USA news on Youtube May 3 2018

WATCH: NRA's New Commercial Just Left The Entire Nation Speechless!

While anti-2A people are busy villainizing organizations like the National Rifle Association

(NRA) and attempting to disarm law-abiding Americans, they forget about the brave and

heroic men like Stephen Willeford.

Willeford is a plumber from Sutherland Springs, TX who at the risk of his own life chased

and shot the man who took the lives of 26 people at the nearby Baptist church.

Willeford is also an NRA member and he tells his story of the harrowing day that was a

very sad day in history.

Willeford speaks simply and plainly that everyone who was harmed that day represented his community

on that fateful day in November.

He clearly emphasizes that he does not believe that he is the bravest or most heroic man

in the world.

He just believes he happened to be the only person available in a position to stop a very

bad man from doing anything worse than what he had already done and what he accomplished

was already horrific.

"My daughter came into the bedroom and she said, 'Dad, there's a man in black tactical

gear" at the church.

Willeford, an NRA member, says at the start of the ad.

"Every one of those shots, to me, represented one of my neighbors, one of my friends, and

I ran as fast as I could."

"Immediately, he came out of the church…" he recalled.

"He hit the truck in front of me, he hit the car behind me, he hit the house behind

me, and I hit him."

"He had an AR-15, but so did I," Willeford continued.

"It's a matter of the heart.

I'm not the bravest man in the world or anything, but I was here, I was here and I

could do something.

And I had to do something."

Earlier this week, Willeford penned an opinion piece for the Dallas News recalling that tragic

day and speaking about the importance of the Second Amendment

Willeford states:

"More than 80,000 National Rifle Association members and firearms enthusiasts will arrive

in Dallas at the end of the week for the organization's 147th annual meeting, and it's a good time

to reflect on why the Second Amendment is important and what we can do as law-abiding

citizens to protect it.

Not everyone in Dallas has welcomed NRA members ahead of this big event.

Politicians and anti-2A activists have made clear their belief that the way to stop criminals

is to restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens, and many have blamed the men and women of

the NRA for acts of deranged individuals.

Sometimes, it feels like the mainstream media hates firearms.

I have been saddened to see politicians demonize the men and women of this organization lately.

It's an organization that taught me a great deal and of which I've been a proud member

most of my life.

I personally want to welcome the visitors expected for the NRA's Annual Meeting.

This is a time for all of us to come together to celebrate our nation's freedom.

People will be coming from every state, city and town in the United States.

They will come with one anthem: we are the NRA."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> WATCH: NRA's New Commercial Just Left The Entire Nation Speechless! - Duration: 4:19.

-------------------------------------------

NOW IN FOUR MAJOR DEMOCRATS ARRESTED FOR FRAUD - Duration: 13:03.

NOW IN: FOUR MAJOR DEMOCRATS ARRESTED FOR FRAUD

Four members of an election board were charged Monday with intimidating voters, casting bogus

ballots, and falsely certifying the results in their polling place during a March 21 special

election for the state House's 197th District.

It was disclosed by The Philadelphia Inquirer that the imprisoned Democrats are Dolores

Shaw, 61; Calvin Mattox, 52; Thurman George, 57; and Wallace Hill, 60.

Every single one of them manned the ballot machines at the Esperanza Health Center at

Kensington and Allegheny Avenues in the 43rd Ward, one of the polling positions where complaints

about unlawful electioneering were submitted, reports Born To Be Right.

Attorney General Josh Shapiro told reporters that these charges should "draw a very clear

line ahead of next week's election."

He added that one elderly couple, two Republicans, cast their ballots together.

However, only one was recorded, while the other was replaced with a write-in vote for

the Democrat in the race.

Shapiro said that when one voter tried to cast a ballot for the Green Party candidate,

he was told the ballot machine was broken and later was cursed at when he returned to

try again.

Another person who wanted to vote for the Green Party candidate was aggressively questioned

when he tried to bring someone into the polling booth to assist him, as allowed by law.

"One should not chalk these actions up to typical partisanship or typical electioneering,"

Shapiro said.

"These were crimes."

Emilio Vazquez, the Democratic leader of the 43rd Ward, ended up winning this election

and was sworn into office on April 5.

Philadelphia District Attorney Kelley Hodge said that the actions of this election board

are "a ruthless example of why so many of our fellow citizens are skeptical and distrustful

of our elections."

"Shaw, who was judge of elections at the polling place, faces six felonies and four

misdemeanors," the Inquirer reported.

"Mattox, a minority inspector, faces six felonies and five misdemeanors.

George, a machine inspector, faces five felonies and three misdemeanors.

Hill, a translator, faces six felonies and four misdemeanors.

They could receive prison time on the most serious charges, if convicted."

Yet again, this indicates that Democrats think that they surpass the barriers of the law

and will not accept a defeat in any case.

The prosecutors added that the probe revealed bribes paid by athlete advisers — including

financial advisers and associate basketball coaches — to assistant and associate basketball

coaches to exert influence over

student athletes, ESPN said.

For more infomation >> NOW IN FOUR MAJOR DEMOCRATS ARRESTED FOR FRAUD - Duration: 13:03.

-------------------------------------------

PEOPLE FURIOUS CLINTON WINS HORRIFYING COURT VICTORY - Duration: 16:21.

PEOPLE FURIOUS: CLINTON WINS HORRIFYING COURT VICTORY

A federal judge tossed a lawsuit Thursday that would have pushed the State Department

and FBI to do more to try to track down Hillary Clinton's emails, ruling the government

has done all it reasonably could to locate the former secretary of state's messages.

As Christian News Alert reports:

Both Judicial Watch and Cause of Action, government watchdog groups, sued back in 2015.

Their demand was the government recover all of Clinton's emails instead of a small percentage.

Their claim for this lawsuit is that Clinton violated the open-records laws when she decided

to delete her emails.

Open-record laws cite that there should be a preservation of the emails in question.

At the conclusion of the trial, US District Judge James E. Boasberg, who was appointed

by former-President Obama, claimed that the FBI was successful in their efforts.

Furthermore, he said that the FBI did manage to recover thousands of emails that Clinton

did not turn over.

"Those efforts went well beyond the mine-run search for missing federal records … and

were largely successful, save for some emails sent during a two-month stretch.

Even then, the FBI pursued every imaginable avenue to recover the missing emails," Judge

Boasberg wrote.

This is not the first time that the case was shot down.

In 2016, the lawsuit was dismissed as moot.

However, not long after, the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed

the finding.

The Circuit Court demanded that the government "shake loose a few more emails."

Yet Judge Boasberg did what he could to make sure that the shaking for emails would stop.

"The Court of Appeals may have asked the Government to 'shake the tree harder'

for more emails, but it never suggested that the FBI must shake every tree in every forest,

without knowing whether they are fruit trees," the Judge wrote in his findings.

The president of Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, noted that he thinks President Donald Trump

will be unhappy with the results of this court case.

He also said that he thought there would be more effort put into uncovering all of Clinton's

hidden emails.

"I think the President, once he learns about this, is going to blow his top and he ought

to," Fitton said.

His hope seems to be that this will be enough to push President Trump forward so the truth

can be revealed.

John Vecchione, president of Cause of Action, also spoke about his disappointment over the

Judge tossing his case out.

Vecchione pointed out that he does not believe that Clinton's "unlawfully removed email

records," were actually recovered.

H/T Christian News Alert

"Unfortunately, the court concluded that efforts by the FBI in its investigation of

Secretary Clinton's handling of classified material, which resulted in the recovery of

numerous emails that Clinton had not previously turned over, left nothing further for the

attorney general to do," said Vecchione.

If new evidence emerges that shows Clinton did not give up her deleted emails, it

could

set off additional probe of

the emails.

For more infomation >> PEOPLE FURIOUS CLINTON WINS HORRIFYING COURT VICTORY - Duration: 16:21.

-------------------------------------------

ANOTHER CLINTON RELATED FIGURE TAKES HIS OWN LIFE - Duration: 12:12.

ANOTHER CLINTON-RELATED FIGURE TAKES HIS OWN LIFE

Just ten days after Republican operative Peter Smith disclosed to the media that during the

campaign last year he attempted to obtain Hillary's emails from Russian hackers, he

died in circumstances, which some think are rather suspicious.

Judging from the Minnesota state death record, which was reviewed by the Chicago Tribune,

Peter Smith reportedly committed a suicide in a hotel room in Rochester on May 14th.

He'd placed a bag over his head which had been attached to a helium source of some kind.

This hotel was located right next to the Mayo Clinic, well known specialist hospital that

treats particularly difficult cases.

According to the report, Smith apparently left a suicide note in which he wrote "No

foul play" was involved in his death and that he decided to take his own life due to

a "recent bad turn in health since January, 2017" and cause his life insurance policy

was almost expired.

Even someone from the other side of the political aisle found this note suspicious and troubling:

Furthermore, the journalist that interviewed Smith 10 days before he committed suicide,

Sane Harris, he admitted that he didn't detect to the Republican operative any sign

of illness, nor did he detect any hidden will to take his own life away.

One of Smith's former employees was asked about the condition of his now-deceased boss,

and he stated that his boss had been receiving treatment from the Mayo Clinic for his heart

condition, which kind of suggests that he had been hopeful about recovering.

According to a Wall Street Journal publication, Harris itemized Smith's achievements, which

consisted of assembling a team independent from then-GOP presidential candidate Donald

Trump's campaign with the purpose of recovering emails that might have been stolen from Hillary's

private server while she was State Secretary.

"Mr. Smith's focus was some 33,000 emails Mrs. Clinton said were deleted because they

were deemed personal," Harris reported.

"Mr. Smith said he believed that the emails might have been obtained by hackers and that

they actually concerned official matters Mrs. Clinton wanted to conceal."

Harris noted that he discovered some recruiting emails which were written by Smith in order

to persuade others to join him by convincing them that he was working with retired Lt.

Gen. Michael Flynn, who at the time was serving as a top adviser to Trump.

Peter Smith's death two months ago doesn't appear to be the first one that's been related

with Clinton and had been considered a suicide.

There've been many other similar cases, such as the "suicide" of Deputy White

House Counsel Vince Foster in 1993 by a gunshot wound, which is still found by many conspiracy

theorists to be a classical murder case perpetrated by the Clintons, despite lack of evidence

to support these claims.

For more infomation >> ANOTHER CLINTON RELATED FIGURE TAKES HIS OWN LIFE - Duration: 12:12.

-------------------------------------------

NEW MEMOS SHOW OBAMA ADMIN LIED ABOUT "URANIUM ONE" EXPORTS - Duration: 11:41.

NEW MEMOS SHOW: OBAMA ADMIN LIED ABOUT "URANIUM ONE" EXPORTS

As the mainstream media continues to obsess over $100,000 worth Facebook ads allegedly

purchased by Russian spies in 2016 seeking to throw the presidential election, behind

the scenes, far removed from the sight of CNN and MSNBC, the Uranium One scandal, in

which the Obama administration approved a deal that handed a Russian-controlled corporation

20% of America's uranium reserves despite the existence of an FBI investigation into

ongoing illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes, is slowly spiraling out

of control…despite CNN's continued ignorance of the topic.

Via TFPP:

The Uranium One deal landed the Clinton Foundation roughly $145 million, but former President

Obama approved of the obvious bribe.

According to Zero Hedge, the deal left a Russian government-owned corporation with 20% of America's

uranium reserves.

But the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission repeatedly assured Congress that U.S. uranium

reserves wouldn't be exported.

From the Hill:

"No uranium produced at either facility may be exported," the NRC declared in a

November 2010 press release that announced that ARMZ, a subsidiary of the Russian state-owned

Rosatom, had been approved to take ownership of the Uranium One mining firm and its American

assets.

A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance in a letter to Sen. John Barrasso,

a Wyoming Republican in whose state Uranium One operated mines.

"Neither Uranium One Inc. nor AMRZ holds a specific NRC export license.

In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need

to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the exports of uranium for use

in reactor fuel," then-NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko wrote to Barrasso.

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the

narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post's official

fact-checker site this week.

"We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without

a license, which Rosatom does not have," the Post reported on Monday, linking to the

2011 Barrasso letter.

The 2011 Barrasso letter makes it clear that Rosatom didn't have an export license and

explained why such a license is of value to the "common defense and security of the

United States."

The letter, addressed to Senator Barrasso, states:

At this time, neither Uranium One Inc. nor ARMZ holds a specific NRC export license.

In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One, Inc. or ARMZ would need

to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the export of uranium for use

in reactor fuel.

Before issuing such a license, the NRC would have to determine that the proposed export

would not be inimical to the common defense and security of the United States

Freshly released Nuclear Regulatory Commission memos, however, prove that exports were approved.

Yellowcake uranium was exported from the U.S., regularly between 2012 and 2014.

To cover their tracks, Obama signed a waiver which allowed the uranium to be first driven

to Canada, where it would then be exported to Europe.

Obama had the audacity to claim in 2013 that his administration was the "most transparent"

in history.

And we're still learning, time and time again, how sneaky he could be.

The Hill continues:

Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake

uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned

mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party.

Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,

government documents show.

NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount of uranium that Uranium One

exported because the information is proprietary.

They did, however, say that the shipments only lasted from 2012 to 2014 and that they

are unaware of any exports since then.

NRC officials told The Hill that Uranium One exports flowed from Wyoming to Canada and

on to Europe between 2012 and 2014, and the approval involved a process with multiple

agencies.

Rather than give Rosatom a direct export license — which would have raised red flags inside

a Congress already suspicious of the deal — the NRC in 2012 authorized an amendment

to an existing export license for a Paducah, Ky.-based trucking firm called RSB Logistics

Services Inc. to simply add Uranium One to the list of clients whose uranium it could

move to Canada.

The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount

of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario

from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the "other parties

to Export."

Uranium left U.S. shores after all, and the efforts to cover up the move left Congress

in the dark for years.

The Hill received an email from "Uranium One's American arm" admitting that uranium

was trucked to Canada to be exported throughout Europe and Asia.

According to the letter, the move technically complies with federal law.

The Uranium One email reads:

"None of the US U308 product produced to date has been sold to non-US customers except

for approximately 25% which was sold via book transfer at the conversion facilities to customers

from Western Europe and Asia," executive Donna Wickers said.

"Any physical export of the product from conversion facilities to non-US destinations

is under the control of such customers and subject to NRC regulation."

The Uranium One bribery scandal is blowing up quickly and the publicly is learning how

lie after lie buried the shady deal.

How much longer can mainstream media dismiss it?

Is this what Obama meant when he told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to let Putin know

that he would "have more flexibility" after

the 2012 election?