USA news on Youtube Apr 26 2018

Melania Humiliates Michelle & Hillary, Rocks State Dinner With Stunning Secret Weapon.

First Lady Melania Trump had risked everything by shunning an event planner for the Trump

administration's first State Dinner.

If anything went wrong, the blame would fall squarely on her shoulders.

So when she rocked the State Dinner with a stunning "secret weapon," it put Michelle

Obama and Hillary Clinton to shame, as Melania crushed them and their legacy in doing only

what Jackie Kennedy could do almost 60 years ago.

History is made in moments, and that moment came for Melania Trump last night.

Every since Melania Trump came to Washington D.C. to fulfill her role as our nation's

first lady, she has been shunned by the mainstream media and the swamp dwellers.

They discounted her as just a "pretty face," a brainless former model who couldn't hold

a candle to Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton, who were Ivy league educated lawyers.

They excoriated her in the press with horrible reviews, making fun of her accent and judging

her marriage as one of convenience.

She would never come close to being the first ladies they were, in their biased eyes — until

last night.

Melania chose to hold the State Dinner in the White House State Dining Room.

With 13 round tables with ten seats at each, all lit by beautiful candelabras, the mood

was intimate and magical.

She didn't want the big tents that Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton used, packing 400

Hollywood celebrities and Washington, D.C. swamp creatures on the South Lawn.

Michelle and Hillary's State Dinners were like big Hollywood productions with rappers

rapping and a guest list that included every super rich celebrity and political donor that

would make donations to the Obama or Clinton election funds.

The Trumps don't owe any swamp dweller or Hollywood celebrity anything.

President Donald Trump funded his own campaign along with Americans who donated to him on

their own.

So Melania was free to keep their guest list to 130, which included Vice President Mike

Pence and his wife Karen, Gen. John Kelly and his wife, Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her

husband, and Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner, just to name a few.

When the president and Melania stepped out to greet France's President Emmanuel Macron

and his wife Brigitte, she was stunning in a Chanel black Chantilly lace haute couture

gown that had been hand-painted with silver and embroidered with crystal and sequins.

All eyes were glued to her as the Macron's approached, and after the customary double

cheek kiss Europeans are famous for doing, Melania started to speak to them in fluent

French, something only Jackie Kennedy could pull off almost sixty years ago.

First Lady Jackie Kennedy had her moment as she became an icon and stole the show when

she wowed France's President Charles De Gaulle, speaking to him in fluent French.

NBC reported in 1961, "At the height of the era known as Camelot, President John F.

Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy visit France.

The French are enchanted with the First Lady, prompting JFK to say he is only 'the man

who accompanied Jacqueline Kennedy to Paris."

Melania may have gotten off to a rough start as the first lady, according to the liberal

press, but last night even the mainstream media had caught Melania fever.

They were enchanted by the first lady, too.

Under the headline, "Melania Trump masters the moment," CNN's Kate Bennett and Betsy

Klein wrote: "When President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrived on the

White House South Lawn Tuesday morning to formally welcome French President Emmanuel

Macron and his wife, Brigitte, one thing was clear: The first lady commanded attention."

That's from CNN, who hates President Trump and wishes him only to be impeached.

But they couldn't help themselves, they know there are these moments when icons and

legends are made and that is what happened yesterday with Melania Trump.

The leftist Washington Post reported, "When second lady Karen Pence was asked by the waiting

press pool how Mrs. Trump was doing as first lady, Vice President Pence answered for her:

'Breathtaking,' he said as the second couple made their way to the State Dining

Room, a formal and intimate setting.

So it would seem that the first lady earned a solid A-plus for her first diplomatic outing."

They add, "After dinner, the Washington National Opera entertained guests.

Another big fan of opera?

Jacqueline Kennedy, one of the past first ladies who Mrs. Trump has said she admires."

There were no rappers at this State Dinner.

She has hit her stride, and being an icon doesn't require an Ivy league education.

In one day, she surpassed Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton as first ladies, and it's

not about just speaking French or wearing a Chanel black Chantilly lace haute couture

gown or a stunning white suit with a matching hat.

It's something Jackie Kennedy had, that Melania Trump possesses, an aura of class

and grace.

It's their "secret weapon" which can't be defined in words.

The little girl who grew up under Communist rule had a dream to come to America where

she made her mark and is now making history bringing back the "Camelot" magic to the

White House.

She's making America great again in her own brave and elegant way.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Melania Humiliates Michelle & Hillary, Rocks State Dinner With Stunning Secret Weapon. - Duration: 5:27.

-------------------------------------------

Calling Me Daddy Challenge Dance Compilation #calling10kdada - Duration: 3:07.

Calling Me Daddy Challenge Dance Compilation #calling10kdada

For more infomation >> Calling Me Daddy Challenge Dance Compilation #calling10kdada - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Senate Democrats Are Furious To Find Out What Republicans Just Took Away From Them - Duration: 14:41.

Senate Democrats Are Furious To Find Out What Republicans Just Took Away From Them

The base salary of a U.S. senator is $174K a year.

That's nearly five times the amount of money that the average American earns every year.

To put it in simple perspective, you would have to work five times longer than a junior

senator to earn a gallon of milk.

A gallon of milk, on the average is about three bucks.

Let's say you earn a $9 an hour.

You'd have to work 20 minutes in order to buy that gallon of milk.

A U.S. senator would have to work 4 minutes for that same gallon.

Which often has people pointing out the fact that the only "company" in the world that

pays its employees more than its employer is the government.

Everywhere around the globe, civil servants (also called "elected officials" or "politicians")

earn a boatload more than their employers, the taxpayers.

It's a crazy phenomenon, but it's absolutely true.

In order for us to get our money's worth then, it is assumed that they are going to

be working their butts off for that lucrative salary and its mountain of benefits, particularly

when so much is backlogged.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell received an interesting letter from a host of Senators

who requested a delay in the August Recess for the Senate in order to get their work

done.

Amazingly, McConnell agreed!

And Democrats are furious.

The Daily Caller:

The Senate will work in Washington during the first two weeks of August, instead of

allowing senators to be back in their home states.

"Once the Senate completes its work on health care reform, we will turn to other important

issues including the National Defense Authorization Act and the backlog of critical nominations

that have been mindlessly stalled by Democrats," McConnell said in a statement.

McConnell, who was under pressure to cancel August recess altogether by members of his

party, made the announcement during a weekly lunchtime meeting with his conference.

The group of Republican senators, led by Georgia Sen. David Perdue, sent a letter to McConnell

on June 30 asking to "truncate" or "forgo" the August Recess all together given the limited

number of legislative days on the calendar available.

The letter was signed by Republican Senators Perdue, Steve Daines, of Montana, Joni Ernst

of Iowa, John Kennedy Louisiana, James Lankford Oklahoma, Mike Lee of Utah, Mike Rounds of

South Dakota, Luther Strange of Alabama, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, and Thom Tillis of North

Carolina.

This was important for these Republican senators because there has been an almost constant

Democrat attempt to drag their heels on nearly every piece of legislation or procedural vote,

going back to Trump's inauguration.

This move will instill the Senate Majority Leader with just a tad more respect from Trump

supporters as well as they have become somewhat distrustful of everything the Republican establishment

has done to date.

Hopefully, the two weeks will be enough time to effect real and purposeful change.

Join USA

Politics

Today And Share This Article Now!

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA

GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> Senate Democrats Are Furious To Find Out What Republicans Just Took Away From Them - Duration: 14:41.

-------------------------------------------

Leaked! Obama's Ties Fully Exposed, CIA Official Reveals Barack Obama's Plans - Duration: 15:52.

Leaked!

Obama's Ties Fully Exposed, CIA Official Reveals Barack Obama's Plans To Destroy

America And Proves President Trump 100% Right

Clare M. Lopez is persuaded Obama is attempting to bring down America as we probably are aware

it.

Previous CIA employee, Clare M. Lopez, was not only a pencil pusher with a work area

work for our legislature.

She was the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy

and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and

the Canadian Meighen Institute.

That is a significant resume!

So when you read what she stated, this can't in any way, shape or form be originating from

a position of wildness.

It's entirely genuine.

Via Yes I'm Right:

Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi.

She was also a Vice-President of the Intelligence Summit, she was formerly a career officer

with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Center for Counterintelligence and

Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and

served as a consultant , Intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms.

She was named Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.

Lopez said the global war on terror was an effort to "stay free of Shariah," or repressive

Islamic law, until Obama's administration began siding with such jihadist groups as

the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates.

Lopez believes that the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly infiltrated the Obama administration

and other branches of the federal government.

One of the most outrageous of those appointments is Mohamed Elibiary, a senior member of the

Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council.

According to a report by the Center for Security Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a U.S.

Partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group.

Two months ago, a firestorm erupted online after Elibiary tweeted that a 'Caliphate'

was unavoidable and compared it to the European Union.

Clare broadly expounded, on video.

It's completely chilling:

That is all I expected to listen.

Here's a later video in which she discusses digital fear mongering and why Trump is totally

right:

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

Join USA Politics Today And Share This Article Now!

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> Leaked! Obama's Ties Fully Exposed, CIA Official Reveals Barack Obama's Plans - Duration: 15:52.

-------------------------------------------

SCHUMER DENIED McConnell BLOCKS Vote to 'Protect' Robert Mueller - Duration: 14:41.

SCHUMER DENIED: McConnell BLOCKS Vote to 'Protect' Robert Mueller

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell flat-out rebuked Congressional Democrats Tuesday; announcing

he has no plans to introduce legislation to the Senate floor to "protect" Robert Mueller

from being fired.

According to the Associated Press, McConnell was speaking with Fox News when he outright

rejected Sen. Chuck Schumer's demand that the special counsel be immune from removal

by the President, saying "we'll not be having" a vote anytime soon.

"We'll not be having this on the floor of the Senate," McConnell said on Fox News.

His remarks come just days after lawmakers introduced legislation to ensure the special

counsel continue his nearly year-long probe; regardless of future developments and potential

staff shake-ups inside the Department of Justice.

"I think having Congress tell him what we believe he should do in this case is simply

poking the bear, and I'd just prefer not to do that," said GOP Sen. Mike Rounds.

Trump has also privately pondered firing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is overseeing

Mueller's investigation.

Within a day of Trump's criticism, Republicans Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lindsey

Graham of South Carolina combined two bills they introduced last summer to protect special

counsels.

They introduced the new bill along with Democratic Sens. Chris Coons of Delaware and Cory Booker

of New Jersey, and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican, announced that

his committee would vote on the bill.

The legislation would give any special counsel a 10-day window to seek expedited judicial

review of a firing, and would put into law existing Justice Department regulations that

require a firing to be for "good cause."

Democrats immediately jumped on the legislation, but many Republicans have been cool to it.

At least three of the 11 GOP members of the Judiciary panel have said they will vote against

it and another five have said they have questions about its constitutionality.

Grassley is one of those with concerns, but said he felt obligated to hold a vote.

Republicans off the committee had questions too — and some acknowledged

that

it could

be

politically difficult.

For more infomation >> SCHUMER DENIED McConnell BLOCKS Vote to 'Protect' Robert Mueller - Duration: 14:41.

-------------------------------------------

Susan Rice Backed Out From Testifying Before The House Committee Regarding The Unmasking Scandal - Duration: 18:27.

Susan Rice Backed Out From Testifying Before The House Committee Regarding The Unmasking

Scandal

Susan Rice backed out from testifying before the House committee regarding the unmasking

scandal. She was supposed to visit Capitol Hill on Tuesday for a meeting with the House

committee investigating allegations she "unmasked" President Trump associates in Russian interfering

investigations.

Rice was supposed to face hard questions regarding her role while working as President Barack

Obama's national security adviser. Trump claimed that Rice committed a crime by requesting

the names of his associates documented in intelligence reports, from the government

analysts.

Rice was expected to give a closed-door testimony Tuesday before the Republican-led House Permanent

Select Committee on Intelligence.

But that session has been postponed.

One independent journalist, Mike Cernovich revealed the Susan Rice unmasking story in

early April.

Cernovich wrote:

"The White House Counsel's office identified Rice as the person responsible for the unmasking

after examining Rice's document log requests. The reports Rice requested to see are kept

under tightly-controlled conditions. Each person must log her name before being granted

access to them.

Upon learning of Rice's actions, H. R. McMaster dispatched his close aide Derek Harvey to

Capitol Hill to brief Chairman Nunes.

'Unmasking" is the process of identifying individuals whose communications were caught

in the dragnet of intelligence gathering.' While conducting investigations into terrorism

and other related crimes, intelligence analysts incidentally capture conversations about parties

not subject to the search warrant. The identities of individuals who are not under investigation

are kept confidential, for legal and moral reasons."

Please share this post on Facebook if you think Susan Rice is guilty.

What is your opinion on this? Scroll down to comment below!

Join

USA

Politics

Today And Share This Article Now! TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA

GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> Susan Rice Backed Out From Testifying Before The House Committee Regarding The Unmasking Scandal - Duration: 18:27.

-------------------------------------------

The Dart Board 4-19-18 - Duration: 1:08:09.

For more infomation >> The Dart Board 4-19-18 - Duration: 1:08:09.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Pulled Russian Strings To Smear Trump – New Evidence Rocks Washington - Duration: 18:27.

Obama Pulled Russian Strings To Smear Trump – New Evidence Rocks Washington

The controversy over alleged misconduct regarding connections between the Trump campaign and

Russian interests has only gotten more convoluted.

Now, there are so many unsubstantiated statements and so many potential characters, it'll

soon reach critical mass and NOBODY will be able to comprehend it.

To put it another way, the case that has consisted of unproven allegations and the purported

involvement of numerous actors, both American and Russian, is likely to have contained irregularities

committed by various persons.

But there's still zero evidence that President Trump, his son, or his campaign staff were

the ones who did anything wrong.

The latest twist in this convoluted mess involves the highly questionable approval by the Obama

Department of Justice of a request to allow a Russian lawyer into the US before she met

with members of the Trump campaign.

It begs the question: Why would Obama's DOJ do this?

Well, the answer might be that Leftists had been planning this Trump/Russia farce for

a very long time.

Via The Hill:

"The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump's inner circle was initially cleared

into the United States by the Justice Department under 'extraordinary circumstances' before

she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president's eldest son,

members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and

Justice Department documents and interviews.

This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most

intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa.

Later, a series of events between an intermediary for the attorney and the Trump campaign ultimately

led to the controversy surrounding Donald Trump Jr."

We should never suspect that these "extraordinary circumstances" might be part of a political

set-up designed to entrap Trump officials, should we?

But it turns out that this Russian attorney was involved in lobbying activities:

"She also engaged in a pro-Russia lobbying campaign and attended an event at the Newseum

in Washington, D.C., where Russian supporters showed a movie that challenged the underpinnings

of the U.S. human rights law known as the Magnitsky Act, which Russian President Vladimir

Putin has reviled and tried to reverse.

Join USA Politics Today And Share This Article Now!

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA

GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> Obama Pulled Russian Strings To Smear Trump – New Evidence Rocks Washington - Duration: 18:27.

-------------------------------------------

Caught! They Are Guilty, Guilty As Charged – See Who's Now Facing Up To 10 Years In Prison For Ste - Duration: 15:52.

Caught!

They Are Guilty, Guilty As Charged – See Who's Now Facing Up To 10 Years In Prison

For Stealing

It's been said that steep punishments for wrongdoing are not an obstacle, that individuals

will commit acts of brutality regardless of the punishment.

There is additionally a school of believed that expresses that death penalty, or capital

punishment, likewise will do nothing toward diminishing the event of wrongdoing.

In specific states where leniency appears, the wrongdoing measurements seem to show that

there is a probability of more wrongdoing, as well as that the recidivism rate (or the

rehash offense part of wrongdoing) is likewise more in those areas.

In New Jersey, a crime-duo has been arrested for assault and robbery.

The thieves knew the casualty and they were rough in their assault.

The kicker to this one is that they will both be confronting a potential 5-10 year sentence.

What was justified regardless of this fierce battery?

A cell phone and $16!

A New Jersey man and woman could spend five to 10 years in prison for stealing a cellphone

and $ 16 last week, according to Thursday reports.

Anthony J. Stackow, 37, allegedly punched the victim in the face and body while Alyssa

Santiago, 32, rifled through the victim's pockets to steal the cellphone and $ 16 cash,

the Jersey Journal reported Wednesday.

Stackow also faces a criminal mischief charge for smashing the cellphone on the ground.

The pair's first appearance in court on Tuesday determined that they would be detained

for the course of their prosecution.

The case will be heard in court by a superior court judge Thursday.

The couple stands accused of second-degree robbery, which carries a five to 10 year sentence.

Stackow's additional criminal mischief charge could add to his sentence, however.

The victim, whose identity was not released, told authorities he recognized Stackow and

Santiago as his cousin's friends.

He declined medial treatment despite Stackow's alleged violence.

For this situation, regardless of the potential charges, see that the casualty has picked

not to look for restorative treatment.

Much of the time this way, where the casualty knows the culprit and where medicinal treatment

is not looked for, it comes from the accept with respect to the casualty that on the off

chance that they do get treatment, the courts may force a more prominent sentence (which

is in some cases genuine).

On the off chance that the casualty has been through this kind of circumstance sometime

recently, or knows somebody who has, the odds that the culprit has discharged on a detail

or discharged before may encourage this discernment that not looking for therapeutic care is shrewd.

Regardless, these two will confront a firm sentence in any case.

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank

you

for reading.

Join

USA

Politics Today And Share This Article Now!

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA

GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> Caught! They Are Guilty, Guilty As Charged – See Who's Now Facing Up To 10 Years In Prison For Ste - Duration: 15:52.

-------------------------------------------

He's On Chopping Block He Deliberately Sabotaged President Trump, Now It Is Over For Him! - Duration: 15:52.

He's On Chopping Block?

He Deliberately Sabotaged President Trump, Now It Is Over For Him?!

The deep state is a decade in length system of Democrats doing their best to prevent anything

positive from occurring in Washington, DC.

Since President Trump gone into the office, their new objective is to stop Trump no matter

what.

In any case, have their strategies gone too far?

Uncommon Counsel Robert Mueller, who has been delegated by Rod Rosenstein to explore the

cases of collusion between the Trump organization and the Russians, is on a tear at the present

time, employing each Liberal lawyer he can.

He has the pleasure of being BFF to James Comey, previous FBI Director who was broadly

terminated by President Trump.

Another forecast is out there that says that the Special Counsel Mueller is so harsh to

the organization, that he won't make it 100 days from now, that Trump will be asking

for his terminating before he can get to the meat of the investigation.

Via The Gateway Pundit:

Legal News site, LawNewz wrote a piece Friday morning predicting a special advisor Mueller

will not make it another 100 days.

"Lets be clear, it was extraordinary for the President to fire the FBI director.

In fact, James Comey was the only second ever to be fired in the United States.

History.

The President, however, had the authority to do it, but despite coming under fire during

2016 elections, Comey was long viewed as a fixture, sometimes controversial but even-handed,

non-partisan and eminently qualified director who never would have been fired.

Especially because of the ongoing Russia investigation.

Except that is exactly what happened, and why it happened.

The President admitted as much.

Since then the "witch hunt" investigation into the Trump campaign and alleged collusion

with the Kremlin has taken a definitely more dangerous and personal turn for the President.

And that's why we think it will not be longer than 100 days before Trump pulls the trigger

and "Comey" Mueller (he can not technically fire it, but he can certainly order it and

make it happen).

After all, as the campaign and his first few months in office prove, Trump puts his family

above anything else.

As the information continues to seep out about the work that Mueller is doing and the subpoenas

begin to come, we believe the President will be increasingly frustrated and the administration

will undoubtedly continue to seek to undermine Mueller's credibility.

And lets be clear, by any objective standard Mueller is an unassailable, apolitical public

servant.

"

Cristina Laila of the Gateway Pundit goes ahead to show a portion of the appointments

that Mueller has made to move down what we definitely know to be a stacked deck with

regards to those researching Trump.

What Laila neglects to say however is that the wellspring of this 100-day forecast is

Dan Abrams (who is the Managing Editor of Law Newz).

This is the same Dan Abrams who was once General Manager of MSNBC while facilitating The Abrams

Report.

Abrams is likewise the Chief Legal Analyst for NBC and his expectation is constructed

absolutely in light of ill will for Trump and a conspicuous sycophantic reverence for

Mueller, asserting that "by any objective standard Mueller is an unassailable, apolitical

public servant????"

Is this the Twilight Zone?

Since when has any target standard at any point been doled out to a Leftist.

What's more, excuse me, yet "unassailable, apolitical?"

Is this person joking?

There is a huge amount of confirmation out there that shows the exact inverse.

Decent attempt.

Mueller stays and quite a while from now, this at last wraps up with a huge nothing

to appear for the billions spent.

What do you think about this?

Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.

Thank you for reading.

Join USA

Politics

Today And Share This Article Now!

TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA

GREAT AGAIN!

For more infomation >> He's On Chopping Block He Deliberately Sabotaged President Trump, Now It Is Over For Him! - Duration: 15:52.

-------------------------------------------

HE'S DONE IT Trump DROPS NUKE On FBI – Let The Riots Begin! - Duration: 13:57.

HE'S DONE IT: Trump DROPS NUKE On FBI – Let The Riots Begin!

While talking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah said

that President Trump's attorneys have already approved the idea of appointing a second special

counsel to investigate the FBI and Justice Department's actions during the 2016 presidential

campaign.

"FISA warrant should it be released? and what about a second special counsel?" a

reporter asked, according to Infowars.

"Presidents attorneys have addressed this and said yes to a second special counsel,"

Shah responded.

"That document along with any other that the House Intelligence Committee chooses to

vote out of its committee through its process and all the House procedures, we would entertain

like anything else."

Shah went on to say that the White House will approach further memos, including the one

created by Democrats, in the same way they handled the memo authored by Devin Nunes.

"Which is to allow for a legal review, national security review led by the White House Counsel's

Office, and then within five days the president will make a decision about declassifying it,"

said Shah.

This comes after Congressman Trey Gowdy just spoke out to slam those who are trying to

downplay the implications of the just-released House Intelligence Committee memo.

Ever since the release of the FISA memo, which makes clear that the infamous Steele dossier

was instrumental in securing FISA warrants on former Trump adviser Carter Page, liberals

have been pointing to the memo's final section.

The conclusion of the memo states that former Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos

as the impetus for the FBI's monitoring of Trump's campaign, and the anti-Trump

crowd argued this point washes out the rest of the memo's implications.

Gowdy, however, wasn't having any of it.

"It is important for the American public to know if the dossier was paid for by another

candidate, used in court pleadings, vetted before it was used, vetted after it was used,

and whether all relevant facts were shared with the tribunal approving of the FISA application,"

Gowdy wrote on Twitter, according to Daily Caller

"While this memo raises serious concerns with the FISA process, I have been and remain

confident in the overwhelming majority of the men and women serving at the FBI and DOJ,"

Gowdy added.

"As I have said repeatedly, I also remain 100 percent confident in Special Counsel Robert

Mueller.

The contents of this memo do not – in any way – discredit his investigation."

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

H/T reporttec