BREAKING NEW DOCUMENTS REVEAL FBI'S CLINTON COVER-UP
The revelation last year of an unorthodox tarmac meeting between former President Bill
Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch set off a frenzied scramble at the FBI
to track down the source.
Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, which on Thursday released 29 pages of FBI
emails related to the 2016 meeting, said the messages show officials were more concerned
about the leak than the substance of the report.
From The Federalist Papers Project:
It's always a bit of a bummer when news comes out that you already knew about.
Yeah.
I figured that was the case all along.
Or, worse, how did you guys NOT realize this until now?
As Republicans and Democrats alike are trying to get to the bottom of the ongoing Russia
controversy, new information has emerged concerning the former President Bill Clinton, former
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and what they covered up.
According to Fox News:
In Washington, the ostensible story is rarely the real story.
We know, for example, that former President Clinton engineered a meeting with President
Obama's attorney general, Loretta Lynch, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Airport on June
27, 2016.
That's the official story, replete with the charming and intentionally disarming detail
that all they talked about was their grandchildren.
It was just coincidental, don't you know, that at the time the FBI was looking into
Hillary Clinton's use of a "personal" email server to send, receive and store classified
information.
And it was also simply coincidental that just a few days later, the director of the FBI
– who served under Attorney General Lynch – announced that he wouldn't recommend
a prosecution of Hillary Clinton.
Yes, that was the original story.
And, if you believe that story, I have some oceanfront property I would like to sell you
in Arizona…for a great price, of course.
But new information has emerged to confirm "a frantic scramble erupted in the halls
of the FBI to cover up this meeting.
In fact, the FBI turned its sharp light not on the scandalous meeting between the attorney
general and Bill Clinton–but rather on one of the whistleblowers who got the word out."
Judicial Watch had asked the FBI, "for any records that might pertain to the infamous
tarmac meeting".
The FBI ignored them.
Judicial Watch sued for the records.
The FBI then said they couldn't find any.
Yes, just imagine a seven-year-old in a lie, how they wold handle it…that sums up the
FBI's responses.
But, because of a revelation in another lawsuit, the FBI "without our knowledge–'reopened'
our [Judicial Watch] FOIA request.
The agency supposedly found about 30 pages of information, which it needed six weeks
to review.
The FBI finally gave them to us late Thursday."
Now we know why the FBI played shell games.
The documents show that FBI officials were concerned solely about the leaking of details
of the tarmac meeting.
None of the documents show top agency officials cared one whit about the propriety of the
meeting itself, but only about who blew the whistle on the covert tête-à-tête.
In one email, an FBI official writes "we need to find that guy."
And in another we learn that the Phoenix FBI office was contacted "in an attempt to stem
any further damage."
An FBI official working on Lynch's security detail even goes so far as to suggest non-disclosure
agreements to keep the full facts from coming forth.
No wonder the FBI didn't turn these documents over until we caught it red-handed, hiding
and lying about them.
Simply put, the FBI appears to be fully complicit in a cover-up that attempted to influence
a presidential election for a favored candidate – Hillary Clinton.
And the truth was trampled on a Phoenix tarmac.
So while we worry, ring our hands, furrow our brows over our country's leaders conspiring
with individuals outside of our country…we should probably be concerned with leaders
who are conspiring with individuals within our country.
Don't you think?
(Source: www.thefederalistpapers.org)
Comey in July 2016 said Clinton was "extremely careless" in handling classified and other
emails on the servers but recommend no criminal charges — a conclusion Lynch accepted.
What do you think about this?
Scroll down and feel free to share your
opinion
in the comment
section below.
No comments:
Post a Comment