Wednesday, December 27, 2017

USA news on Youtube Dec 27 2017

Hello fellow movie lovers, I am Torstein from Cinema Terror and this is my review of Firecracker,

or its alternative title Naked Fist.

Before I go into the plot of the film, I have to say that I was taken back as it start off

stealing the awesome music from Shogun Assassin for its opening scene.

It does not have the same guy credited doing the music either, so I am going to guess that

the score was straight up stolen here.

It is a cool enough of a score for me to be more happy that it is in this film than for

me to be mad about the fact that it probably had no rights being here.

Firecracker tells the story of Susanne Carter, a young female martial arts expert who are

going to the Philippines to find out what has happened to her missing sister.

During her investigations, she gets involved with some bad drug dealers that also puts

together underground death matches.

Susanne starts to believe that these bad guys are reponsible for her sisters disappearance

and the only way to get revenge is to participate in one of these underground fights that will

make either her of her opponents face death.

That's pretty much the story and its not something we haven't seen thousands of times before

in b-movie action flicks.

Firecracker has a different selling point to it though, and here's also why the alternative

title of Naked Fist suits the film much better.

Take a look at this quick trailer from the Shout Factory release.

If you didn't catch it, then the end line in the trailer is «the first erotic martial

arts thriller» and add to that that the leading role of Susanne is played by the lovely Jillian

Kesner and add to the top of that again that this is an American Phillipino co-production

with the Roger Corman company New World Pictures behind it then you should know what you are

getting into.

This is just another run of the mill action flick, but with some added nudity by the main

character in it.

There is a five minute long fighting scene in it where Kesner looses more and more clothes

by the most ridiculous reasons they could come up with.

This scene has nothing to do with the rest of the filmed and was actually shot later

by a different director just to spike up the nudity of the film.

Does it work though?

Is it enough to make this stand out from the countless of other action films out there?

No, I can't say that it does, but would I have even have heard about it if it wasn't

for this angle?

Probably not either as I first found out about this film by it being on the section 3 list

of the Video Nasties in the UK.

It actually had to be cut nearly four minutes later on to achieve an 18 certification.

Crazy stuff considering how silly this film is.

Surprisingly enough, they did actually get the right girl as Jillian Kesner not only

looks great, but also has some martial arts skills to her.

There are a few obvious scenes where they got a stunt double in a terrible wig to do

her scenes, but for like 80 percent of the time, it's her that is doing the fighting

scenes herself.

And there are plenty of them as the movie hardly goes on for ten minutes without having

some fighting going on.

Not saying that any of these are great or anything, but its people hitting each other.

It's more goofy than intense or thrilling.

Then there is the searching for the sister and the bad guys doing drug dealing things.

Oh, and Kesner's character also gets romantically involved with one of the baddies, a John Holmes

look a like played by Darby Hinton.

They have a love scene, if you can call it that, where he starts to cut off her clothes

piece by piece.

Very romantic indeed.

I couldn't help but wondering what they would do after they were done and she had to go

home.

Was she anticipating the knife to be involved in the love making and bring extra clothes?

Well, judging by the previous topless kung fu fight, then I guess you could say that

she isn't the shy type.

Firecracker is directed by the Filippino b-movie maestro Cirio H. Santiago.

He was behind the camera on a lot of the Corman produced b-movies shot in the Philippines

in the 80's like Naked Vengeance and a film I've also recently reviewed called Demon in

Paradise.

Santiago goes for shit happening instead of things developing and there is an odd charm

to his movies, regardless if they are good or not.

It's almost like he is comfortable balancing a thin line between entertaining and boring.

Firecracker is right on that very thin line, with a few highlights saving it from being

a drag to sit through.

Firecracker is a mostly forgettable low budget action film that has little new to offer,

except a female heroine who has no objections to taking off her clothes to create this piece

of trashy art.

If you like the Filippino action films or the late 70's and early 80's then this should

be on your watchlist, for the rest of the world though there isn't all that much interesting

stuff to be found here.

Even if it isn't a good movie, it did steer me away from becoming bored and ultimately

I am happy that I have seen the film.

I am going to give Firecracker, or Naked Fist as I much more prefer that title, the average

score of 2.5 out of 5.

Anyone out there that might be a fan of Firecracker or other Filippino action films of the past?

Feel free to go nuts with recommendations in the comment section below.

And if you enjoyed this review then there are plenty more to be found on my channel.

I also have a Patreon site, so you know, if you enjoy online begging then go ahead and

donate something to make me happy.

Hope to see you again and thank you for watching.

For more infomation >> Firecracker (1981) - Movie Review - Duration: 5:33.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING!!! Obama Just Tried To TAKE OUT TRUMP!! MK Today - Duration: 4:59.

BREAKING!!!

Obama Just Tried To TAKE OUT TRUMP!!

Barack Hussein Obama is spending his Christmas vacation trying harder than ever to execute

his plans of destruction.

It's clear that he believes that if he can't be the president, nobody can and he'll stop

at nothing to take his successor out.

However, this latest desperation move was even low for him.

He's definitely gone too far this time and is about to learn a really painful lesson.

There's arguably no bigger sore loser in this world than Obama who is having an exceptionally

difficult time relinquishing his role of Commander-in-Chief to Donald Trump.

Rather than slipping into obscurity and enjoying his retirement, he's working harder than

he did in eight years, but for all the wrong reasons.

Obama is so arrogant that he's taking the stage and airways every chance he can get

– like his wife Michelle Obama is known to do – complaining about Trump rather than

speaking of unity and change he pretended to preach while in office.

He seems to be getting frustrated with the progress of his efforts and has now issued

a warning to all of America about what he believes Trump is doing to destroy the country.

It's ironic coming from a presidential failure such as himself.

As Freedom Daily reported on Tuesday, there's a good chance that the Obamas may not be included

on the coveted royal wedding guest list to watch his friend, Prince Harry mary American

Meghan Markle.

While this is a major snub to the pretentious pair who expected to be invited, the reason

for it has a lot to do with his nemesis, President Trump.

Realizing this, Obama just grossly stepped up his slanderous game like a petulant child.

Despite practically begging to be invited, the British government is actually begging

the royals to refuse the Obamas on their guest list for the much-anticipated wedding set

for May 19.

The Obamas can thank President Trump for that which will surely not sit well with the entitled

pair.

Seemingly in response to this recent turn of events for the Obama, Barack went on the

air with Prince Harry to weasel his way into an invite by discrediting Trump.

He even went as far as to issue a warning about the current president as a scare tactic.

After a brief icebreaker in the interview with Harry, where Obama talked about all things

"cool" and comfortable to him, such as his preference between boxers or briefs, which

baller he likes best, and who his favorite Kardashian is – he got right into what he

was really there for – to warn America about what Trump is doing.

"Obama also talked about the dangers of a president hopping on social media … he

didn't mention Trump by name, but it was pretty obvious," TMZ reports.

According to Daily Mail:

Obama said in an interview with Britain's Prince Harry, broadcast on BBC radio on Wednesday,

that social media should promote diverse views in a way that "doesn't lead to a Balkanisation

of our society."

"All of us in leadership have to find ways in which we can recreate a common space on

the Internet," Obama said.

"One of the dangers of the Internet is that people can have entirely different realities,

they can be just cocooned in information that reinforces their current biases."

Obama has previously warned that social media platforms can lead people to make snap judgments

about complex decisions although he has refrained from criticising his successor Donald Trump

who regularly uses Twitter.

Obama said in the interview broadcast on Wednesday that moving online communities offline helped

people to see that many issues were not as simple as they might seem in a chatroom.

"It's also, by the way, harder to be as obnoxious and cruel in person as people can

be anonymously on the Internet," he said.

It was obvious what he was doing and ironic at the same time since he was criticizing

Trump for doing exactly what he was doing by publicly bashing him.

This desperation move comes three weeks after Michelle Obama did the same exact thing.

These two look exceptionally immature and their tactless trashing-Trump mission is so

obvious that it's almost humorous.

The Sun reports:

Government mandarins are urging Prince Harry not to invite the Obamas to his wedding for

fear of infuriating Donald Trump.

Harry and fiancée Meghan Markle have told aides they want the former US president and

wife Michelle at their big day on May 19.

The 33-year-old prince has become good friends with the Obamas since bonding with them during

the Invictus Games.

But Britain's relations with Trump's White House have sunk to their lowest ebb since

his election last year.

The property billionaire does not hide his loathing of Mr Obama and is expected to be

enraged if his predecessor gets the coveted call up when he won't.

They can run their mouths about Trump all they want, but he's still their president

too.

They are only making themselves look worse and still won't be invited to the wedding

party since the president has more power than they do and the British aren't willing to

risk a relationship to have the Obamas at the wedding.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

For more infomation >> BREAKING!!! Obama Just Tried To TAKE OUT TRUMP!! MK Today - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

Trump LIVID After Learning How Sessions Worked To Bury Biggest Scandal In American History |MK Today - Duration: 5:02.

Trump LIVID After Learning How Sessions Worked To Bury Biggest Scandal In American History.

It's only a matter of time until Hillary, Obama, and their lackeys are exposed for the

traitors and criminals that they are.

The walls are closing in on them and recently in November, FBI informant William Campbell

came forward saying that he has damning evidence that links Hillary and Obama to the Uranium

Scandal where he'll soon testify in court and reveal what he knows.

Campbell has already given the Justice Department overwhelming evidence that proves how corrupt

Hilary and Obama are.

Much of Campbell's testimonies have revealed information about kickbacks and money laundering

with Russian officials.

But as more information is coming out, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is being implicated

now as well.

New evidence proves that he's been working with Hillary and Obama to sweep the scandal

under the rug.

Ever since Trump was sworn into office, he has been faced with numerous traitors from

within who don't want to see the swamp drained.

They are perfectly content with the status quo and will stop at nothing to keep Trump

from succeeding.

For a while now, people have wondered whose side Jeff Sessions was on.

Now with this new information, we finally know.

A scathing report shows that under Sessions, the Justice Department downplayed critical

evidence that linked Obama and Hillary to the Uranium One Scandal.

The Hill reports:

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney

General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was

no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case.

Their argument was that the criminal charges weren't filed until 2014, while the Committee

of Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred

in October 2010.

"The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted

was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before," Sessions

testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein's letter from

a few weeks earlier.

But investigative records show FBI counterintelligence recorded the first illicit payments in the

bribery/kickback scheme in November 2009, a year before the CFIUS approval.

Trump is fed up with Hillary being excused of numerous crimes and is now issuing a dire

warning to Jeff Sessions and the entire Justice Department.

Unless Sessions steps in and prosecutes Hillary, Trump says he will be forced to step in and

take drastic measures.

"A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me," Trump

told reporters.

Supreme Journalist reported:

Breitbart.com reports: Trump said that the Justice Department should be investigating

Democrats and the Clintons, sharing several observations on Twitter.

"This is real collusion and dishonesty," Trump wrote on Twitter Thursday night, responding

to Donna Brazile's revelation that Hillary Clinton's campaign was controlling DNC operations

and fundraising well before winning her primary.

"Major violation of Campaign Finance Laws and Money Laundering – where is our Justice

Department?" Trump wondered.

The president appears unhappy with Attorney General Jeff Sessions failure to investigate

the Clintons, despite recent revelations about their "crooked" behavior.

Trump said he thought Clinton's "deleted E-mails, Uranium, Podesta, the Server, plus,

plus…" all deserved closer scrutiny.

"People are angry," Trump continued on Twitter.

"At some point, the Justice Department, and the FBI must do what is right and proper.

The American public deserves it!"

Trump also spoke about his frustration with the Justice Department in an interview with

Fox News host Laura Ingraham.

"The saddest thing is because I'm the President of the United States, I'm not

supposed to be involved in the Justice Department, I am not supposed to be involved in the FBI,"

Trump said.

"I'm not supposed to be doing the kinds of things I would love to be doing and I'm

very frustrated by it."

Trump indicated that he wanted the Justice Department to investigate the Clintons.

"I look at what's going on with the Justice Department, well, why aren't they going

after Hillary Clinton with her emails and dossier?" he asked.

"It's very discouraging to me.

To be honest, I'm very unhappy about it."

Trump signaled frustration with Attorney General Jeff Sessions for failing to target the Clintons.

One of Trump's major selling points on the campaign trail was how he always insisted

Hillary would be investigated and charged for her crimes against America.

It's time we get to the bottom of it and charge Hillary, Obama, and the whole gang

for the treasonous snakes that they all are.

The American people are sick and tired of being promised that Hillary and Obama will

pay for their crimes only to be disappointed time and time again.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

No comments:

Post a Comment