Monday, October 29, 2018

USA news on Youtube Oct 29 2018

Hello and welcome to Declassified,

I'm your host Gina Shakespeare.

Today on the show, Chinese subversion of the United States is deep and far reaching.

Please feel free to subscribe to Declassified,

like and hit the notifications button,

this story is by senior investigative reporter from the Epoch Times, Joshua Phillip.

For decades, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been subverting the United States by

infiltrating, undermining, and influencing its key institutions.

This topic is only recently coming to the surface.

Vice President Mike Pence said on Oct. 4,

"Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach to advance its influence

and benefit its interests."

He added that the CCP is working to influence U.S. elections and domestic policies,

and "today, the Chinese Communist Party is rewarding or coercing American businesses,

movie studios, universities, think tanks, scholars, journalists,

and local, state, and federal officials."

But if we take a look at some of the examples of the problem,

it become much more real, starting with censorship and theft in U.S. business.

With the subversion of businesses,

the CCP is forcing U.S. companies to

abide by its domestic censorship programs.

On April 25, the CCP's Chinese Civil Aviation Administration

sent a letter to 36 foreign air carriers demanding they change the descriptions of "Taiwan,"

"Hong Kong," and "Macao" to follow CCP propaganda.

The White House responded to this demand on May 5,

with the press secretary saying,

"This is Orwellian nonsense,

and part of a growing trend by the Chinese Communist Party

to impose its political views on American citizens and private companies."

Many companies also agree to follow CCP censorship.

Google and Facebook are examples of this,

since even though they're blocked in China,

they have both agreed at times to take down content for the CCP.

There has also been plenty of chatter about Chinese economic theft.

But did you know that some U.S. companies

are forced to knowingly hand over intellectual property to access the Chinese market?

A 2017 U.S. government survey of the integrated chip industry

found that 25 companies were forced to form joint ventures with Chinese companies,

and transfer their technology.

The United States has lost close to $1.2 trillion from intellectual-property theft,

mainly from the CCP, over the last three years, according to The Hill.

That number doesn't even include patent infringement.

The CCP has even gone to the source with this type of theft,

and according to former senior U.S. Naval intelligence officer John Jordan,

China's Ministry of State Security has agents in Silicon Valley assigned for this purpose.

There is also spying on customers, and this goes to the chip level of devices.

Bloomberg recently claimed the CCP was spying at the chip level

on Amazon and Apple devices.

Examples of the CCP spying by through supply-chain threats goes back much farther, however,

and includes chips, firmware, infected apps, data-sharing programs, and other vulnerabilities.

The Epoch Times has reported on this since at least 2010.

Next step, subversion of films and entertainment

As part of its focus on "culture warfare,"

the CCP has also subverted Hollywood and the U.S. entertainment industry.

The U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission

reported in October 2015 that "China views film as a component of social control,"

and that when regulating film,

"the CCP's concerns are positioned above all other interests."

Films are screened by the CCP's State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film, and Television,

which decides whether they can be shown in China,

and filmmakers are actively catering to the administration's policies.

Some filmmakers are agreeing to co-produce films with the administration,

which gives them a stronger chance of entering China,

but also ensures the films fall under the CCP's laws on films and censorship.

CCP laws on films include requirements, among many,

that they need to have at least one scene shot in China,

cast at least one Chinese actor,

and illustrate "positive Chinese elements."

Anything that shows the CCP's human-rights abuses,

poverty, totalitarian social monitoring,

or other serious issues aren't allowed to be shown.

Under CCP censorship law,

Hollywood also can't show the United States or U.S. military in a positive light.

This is serious when you consider

how much of the U.S. film industry either is directly owned by Chinese companies,

such as through the Dalian Wanda Group,

or has agreed to work with the CCP.

Next step, influence of US universities and education

Through financing, research partnerships, and other joint programs,

the CCP has also managed to subvert American universities.

Foreign Policy reported in May,

"On campuses across the United States,

funding gaps are leaving departments with little choice

but to turn to those groups with the deepest pockets—

and China is keen to offer money,

especially through its global network of Confucius Institutes."

This money comes with a price, however,

since the CCP takes its Faustian bargain as an opening

for censorship and influence.

Foreign Policy, for instance,

noted that the co-director of Savannah State University's Confucius Institute

has directly engaged in censoring information on Taiwan.

Then there are the Chinese Student and Scholar Associations (CSSA),

which are often openly financed and directed by Chinese consulates.

The CSSA pressure Chinese students and block events in American universities,

based on CCP censorship programs.

In one case at the University of California– San Diego in 2017,

the local CSSA tried to block the Dalai Lama from speaking at commencement.

The Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars

released a report documenting cases of Chinese embassy officials

trying to infringe on U.S. academic freedoms.

It states, "Over the past two decades,

PRC diplomats stationed in the United States

have infringed on the academic freedom

of American university faculty, students, administrators, and staff."

The CCP has done this by "complaining to universities about invited speakers and events;

pressuring and/or offering inducements to faculty

whose work involves content deemed sensitive by the PRC authorities"

and other methods, the report says.

Sometimes, the CCP's pressure includes threats and intimidation of professors.

Subverting academia and policy

At think tanks,

which have a role in shaping government policy,

the CCP has made significant efforts to push its interests either through funding,

through partnerships, or by influencing the academics involved.

Bill Gertz at The Washington Free Beacon reported on Aug. 24

that one of the CCP's main overt spy agencies, the United Front Department,

is actively involved in operations to influence think tanks in Washington.

He cites a congressional commission report,

stating the CCP "employs tens of thousands of operatives" to promote its policies,

and includes "paying several Washington think tanks,

with the goal of influencing their actions

and adopting positions that support Beijing's policies."

The report says the CCP

"has sought to influence academic discourse on China

and, in certain instances, has infringed upon—

and potentially criminally violated—

rights to freedoms of speech and association

that are guaranteed to Americans and those protected by U.S. laws."

As an example, Gertz notes that Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

receives funding from Tung Chee-hwa,

a vice chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference,

which directs the United Front Department.

"The funding for Johns Hopkins came from Tung's non-profit group in Hong Kong...

which is a registered Chinese agent," he writes.

Gertz notes China ties exist with Brookings Institution,

Atlantic Council, Center for American Progress,

EastWest Institute, Carter Center,

and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

When it comes to the academics themselves,

the CCP actively pressures them to self-censor.

Academics who break CCP censorship policy,

including on the regime's serious human-rights violations,

risk being blacklisted from China.

Major news outlets are even actively promoting CCP propaganda,

disguised as paid inserts meant to resemble legitimate news content

from the CCP's China Daily state-run news outlet.

The paid inserts have in the past defended

the CCP's often brutal human-rights violations

and excused its crackdowns on religious liberty.

Sometimes, the paid inserts correspond with broader pushes.

This has included paid inserts in The New York Times and other outlets,

alongside paid broadcasts from CCP state-run media in Times Square

to defend the CCP's military push into the South China Sea.

Part of this was run through the Xinhua news agency,

which the Trump administration in September ordered to register as a foreign agent.

Let that sink in for a moment:

Foreign agents interested in shaping U.S. public opinion

are paying major news outlets to republish propaganda.

This doesn't just tie to CCP government policy.

It also ties to its military doctrine,

under its "Three Warfares" system

of psychological warfare, legal warfare, and media warfare.

The goal of Three Warfares is to alter how people interpret information,

create legal blockades to defend CCP actions,

and control people's exposure to information through its influence on media.

"The 'Three Warfares' were injected into a section of guidelines

that has been consistent since at least the 1963 revision,

which directs the Political Work Department,"

according to the website War on the Rocks.

The Diplomat reported that under the Three Warfares doctrine,

the CCP creates "cognitive maps" that then "guide the direction

and character of tailored influence operations,

including conversion, exploitation, or subversion."

In conjunction, the CCP's propaganda department

"broadcasts sustained internal and external strategic perception management campaigns

through mass media and cyberspace channels

to promote specific themes favorable for China's image abroad."

And for the final segment today,

foreign agents and political control

In addition to all these systems to control information,

silence academics, influence policy, censor news outlets,

and pressure students,

the CCP also has programs to more directly influence U.S. political circles.

Among the groups behind the CCP's subversion of elite circles is the Committee of 100.

Epoch Times columnist Trevor Loudon said the group

"regularly sends delegations of American journalists to China and facilitates meetings

with high-level government and business leaders."

Chinese consulates also engage in direct pressure on U.S. politicians,

and The Epoch Times has documented cases in which U.S. representatives have received calls from the CCP,

which attempts to pressure them over their stances on the Chinese regime's human-rights abuses.

Cognoscenti Group reported that

"Chinese political warfare and influence operations

actively target foreign governments, organizations, groups,

and individuals to shape their perceptions and behavior."

"Driven by its political goals,

Chinese influence operations are a centerpiece of the PRC's overall foreign policy

and military strategy," it states.

The Washington Free Beacon reported, "China has enfolded many former U.S. officials as

part of its lobbying efforts and influence operations.

Gertz said China has used coercive measures on Americans to serve its own interests."

Gertz said in the story that the CCP's efforts "have literally changed the direction of

American foreign policy toward China."

The Project 2049 Institute detailed the CCP's political-warfare operations

in an October 2013 report, stating,

"Political warfare is a critical component

of Chinese security strategy and foreign policy."

On the significance of this, it states,

"Political warfare seeks to influence emotions, motives,

objective reasoning, and behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups,

and individuals in a manner favorable to one's own political-military objectives."

That's all the time we have for today,

thank you very much for watching.

If this story was of interest to you

and you would like to find more about how China is subverting America

and other countries,

please visit the China section of the Epoch Times website.

For close to 2 decades,

the Epoch Times has been a leader

in providing truthful and independent news on China.

For more infomation >> Chinese Subversion & Corruption of U.S.A is Deep and Far Reaching - Duration: 15:08.

-------------------------------------------

Former England U20 star Will Addison could make Ireland debut against Italy - Duration: 3:00.

Will Addison has moved a step closer to his Test debut by being named in an unfamiliar 26-man Ireland squad to face Italy

Former England Under-20s star Addison could now well make his senior international bow in the clash at Chicago's Soldier Field on Saturday

Head coach Joe Schmidt has opted to hold back the likes of captain Rory Best and vice-captains Johnny Sexton and Peter O'Mahony, with Argentina, New Zealand and the USA all still to face in Dublin

British and Irish Lions forwards Iain Henderson and Sean O'Brien and full-back Rob Kearney have also been left out of the squad to travel to Chicago, with boss Schmidt keeping a clutch of stellar names fresh for the three Dublin encounters

Leinster playmaker Ross Byrne has also edged closer to his Test bow in making the Chicago squad, with Joey Carbery possibly pencilled in to start at fly-half

Addison left Sale for Ulster in the summer and has since earned rave reviews for a string of fine performances with the Belfast province

Now the 26-year-old - who qualifies for Ireland through his mother - can push for his first Test cap, when Ireland take on Conor O'Shea's Italy in America

Schmidt's decision to keep some senior players fresh for the Dublin encounters also means Ireland will have a new face as captain this weekend

Forwards: F Bealham (Connacht), T Beirne (Munster) J Conan, S Cronin, T Furlong (all Leinster), D Kilcoyne (Munster), J McGrath (Leinster), J Murphy (Ulster), A Porter (Leinster), Q Roux (Connacht), R Ruddock, James Ryan (both Leinster), N Scannell (Munster), D Toner, J van der Flier (both Leinster)

For more infomation >> Former England U20 star Will Addison could make Ireland debut against Italy - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

M Asam Magic Finish | Review & Wear Test - Duration: 11:33.

Hey my little artists! Today I'm trying out the M. Asam Magic Finish makeup. I

couldn't find too much about this company, just what they sell, but I think

it's a German company founded in 1963. It's mostly skincare, but they do

have some of these makeup products. This was 24,75 Euros

directly from the website. You can also get it on Amazon and it's very popular

on QVC. I found it on the American Amazon as well, for 35 dollars and

90 cents. So it comes in this little cardboard box and when you open it...

I already made a dirty, excellent! When you open it, you get a container like

this. It looks quite fancy, I mean, it's completely out of plastic, but still.

What irritates me though, this is the product that you get inside. There's only

one color for all skin tones, so this is the first claim, that it adapts to any

skin tone. I really don't know if this is gonna happen for me, but we'll find out!

Then it has more claims, so it doesn't stop there! It says that it hides redness,

pigmentation and wrinkles. Usually foundation makes texture worse, so I'm

thinking this might also help my acne scarring, as well as my wrinkles. I have a

lot of them, if you see them right here, because I laugh too much, which is not

a bad thing. Anyways, it also hides dark circles, it mattifies and it's supposed

to be a four in one product. So it's a primer, a foundation, a powder and a

concealer in one product. I am very excited to try this out! Let me put it on

one side of the face first, to see if there is a difference between the two.

The texture is is weird. It's like mousse au chocolat, that is a little too hard, but okay.

I don't know how much to take of this. It says you can use like a brush or a

sponge and your finger... okay, this looks so dark. It didn't specify, it it feels most natural

for me to use my fingers with this, so let's see what happens. So far I'm

looking orange on this side. Let's see if that still changes. Oh my God.

Well okay, it feels really nice on the skin. It's very, very smooth. I can tell,

definitely, that it is mattifying and it is concealing some stuff. Hmm, it's looking

lighter now, isn't it? Still looking a little tanned, don't get me wrong, especially

here in my hairline. Let me blend that in a little more. Okay, now it's dyed my hair,

excellent! I mean this side definitely looks better than this side, but it's

also still... it's getting a little lighter? How is it doing that? I don't understand.

It's definitely not like... it's very, very light coverage. I mean you can still see

my keloids here, all these scars are still there, my chin is still kind of red.

I'm excited to see what it does to this little situation right here, but it did

get lighter now. It looks like it's actually my skin tone, just maybe like a

smidge tanned? I will try and see if this is a little

buildable as well, but first let me finish this side. I think I'm taking a

little too much product as well. It's crazy how this is like changing color.

How did it do with my wrinkles? Okay, I still have wrinkles. That is

disappointing. I thought I would be wrinkle free with this. I guess I do have

to get Botox or what do you put on wrinkles? Do you put hyaluronic acid on wrinkles as well?

Oh and by the way, so I only have moisturizer and hyaluronic acid on my

skin right now. I have combination skin, so I get an oily nose and my chin is

kind of oily, my forehead is a little dry and the rest is kind of dry. I have acne

scars, as you see and a lot of pigmentation errors, but you can see all

of that. I'm still glittery! Never doing a glitter eye look again! It feels really

nice. So it feels like I have nothing on my skin and my skin right here is so velvety

smooth. Okay, so it definitely dyes your hair, so be careful with that. Okay, I am

pretty amazed at this. It looks great and it feels great. It is kind of like a BB

cream, only nicer. You know how BB creams sometimes feel very oily

and you're just like, I know this is gonna break me out. This doesn't feel

like that at all. Let me try and build up the coverage a little bit, in the areas

where I need more. They did a pretty decent job of covering up these pimples

as well. I mean, you can still see them. It's obviously not like a high coverage

concealer, but I'm so... I am so amazed. Wow, cat hair in my eye,

excellent! I do feel like I'm a little more tanned though, than I am usually, so it

does darken the skin a little bit. Also, I worry how this works with really deep

skin tones. I would love to try that on someone. Does someone want to be my model?

I'll do the rest of your makeup as well, don't worry, but I would love to see how

that works. So it's kind of buildable as well, as you just saw on my nose there. I

mean, it's doing nothing for the dryness around this... the circle? The pimple.

It really does feel like, I mean, it's not you know, it's not making my pores more

visible, but I don't think it's making them less visible either. My wrinkles are

just same. I mean I'm gonna show you the before and after picture they put on

their website, which I mean, what did they use like except photoshop? That's not gonna

happen, but this does feel nice. So I'm gonna finish the rest of my makeup now.

I'll check in again and then we will see how this wears during the day; and

before I forget, it is 12:00 noon right now, so I will at least wear this till

8:00 p.m. Now I look better don't I? So the blending was actually really nice on

this makeup. I felt like I didn't need powder. It worked out really well. Okay,

that looks a little line-y there. Let me just go over that again, but it honestly,

it blended very, very well. I didn't feel like there was a difference. Usually when...

I barely ever only wear foundation without powder, because just my skin is

too oily for that, but it worked very well. I'm very

impressed so far. I'm just excited to see how this will hold up with my oils and

all of that and if it'll look terrible. Um

it does... I have to say, it does accentuate dry patches though. Like you know, where

my... I don't have any like dry patches just solely on my skin right now, but

where I have pimples. Let me zoom in on my nose real quick. Oh that is very close,

but can you see that on my nose? How it um... how it looks very, very drying? Let me

focus on there. Yeah, and I fear... it looks nice on the rest of my skin, obviously

it's not super full coverage, but I feel like it's probably gonna accentuate dry

flakiness, if you have very dry skin, this is probably not for you.

I mean, it's mattifying, so you're probably not gonna reach for a

mattifying product anyways, but just to let you know. Now I will show you what it

looks like with flash photography and also in natural daylight and then I'll

check in later, to tell you how it's holding up!

Okay, so I'm sitting in front of a window right now. I think it looks nice. I don't

know, I can't really tell in the...in the viewfinder. I guess I'll see when I

edit this video, but it looks really nice. Let me turn around to a more shade,

okay, now you can't see anything, that was pointless.

Let me turn back around, right to the window.

This lighting is great! I wish daylight was more reliable, so I could use it, but

anyways. This is what it looks like in daylight. Okay I just did some rigorous

cleaning and the makeup held up pretty well, I'm a little bit greasy, like it's

rubbing off of my chin a little bit. That's quite normal.

It's kind of completely off of my pimple right here, so I'm thinking that, when I

get oily or a little sweaty, that it doesn't do very well with that and it

kind of breaks up. Let me check the time real quick.

It is 2:52, so it's not been that long. To be honest, it should still really look

perfect, without me doing anything to it. I'm gonna add a little bit more on my

pimple, because I'm going outside now to do grocery shopping, so I do want that to

be a little bit more covered, but I'm gonna leave the rest. I'll check in later.

All right my loves, it is now 8:06 p.m., to be exact, and I've been wearing this

for eight hours. I look pretty greasy, it could be worse

to be honest. Let me zoom you in a little more, so you can really see what's going

on. I think it has just basically rubbed off everywhere. I mean, it's not covering

my pimples at all anymore. I've even, you know, I've gone over this

pimple twice and now it's, it's back being red again, so I think it's just kind of

rubbed off, but it's not broken up in a weird way. It doesn't look very terrible,

you know, it looks a little weird on my nose here, but it looks pretty good,

pretty decent still; and the advantage you have of having only one product that

you're using, so you're not setting it with powder or setting spray or anything

in that... like that. It's very easy to reapply, so I just went ahead..got.. went

ahead and like, put it a little more on there and it blends in perfectly with

the other... the rest of the product, so that is definitely an advantage.

So in conclusion, does this product do what it promises to do? Absolutely not. To

me, this is a BB cream alternative. It is a very simple way of just putting some...

something on your face, that makes you look a little more put together, a little

more covered than if you have nothing on, but it doesn't reduce your wrinkles, it

doesn't cover everything, you'll still have to use a concealer if you have very

dark circles, if you have pimples like me, you might want to use a concealer to

even... to cancel those out as well. You will not achieve that with this product.

I am gonna continue using it though, because as I said, as a BB cream

alternative, I'm really liking it! I like the texture, I like the way it makes my

skin look and I like the way that it doesn't feel as oily and as kind of

comedogenic as a BB cream would, even if it's not... even it's just in my mind, but

the psychological effect to me is there. The other thing I have to say though,

look at my eye makeup. Do not use this solely as an eye primer. It is pretty

much gone. It does not look good, use an eye primer if you're using this. Don't

just assume that this works as well as using a concealer and a setting powder.

So today I learned, don't use this as an eye primer, but yeah in general, happy

with this product, unhappy with the way it's advertised. If they just advertised

it in the way in what it was, I think it would be a lot more honest and I still

think people would buy it; but this is just dishonest. So I'm not sure I can

recommend it, just solely based on that, but you'll have to make that decision

for yourself anyways. I'm just here to give you the facts. Really hope you liked

this video! You can always subscribe, you don't have to though, it really doesn't, you

know, it matters to me a little bit, because I want you to stay with me and

communicate with you, but in the end, do what you want to do and I really hope

I'll see you next video! I make new ones every Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday!

Bye bye!

No comments:

Post a Comment