USA news on Youtube Jan 27 2018

Enjoy!

For more infomation >> Alm fighting Berkut and Fernand, With a Twist.. - Duration: 1:46.

-------------------------------------------

Obama's Pedophile Secret OUT After Department Of Defense Releases Startling Memo To Public - Duration: 4:43.

Obama's Pedophile Secret OUT After Department Of Defense Releases Startling Memo To Public

For the past eight years thanks to Obama, America's enemies were able to operate right

underneath our noses.

Not only were known terrorists given positions within Homeland Security, but Obama's backroom

deal with terrorists put Iran on a path to nukes and allowed the Taliban to develop their

multi-billion dollar heroin drug enterprise to fund terrorism against the West.

While we were all aware of Obama's terrorist and thug-pandering antics, now we're learning

of a nasty deal he worked for known pedophiles at the White House proving once again this

man's nasty malice for our country and for our people.

We'd hope that our elected officials would have the bests interests in mind of the people

they lead, but Obama proved over and over that was not his mission.

Now we're learning that he handed out security clearances to known pedophiles in another

Obama scandal that's making headlines this morning, after the startling contents of a

new Department Of Defense report was just released.

Conservative Tribune reports:

A new Department of Defense report indicates that numerous security clearances — many

issued during the Obama administration — were given to people who you wouldn't trust to

watch your daughter, let alone the country's secrets.

"165 defense contractors had their initial security clearances revoked last year after

further investigation linked the recipients to problematic or illicit activity," stated

NBC News, which reviewed the DOD report.

The reasons for those revocations included "questionable financial transactions, influence

by foreign governments and even felonies like pedophilia."

Yes, it looks like the oh-so-competent Obama administration handed out high level security

clearances to people who had committed appalling crimes… and it wasn't fixed until recently.

"In one example, a person given interim secret clearance in 2015 was discovered in

2017 to have been found guilty of raping a child prior to applying for the clearance,"

NBC News reported.

How does a conviction for child rape go unnoticed by a federal agency during a background check?

It seems almost inconceivable that even a rudimentary criminal history review would

fail to turn this up, which raises serious questions about how many of these clearances

were simply rubber-stamped by bureaucrats.

The good news, if you can call it that, is that the percentage of revoked clearances

is relatively small.

However, the number of people who were given clearances they shouldn't have received

is still measured in the hundreds.

"The report captured data from 200,000 applications for secret or top secret clearance by defense

contractors over the past three years, many of which were not fully adjudicated until

2017," NBC explained.

"It found that 486 applicants had their clearances denied or revoked.

Of those applicants, 165 had slipped through the initial round of vetting and been allowed

access to sensitive information."

The Obama administration, of course, has been accused of not taking security seriously during

several well known scandals.

This is absolutely outrageous but not surprising considering that Obama constantly used his

power as president to protect thugs and people who hated our country.

Let's not forget this is the same clown who provided deadly weapons to Mexican drug

cartels, and then "lost track" of the weapons.

Those guns as we know were then used to kill American citizens.

Of course there's also Benghazi, where Obama let our men die all for the sake of the optics

with his reelection and the need to push the narrative that "Al Queda was on the run."

And let's not forget about the current massive Uranium One Scandal where Obama is at the

center of this historic scandal where he bent guidelines and fast-tracked the transfer of

key uranium supplies to Russia.

This is your legacy, Obama.

Throwing America under the bus and emboldening our enemies.

But it's truly startling that people who are known child rapists would be given security

clearances with zero regard for the horrific crimes they're committing against America's

children.

"There was a disturbing trend within the 44th president's administration and it was

this: National security seemed to constantly take second place to political gamesmanship

and questionable schemes," Conservative Tribune concluded.

"There may be a new occupant in the White House, but many remnants of the Obama era

still remain.

The safety of the country should come before politics, and the American people deserve

answers to this alarming report about clearances."

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

For more infomation >> Obama's Pedophile Secret OUT After Department Of Defense Releases Startling Memo To Public - Duration: 4:43.

-------------------------------------------

Dennis Prager: "I Was Wrong. Donald Trump Is a 'Great President' |MK Today - Duration: 4:02.

Dennis Prager: "I Was Wrong.

Donald Trump Is a 'Great President'.

"My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong," said Dennis Prager, describing Donald Trump

as a "great president" whose political successes are connected to a disregard for

the left-wing and partisan Democrat news media narratives.

Prager's comments came during Thursday's episode of his eponymous radio show.

While Prager has said that Trump was his last choice during the Republican primaries, he

supported him vigorously in the general election against Hillary Clinton.

"The only way to govern [while advancing] the principles of conservatism," said Prager,

was to disregard left-wing and partisan Democrat agitation pushed across the news media landscape.

Prager said:

I was wrong.

My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong, in retrospect.

I was wrong.

I had friends who supported him, and I didn't understand them.

I said, "Are you not aware of what he said about John McCain?

Isn't that enough to disqualify the guy?"

They perceived in him what I did not perceive in him, that these over-the-top statements

– as objectionable as the statements themselves may be, and none of them defended the statements

– nevertheless, what they perceived was accurate: a man who doesn't give a damn

about what the press says about him.

That is the only way to govern.

It is the only way to advance the principles of conservatism in the United States is to

not give a damn.

"[Donald Trump] is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would've made," said

Prager, describing Romney as "tepid" and concerned with appealing to news media outlets

such as The New York Times.

A president's actions are a more important metric of presidential success than a president's

demeanor, said Prager:

Would I like Donald Trump to have Mitt Romney's temperament, or for that matter Barack Obama's

temperament?

Yeah.

So what?

I would like a whole host of things.

People are packages.

What a president does is more important to me than a president's demeanor.

He is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would've made.

Mitt Romney would've awakened every day to read The New York Timeseditorial page to

see how he's covered.

Mitt Romney gave us Romneycare in Massachusetts.

I campaigned for Mitt Romney, he would've been a better president [than Barack Obama].

Any Republican is better than any Democrat, that's just the way it is.

Having said that, Romney would've been a tepid president.

Nothing comparably conservative compared to Donald Trump.

Concerns with a president's demeanor should be secondary to broader analyses of a president's

impact, said Prager.

"He has turned out to be a great president with big communication flaws, in the way he

tweets and some of the things he says and his temperament," said Prager.

"My temperament is the opposite.

I love dignity.

I love understatement.

Okay, so be it.

So what?

I'm not sure I'd be as good a president as he.

How do you like that?

That's how good he's been."

In April of 2017, Prager invited ostensibly conservative NeverTrump news media figures

to celebrate Trump's presidency.

"Do conservatives — or non-leftists, for that matter — appreciate just how terrific

Donald Trump has been as president?" he asked.

"And how lucky we are that he won the presidency?"

"What I do know is that they ought to be deeply appreciative of him, and deeply grateful

for luck or providence, and certainly for Trump himself, that he was elected president,"

continued Prager.

"First, it is unlikely that any other Republican would have defeated Hillary Clinton.

Second, he has not only surpassed many of our expectations but also thus far governed

in a manner more consistent with conservative principles than any president since Ronald

Reagan, and arguably Calvin Coolidge."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

For more infomation >> Dennis Prager: "I Was Wrong. Donald Trump Is a 'Great President' |MK Today - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

THE ROLLING STONES - Live in Kansas City (1981) - Bootleg Radio (HD) - Duration: 2:19:41.

Enjoy the music and feel free to Subscribe!

For more infomation >> THE ROLLING STONES - Live in Kansas City (1981) - Bootleg Radio (HD) - Duration: 2:19:41.

-------------------------------------------

Newly Uncovered FBI Texts Prove Russia Investigation Is a SHAM – Mueller Is Finished! - Duration: 6:00.

Newly Uncovered FBI Texts Prove Russia Investigation Is a SHAM – Mueller Is Finished!

We've known that FBI agent Peter Strzok was demoted from Robert Mueller's investigation

into alleged Trump-Russia ties for making anti-Trump texts, but it's likely that was

just for cover in the event that Strzok's bias would ever be made public.

After all, is there anyone on Mueller's team that isn't anti-Trump?

All Strzok did "wrong" was leave a paper trail proving his bias.

And we know that there was an attempt to conceal that paper trail, as five months-worth of

text messages between Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page mysteriously "disappeared."

I don't need to tell you that the FBI isn't so careless with information that it loses…..

ever.

Even more curiously, the five month period where the "missing" texts end is May 17,

2017…. the exact day that Mueller's investigation began.

Are we really supposed to believe that's a coincidence?

In the immortal words of John Stossel: Give me a break!

While it's unlikely that thousands of texts were accidentally lost, one sent on May 19th

stands out.

According to BizPacReview,

Strzok admitted hat there's no real case for collusion between Russia and Trump.

"There's no big there there," he'd said as he was debating joining Muller's

team.

Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental

Affairs Committee, told WISN-Milwaukee radio host Jay Weber that the text is "jaw-dropping."

"In other words, Peter Strzok, who was the FBI deputy assistant director of the counterintelligence

division, the man who had a plan to do something because he just couldn't abide Donald Trump

being president, is saying that his gut sense is that there's no big there there when

it comes to the Mueller special counsel investigation," Johnson continued.

As reported by the Daily Caller's Chuck Ross, the text was part of 400 pages of texts

between Pete Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page, who was working as an FBI lawyer.

The phrase "there's no big there there" is an allusion to a famous adage by writer

Gertrude Stein "there's no there there," which means essentially that there's no

story, even if proponents act as if there is one.

Read some of the texts and you'll feel like you're watching and episode of House of

Cards.

In some texts following the election, there was discussion of a "secret society" that

had attempted to prevent Trump's victory.

Appearing on Fox News, Reps. John Ratcliffe and Trey Gowdy explained that "We learned

today about information that after — in the immediate aftermath of [Trump's] election

that there may have been a secret society of folks within the Department of Justice

and the FBI to include Page and Strzok that would be working against

him."

This

story just keeps getting weirder and weirder.

These revelations, combined with the newly uncovered memo that allegedly contains shocking

evidence of FISA court abuse, don't look good for those trying to allege that it was

the Russians who helped Trump win.

If anyone was influencing the election, our own government played a pretty large role,

too – and it wasn't in support of Trump.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe