USA news on Youtube Apr 28 2018

California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic

Earlier this week, President Trump proposed a new question to add in the 2020 census form.

The question is sparking controversy as it involves questioning one's citizenship.

Now, the blue-dominated state of California is whining over this new tactic–and is going

so far as to sue.

The Trump administration vowed to include the question of whether someone was a citizen

or not on the 2020 census.

California rebutted with their decision to sue the administration.

The Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, announced the suit against the government, claiming

the question was "unlawful."

Attorney General Becerra tweeted the decision:

Fox News reported:

The Commerce Department said in a statement that the citizenship question would be added

in response to a request by the Justice Department made in December.

The statement said that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross "has determined that reinstatement

of a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire is necessary to provide

complete and accurate census block level data."

Democrats have criticized the administration's announcement, saying the inclusion of such

a question amounts to an effort to intimidate immigrant communities and siphon money and

electoral power away from them.

In a San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece published Monday, Becerra and California Secretary

of State Alex Padilla wrote that the inclusion of a citizenship question would be "illegal"

and "an extraordinary attempt by the Trump administration to hijack the 2020 census for

political purposes."

"California, with its large immigrant communities, would be disproportionately harmed by depressed

participation in the 2020 census," they wrote.

"An undercount would threaten at least one of California's seats in the House of Representatives

(and, by extension, an elector in the electoral college.)"

It is likely the disapproval of the question stems from California's lost sanctuary city

policies.

Since the decennial census is required by Constitution to determine federal spending,

California's loss of funding would be devastating to the massive state.

Leave us your thoughts

in the comments

section below.

For more infomation >> California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic - Duration: 11:47.

-------------------------------------------

A Video From Robert Mueller's Past Just Resurfaced And Now Everyone Is Asking This One Question - Duration: 11:16.

A Video From Robert Mueller's Past Just Resurfaced And Now Everyone Is Asking This

One Question

Robert Mueller is in big trouble.

A video from his past has just resurfaced.

And now everyone is asking this one important question.

Mueller's honesty and integrity as an investigator are being called into question.

Despite his reputation as a squeaky clean lawman, the reality is far grimmer.

In 2003, Mueller testified to Congress supporting the false notion that Saddam Hussein possessed

weapons of mass destruction.His testimony helped launch the Iraq War.

Trump won the election in part because of his vocal opposition to the war.

Mueller's image as a hyper-competent FBI Director has also been undercut.

In 2001, the FBI – under his watch – bungled the investigation into the post 9/11 anthrax

attacks.

Daniel Ashman wrote in The Federalist:

"Mueller's FBI honed in on Steven Hatfill as the culprit — a "flag-waving" American,

who had served in the Army, then dedicated himself to protecting America from bioterrorist

threats by working in the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.

There was no direct link from Hatfill to the attacks, by the FBI's own admission, and

the bureau never charged Hatfill.

The FBI did however spy on, follow, and harass him non-stop for years.

The Department of Justice also publicly outed Hatfill as the possible terrorist.

While Hatfill's dignity and life was being trampled on by America's secret police,

Mueller took a stand.

But on a different topic.

He made front page news for threatening President Bush he would resign over NSA policy.

All while his own team was trampling on the rights of an American in the FBI's largest-ever

investigation.

Hatfill successfully sued the government for its unlawful actions.

He won almost $6 million dollars.

After the Hatfill investigation blew up in the FBI's face, they moved on to Bruce Ivins,

another Army researcher who had actually volunteered to help the FBI investigate this case, and

had been doing so for years.

It wasn't until five years after the attack that Mueller's men decided Ivins was a target.

The FBI case against Ivins, once again, was based on circumstantial evidence…

… Ivins was never indicted, just given the Hatfill treatment.

His house was raided, and he was threatened with a death sentence, or as his lawyer put

it, put under "relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo."

He committed suicide."

Mueller's tenure at the FBI was a mess.

Donald Trump has every right to question his honesty, competency, and objectivity.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in

the

comment section.

For more infomation >> A Video From Robert Mueller's Past Just Resurfaced And Now Everyone Is Asking This One Question - Duration: 11:16.

-------------------------------------------

After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!! - Duration: 11:17.

After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!!

Barack Obama is undoubtedly in full panic mode right now after new documents came out

that expose how he colluded with the FBI and CIA to take Donald Trump down.

Fox News reported that newly released text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok

and Lisa Page indicate that there was a coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama

White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in

the early phases of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign

and Russia.

GOP congressional investigators say that this new information "strongly" suggests collusion

between former President Barack Obama's Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate

Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan.

The investigators added that this directly contradicts Obama administration's public

stance about its hand in the process.

On August 2, 2016, Strzok texted Page, "Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign.

Just thinking about congress, foia, etc.

You probably know better than me."

The next day, Strzok wrote another text to Page talking about how former FBI Deputy Director

Andrew McCabe was concerned with "information control" related to the initial investigation

into the Trump campaign.

Days later, Strzok again texted Page, "Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter

for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be

pulled.

I'd let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before

the Wed WH session."

The GOP investigators explained that in these text messages, "D" referred to FBI Director

James Comey, and "McDonough" referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.

"We are not making conclusions.

What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment

of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved

[in the Trump-Russia investigation]," a GOP congressional source said.

The GOP investigators also said that the CIA and FBI are supposed to be "independent

agencies," and noted that "coordination between political actors at the White House

and investigators would be inappropriate," raising questions about the level of involvement

of Obama White House officials.

Clearly, an investigation must be launched into the criminal lengths Obama went to in

the hopes of taking Trump down..

SHARE this story if you think Barack Obama should be INVESTIGATED!

h/t Fox News