So Halloween is coming up and we have one question: are sadistic strangers actually
poisoning kids' candy?
So lots of kids who trick or treat can remember bringing home pillowcases and plastic pumpkins
full of candy every October 31st.
And if you were like me, you had to fork those bags over to an adult for individual inspection
to make sure they weren't full of razors, needles, poison, and laxatives wrapped to
look like Tootsie Rolls...Which is honestly the craziest version of this story that I
heard growing up….But does all of this candy chaos come from somewhere or is it just a
ghost story?
Well I decided to do a little digging into the "killer candy" urban legend and the
answer is a resounding!...not really?
Kind of?
Maybe?
Because even though we've been hearing this myth for decades, there isn't a whole lot
of proof that any kids have actually been poisoned and killed by strangers.
In fact, it seems that most confirmed instances of candy tampering cropped up after the urban
legend became legendary.
But before we get deeper into candy than Charlie in Willy Wonka's factory we have to ask
ourselves: Why do kids trick or treat and get candy in the first place?
So tricking or treating on Halloween already has a spotty history as a holiday.
Turns out that Halloween has its roots in the Celtic Festival of Samhain (Saw-Win).
Celebrated on October 31st, some would gather to pay homage to the dead, or dress in costumes
to fool the demons who returned to earth.
In the ninth century when Christianity spread through Celtic regions, they converted November
2nd into All Souls' Day because they were trying to convert pagan holidays into Christian
celebrations.
Adults and eventually children would go around "souling" or asking for treats in exchange
for praying for the souls of strangers' deceased relatives.
Another version of this tradition is Guy Fawkes Day aka Bonfire Night, where British children
would walk around singing and begging for pennies to commemorate the foiling of the
"Gunpowder Plot" of 1605.
(Although most of us just know the Guy Fawkes Mask in V for Vendetta.)
The US got in on the act in the mid-19th century, and by the early 20th century kids begging
for candy caught on...along with a certain amount of pranks and vandalism.
But ask for candy door to door is a fairly recent custom in the US popularized in part
by Irish immigrants.
The phrase "Trick or treating" as we know it started to emerge in the 1930s and 1940s.
Today, Americans spend an estimated $2 billion on candy a year for just for Halloween! and
the average pumpkin bucket carries 250 pieces of candy, which is 9,000 calories and 3 pounds
of sugar.
So halloween is now a huge industry.
Ok so we've established a loose history of why every year we fork over tons of candy
to cute kids dressed like Spiderman and Elsa from Frozen, but that brings us to our next
question: when did we start hearing about strangers handing out candy that kills?
Well it seems like the answer here is part truth, and part hysteria and part groupthink.
And our contentious relationship to tainted treats stretches back to the late 19th century.
According to Professor Samira Kawash, there were reports as early as 1899 and the early
20th century that kids were dropping dead from poisoned candy, although all of these
cases turned out to be related to meningitis and not toxic treats.
So have strangers ever handed out tainted candy to unsuspecting kids?
Short answer is yes.
On Halloween 1959 a California dentist named Dr. William V. Shyne passed out approximately
450 candy covered laxatives to the children in his neighborhood.
30 of those kids got seriously sick and he was charged with "outrage of public decency"
among other crimes . . .like being the worst.
According to Professor Joel Best at the University of Delaware, there's been about 80 cases
of sharp objects found in kids' halloween candy.
But even though there have been isolated instances of pins and needles found in candy bars, they
were usually placed there by family members trying to play a prank, and haven't proven
fatal.
Because nothing says "gotcha" like an open blade in your kids' Snickers bar.
Ok so a deranged dentist and some sensational media coverage helped this myth take hold.
But has a child ever been Killed by poisoned halloween candy?
The answer to that is also a yes….but it wasn't by random strangers.
In 1970 a little boy's family reported he had died after ingesting tainted candy at
his home in Michigan.
Police later discovered that the boy had actually died from accidentally ingesting his uncle's
heroin supply and his family tried to cover it up by sprinkling the drugs on his halloween
candy.
Then in 1974 Ronald Clarke O'Bryan poisoned his 8-year-old son with a cyanide laced pixie
stick.
O'Bryan had taken a life insurance policy out on his two children in order to wipe out
his debts so he gave the poisoned candy to his son, daughter, and several neighborhood
children to make it look like a random act.
His son died, but his daughter and the other children never opened the candy, opting for
other treats instead.
O'Bryan was executed in Texas in 1984.
So it seems that while kids have been given candy with poison, needles, and razors, it's
actually family members and not strangers that pose the greatest risk in terms of candy
related fatalities.
Well that leaves us with our final question: if the evidence doesn't support the urban
legend, then why do tall tales of poisoned candy persist?
Because it's starting to seem like the main reason for all the candy caution was giving
my father an excuse to pick out all the fun sized Whoppers from my Halloween haul (and
seriously: who likes Whoppers???)
The 80s saw a resurgence of tainted candy fears when stories and warnings were targeted
at parents to keep their kids safe from candy criminals.
James Barron ran a 1982 article in the New York Times urging anxious parents to give
their kids' candy the once over before letting them rot their teeth and a 1983 piece by advice
columnist "Dear Abby" urged the same.
And this wasn't just a media frenzy.
This urban legend was the perfect storm of fiction, fact, and spooky sensationalism.
There's just enough accuracy to make the story credible as a widespread issue.
Plus the holiday is all about pulling pranks and dressing up in disguises, which makes
the idea of dangerous strangers more believable.
But overall it seems like you're more likely to get a neighbor who hands out toothbrushes
than toxins.
So how does it all add up?
Well it seems like Halloween trick or treat had pagan roots that eventually evolved into
kids going door to door around the US asking for food.
And even though there are scattered instances of candy that's been tampered with, there
isn't evidence to support the claim that there are hoards of strangers handing out
poison to kids.
In fact, the only fatalities from halloween candy came from family members, not strangers
on the street.
So even though both sides of this story exist to a certain extent, the actual meeting of
"stranger danger" and "candy that kills" isn't really a thing and it's definitely
not a rampant evil in our midst.
But on the plus side, it's still advisable for parents to check kids' candy and throw
away unwrapped stuff for sanitary reasons.
Because some neighbors still throw handfuls of dirty pennies into Halloween bags.
And they're the real villains here.
So what do you think?
Have any more evidence to add on killer candy?
Drop your best spooky urban legends down in the comments, let's have some fun debunking
them, and see you next week!
Hi everyone!
Before we get to your questions, just want to let you know if you like the Origin of
Everything make sure to follow to our Facebook page, subscribe on Youtube and like us on
Instagram!
All of the links are in the video description.
We post new episodes every Tuesday as well as interesting history related content throughout
the week.
Plus if you reach out I'm able to reply to your questions directly between episodes.
Alright, Let's see what you had to say about the history of why there is a North and South
Korea!
So a lot of viewers from last week want to know more about China's involvement in the
Korean War as an ally of North Korea.
This is a great question.
You are correct in asserting that China did become an ally of North Korean forces, largely
because both nations supported communism.
The US and other nations were looking to uphold a UN proclamation that, in name, looked to
reunite the two sections of Korea and spread capitalist development.
I'll drop a link about President Truman's decision to send troops to North Korea in
the description.
Rod Prince on Facebook wonders about how much of the conflict influenced the later economic
outcomes of North Korea vs. South Korea.
Another great question!
From my research, a lot of the language surrounding the occupation of Korea from the 19th through
20th centuries has been couched in economic development, although the outcomes of each
nation have varied.
But I'm also going to pitch this one out to the audience.
Does anyone have more to offer on the economic history of Korea, either following our timeline
or a different one?
Be sure to send me a comment on the PBS Origin of Everything Facebook page (the link is in
the description) a sure to post your thoughts!
Thanks and see you next week!
No comments:
Post a Comment