-------------------------------------------
Meghan's Brother Pens Open Letter To Harry With Shocking Secret: It's Not Too Late - Duration: 5:28.
Meghan's Brother Pens Open Letter To Harry With Shocking Secret: It's Not Too Late.
The drama surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's wedding just evolved into one hot
mess.
After months of wary British citizens questioning the American actress true intentions, her
beleaguered brother Thomas Markle, Jr. just penned a scathing open letter addressed to
Prince Harry, and it contains a shocking secret that sheds light on why he advises that "it's
not too late."
Thomas Markle Jr. is the half-brother of Meghan Markle with the siblings sharing the same
father, Thomas Markle, Sr. Markle Jr. is extremely upset over the snub his sister has given to
all of her relatives, with only her mother being invited to the royal wedding.
Mr. Markle warns Harry, telling him "it's not too late" to scrap the wedding plans
and laying out his reasons, why he believes the prince is making "the biggest mistake
in royal wedding history."
The letter, shared with In Touch Magazine reads, "As more time passes to your royal
wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history.
Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you.
I'm confused why you don't see the real Meghan that the whole world now sees."
He adds, "Meghan's attempt to act the part of a princess like a below C average
Hollywood actress is getting old.
Meghan is a jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal
family heritage."
The Daily Mail reports, Meghan's 51-year-old brother from Oregon "then went on to claim,
that their father went into debt in order to support Markle's acting dream and is
still struggling financially.
He also claims that their father was not invited to the wedding."
This supports previous reports that Meghan was her father's favorite and was born at
a time in his career, as an Emmy Award-winning lighting director, when he spared no expense
in funding her private high school education.
Meghan graduated in 1999 and went on to North Western University.
It took the future Princess Pushy, who was raised in the exclusive area right outside
Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills, eleven long years after graduation before she landed her
role in the TV drama Suits in late 2010.
So, it's quite possible her father funded her years in between so she never had to give
up her acting dream.
This also sheds light on one of her early YouTube videos from 1999 while, as a struggling
actress, she is driving around Beverly Hills with estranged best friend Nikki Priddy and
says, "Yeah, I'm supposed to go visit my dad, but he's upset with me right now."
Back to her brother's letter, it continues, "What kind of person starts out by using
her own father until he's bankrupt, then forgets about him in Mexico leaving him broke,
over mostly all her debts?"
It goes on, "And when it's time to pay him back she forgets her own father like she
never knew him.
It's very apparent that her tiny bit of Hollywood fame has gone to her head."
That's quite a bombshell Mr. Markle dropped, and this whole mess could have been avoided
if Meghan would have just contacted her relatives and smoothed over this entire situation.
One thing must be true; namely, all of her relatives claiming that she hasn't spoken
to them since she made it big on Suits.
Many people are also speculating that Thomas, Jr. must have recently been in contact with
Thomas, Sr., and upon hearing his dad was still waiting for an invite that would never
come, the son was angered to see his father hurt to the point of lashing out with this
letter.
But, there's more.
Mr. Markle writes, "Not to mention, to top it all off, she doesn't invite her own family
and instead invites complete strangers to the wedding.
Who does that?
You and the royal family should put an end to this fake fairytale wedding before it's
too late."
Well, according to the tweet below, the Brits already have minted the official wedding coin.
Mr. Markle had some parting words for Harry, finishing his letter with, "Meghan is still
my sister.
She is family.
So whatever happens is up to her, whether she wants to forget knowing me or the rest
of her family, family comes first.
Also, you would think that a royal wedding would bring a torn family closer together,
but I guess we're all distant family to Meg."
I highly doubt Meghan's reclusive dad would have made a stink about not getting the invite,
but there is no doubt this must have hurt him greatly.
In that video from 1999, Meghan shows photos of herself with her dad.
It's evident they were close and he was a good father.
There are those who say her extended family are just gold diggers and want to get something
from her.
There is probably some truth on all sides of this mess, but it is unforgivable to not
invite your father to your wedding when he is not one of the gold diggers.
We don't know the entire story, but we do know her father has not spoken to the press
and has only wished her well through third parties.
If Princess Pushy is willing to shun her father in this manner, she might marry a prince while
wearing a diamond-crusted tiara, but under that crown, she's just a mediocre actress
who stepped over countless people to get to Buckingham Palace.
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
usa facts today.
-------------------------------------------
North Korea relocates 3 detained Americans to hotel - Duration: 0:32.
For more infomation >> North Korea relocates 3 detained Americans to hotel - Duration: 0:32. -------------------------------------------
Gymnastics with Terry Crews | Kevin Hart: What The Fit Episode 9 | Laugh Out Loud Network - Duration: 13:26.
For more infomation >> Gymnastics with Terry Crews | Kevin Hart: What The Fit Episode 9 | Laugh Out Loud Network - Duration: 13:26. -------------------------------------------
Preparing for Contact - Duration: 15:29.
Preparing for Contact
by Anela Izadi Ph.D.
Based on the archeological findings, whistleblower and contactee testimonies, there is no doubt
that humans have been visited by various ET races for centuries.
Through certain times in our history, ETs and inner-earth beings walked freely among
us and even acted as our teachers and Gods, influencing our current reality.
At some point in our evolution, open human-ET interaction ceased as our collective memory
of the events faded.
However, as Rebecca Hardcastle, Ph.D. points out, humans possess extraterrestrial consciousness
which links us directly to our ET ancestors.
It appears that the time has come for humanity to remember on an individual and global scale
who we are, where we came from, and our purpose in the Universe.
Unfortunately, our stratified political structure has been a hindrance to the unveiling of our
collective memories and to the disclosure process involving our historical events and
human-ET interactions.
Fortunately, as Dr. Salla says, the �First Contact� is not a purely political process
but rather it is also a social process due to the large number (millions in USA alone)
of ordinary individuals having direct interactions with ETs.
In this article I am going to focus on this social process in relation to preparation
for contact.
Those Who Believe vs. Those Who Don�t
A 2015 Newsweek poll found that 54% of Americans believe in ET existence and approximately
30% of those believe that we have had contact with ETs, which has been covered up by our
government(s).
A 2012 survey by National Geographic found that 77% of Americans believe that ETs have
been visiting Earth.
The key word in these polls is �belief.� Whether the belief in ET existence, or communication
is true is not a prerequisite for the belief itself.
For example, an individual with no ET contact who believes that ETs exist and have contacted
humans can share the same belief with an individual who is an abductee or a contactee.
The former individual has a priori, non-empirical knowledge, which is independent of their experience
while the latter has a posteriori knowledge that is acquired by experience.
To prepare for contact, whether as a collective or as an individual, those who don�t believe
ETs exist must participate in the process of changing their belief system through attaining
a priori or a posteriori knowledge base.
The belief in the existence of ETs is the foundation upon which an individual or a group
prepares for contact.
Our government(s) make this process more challenging by refusing to officially disclose existence
of ETs and by persecuting whistleblowers like Phil Schneider.
However, due to social media connectivity across the globe and ease of travelling, sharing
of ET-related information and knowledge is becoming increasingly difficult to control.
It appears though that partial government-controlled disclosure is underway either because of government�s
inability to control the social process and spread of information or because of the secret
government-ET interactions where our government(s) feel pressured to start the disclosure process
On the other hand, what must the individuals with either a priori or a posteriori knowledge
base prepare for?
One word comes to mind�
Acceptance.
Psychological Reactions to Life-Changing Information
Elisabeth K�bler-Ross was a Swiss-American psychiatrist who was one of the early scientists
to study near-death experiences.
In her book On Death and Dying, she discussed the five stages of coping with grief as related
to death and dying.
The five stages are abbreviated as DABDA and stand for:
Denial Anger
Bargaining Depression
Acceptance
Since 1969, when her book was published, these five stages have been accepted as the best
description of the psychological responses individuals experience when faced with any
life-changing situations.
These stages are reactions to events and are unique to each person who is experiencing
them.
The most important thing to keep in mind is that not everyone who experiences a life-changing
event feels all five of the responses in their linear progression.
I believe that the knowledge and understanding of these qualitative descriptors of human
emotional states can be used to prepare individuals and groups for indirect and direct conscious
contact with ET or inner-earth races.
The two stages that I will focus on in this article are Denial and Acceptance with brief
description of anger, bargaining, and depression as they relate to realization and knowledge
of the ET presence among us and the ET interaction with humans.
Denial
When an individual experiences a traumatic event (i.e. car accident, alien abduction)
not remembering what happened is a common occurrence because the brain shifts its focus
from making memories to escaping danger.
It enters the survival mode or the basic fight-or-flight response.
The same happens on an emotional level when an individual is faced with life-changing
information (i.e. their religion is a cult, ETs are real).
He or she enters the denial stage, which can last from a brief moment to a lifetime.
During the fight-or-flight response, excessive production of noradrenaline destroys the brain�s
ability to store memories.
Adrenaline rush facilitates quick reflexes and extra physical strength focusing the individual
only on knowledge beneficial to survival.
Immediately after the inciting event, the individual�s first thought is rooted in
disbelief and denial (i.e.
Did I really experience this?
This is not real.
This did not happen.)
Humans have evolved or are made not to see reality as it is.
Instead, we perceive reality with our senses.
Our behavior in response to any reality is directed toward our survival (physical, mental,
and emotional) and not necessarily the truth.
In addition, based on our individual knowledge base, we can mentally and emotionally process
only what we know.
Our ability to resort to denial when faced with something we cannot mentally or emotionally
process is the greatest hindrance to our spiritual evolution as well as to conscious interaction
with ETs.
Our ignorance (intentional and un-intentional) of our perceptions outside the realm of five
senses compound the problem of processing the information that seems unreal or out of
the realm of our current reality.
I believe this is the reason as Carl Jung suggested why majority of ET contact experiences
occur in Delta brain wave range while the person is in deep sleep and why ETs appear
to abduct or contact individuals while they are in Theta/Delta brain wave ranges.
Interaction with ETs while in Theta/Delta brain wave range removes an individual�s
ability to fight-or-flight, reducing the hormone-induced physical stress response.
It also brings to focus reality that was not perceived with our five senses.
As the interaction takes place within our subconscious or even in an unconscious state,
the experience is reduced to a dream-like quality and memories which have to be processed
on an emotional level.
The more we start paying attention to our senses beyond the physical five senses, our
dreams and emotional states, the more we become prepared for this contact to occur.
At the same time, it becomes easier for contact to take place and be remembered.
The sooner we stop denying our experiences, we can establish conscious contact in the
Alpha/Beta brain wave range.
Author and contactee Lyssa Royal suggests that ETs prefer human-ET interaction to take
place in the Theta/Delta brain wave range because it is the equivalent of the ET waking
state.
Although this is highly possible, I believe that human-ET interaction in Theta/Delta range
are related to neutralizing our responses and making them more predictable.
Our unpredictable physical responses could present a safety hazard to the ETs and ourselves
during the interaction.
However, as someone who is a sleep walker, I can attest to being in Delta brain wave
range, being physically active around our home, and fully remembering what I was doing
while sleep walking.
As I tell my husband, what happens in Theta/Delta brain wave range, stays in Theta/Delta brain
wave range.
Dreams are easier to deal with and harder to deny than the Alpha/Beta waking conscious
reality of an ET contact unless an individual is predictable to himself and the ETs in his
physical and emotional responses for a face-to-face, consciously aware interaction.
I also believe that majority of us are in telepathic communication with ETs but again,
we are not necessarily consciously aware of it or simply deny that it is the case.
Based on a personal experience, I don�t believe that an individual must be in a trance
or a dream-like state for this interaction to take place.
I have also had the experience of attempting telepathy while in a dream state.
It is possible that telepathy is independent of the brain activity and rather depends on
the person�s energetic state.
Anger, Bargaining & Depression
As an individual accepts the reality of ET presence or realizes that they are an abductee
or a contactee, they may start to ask, �Why me and Why now?� Realization that his reality
has been turned upside down, that instead of being on top of the world he is a bottom-feeder,
or that he is not as intelligent as he initially thought, can bring about anger and frustration
which is often directed out at world and at random.
When anger does not bring about inner peace, he may turn on to bargaining especially with
their God or the ETs themselves.
I believe the bargaining stage maybe an emotional reaction which could be easily exploited by
the ETs with a negative agenda.
When it comes to death and dying, individuals who enter this stage learn quickly that it
does not work and inevitably enter the depression stage.
During the depression stage, individuals may experience reactive and/or preparatory depression.
Reactive depression occurs as a reaction to current and past losses.
For example, if a woman realizes that she provided her womb and genetic material to
an alien-hybrid program, she may feel a sense of loss with each pregnancy.
Preparatory depression occurs when an individual feels a deep sense of future loss.
For example, a wealthy oil executive realizes that with the announcement of ET technologies,
he will suffer a major financial loss.
The two whistleblowers/contactees who come to mind to best illustrate their coping mechanisms
when faced with ET presence are Charles Hall and Clifford Stone.
In the simplest of terms, Mr. Hall is left brained and Mr. Stone right brained.
We all have an inherent tendency toward a particular way of assimilating and processing
information.
Right brained individuals focus on the visual and process information in an intuitive way,
absorbing the whole picture then the details in an intuitive fashion, using pictures rather
than words.
The left brain is verbal, processing information in an analytical, linear way, observing first
the details and then formulating the whole picture.
While Mr. Stone experienced anger, bargaining and depression during his preparation for
contact and while actively participating in contact with various ET races, Mr. Hall skipped
right over them while staying in denial stage until he had accumulated enough evidence for
himself to move right into the acceptance stage.
I suspect that this is exactly how the public will react when faced with the information
that ETs are real and have been in secret contact with our government(s) making treaties
which have been withheld from public knowledge.
Depending on an individual�s personality and inherent left or right brain predisposition
to analyze information, some will not stay in these stages for long or may skip them
all together while others may take their time to move to the acceptance stage.
I believe that our government(s) are most concerned with the anger stage and will utilize
every possible tool at their disposal to control individuals and masses to minimize harm as
a result of anger directed toward government, ETs themselves and even individual whistleblowers
who have had contact or have been abducted by ETs.
I think it is extremely important to educate abductees and contactees who are trying to
recollect their experiences or make sense of their reality on these stages of psychological
reactions because, in effect, they are grieving.
A part of them dies when they realize they have had these incredible experiences no matter
whether they were positive or negative, and, a new individual is born � one with a greater
sense of reality.
Acceptance
As I explained earlier, humans are governed by biological factors and individual-specific
perception when faced with life-changing events.
However, how we respond to these events not only depends on whether we are right or left
brained but also on our two basic primary emotions, love and fear.
As K�bler-Ross says: �These two emotions cannot co-exist � they are opposites.
From love comes happiness, contentment, peace, and joy.
From fear comes anger, hate, anxiety and guilt.
�
Acceptance is rooted in love � love of something greater than self.
It is giving up ego-based control of people and situations that cannot be controlled.
With acceptance of new belief systems, new knowledge, situations, or previously suppressed
experiences, an individual must do a fair amount of forgiveness to self and others.
The acceptance stage is marked by peaceful resolution and quiet expectation of inevitable
future to come.
Time spent in acceptance is spent in inward contemplation and letting go of all negative
emotions.
I love Eckhart Tolle�s definition of acceptance as a �this is it� response to anything
occurring in any moment of life.
When a person stops struggling to resist whatever they are facing, they become psychologically
stronger because of the peace and serenity that overtakes their emotional and physical
responses.
When we as individuals and a society at large reach the acceptance stage, we will be ready
for contact.
-------------------------------------------
Innovation in the US Patent System [Fourth Branch] - Duration: 3:15.
Over the last few decades, the Patent and Trademark Office
has dramatically increased the number of patents it has issued.
At the same time, patent litigation has increased dramatically.
Alex Blumberg of our Planet Money team and NPR's Laura Sydell have this report on
a patent system that's been turned on its head.
When you talk about the patent system among techies in Silicon Valley, there's usually an audible groan.
If I say patent system what do you say?
I think it's just a way for lawyers to make money.
Josh Malone, inventor of Bunch O Balloons — a device that allows you to fill one hundred
water balloons in a minute — had some trouble enforcing a patent for his invention.
Josh invented the product and ran a very successful Kickstarter campaign in 2014.
It was very easy to copy and it was quickly copied by a company named Telebrands,
who started immediately selling a copycat product and,
within the first year of them selling the copycat product they made 40 million dollars,
just off of their own infringing product.
Even though the Patent Office gave Josh a patent for the invention,
he found himself having to defend the patent again and again in the PTAB — a court within the Patent Office.
Josh Malone actually has six issued patents that I'm aware of and they all relate to the Bunch O Balloons,
and Telebrands has filed eight petitions for what's called post-grant review at the PTAB.
If your product's worth tens of millions of dollars, you have to have the resources to fight it
because the patent's just not straightforward to enforce.
Josh ended up in the middle of a broader public debate about what patents should be granted
and how those patents are to be enforced.
Innovators like Josh need patents.
They need them in the way that everyone sees every week on the show Shark Tank —
where the venture capitalist asks the inventor, the very first question: "Do you have a patent?"
And sometimes they say, "No." And the response is, "Are you insane?
You just went on national television and gave away your idea.
There's no way we're going to invest now in you thousands if not millions of dollars."
There are huge problems when patents get issued by mistake because it prevents the entire public
from exercising their knowledge over the invention or using their knowledge over the invention.
So, this is a big debate that's currently going on in patent law, in patent economics, and patent policy,
of how do we tailor property rights in patents that actually do promote innovation?
70 percent of my revenue is going to litigation.
Why has Josh encountered so many problems with enforcing a patent for Bunch O Balloons
and how has that affected his work?
-------------------------------------------
ICO Regulation Around the World: United States - Duration: 2:23.
In the U.S., in general, securities offered must be registered with the SEC
unless an exemption applies, for instance if offered to accredited investors.
But how to determine if a token is a security? A token can be an investment,
and according to the Securities Act, an investment contract is a security. The U.S.
Supreme Court established a test called the Howey test to determine whether an
arrangement involves an investment contract.
It must be an investment of money in a common enterprise with the expectation
of profits predominantly from the efforts of others. What else do we have?
We have several statements of SEC chairman Jay Clayton. He stated for
instance that tokens and offerings that feature and market potential profits
contain the hallmarks of a security under U.S. law - which to date, ICOs
largely have been. With that being said, it's possible that an operational
utility token which for instance confers a right to access or license a system, or
use a system or its outputs does not qualify as a security. However, a utility
token presale will most likely qualify as a security because these investments
are usually pursued with the expectation of profits. So this is where the Simple
Agreements for Future Tokens called SAFTs come in. These agreements for
future tokens are offered to accredited investors. Telegram just recently raised
1.7 billion with these agreements. In order to comply with securities laws,
they filed a D form. That's a notice for an offering exempted from registration
requirements. To conclude, in the U.S. today, token offerings usually trigger
registration requirements unless the ICO is structured so that an
exemption applies.
No comments:
Post a Comment