Wednesday, May 9, 2018

USA news on Youtube May 9 2018

BREAKING: Obama Responds to Trump's Withdrawal From Iran Deal.

Because former President Barack Hussein Obama just can't seem to keep his yapper shut

today, he just couldn't help but come out and condemn the fact, that President Donald

Trump just undid his terrible and highly irresponsible Iran nuclear deal.

The former failure of a president released a lengthy statement who probably no one will

ever read in its entirety Tuesday, afternoon where he condemns President Trump for withdrawing

the United States from the nuclear deal Obama, and his cronies irresponsibly arranged back

in 2015.

Although Obama issued a brief statement on Twitter he had to link it to his Facebook

account, because he there are not enough characters on Twitter for some much of his double speak,

half-truths and outright lies.

His full statement on Facebook reads as follows:

"There are few issues more important to the security of the United States than the

potential spread of nuclear weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war in

the Middle East.

That's why the United States negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

in the first place.

The reality is clear.

The JCPOA is working – that is a view shared by our European allies, independent experts,

and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense.

The JCPOA is in America's interest – it has significantly rolled back Iran's nuclear

program.

And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and verification

regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North

Korea.

Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed,

walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the

very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.

That is why today's announcement is so misguided.

Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America's closest allies, and an agreement

that our country's leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated.

In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration

to the next.

But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding

America's credibility, and puts us at odds with the world's major powers.

Debates in our country should be informed by facts, especially debates that have proven

to be divisive.

So it's important to review several facts about the JCPOA.

First, the JCPOA was not just an agreement between my Administration and the Iranian

government.

After years of building an international coalition that could impose crippling sanctions on Iran,

we reached the JCPOA together with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union,

Russia, China, and Iran.

It is a multilateral arms control deal, unanimously endorsed by a United Nations Security Council

Resolution.

Second, the JCPOA has worked in rolling back Iran's nuclear program.

For decades, Iran had steadily advanced its nuclear program, approaching the point where

they could rapidly produce enough fissile material to build a bomb.

The JCPOA put a lid on that breakout capacity.

Since the JCPOA was implemented, Iran has destroyed the core of a reactor that could

have produced weapons-grade plutonium; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over 13,000)

and placed them under international monitoring; and eliminated 97 percent of its stockpile

of enriched uranium – the raw materials necessary for a bomb.

So by any measure, the JCPOA has imposed strict limitations on Iran's nuclear program and

achieved real results.

Third, the JCPOA does not rely on trust – it is rooted in the most far-reaching inspections

and verification regime ever negotiated in an arms control deal.

Iran's nuclear facilities are strictly monitored.

International monitors also have access to Iran's entire nuclear supply chain, so that

we can catch them if they cheat.

Without the JCPOA, this monitoring and inspections regime would go away.

Fourth, Iran is complying with the JCPOA.

That was not simply the view of my Administration.

The United States intelligence community has continued to find that Iran is meeting its

responsibilities under the deal, and has reported as much to Congress.

So have our closest allies, and the international agency responsible for verifying Iranian compliance

– the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Fifth, the JCPOA does not expire.

The prohibition on Iran ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is permanent.

Some of the most important and intrusive inspections codified by the JCPOA are permanent.

Even as some of the provisions in the JCPOA do become less strict with time, this won't

happen until ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years into the deal, so there is little reason

to put those restrictions at risk today.

Finally, the JCPOA was never intended to solve all of our problems with Iran.

We were clear-eyed that Iran engages in destabilizing behavior – including support for terrorism,

and threats toward Israel and its neighbors.

But that's precisely why it was so important that we prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear

weapon.

Every aspect of Iranian behavior that is troubling is far more dangerous if their nuclear program

is unconstrained.

Our ability to confront Iran's destabilizing behavior – and to sustain a unity of purpose

with our allies – is strengthened with the JCPOA, and weakened without it.

Because of these facts, I believe that the decision to put the JCPOA at risk without

any Iranian violation of the deal is a serious mistake.

Without the JCPOA, the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between

a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East.

We all know the dangers of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon.

It could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose

unacceptable dangers to America's own security; and trigger an arms race in the world's

most dangerous region.

If the constraints on Iran's nuclear program under the JCPOA are lost, we could be hastening

the day when we are faced with the choice between living with that threat, or going

to war to prevent it.

In a dangerous world, America must be able to rely in part on strong, principled diplomacy

to secure our country.

We have been safer in the years since we achieved the JCPOA, thanks in part to the work of our

diplomats, many members of Congress, and our allies.

Going forward, I hope that Americans continue to speak out in support of the kind of strong,

principled, fact-based, and unifying leadership that can best secure our country and uphold

our responsibilities around the globe."

Has anyone here ever seen so much whining from a past president before?

This guy is even worse than Jimmie Carter and his outright anti-Semitic writings.

He actually thinks people still care what he has to say.

He took our nation down a path of unabashed globalism where right was wrong and wrong

was right and he actually has the audacity to call President Trump out for fixing the

mess he left?

Both in our nation's economy and the world.

Obama turned our nation into a laughing stock on the world stage and he doesn't even care

one bit.

He bribed Iran with our tax dollars into a nuclear deal which had no upside for the US

whatsoever while at the same time tapped our future president's building.

He was more concerned about an American like Donald Trump than a regime like Iran where

they chant d***h to the USA and Israel on a daily basis.

We all know people voted for Obama because of his skin color without ever even investigating

who or what he really was, but now it's time to fix that 8 year mess, and like Obama

told the GOP back in 2009, it's time you Obama ride in the back of the bus and let

the adults fix the mess you and your administration left us with.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Obama Responds to Trump's Withdrawal From Iran Deal - Duration: 8:10.

-------------------------------------------

'Little Hitler' David Hogg Now Believes He Should Decide Who Lives And Dies - Duration: 4:18.

'Little Hitler' David Hogg Now Believes He Should Decide Who Lives And Dies.

It has been a busy week for gun control activist David Hogg.

Between pushing for high schools nationwide to register people to vote, harassing politicians,

and making contradictory statements about black people, Hogg has had a lot on his mind,

but he did find the time to decree that he is the one who gets to decide who should live

and who should die.

Hogg's week of self-importance started on Saturday, which is technically last week,

by sending a braggadocios tweet in which he said, "The young people will win," his

newest catchphrase, to gloat about a mayor who is facing a recall vote because he called

out the teenager.

Hogg tweeted a link to the story with his caption from The New York Post.

"A Republican mayor of a Maine city now faces a vote that could remove him from office

over his tweets mocking a survivor of the Parkland, Florida, school shooting," The

Post wrote.

"Nick Isgro now must face a recall vote in Waterville, where he was elected to a second

term last November.

Isgro's tweet in early April was directed at David Hogg, who gained prominence as a

gun control advocate after the shooting that left 17 people dead."

Mayor Isgro's tweet, which his political opponents quickly seized on, read, "Eat

it, Hogg."

The tweet by Mayor Isgrow was accompanied by a story about Fox News backing embattled

host Laura Ingraham after Hogg called for a boycott of her show because she mocked him

for not getting into the colleges that he wanted and then whining about it on Twitter.

He went on to send out two tweets decrying the racial disparities of the victims of gun

violence.

As if it is white people's fault that black people in the inner city are shooting each

other, and as if it would be better if more white people were shot.

"Horrifying stat of the day: African Americans between the ages of 15 and 29 are 18 times

more likely than their white peers to be the victim of a gun homicide," he wrote in the

first tweet.

"'In 2016 more than half of the members of the House of Representatives — or 232

of the 435 — received money from gun rights groups like the National Rifle Association

and Gun Owners of America.'

-Politico — Yet we still wonder why we haven't seen any gunsense at the federal level,"

he said in the other.

It is impressive how Hogg cares for African Americans, isn't it?

Of course, his only includes those African Americans that agree with him.

Following those tweets was another that called for the removal of black Utah Rep. Mia Love,

a Republican.

"Young people can have an impact, don't believe me?

Congresswomen @RepMiaLove of UT's 4th congressional district got $63,350 the % of people registered

to vote there between 18-29 is 6% we can easily vote her out.

The young people will win– so long as we vote," he wrote.

And little David was not done.

On the heels of his failed boycotts of FedEx, Laura Ingraham, BlackRock Inc. and The Vanguard

Group, Hogg declared that he would be switching his bank because Bank of America has not abandoned

gun manufacturers, and he called for others to follow him as they have not in the past.

"Bank of America lied to everyone about not doing business with manufacturers of assault

weapons.

Guess I'll be changing my bank soon!

#BoycottBankOfAmerica," he wrote.

With that amount of activity, it is a wonder that David Hogg had the time to tell everyone

that he is the arbiter of who is allowed to live on this planet with him.

In one of the most Hitler-like statements in the history of Twitter, Hogg wrote, "We

can and we will change the world for those that should still be in it.

The young people will win."

Who should be in it?

Who made this 18-year-old media darling, who has stepped on the bodies of his dead classmates

to gain fame, the decider of who is worthy to live?

The unmitigated gall of this kid grows daily, and it is time someone gives him a reality

check on his place in the world.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> 'Little Hitler' David Hogg Now Believes He Should Decide Who Lives And Dies - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

Liberal TV Host Desperate for You to Forget Who She Was Supporting - Duration: 5:16.

Liberal TV Host Desperate for You to Forget Who She Was Supporting.

One of the most outspoken anti-Trump TV hosts, Samantha Bee, was caught with her pants down.

Her show is scrambling to remove traces of segments where she supported a notorious scumbag.

She's hoping you'll forget, but we won't let that happen.

In the battle of the culture wars, late-night TV is decidedly liberal.

Once upon a time, Americans could watch an hour of comedy at the end of a long day.

It was a relaxing diversion from all the headaches of the outside world.

Talk show hosts provided "light" entertainment, jokes, and interviews.

All of America loved the likes of Johnny Carson and his apolitical content.

Those days are long gone.

Since Donald Trump was elected president, late-night TV has become all but liberal propaganda.

Hosts like Stephen Colbert openly praised Marxist leaders in response to Donald Trump

Jr. tweets.

The rest of the pack is just as toxic and hateful.

Perhaps worst of all is Samantha Bee.

Bee likes to positional herself as the only female late-night host in a crowd of men.

From her days on The Daily Show, she scored a show on TBS.

The poor imitation of The Tonight Show tries to provide comedic segments, with a heavy

dose of liberal dogma.

As a self-proclaimed feminist, Bee spends most of her time complaining about President

Donald Trump and conservatives.

She pays special attention to the hacks on the left, propping up Democrats whenever she

has the opportunity.

But all of that liberal-worship has come to bite her on the ass.

It was discovered Samantha Bee's show featured an extensive segment praising a Democratic

politician.

She claimed this man would be the answer to Donald Trump.

In fact, she even portrayed him as some kind of superhero.

Now, she and her show are scrubbing all mentions of this man.

I guess he wasn't the savior they hoped he would be?

How come?

Oh, it was Eric Schneiderman, the man who sexually abused four women and called his

Shri Lankan girlfriend a "brown slave."

Full Frontal with Samantha Bee featured a segment effusively praising former New York

Attorney General, and alleged abuser Eric Schneiderman last fall and is now hastily

walking it back.

Amidst the recent allegations against Schneiderman of non-consensual physical assault by four

separate women, Bee and her nightly talk show are doing damage control for their part in

promoting both him and his work in November 2017.

Bee's team has already removed a tweet from the show's Twitter timeline, as called out

by Jack Posobiec, and renamed the clip on their YouTube channel of Schneiderman's

appearance on the show to "Former AG Tricks Sam Into Thinking He Was Decent."

The segment called Schneiderman "a hero who stood up to democracy's nemesis",

and likens him first to Superman and then to Spider-Man.

Both in language and imagery, Schneiderman is positioned as a "hero," and President

Donald Trump his "Lex Luthor."

He is also called a "deadly viper" and a "white mamba."

[Source: Breitbart]

Bee's show heaped a ton of praise on Schneiderman, at a time when he was barely in the spotlight.

As AG of New York, he was investigating Harvey Weinstein.

But beyond that, there was little he did that deserved attention.

Unless, of course, you're a liberal TV host.

You have to keep in mind that Democrats live in a giant bubble from reality.

The con artists in the media support the con artists in Washington, D.C.

They spend a ton of money propping up candidates like Hillary Clinton.

Schneiderman was once considered a Clinton ally; he even eyed a future in her White House.

So, it comes as no surprise that a left-wing hack like Bee would hype up this Democrat.

It's just all so ironic.

Her show portrayed Schneiderman as a Spider-man-like hero, even showing his name against a web.

They had a sit-down interview with the man, clearly hoping to give him some positive screen

time to improve his image and future political campaigns.

How did Bee not notice the warning signs?

Many are now talking about how Schneiderman had a reputation.

He abused drugs and alcohol.

His treatment of women was certainly talked about.

Years ago, Donald Trump predicted his downfall.

So, what's the story, Bee?

Were you completely unaware your "hero" was a scumbag?

Or did you deliberately ignore the rumors swirling around, because he was a Democrat?

The double standard can't be ignored.

Liberals take any rumor or hint of a rumor about Trump and twist it into a controversy.

But they ignore — or even cover up — actual evidence of Democratic wrongdoing.

Bee is only now trying to fix her mistakes after Schneiderman's crimes were plastered

all over the Internet.

Maybe Bee, and the rest of her late-night buddies, should look for better people to

worship.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

No comments:

Post a Comment