email investigation.
On his assumptions about her chances of winning the presidency — another investigatory abuse.
The Mueller team is reportedly still looking into the possibility of election-cycle collusion
with Russia by Trump officials.
That track will require Mueller's DOJ counterparts to look carefully at the Clinton campaign.
Which paid opposition researcher Steele, a British subject, for dirt on Trump that was
produced through collusion with Russian sources.
Mueller is also said to be investigating whether Trump or his advisers broke laws concerning
the release of confidential government information.
If so, the DOJ may have to indict Comey.
He confessed to passing along confidential FBI memos to a friend for the expressed purpose
of leaking their contents to the press.
High-ranking Obama administration officials may also be subject to indictments.
Given that they may have requested the "unmasking" of American citizens whose communications
were intercepted during the surveillance of foreign parties and then leaked the names
of those citizens to the press.
Mueller's team apparently has assumed that Michael Cohen's status as Trump's attorney.
Offers no protections under normal attorney-client privilege protocols.
If that is true, the DOJ will have to investigate why the FBI allowed Clinton aide Cheryl Mills
to pose as Clinton's attorney and thereby be shielded from providing testimony on what
she knew about the email scandal involving her "client."
Investigators have swarmed Cohen's offices and residence, supposedly in fear that he
might destroy pertinent records.
The FBI should probably then reopen the investigation into the Clinton email scandal, given that
Clinton destroyed more than 30,000 emails as well as computer hard drives that had been
requested by federal investigators.
What is going on?
Mueller has searched far and wide for wrongdoing but so far has found little.
Meanwhile, there is plenty of other wrongdoing already found, but no one seems to be looking
at it.
Flynn, Cohen, and other Trump aides are considered small enough fry to go after.
Clinton, Comey, McCabe, and others seem big enough fry to leave alone.
No one thought Hillary Clinton would blow the election.
Top Obama officials at the FBI, DOJ, intelligence agencies, and National Security Council believed
in 2015 and 2016 that they could ignore laws with impunity because a protective Clinton
administration would soon be in power.
Politics have infected these investigations.
Trump was seen as a threat to the status quo, and FBI and DOJ lawbreakers were seen as custodians
of it.
The more Mueller searches for hypothetical lawbreaking, the more he is inadvertently
underscoring that actual lawbreakers must be subject to the same standard of justice.
Ironically, Mueller's investigation has reminded America that it is past time to call
Comey, McCabe, and a host of Obama-era DOJ and FBI officials to account.
For over a year, we have had two standards of legality when there can only be one.
A reckoning is near."
Who knows when Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into the Russian collusion will
come to an end.
But we can rest assured it will end someday, if not by the discovery of some wrongdoing
then by just default.
-------------------------------------------
Actress Ashley Judd Said 'Trump Supporters Are Hurting My Career, If This Continues I'm Go - Duration: 17:31.
Actress Ashley Judd Said 'Trump Supporters Are Hurting My Career, If This Continues I'm
Gonna Move From This Awful Country."
Actress Ashley Judd: 'Trump Supporters Are Hurting My Career
If This Continues I'm Gonna Move From This Awful Country.The Reason behind this that
she attacks Trump many time read below.
American actress Ashley Judd has launched a vicious attack on Donald Trump while addressing
massed crowds protesting against the new US president.
The Kiss The Girls star compared the Republican to Hitler and made the sarcastic reference
to his widely-mocked debate remarks saying: "I am a nasty woman."
Judd then launched into a biting speech against Trump and his supporters adding: "I am not
as nasty as a man who looks like he bathes in Cheetos dust."
The 48-year-old Californian was speaking in front of thousands of protesters in Washington
DC who turned out to stand up for gender equality, healthcare for women and other issues thought
to be threatened under Trump's presidency.
The Women's March is thought to have seen about double the turnout of Friday's inauguration
ceremony with similar protests happening in cities around the world including London and
even Antarctica.
Comparing Trump to Hitler, she referred to the president's cabinet picks as "Nazis
renamed" and continued: "I am not as nasty as a Confederate flag
being tattooed across my city.
She added: "I am nasty like my bloodstains on my bed sheets.
Judd then addressed the contentious issue of the taxation of female hygiene products
which has stirred debate across the world.
She said: "We do not actually choose if and when we had our periods.
We do not like throwing away our favorite pairs of underpants.
"Why are pads and tampons still taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not?
Is your erection really more than protecting the parts of my womanhood?
"I am a nasty woman," actress and activist Ashley Judd declared at the Women's March
on Washington Saturday, before delivering a biting poem about President Donald Trump,
his Cabinet, and his supporters.
"I am not as nasty as a man who looks like he bathes in Cheetos dust," she said, jabbing
at Trump's looks.
Judd, reciting a poem by 19-year-old Nina Donovan, spoke to a crowd estimated at a half
a million people who have descended on the nation's capital to protest Trump on his
first full day as president.
The Women's March has seen about double the turnout of Trump's inauguration ceremony.
And similar protests have been organized in cities around the country and the world (even
Antarctica).
"I am not as nasty as a Confederate flag being tattooed across my city.
… I am not as nasty as a swastika painted on a pride flag," Judd said.
Referencing the white nationalist groups that endorsed Trump's presidency.Judd, a self-proclaimed
"loud, vulgar, proud woman," went to the extreme of comparing Trump to Hitler and referring
to his Cabinet picks as "Nazis renamed,"
Before highlighting the wage inequality between men and women and the luxury taxes imposed
on feminine hygiene products.
"I am nasty like my bloodstains on my bed sheets," Judd said.
"We do not actually choose if and when we had our periods.
We do not like throwing away our favorite pairs of underpants.
Why are pads and tampons still taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not?
Is your erection really more than protecting the parts of my womanhood?
Is the bloodstain on my jeans more embarrassing than the thinning of your hair?"
"I am nasty like Susan, Elizabeth, Eleanor, Amelia, Rosa, Gloria, Condoleezza, Sonia,
Malala, Michelle, Hillary!" she concluded.
"And our pussies ain't for
grabbing."
-------------------------------------------
Trump Wants To Forgive Student Loans For Disabled Veterans - Duration: 17:10.
Trump Wants To Forgive Student Loans For Disabled Veterans
President Trump has a plan to help disabled veterans have their student loans permanently
discharged.
Here's what you need to know.
Student Loan Forgiveness: A New Partnership
The U.S. Department of Education will partner with the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs
to help streamline the process for disabled veterans to have their student loan debt cancelled.
"Our nation's veterans have sacrificed much for our country," U.S. Secretary Betsy
DeVos said in a statement.
"It is important that, in return, we do all we can to give them the support and care they
deserve.
Simplifying the loan forgiveness process and proactively identifying veterans with federal
student loans who may be eligible for a discharge is a small but critical way we can show our
gratitude for veterans' service."
Beginning this month, the Education Department will match borrowers on the National Student
Loan Data System (NSLDS®), who have federal student loans or aid through the Teacher Education
Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant Program, to the Veterans Affairs
database.
The goal is to identify disabled veterans (from the Veterans Affairs Department) who
have federal student loan debt (from the Education Department).
How It Works and How To Apply
Borrowers who are identified will be sent a letter that explains eligibility for student
loan discharge as well as a Total and Permanent Disability Discharge application.
The borrower then signs and returns the application to apply for the discharge.
Borrowers can also apply by email or phone.
Phone: 888.303.7818
Office Hours:
Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM – 8:00 PM (ET)
Saturday: 8:00 AM – 7:00 PM (ET)
Sunday: Closed
Email: DisabilityInformation@Nelnet.net
Completed applications should be mailed to: U.S. Department of Education, P.O.
Box 87130, Lincoln, NE 68501-7130.
A Total and Permanent Disability application can be completed online.
Your Rights If You Have Student Loan Debt And Are Permanently Disabled
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau estimates that tens of thousands of disabled veterans
may not know that they are eligible for student loan forgiveness.
Since the formation of the federal student loan program, borrowers who are considered
totally and permanently disabled have been eligible to have their federal student loans
forgiven.
Student loan forgiveness in this context includes:
Veterans who the Department of Veterans Affairs has determined are unemployable due to a service-connected
disability Borrowers receiving Social Security Disability
Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits
Borrowers certified as "totally and permanently disabled" by a physician
Importantly, cancellation of your student loans here are only for federal student loans.
If you have private student loans, check with your lender regarding options for permanent
discharge.
Many private student lenders offer similar permanent discharge benefits.
In 2016, the Education Department collaborated with the U.S. Social Security Administration
to identify borrowers with disabilities who were eligible for permanent discharge.
The joint effort found 387,000 borrowers with disabilities, who collectively owed over $7.7
billion in federal student loans.
About half of those those borrowers were in default on their student loans (and evidently
not aware of the student loan forgiveness program).
According to the Veteran Affairs Department, more than 800,000 severely disabled veterans
are unemployable due to a service-connected disability.
Good News: No Tax Bill
The good news is that, under the new tax law, disabled veterans will not owe any federal
income taxes on discharged student loan debt.
Previously, cancelled student loan debt counted as income, and thus was taxable under federal
tax law.
Overall
A positive step to help America's heroes for their selfless service.
Zack Friedman is a keynote speaker and Founder & CEO of Make Lemonade, a personal finance
comparison site that helps you live a better financial life.
-------------------------------------------
BREAKING Trump Just FIRED HER – The Entire White House Is Now On Edge - Duration: 11:22.
BREAKING Trump Just FIRED HER – The Entire White House Is Now On Edge
From the time that President Trump took office, the Justice Department has been in the headlines.
The President has taken several measures to rectify the corruption within its ranks, and
not everyone appreciated it.
One of those measures was to clear out several of the Obama Administration officials.
That could have potentially stayed after the administration change.
One of those officials was Sally Yates, who worked directly under Loretta Lynch.
The bad blood between the two is continuing, apparently, since Yates is still backtalking
the Commander-in-Chief, even after being fired rather abruptly.
This was the exchange that had the Twitterverse whispering and asking questions.
President Trump said, "So sad that the Department of "Justice" and the FBI are slow walking,
or even not giving, the unredacted documents requested by Congress.
An embarrassment to our country!"
No doubt that was partly in response to the many injustices that have been brought to
light with the extra investigations that Democrats insisted on.
Yates, a former part of the Deep State Justice Department, was obviously triggered by what
Trump tweeted as she replied with, "For 27 years, I was privileged to work with the
thousands of career DOJ lawyers and FBI agents who work hard every day to keep our country
safe, our rights protected, and the rule of law intact.
They deserve better than this."
As you can probably tell from the exchange, this isn't the first time that the President
and Yates have had a disagreement about something.
Yates was one of the very first firings that the President did after he came into office.
At the time, there was, of course, an outcry that he did so in order to cover something
up.
However, even Politico admits in a piece called "Why Trump Had to Fire Sally Yates" that
what Yates did was just too much insubordination.
According to Josh Blackman who is the author and a constitutional law professor, "The
acting attorney general should have given the president her best advice, then resigned
if he didn't listen.
"But that's not what she did.
Here's a little backstory by Blackman about what did go down the night that Yates got
the ax: "Democrats are calling it the Monday Night Massacre.
On Monday evening, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates announced that under her leadership.
The Justice Department would not defend President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration.
After acknowledging that the Office of Legal Counsel had reviewed the policy, and noting
that the Civil Division could defend it in court, she personally rebuffed the president's
judgment, which she did not find 'wise or just.'
Yates, a career prosecutor appointed by Barack Obama, is now being hailed for standing up
to a supposedly 'tyrannical' president, according to a statement blasted out by the
Democratic National Committee.
But this has it wrong.
If Yates truly felt this way, she should have told the president her conclusions in confidence.
If he disagreed, she had one option: resign.
Instead, she made herself a political martyr and refused to comply.
Trump obliged, and replaced her with the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Dana Boente.
While this late-night termination.
May bring to mind President Richard Nixon's infamous 'Saturday Night Massacre,' the
analogy is inapt.
This is a textbook case of insubordination, and the president was well within his constitutional
powers to fire her.
Call it the Monday Night Layoff instead.
While I defend Trump's constitutional authority to remove the acting attorney general, his
message accompanying the termination warrants a careful study.
Announcing her firing, the president wrote that Yates had "betrayed the Department
of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order."
Charges of betrayal will only serve to chill voices of dissent within the Justice Department,
and limit internal checks on the White House.
Though Yates erred egregiously by making her opinion public, rather than resigning, others
within the executive branch should feel free to raise constitutional doubts to the White
House.
However, if those in the minority sense that they will be deemed traitors.
The voices of reason within the government will be silenced for fear of persecution.
I worry that Yates's foolish last stand will poison the well of President Trump's
already-low estimation of lawyers that tell him 'no.'
Her selfish act of painless self-flagellation—which will no doubt be rewarded by a lifetime of
adulation from the left— Will in the long run be counterproductive, and unfortunately
inhibit dissent within an already skittish agency.
Yates's plan backfired, big league."
Yates not only made the road even harder for her own cause (which conservatives no doubt
thank her for) but she set herself up to be made an example of.
She fell prey to the same thing that many Washington insiders have fallen for; and that
is the idea that President Trump won't take harsh, decisive action against someone.
While he is a politician, he doesn't play politics the way many expected.
President Trump's already deep seeded doubt about lawyers, due to his extensive history
with them, has also been made worse by Yates, and others like her, attempting to manipulate
the country with their antics.
For now, though, President Trump is still calling the shots, and attorneys like Yates
and Lynch are relegated to the peanut gallery.
-------------------------------------------
WATCH Trey Gowdy Blows Lid Off Comey's Fox News Interview, Mentions 'Felony' - Duration: 17:31.
WATCH Trey Gowdy Blows Lid Off Comey's Fox News Interview, Mentions 'Felony'
In an extensive interview with Fox News' Tucker Carlson last night.
The South Carolina Congressman Trey Gowdy executively and meticulously took apart some
of the former FBI director's talking points which led up to President Donald Trump's
firing of the former FBI director.
In the video below, they stopped short of calling Comey a liar.
This all came about when Comey had an earlier appearance on Fox New's Special Report with
Bret Baier where he made a series of odd claims from his time.
As FBI director while he was investigating the now disproven "collusion" between
the Donald Trump presidential campaign and the Kremlin.
Comey told Baier that he isn't sure exactly how much of the debunked " Trump Dossier"
created by former British spy Christopher Steele was paid for by the Democrat National
Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
He followed the claim by downplaying the importance this dossier had in obtaining the wiretap
warrant to spy on Carter Page who is a Trump associate.
Comey denied that he engaged in leaking when he secretly gave his confidential memos about
his meeting with Trump to a friend to have them published in The New York Times.
The Conservative Tribune provided more information on the exchange between Trey Gowdy and Tucker
Carlson: "Carlson zeroed in on those issues with Gowdy.
"He doesn't remember a lot," Carlson said.
"He doesn't remember when he first heard about the Steele dossier.
He doesn't remember who told him about the Steele dossier.
Is that plausible?"
Gowdy, whose reputation for exactness in language and tenacity in grilling witnesses have earned
him the nickname "Bulldog," was having none of Comey's latest line.
It wasn't plausible at all, he said.
"If he learned about it in the fall of 2016.
And it was already known that the Democrats had picked up on that work, so, whoever briefed
him…
Why would you just say the Republicans started it but not also include the Democrats finished
it?
So that, that …" Gowdy didn't have to say, "that's a lie."
Anyone listening understood it.
He then turned to how Comey minimalized the role the dossier played in the FBI's application
to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when it was seeking a warrant to investigate
Trump associate Carter Page as an alleged "agent of a foreign power."
"I've actually read the application, and it is just wrong," Gowdy said.
"It was an indispensable part of the application.
Period."
But it was Comey's denial in the Baier interview that he'd "leaked" information that
Gowdy hit the hardest.
In Comey's world.
Apparently, a "leak" only occurs when the information that's surreptitiously released
involves information that's officially considered "classified" by the government.
Gowdy blasted that for the nonsense it is.
"The other thing that I will tell you, Tucker.
That I learned tonight is Jim Comey has a definition of the word 'leak' that no
one else has," Gowdy said.
"What he says is a leak is what the rest of us call a felony," Gowdy said.
"Leaking is disclosing a confidential conversation which is exactly what he did."
They were only three of the points Gowdy covered, but they blew the lid off key parts of the
story Comey's shilling as he travels the publicity circuit to peddle the memoirs he
titled "A Higher Loyalty."
He's been getting a respectful greeting from liberals like ABC's George Stephanopoulos,
and he's been getting grilled by interviewers like Baier.
But whatever their politics, few know the inside story about Comey the way Gowdy does,
a member of the House Intelligence Committee whose years as a federal prosecutor have given
him an insight into law enforcement most American civilians can't match."
Critics claim that the former FBI Director is more in tune with one political party over
the other and appears as though he wanted to help sway Hillary towards victory in the
2016 election.
The alleged corruption appears difficult to investigate because there seem to be various
levels of corruption amid drama and side stories within the realm of politics.
Some Americans worry about the internal corruption that might affect the outcome of the presidency
and interrupt with the action plan set in place by Donald Trump and his administration.
Please share your thoughts below and tell us what you think about the situation with
former FBI Director James Comey.
Was Trey Gowdy accurate in
what he said?
No comments:
Post a Comment