USA news on Youtube Aug 1 2018

Hillary Clinton Is About To Make The Worst Mistake Of Her Life

Hillary Clinton could be plotting the comeback no one saw coming.

The former two-time failed Presidential candidate is sniffing around the political scene.

And it could end up blowing up in the Democrats' faces and handing them the most humiliating

defeat in party history.

Hillary Clinton cannot help herself.

The midterm elections are just creeping up and Hillary Clinton is determined to insert

herself into the political spotlight.

Most Democrats wish the disgraced 2016 Presidential candidate would go away and take her decades

of scandal and corruption back into the woods of upstate New York.

But the Clintons are addicted to political power the way a Vampire craves blood to survive.

Clinton raised eyebrows with a burst of political activity.

Hillary fired off a series of tweets that touched on core issues or constituencies key

to the Democrat Party.

Clinton promoted the group United for Justice that was started by Clinton loyalists to fight

the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court:

AFTER JUSTICE KENNEDY ANNOUNCED HIS RETIREMENT FROM THE SUPREME COURT, @WEDEMANDJUSTICE LEAPT

INTO ACTION TO LAUNCH A MOVEMENT TO #STOPKAVANAUGH.

THEY'RE DOING A 10-CITY #RISEUPFORROE TOUR AND WILL HAVE A DAY OF ACTION ON 8/26

Hillary also tweeted out support for groups designed to recruit black candidates and register

Latino voters:

.@VOTOLATINO IS WORKING TO ENGAGE LATINOS IN THE CIVIC PROCESS.

THEY RECENTLY HELPED REGISTER 5,000 PEOPLE IN JUST ONE DAY AT MARCH FOR OUR LIVES EVENTS.

THEIR GOAL: REGISTER 422,000 VOTERS FOR THE 2018 MIDTERMS AND TURN OUT 80% OF THOSE PEOPLE.

.@COLLECTIVEPAC RECRUITS, TRAINS, AND FUNDS PROGRESSIVE BLACK CANDIDATES AT EVERY LEVEL

OF GOVERNMENT.

THEY'VE HELPED ELECT 23 OFFICIALS SO FAR AND ARE DOING A SERIES OF TRAININGS FOR CANDIDATES

AND OPERATIVES WITH THE GOAL OF TRAINING 200 PEOPLE BY 2019 AND 2020.

Clinton also donated the maximum of $5,000 to 19 Democratic Congressional candidates

through her group Onward Together.

Hillary also funneled money to Democrat Secretary of State candidates – Nelson Araujo in Nevada,

Deidre DeJear who is running in Iowa, Jocelyn Benson who is the Democratic nominee in Michigan

and Kathleen Clyde in Ohio.

Taken together, these actions look like those of a candidate keeping their options open

for 2020.

Clinton is attaching her name to the fight over the Supreme Court – which is an issue

that has liberals losing their minds over the likelihood of defeat.

Hillary also began promoting groups targeted to black and Hispanic voters – two key Democrat

constituencies she underperformed with in 2016.

Clinton also donated to Democrats in the key battleground districts that will determine

control of the House of Representatives.

Finally, Clinton stuffed money in the campaign war chests of Democrats in four key Presidential

swing states.

Democrats would prefer Clinton stay far away from the 2018 midterms.

She is a tainted figure who automatically makes every situation about herself and her

conduct.

And Clinton's participation in the midterms will only serve to energize Republican voters.

When Clinton campaigned for candidates in 2014 ahead of her presidential campaign the

effort ended in disaster and Democrats across the country were tainted by the association.

Will a similar situation play out in 2018?

And is Hillary setting herself

up

to be

a viable candidate

in 2020?

Let us know your thoughts

in the comments section.

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton Is About To Make The Worst Mistake Of Her Life - Duration: 12:22.

-------------------------------------------

Acosta on Trump rally: It felt like we weren't in America anymore - Duration: 3:55.

For more infomation >> Acosta on Trump rally: It felt like we weren't in America anymore - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

8/1/18 12:44 PM (5555 N Driscoll Blvd, Spokane, WA 99205, USA) - Duration: 0:43.

For more infomation >> 8/1/18 12:44 PM (5555 N Driscoll Blvd, Spokane, WA 99205, USA) - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Trump's SHOCK Announcement HUMILIATES Nancy Pelosi – It's PERFECT - Duration: 13:26.

BREAKING: Trump's SHOCK Announcement HUMILIATES Nancy Pelosi – It's PERFECT

After Democrat Jon Ossoff's embarrassing defeat in Georgia, which came after his campaign

spent a record-breaking $23 million, many of the Democrat Party's Left-wing began

calling for Nancy Pelosi's head.

Donald Trump chimed in with his two cents.

In a tweet dripping with sarcasm, President Trump claimed that he hoped that the Democrats

would keep Pelosi in her top position.

Furthermore, President Trump also urged the Democrats to keep "Cryin' Chuck" Schumer

in the DNC as well.

TrumpTweet0623

The President's banter is clear: the Democrats are going to keep losing unless they get rid

of their old guard.

Even better, the changes that liberal pundits have offered so far are only going to make

things worse for the donkeys.

Feminist writer and anti-white activist Jill Filipovic took to Twitter to call all of Karen

Handel's voters "toxic, vindictive" voters who are beneath contempt.

Filipovic further demanded that Democrats appeal only to their base, which in Filipovic's

mind includes "ppl of color" and women (via Twitchy).

Hideously liberal pundit Sally Kohn hopes the Ossoff loss will rid the Democrats of

their supposed allegiance to "centrism."

Not to be outdone, Ossoff's many Hollywood supporters chimed in with such foolishness

as Alyssa Milano's call for a group hug following the loss (via Breitbart).

Against all of the prognostications of the liberal punditry, Donald Trump's 2016 mandate

looks like it still holds.

The Democrats, who want to ride a non-existent wave of anti-Trump sentiment all the way until

2018, have gone 0-4 in campaigns since President Trump took office.

Even Cher, a longtime progressive, has turned on Pelosi for her lack of success against

the new Republican Party (via Breitbart).

It is ironic to see the Democrats, who criticized the Republicans throughout 2016 for being

a "white man's party," are themselves becoming the party of non-whites.

The move to the racist Left has effectively made the Democrats uncompetitive throughout

much of America.

Word to the Dems: your strategies stink and they are not working.

Keep it up!

President Trump's tweet echoes the sentiments of many of his supporters, some of whom are

former Democrats.

Voters in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan not only voted for President Trump because

of his "America First" message in terms of economic and foreign policies, but they

also voted against the Democrat Party that had left them behind and started calling them

racists.

As the Democrats become more and more Left-wing, expect more and more electoral defeats.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with

your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump's SHOCK Announcement HUMILIATES Nancy Pelosi – It's PERFECT - Duration: 13:26.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Obama Bombshell Opens Door To His Intimate Past - Duration: 13:51.

BREAKING: Obama Bombshell Opens Door To His Intimate Past

Barack Obama's past has always been shrouded in mystery.

It's that way on purpose–the Leftist media has done everything it can to keep it a secret.

It's the opposite of Donald Trump, who's transparent and on the public radar for decades.

No one knew who Obama was before he ran for president.

Now the truth about him is coming out–and it ain't pretty.

Two of his ex-girlfriends describe him as a cold individual who was obsessed with Islam

and Pakistani culture (via The Telegraph).

Genevieve Cook and Alex McNear were two women who had the displeasure of calling Barack

Obama their boyfriend.

They had the opportunity of getting to know the President as few people have.

Even more fascinating is that they knew him when he was in his twenties.

The portrait these two women offer of Obama is valuable because it gives us insight into

who he was before his fame and manufactured public persona.

They saw the true nature of the man who would be President.

Obama's ex-girlfriends gave their remarks to David Maraniss, Obama biographer and associate

editor at The Washington Post.

How convenient that these two women never shared these recollections with anyone before.

But of course, Obama is no longer running for president.

There's no longer need to have the Democrat political machine carefully filtering unwanted

details about Obama's history.

That's why the true story is beginning to come out.

According to Genevieve Cook, there was a "coolness" about Obama.

Cook maintains that Obama put on a facade of "sweet words" that hid his inward cold

nature.

Wow, that sounds familiar!

After all, that's the same trick Obama pulled with the American public.

He used a lot of nice words, promising voters the sun and the moon only to fall short on

everything; a sweet talker with nothing of substance below the surface.

But that's not the worst of it.

That most disturbing part of these two women's accounts is their description of Barack Obama's

fixation with Islam.

Even during his college days, Obama existed infatuated with Middle Eastern culture.

Apparently, Obama had Pakistani friends whose influence on him was enormous.

McNear wrote: "As the multiracial product of an international upbringing, he complained

of being 'caught without a class, a structure, or tradition to support me' and envying

the defined lives of Pakistani friends."

That's something every American should have known about Obama before election day in 2008.

Every voter deserved to know Obama was a Muslim sympathizer.

In 1981, Obama took a trip to Pakistan with his college roommate, Mohammed Hasan.

We have little information about what happened on this trip.

We can only assume the experience solidified Obama's pro-Islam anti-America ideology.

Barack Hussein Obama should never have become president.

Our greatest threat is Islamic terrorism.

How could a Muslim apologist lead us successfully?

That's why Obama intentionally weakened our country and strengthened terrorists.

It's too late now to stop what Obama did.

But by bringing the truth to light, we expose his true "legacy" and get Americans to

rally against the harm he did to this nation.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Obama Bombshell Opens Door To His Intimate Past - Duration: 13:51.

-------------------------------------------

Rush Limbaugh Revealed Trump Has A Surprise Plan To Destroy The Democrats In 2018 - Duration: 12:20.

Rush Limbaugh Revealed Trump Has A Surprise Plan To Destroy The Democrats In 2018

The battle lines are being drawn for the November midterm elections.

Pundits have been increasing the odds of a blue wave and a Democrat take over.

But Rush Limbaugh revealed that Trump has this surprise plan in his back pocket that

could destroy the Democrats in 2018.

Establishment Republicans and anti-Trump journalists were stunned when President Trump tweeted

that he would be willing to risk a government shutdown in order to secure funding for his

border wall.

The conventional wisdom in political and media circles is that the Republican Party will

pay the price for a government shutdown.

This is fake news.

In 1996, the election immediately after the 1995 government shutdown – that the media

claims re-elected Bill Clinton – the GOP gained two seats in the Senate.

And in 2014, after the media claimed the GOP committed political suicide after shutting

down the government over defunding Obamacare the Republican Party gained nine Senate seats

and seized control of the chamber.

That context is important in discussing why Trump would want to threaten a government

shutdown.

Rush Limbaugh dissected his rationale on his show and pointed out the obvious – that

elections are contests of base mobilization and nothing fires up the GOP base more than

immigration.

Limbaugh stated:

"THIS IS ABOUT IMMIGRATION AND IT'S ABOUT BORDER SECURITY.

BUT IT'S ABOUT MORE THAN THAT, BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT MAINTAINING THIS DISTINCT AMERICAN

GREATNESS, A DISTINCT AMERICAN CULTURE AND NOT ALLOWING IT TO BE DILUTED AND WATERED

DOWN WITH THE UNENDING FLOW OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT LEGALLY IN THE COUNTRY.

NOT BECOMING CITIZENS, NOT GOING THROUGH THE PROPER CHANNELS.

BELIEVE ME, THIS IS GOING TO TURN PEOPLE OUT IN NOVEMBER.

YOU'VE HEARD…

I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT'S TRUE, BUT YOU'VE HEARD THAT THE MOMENTUM AND THE ENERGY IS

ALL ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE.

"THE RESISTANCE IS REVVED AND THEY CAN'T WAIT!

THEY CAN'T WAIT TO GET RID OF TRUMP — AND THE FIRST STEP OF GETTING RID OF TRUMP IS

GAINING CONTROL OF THE HOUSE FOR THE DEMOCRATS.

THEY CAN'T WAIT TO DO IT.

I THINK THERE ARE PROBABLY SOME REPUBLICANS THAT BELIEVE THAT.

SO THIS IS AN EFFORT, I THINK, ON TRUMP'S PART TO RATCHET UP THE ENERGY, THE TURNOUT

OVER THE ISSUE THAT GOT HIM ELECTED."

Because, folks, all Trump has right now is his base.

That's his line of defense.

That's his wall.

The people that are gonna vote against Trump — i.e., vote against Republicans — are

not gonna be bought off with a little policy offer here or a policy offer there.

I mean, this is for all the marbles.

Trump needs everybody that voted for him for president showing up and voting Republican

again.

And he needs even more of that.

If Republicans want to hold on to the House and grow their Senate majority, they need

their base's enthusiasm to match that of the Democrats.

Immigration was the issue that powered Trump and the GOP to victory in 2018.

If the Republicans have any hope of maintaining control of Congress in November it stands

to reason that making the election an all-out fight over building the wall and securing

the border is the GOP's best chance.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

For more infomation >> Rush Limbaugh Revealed Trump Has A Surprise Plan To Destroy The Democrats In 2018 - Duration: 12:20.

-------------------------------------------

Some packaged salads and wraps - Duration: 2:59.

For more infomation >> Some packaged salads and wraps - Duration: 2:59.

-------------------------------------------

Plastics Pollution in Cuyahoga County and Ohio-Highlights - Duration: 3:41.

Hello! Here we are on a beautiful day in beautiful Wendy Park. Lake Erie's over to

my right and then leading of course to the whole wide world oceans. My name is

Fran Mentch and I'm the co-chair of the Northeast Ohio Sierra Club, Water

Committee. I'm here today speaking on behalf of the Environment but I'm not

speaking as Sierra Club. The concern that that I want to discuss has to do

with plastics pollution. Voters look for a shortcut. They look for a

heuristic. "I want something I don't want to get all this complicated I want

something really easy." So the heuristic always comes down to money and jobs.

Money - it's taxes and jobs. Well, that is pulled into the political

discourse about plastics too and though they'll say, "People are working, they

they have a job making plastics whatever it is and

they'll say, "You know, the taxes from those jobs are not just help, they're

helping everybody." So they'll say, "If you pull the plastic bags out of the enviros

you're removing jobs." Well again, you have to dig deeper it is somebody's job but

behind that it is a large manufacturing enterprise and they have lobbyists and

there's always always protecting there we all protect our interests right

corporations protect their self interests as we all do individually so

that's part of the discourse. However, it is more complicated than just losing

somebody losing jobs because those people you don't know number one could

they find another job will not the shift in thinking and the use of plastics have

have impact and the jobs won't disappear but they will in fact shift? As we know

from shifting energy in general that the jobs went from one sector to another and

there are these quote these "green jobs" and you don't know how it would act

itself out in the environment either. I mean if you if you're owned a grocery

store and you spend less money on purchasing plastic bags and dealing with

them you may in fact think I'm going to improve my quality the experience of my

customer, you might hire somebody to help facilitate packing or whatever. All these

other things that we look for for quality and pleasure in our lives.

The other part of the political discourse is "nanny government", right? The

government shouldn't have to get involved in telling people getting that

involved in people's lives. So there's an there's an ideological stance also. It's

just keep government out of our lives, the market will solve the problems. The

most effective way to change people's behavior is to in fact legislate against

it. You know it's going to cost you

ten cents if you use a plastic bag. People will bring reusable

bags and they will use less bags. But back to this, the market will

solve all of the problems... in many ways the market, in fact not in many ways, in

in truth, the market is leading this argument against plastic. You can't get

bags from Costco you can't get plastic bags from if you if you get them

from Aldi's or Save-a-Lot they charge you. I think maybe they're not even available.

I don't know exactly what goes on with Whole Foods but it's the same type of

thing, where the private sector is saying, "We don't want to provide plastic

bags for free because if something's free it gets wasted." Right? So people are

willing to bring their own or to or to pay for bags. So the private sector's is really leading in this way. So, that's another argument that's another

way to look at this on the ideological spectrum.