Trump Just Got PRICELESS Justice!
Legal Action Is Finally Coming And The Timing Couldn't Be Better!
As more is revealed about the level of corruption and the degree of conflict of interest that
exists within Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, it becomes more abundantly clear Mueller's
many actions are a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.
President Donald Trump is now suggesting that "angry Democrats" on special counsel Robert
Mueller's team, could potentially face legal action over these "conflicts of interest."
President Trump states "The 13 Angry Democrats in charge of the Russian Witch Hunt are starting
to find out, that there is a Court System in place that actually protects people from
injustice, and just wait till the Courts get to see your unrevealed Conflicts of Interest!"
Naturally, CNN was quick to point out that President Trump did not provide proof of the
alleged conflicts.
Yet, CNN themselves has previously reported that several members of Mueller's team have
donated to Democrats, several exclusively so.
A handful more either worked directly with or for Hillary Clinton or Barrack Obama in
some prior capacity.
Russia's meddling in the 2016 election also has been the subject of several Republican-led
congressional inquiries.
President Trump has suggested this probe is being drug out as a means to damage Republican
chances at reelection.
Several leaked questions that Mueller is interested in asking President Trump are related to possible
obstruction of justice actions.
President Trump states that such questions amount to a "setup and trap" and that
it would "seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened!"
Last month, President Trump also stated on "Fox & Friends" that he might "at some
point" step in and take action against the Justice Department, which is overseeing the
special counsel investigation.
Mueller is a Republican who was appointed by President George W. Bush, and the man who
appointed him as special counsel, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, was appointed by current
President Trump.
Meanwhile, Rep. Louis Gohmert from Texas 1st congressional district attempted to shed some
light on Mueller's rather long, troubling, and sordid history of illicitly targeting
innocent people.
Gohmert states "Judging by Mueller's history, it doesn't matter who he has to threaten,
harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get to allege something or, for that matter, anything.
It certainly appears Mueller will do whatever it takes to bring down his target ethically,
or unethically based on my findings.
What does former Attorney General Eric Holder say?
Sounds like much the same thing I just said.
Holder has stated, "I've known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he's just
trying to make the case as good as he possibly can."
Holder does know him.
He has seen Mueller at work when Holder was obstructing justice and was therefore held
in Contempt of Congress.
He knows Mueller's FBI framed innocent people and had no remorse in doing so."
Gohmert describes Mueller's disreputable, twisted history and how it speaks to the character
of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected
President.
He explains "Any Republican who says anything resembling, "Bob Mueller will do a good
job as Special Counsel," "Bob Mueller has a great reputation for being fair,"
or anything similar; either (a) wants President Trump indicted for something and removed from
office regardless of his innocence; (b) is intentionally ignorant of the myriad of outrageous
problems permeating Mueller's professional history; or (c) is cultivating future Democrat
votes when he or she comes before the Senate someday for a confirmation hearing."
From his early years as an FBI Director, Gohmert describes how Mueller was given a pass in
oversight hearing from most Republican members of Congress.
This allowed him to avoid answering any tough questions.
Gohmert states they were continually told "Bush appointed him."
so it was okay to proceed.
He also describes how glaring problems because evident very quickly.
The Boston Globe noted Mueller's connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an article
entitled, "One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller" during his FBI
tenure.
The Globe stated this
"[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two FBI agents for considering
parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later
that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as
an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters
to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men
framed by FBI lies.
Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart
off his criminal competitors, even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset"
During this time Mueller was the head of the Criminal Division as Assistant U.S. Attorney,
and then later as Acting U.S. Attorney.
No explanation as to exactly WHY Mueller insisted on keeping the defendants in prison that FBI
agents, in the pocket of Whitey Bulger had framed for they did not commit can be found
anywhere.
Perhaps not good people themselves, nevertheless not guilty of these crimes.
However, it is indicative of a larger and more insidious pattern demonstrating Mueller's
penchant for convicting and putting people in jail he disliked, even if they were innocent
of the charges, much more so than he was with ferreting out the truth.
Mueller bore no responsibility for $100 million paid to the defendants who were framed by
FBI agents under his control either.
As the Boston Globe noted "Thanks to the FBI corruption, taxpayers got stuck with the
$100 million bill for compensating the framed men, two of whom, Greco and Tameleo, died
in prison."
Of note, The New York Times had this to say of the relationship
"In the 1980, while [FBI Agent] Mr. Connolly was working with Whitey Bulger, Mr. Mueller
was assistant United States attorney in Boston in charge of the criminal division, and for
a period was the acting United States attorney here, presiding over Mr. Connolly and Mr.
Bulger as a top echelon informant.
Officials of the Massachusetts State Police and the Boston Police Department had long
wondered, why their investigations of Mr. Bulger were always compromised before they
could gather evidence against him, and they suspected that the FBI was protecting him."
Frankly, if Mueller had no knowledge that the FBI agents he employed were actively engaging
in criminal activity, then he was so blind as to be woefully unfit for any type of criminal
case supervision.
Either way, Mueller actively helped to contribute to the damages as he helped to frame individuals
by working to prevent them from being paroled from prison even, while their charges were
in the process of being completely thrown out of court.
Notice also the evidence of a pattern throughout Mueller's career: the leaking of information
to disparage Mueller's targets.
In the Whitey Bulger case, the leaks were too organized crime the Mafia.
One the most fundamental tenets of our Republic is that of the rights of an individual to
be free from "unreasonable searches and seizures."
An arrest is a seizure of your person.
Anyone imprisoned has to have committed a specific crime for which they are found guilty.
Yet Mueller has literally made a mockery of everything this country stands for as Gohmert
points out Mueller has the anti-Santa Claus list; and, if you are on his list, you get
punished even if you are framed.
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
top stories today.
No comments:
Post a Comment