Friday, May 18, 2018

USA news on Youtube May 18 2018

- Tonight, something strange happened in the skies

over Arizona that still hasn't been fully explained.

- [Announcer] An event now known as the Phoenix lights.

- [Announcer] It is extraordinary.

- [Announcer] No one knows for sure what happened

that night in the skies over Arizona in March,

but thousands of people saw something.

- This week on Buzzfeed Unsolved,

we investigate the Phoenix lights,

a possible UFO sighting in Phoenix, Arizona.

This case is regarded by many to be

^one of the bigger UFO cases of all time,

^mainly because of the amount of witnesses.

^You already look like you're stoked.

- I love it, I love it.

(laughs)

A lot of times, it's like ooh, this person saw

a lady get abducted by minions, but nobody had a camera.

- Well, not today, friend, not today,

because spoiler alert, just take a little peek in there.

It's hot. - You didn't even look.

Ooh, there you go.

- There's so much heat in here.

Let's get into it.

- Okay.

- (laughs) Okay.

^On March 13th, 1997, around 7 PM,

^a string of about five lights in a V formation

^appeared in the sky above Phoenix, Arizona.

The National UFO Reporting Center reported that

the first call regarding the lights came in at 8:16 PM

from a retired police officer in Paulden, Arizona,

which is about two hours north of Phoenix.

The retired police officer reported he saw, quote,

^a cluster of red-orange lights

^arranged in a V formation, end quote.

The National UFO Reporting Center reportedly began

to get a flood of calls from south of Paulden suggesting

the lights were moving in a south-eastern direction.

Allegedly, there were over 700 witnesses,

including pilots, police officers, and military officials

that were lighting up the National UFO Reporting Center's

switchboards looking for an explanation.

Some describe the lights as orbs,

^others said triangles.

^A large amount of witnesses describe the lights

^as part of a singular massive craft,

^a craft that made no noise.

- [Shane] So some people saw a craft, I got a bubble,

I got an air bubble in my throat right now, you hear that?

You ever get that?

This is scary, I don't sound like myself.

- [Ryan] Oh, you sound--

- [Shane] I sound like an alien.

- [Ryan] You sound alien.

- Yeah, I'm like a pod person.

(grunts) Okay.

Yeah, you know, that's that thing,

you look in the darkness long enough,

you're gonna see something.

- Yeah, 700 people are gonna all

hallucinate at the same time.

- Yeah.

- Okay.

- I mean, some of them did, some of them didn't.

I mean, it's not hallucinating, I'm saying

some of the people looked up and said--

- Misidentified.

- Oh, I see something, I'm staring at the darkness,

are those all connected, what's my mind doing?

- Here's a crazy dot--

- In March?

- Though this may be, I may be going off the deep end here,

but if 700 people say they saw something,

what if they actually saw something?

- No doubt they saw something,

but what is that thing?

- Don't, what?

- That's the question.

- [Ryan] One man named Terry Proctor captured

^one of the only videos of this event.

^The grainy, low-quality video, which we can't show you

^due to copyright, seemingly displays five lights

in a V-like pattern in the sky.

^Around 10 PM, a second set of as many as nine lights

^appeared in the sky, seemingly hovering in the same spot.

^Whether these lights are related to or are in fact the same

^lights from the seven PM sighting, is unclear.

However, it's this set of lights that comprises

most of eyewitness testimony, as it was later in the night

after the buzz of the first sighting had people on alert.

- [Shane] It seems like not the usual M.O. for aliens,

right, to sort of do a little appetizer?

- This is a weird case because there's a possibility

that one was legit and one actually was something normal,

but was misidentified, so it confuses things.

- Curious.

- Or they were the same thing.

I think either is just as likely.

I think it's possible that aliens knew

they were gonna be seen, or didn't know that

they were gonna be seen, one of them fucked up,

was asleep at the wheel, forgot to turn on

the cloaking device or some crazy shit like that.

- It's just a button.

- And now he's fired and he's looking for work.

His wife divorced him, his little alien kids

don't have income to live off of,

it's a really bad situation for that alien father.

- I don't think aliens have money.

- A laser printer technician named Dana Valentine

witnessed the craft from his yard in Phoenix.

^Quote, we could see the outline of a mass

^behind the lights, but you couldn't actually see the mass.

^It was more like a gray distortion of the night sky, wavy.

^I don't know exactly what it was,

^but I know it's not a technology the public

^has heard of before, end quote.

^Tim Ley, a management consultant, described the event

^saying, quote, it was astonishing and a little frightening.

^It was so big and so strange.

^You couldn't actually see the object,

all you could see was the outline,

^as though something was blotting out the stars.

^The lights looked like gas.

^There was a distortion on the surface.

^Also, the light didn't spill out or shine.

^I've never seen a light like that, end quote.

According to a USA Today article from the time,

air traffic controllers could not see the lights on radar,

despite seeing them with their own eyes in the sky.

That's pretty significant.

- Yeah.

- If there are planes, you would see them on the radar.

- Yeah.

- So it's not a plane.

- Unless it was stealth.

- We'll get into that later.

Based off of reports, it appears that the mysterious

spacecraft was enormous, made no sound, moved slowly,

and on occasion, would hover over an area.

Phoenix physician Dr. Lynne Kitei was a witness

of these lights and states, quote,

^it was a mile-wide formation of these orbs

^and I caught them head-on turning into a V, end quote.

^Witness Sue Watson described the craft as, quote,

^a shopping mall flying over my home.

^It had these lights in front and then it was

^totally illuminated underneath, like a yellowish amber.

^It was a totally rounded boomerang shape, end quote.

Videos of this second event showed the string

of nine lights hovering in the sky.

The lights illuminate off and on randomly

over the course of a couple minutes while floating

in what could be described as a loose, V-like formation.

Other videos captured the events of March 13th, 1997

and according to a USA Today article, quote,

^computer analysis of the tapes puts the object

^at 6,000 feet long, or more than a mile, end quote.

- [Shane] With these things, I tend to,

you know, I tend to put it first on spooky military activity

more so than extraterrestrials.

It just seems like a big gamble for extraterrestrials

to just, I mean, if they're coming down at night

in the first place, you know, clearly,

and they're trying to cloak themselves, well great.

Maybe hang outside a few miles outside of town.

- I mean, really it's not that much of a gamble.

What's the gamble?

They're clearly more advanced than us, what's gonna happen?

Okay, we see them, we did see them.

We're not gonna attack them.

- So pop on by around the afternoon.

- Because maybe they--

- Let's get some peepers on that ship.

- Maybe they saw us and they were like, hm, not interested.

Swipe right, or left, or whatever the fuck Twitter is.

Not Twitter, Tinder, just sounded like an 80-year-old man

right there. (laughs)

- Whatever Twinder.

- Whatever Twinder is. - Twinder.

- Uh, yeah.

I think maybe they saw, they came to check out resources.

They didn't like what they saw so they just left.

While there are people who say the lights

were part of one giant craft, there are others who believe

the lights themselves were the crafts.

^A truck driver named Bill Greiner's recollection

^of the event seems to suggest the latter.

^Greiner said that his truck route took him

^within a mile of Luke Air Force Base.

^He states that he witnessed two orbs,

one of which was floating over the air force base.

At that moment, three F-16s took off,

after which the orb pursued one, but then shot up

into the sky and disappeared.

^Quote, before this, if anybody had told me

^they saw a UFO, I would have said "yeah,

^"and I believe in the tooth fairy."

Now I've got a whole new view.

I may be just a dumb truck driver,

but I've seen something that don't belong here.

I wish the government would just admit it.

You know what it's like in this city right now?

It's like having 50,000 people in a stadium

watch a football game and then having someone

tell us we weren't there, end quote.

- Love this guy.

- Yeah, I love it.

He's like he realizes the first thing a skeptic

is gonna say is "oh, it's a fuckin' truck driver."

Check that box. - Yeah.

I was gonna say, oh, it's a fuckin' truck driver.

He got me dead to rights.

- And then he gave a solid analogy of people

watching a sporting event and then having people go

"hey, you didn't watch that."

- And he also gave the I was a skeptic until I saw this

defense, which is great.

Oh yeah, and I believe in the tooth fairy, go fuck yourself.

- It was a three-pronged attack.

- That's pretty good.

- This guy's, uh, he's a savant when it comes to rhetoric.

- Yeah.

^- [Ryan] On May sixth during a council meeting,

^city councilwoman Frances Barwood asks city manager

^Frank Fairbanks if there was going to be an investigation.

^Quote, I asked if anybody knew what this object was

^and could we check into it.

^I was met by a whole bunch of stares, end quote.

^She claims that following the meeting,

a city manager approached her and said, quote,

you shouldn't have asked that question, end quote.

Then the Arizona Republic published a cartoon

of city councilwoman Barwood with a light switch

on her forehead and a button on her jacket

^saying, quote, I love UFOs, end quote.

Barwood continues, the mayor's office put signs

on my picture in the hallway and I found out afterwards

they handed out business cards with my name on it

that said speak into the tin foil.

I will hear you, end quote.

Despite being ridiculed, Barwood began receiving

phone calls from other witnesses

all describing the same thing.

Nonetheless, for a while, the case went unacknowledged

until a USA Today article released three months later,

on June 18th, 1997 described the event,

effectively bringing the story into the national spotlight.

From the article, quote, on March 13th,

hundreds of people reported an enormous object

or objects in the night sky.

It's the most confounding UFO report in 50 years.

So far, there is no explanation,

but the government is not investigating.

Local and federal agencies disagree over who should

purse the report, end quote.

- [Shane] Yeah, I guess it didn't,

so there's been almost no coverage of it up until here.

- [Ryan] No, and this is three months after the sighting.

- [Shane] 'Cause this is, this is before YouTube or--

- [Ryan] Yeah, no one's on Twitter going "holy shit."

- Yeah.

- 'Cause, you know, I mean for example, remember,

what was it, a couple months ago when the SpaceX

launch happened and it looked like the sky was breaking?

If that happened in 1997 and we didn't have Twitter.

- Everyone would think it was an alien.

- Everyone would think it's an alien,

they would lose their mind.

- Yeah.

- Of course, the government was, to their credit,

able to give an explanation.

They even announced it was gonna happen.

They said this ship's, it wasn't a covert operation,

so in that case, I don't know if it's too similar, but

the internet is a tool of knowledge, I suppose.

- In some ways.

- Yeah, or it could be a means of destruction,

the end of us.

- Just hang in there, everybody.

- [Ryan] With the country hungry for answers,

then-governor Fife Symington held a press conference

^where he claimed he knew who was responsible

^and brought out the accused.

- And now I'll ask Officer Stein and his colleagues

to escort the accused into the room

so that we may all look upon the guilty party.

Don't get him too close to me please.

(audience laughs)

- [Ryan] And it's here that this story gets interesting,

because despite making a joke of the event,

Governor Symington would later publicly admit

^that he too had seen the craft.

Quote, I saw a huge craft come right over Squall Peak.

It was just breathtaking.

As a pilot and a former Air Force officer,

I can definitively say that this craft

did not resemble any man-made object that I'd ever seen.

^It was certainly not high altitude flares,

^because I've never seen flares fly in formation.

^Unquestionably, it was a UFO, end quote.

Another interesting fact from Governor Symington

^was the fact that his office did inquire about the object,

^but they never received an answer,

^and if a governor can't receive an explanation

from the powers that be, what could they be hiding?

- [Shane] There's probably a lot of things

they don't tell governors.

- [Ryan] Sure, but not when the governor in question has

a state full of people that are pressing him for answers.

You would think that they would be like,

"hey, I know a lot of people are on you right now.

"You're under a lot of heat.

"This is what you do," but instead they

ostracize him, they keep him on the outside

to think oh, I wonder what he's gonna do?

Maybe he'll run his mouth.

- I would be more concerned if he did know something.

- I'm just saying that if they had talked to him,

he wouldn't have said anything ever, I think.

Because he would have had the fear of god in him.

- But then he's still,

he's still like a loose cannon.

- [Ryan] Not necessarily.

- They can't know for sure that if they tell him something,

he's going to, he could go nuts, they don't know.

- Yeah you can, because it's your job.

I'm just saying that by keeping someone in the dark,

you're giving them the liberty to say

whatever they really want.

- With no basis for it, though.

So if anyone hears it, they're not gonna--

- It has a little bit of basis.

He's a governor saying something,

so that already inherently has a little bit of basis.

- But he doesn't know more than anyone else in town.

- I know. - Is the thing.

- But it just makes it look more suspicious.

- I don't think it does.

- I think it does.

- Well, agree to disagree here.

- All right.

With that, let's get into the theories,

of which there are only two.

The first theory is the official explanation

^from the Air Force that the lights witnessed in the sky

^were merely flares dropped in a training exercise

^from high altitude that night.

^The military states that the flares were dropped

^over the Barry M. Goldwater range near Gila Bend, Arizona,

^though it's worth noting that Tuscon's Davis-Monthan

Air Force Base, the base that allegedly carried out

the training exercise originally stated

that it had no planes in the air at the time.

Former F-16 pilot Ty Groh believes that the lights

^may well have been military flares.

He says that flares go where the wind takes them.

A breeze may have been able to carry

all of them at an equal distance.

In June of that year, a local news anchor taped

another flare drop by the military, and skeptics suggest

it bared a striking resemblance to the Phoenix lights.

One important detail is what time the military reportedly

dropped flares on the night of the Phoenix lights.

The flare drop apparently occurred around 10 PM,

^aka the same time sightings of the second

^set of lights were reported,

^but while that possibly explains those lights,

^that still offers no explanation for the first set

^of lights that were seen nearly three hours earlier.

^One man named Mitch Stanley claims that during the time

^of the first sighting, he happened to be using

^a high-powered telescope capable of seeing

^1,500 times more light than the human eye.

When he looked at the first set of lights,

he claims they were planes.

While compelling, this story seems odd

^when you consider the fact that no planes were reported

^in the air during the time of the first sighting,

^and since it wasn't just one light, but rather five lights,

^it seems odd that there would be five unaccounted-for

^planes flying in tight formation.

- [Shane] My gut tells me it's just some

shady military activity.

Could have been flares, could have been stealths.

You know, who knows?

- [Ryan] They've only given one explanation

for the second set of lights,

and even that explanation to me is shit, I would say.

(laughs)

I think it's a shit explanation.

- This one's shit.

- I just think the flares, even if you do buy the flares,

sure, the first set of lights still unexplained,

except for one dude with a telescope

who's competing against 700 witnesses.

And why the fuck is this guy with a telescope,

he just happens to be using a telescope

at the exact time of one of the craziest events of all time?

- You gotta be honest, telescope people are weird.

- (laughs) Yeah, I know, 'cause he's actually--

- [Shane] We don't wanna be one of those.

- He's a favorite among skeptics, they're like

"see, this guy's using a high power telescope with his mama"

which he was, he was using, he was in the back--

- No, I don't doubt that he was,

that him and his mama were out with their telescope.

I'm just saying telescope people, I mean,

how much are they spending on these telescopes?

They're gonna be out there every single night

with like a margarita like let's see what I find.

- [Ryan] Yeah that's true.

- Oh, empty sky again, wow what a night.

Well, that's been eight hours,

guess I'll go to sleep 'cause the sun's coming up.

They're basically vampires.

- Then he says to his mom "good scoping."

She goes "good scoping, son" and then they go back to bed.

- When are you gonna move out?

(laughs)

- Which brings us to our next theory,

that the lights were not flares, but actual UFOs,

^and perhaps proof of extraterrestrial life.

^On the third year anniversary of the lights,

^another flare demonstration was performed

^to attempt to mimic the lights,

^this time by the National Guard,

^but people remained unconvinced

^that this was what they witnessed three years earlier.

^The flares, quote, flickered and moved erratically,

^end quote, and not in the bizarre grouped fashion

^of the Phoenix lights.

Jim Dilettosa, a special effects expert, analyzed videos

^of the lights and said, quote, I have no idea

^what they were, end quote.

^Him and his team detail the orbs as, quote,

^a perfectly uniform light with no variation

^from one edge to the other and no glow.

^They have ruled out lasers, flares, holograms,

^and aircraft lights as sources, end quote.

To gain further insight on this case,

^we sat down with ancient alien expert Giorgio A. Tsoukalos.

What do you think the plausibility of this event

actually happening is?

- Well, we know it happened. (laughing)

- We do know what happened.

Ryan and I agree, we don't know what it was exactly.

- What it was, yes, correct,

and what I think is fascinating is that

something similar happened seven years earlier in Belgium,

which was also seen by thousands upon thousands of people.

Same triangle formation and then also the individual lights.

So I think it's fascinating.

- Have you seen anything that could maybe

be an early version of what we saw in the Phoenix lights?

- Sure, what's interesting is that Alexander the Great

and also in some accounts of ancient Constantinople,

there are references of giant flying shields.

Giant shields that are glowing in the sky

and just crossed, you know, over the lands.

So when you have these accounts of ancient flying shields

up in the sky that are witnessed by armies,

you have to wonder, well, were they all drunk?

(laughing)

Were they all smoking, or did they actually see something?

- [Ryan] Even if the lights were misidentified flares

^or planes, this still doesn't explain numerous witnesses

^describing a massive craft that the lights were attached to.

^Piggybacking off that, on March 14th, 1997,

^the morning after the Phoenix lights,

^an airman from Luke Air Force Base

^detailed a disturbing story from the day prior.

^He claimed that the base got a call from Prescott Valley

^Airport, quote, reporting an object that had

a near-miss with a small Cessna, end quote.

He claimed this call came at, quote,

^approximately 8:32 PM, that they encountered something

^over Phoenix, Arizona, end quote.

^As a result, the airman claims that Luke Air Force Base

^sent two F-15s to investigate.

Upon their return to base, here's how the airman

described the pilot of one of the F-15s.

Quote, the command pilot of this particular flight,

I've never seen this man scared, and he was scared to death.

He's not sure what it was.

His statement was that they followed this aircraft,

it went on a straight-line course.

He saw five distinct lights in a triangular pattern.

How often would this happen where the military has stealth

planes out that they don't tell Air Force bases about?

- [Shane] It's possible.

- [Ryan] That seems wildly counterproductive to me.

You don't wanna be sending out a bunch of planes

to investigate things when you could easily be like

"oh yeah, that's one of ours."

- Yeah, I just feel like the military, you know,

it's hard to pin down.

Hard to pin down what they might do.

- I think I just made a good point.

- I mean, certainly, certainly a good point for you.

- [Ryan] After this revelation, the airman claimed

^the Air Force base, quote, had a complete lockdown.

^All hell broke loose basically

^and the facility was closed, end quote.

Noteworthy is that this encounter occurred

around 8:30 PM at the time of the first sighting,

about an hour and a half before the military

claims they dropped flares.

In response, the Air Force has denied

this encounter ever took place.

Classic. - I love that, yeah.

- [Ryan] Classic, do you think they just have a dartboard

that they throw whether or not they're gonna,

they're gonna deny?

- Just spin a wheel.

- What should we tell them this time?

- Yeah.

- I think it would be a fun job to be the person

who makes up fake stories that the military leaks.

- Spin doctor.

- Ooh, a spin doctor. - Yeah.

- And then he spins his wheel--

- Oh, he spins a wheel!

- That has topics on it-- - It's all very literal.

- And it has topics on it.

- We're going with flares, unfortunately.

- And everyone in the office who had flares

in their pool is like "yeah!"

- They choke Alf a little bit more.

(Ryan laughs)

- It makes sense that the Air Force

would deny this story, since denying interest in UFOs

is something that the government has already done.

^In December 2017, it was found that the nation's

defense department had used $22 million

of their annual $600 billion budget

for an advanced aerospace threat identification program.

^Defense department officials admitted that for years,

^the program had been investigating

^unidentified flying objects.

^Here's a quote from a New York Times article

on a 60-minute documentary on this topic

detailing documents provided in the documentary.

Quote, documents that describe sightings of aircraft

that seem to move at very high velocities

with no visible signs of propulsion,

or that hovered with no apparent means of lift, end quote.

Why do you think the government approaches the topic

of UFOs with such trepidation?

Why do you think they're so against it?

- That's a great question because as we now know,

ever since the '50s and the '60s, you know,

open-minded people like the three of us

and our great audience, we've always been laughed at and oh,

you know, those are the kooks, those are the crazies.

And then there's reports coming out, well,

we've been studying this, you know, files and files

with hundreds of thousands of documents,

world-wide, not just by the US government,

but by governments from Brazil, England, all over the place,

that ultimately, this stuff has been investigated

and the fact that the Pentagon in December of 2017

released a statement saying "hey, we're investigating UFOs,"

that to me indicates that we've passed,

or we are experiencing a paradigm shift, which is great.

- [Ryan] In the end, neither skeptics nor believers

can concretely prove what happened that night.

Despite hundreds of witnesses across an entire state,

the world seems content to leave what transpired

that night as a mystery.

Perhaps one day we'll have an answer,

but for now, the case remains unsolved.

(mysterious music)

For more infomation >> The Unexplained Phoenix Lights Phenomenon - Duration: 24:42.

-------------------------------------------

9 Jähriger über die Bestimmung und das Universum. Spricht da ein Philosoph? Aufgenommen in den USA - Duration: 5:26.

For more infomation >> 9 Jähriger über die Bestimmung und das Universum. Spricht da ein Philosoph? Aufgenommen in den USA - Duration: 5:26.

-------------------------------------------

Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him - Duration: 11:11.

Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him

House Speaker Paul Ryan recently revealed that he will not seek re-election.

So during his past few months in office, he doesn't have to worry about what voters

think of him.

And with that new freedom, Paul Ryan just looked Trump square in the eye and betrayed

him.

Speaker Ryan offered President Trump a plan on immigration that would let House legislators

vote for amnesty, and then vote against a bill containing Trump's three big immigration

reforms.

His plan uses another GOP amnesty plan around 20 representatives are pushing as leverage

to persuade Trump to remove the DACA amnesty portion of the current immigration bill, and

place it in a separate bill.

This would allow a large number of Representatives who are weak on illegal immigration to vote

for amnesty, and also vote against Trump's immigration plan, which includes funding for

a border wall.

As reported by Breitbart:

"HOUSE SPEAKER PAUL RYAN OFFERED PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP A PLAN THAT WOULD LET HOUSE LEGISLATORS

VOTE FOR AN AMNESTY — AND THEN VOTE AGAINST A BILL CONTAINING TRUMP'S BIG THREE IMMIGRATION

REFORMS, SOURCES TELL BREITBART NEWS.

THE RETIRING SPEAKER OFFERED THE DEBATE PLAN ON TUESDAY TO COUNTER THE GROUP OF 20-PLUS

PRO-MIGRATION GOP REPRESENTATIVES WHO ARE PUSHING FOR AN AMNESTY VIA A DISCHARGE PETITION.

THE DISCHARGE PETITION WOULD SCHEDULE A "QUEEN OF THE HILL" DEBATE AROUND FOUR BILLS WHICH

WOULD ENSURE PASSAGE OF AN AMNESTY BILL FOR AT LEAST 2 MILLION 'DACA' ILLEGALS.

RYAN ALSO WANTS AN AMNESTY, AND HIS PLAN, SOURCES SAID WEDNESDAY, LEVERAGES THE DISCHARGE-PETITION

PUSH TO PERSUADE TRUMP TO ALLOW HIS FOUR-PART PACKAGE OF IMMIGRATION REFORMS TO BE SPLIT

INTO A PROPOSED AMNESTY BILL AND A THREE-PART REFORM BILL.

THAT RYAN TWO-BILL SPLIT WOULD ALLOW ROUGHLY 40 BUSINESS-FIRST GOP LEGISLATORS TO VOTE

FOR AN AMNESTY AND ALLOW THEM TO BLOCK TRUMP'S REFORMS ON BORDER SECURITY, CHAIN-MIGRATION,

AND THE VISA-LOTTERY.

ONE SOURCE SAID THE AMNESTY BILL WOULD BE AN ADD-ON AMENDMENT TO THE REFORM BILL — AND

NEITHER MEASURE WOULD PASS UNLESS BOTH WON A MAJORITY.

THE TWO-BILL PLAN EMERGED FROM LEADERSHIP EFFORTS TO MANAGE THE DISCHARGE PETITION,

BUT IT LEAVES MAJORITY LEADER KEVIN MCCARTHY IN A DIFFICULT POSITION.

MCCARTHY INITIALLY ACCEPTED RYAN'S TWO-BILL PLAN, WHICH AIDS THE GOP'S PRO-MIGRATION

MEMBERS, INCLUDING HIS FELLOW CALIFORNIAN, REP.

JEFF DENHAM.

BUT THE LEADERS HAVE NOW RECOGNIZED THAT RYAN'S TWO-BILL PLAN CREATES MANY NEW PROBLEMS.

IT ALARMS THE GROWING CONSERVATIVE SIDE OF THE CAUCUS, IT ALIENATES THE GOP'S 2018

VOTERS, AND IT THREATENS MCCARTHY'S PLANS TO QUIETLY SLIP INTO THE HOUSE SPEAKER'S

JOB AFTER RYAN'S SCHEDULED DEPARTURE IN JANUARY, A SOURCE SAID.

IT ALSO TORPEDOES TRUMP'S REFORM STRATEGY BY SPLITTING THE BUSINESS-BACKED AMNESTY FROM

THE VOTER-BACKED REFORMS."

If Speaker Ryan's plan were to succeed, it would create a ton of problems for Republicans.

The biggest issue it would cause is alienation of Republican voters.

With the midterm elections just months away, a Republican push to grant amnesty to at least

two million DACA illegals could turn off a ton of pro-Trump voters.

If Republicans don't do well in the upcoming midterms and Democrats are able to take control

of Congress, it could end in the impeachment of President Trump.

Do you think Republicans should grant amnesty to DACA illegals?

Let us know your thoughts

in the comments

section below.

For more infomation >> Paul Ryan Just Looked Trump Square In The Eye And Betrayed Him - Duration: 11:11.

-------------------------------------------

Report Hillary And Obama's FBI Cover Up Revealed, Sets Fire To Washington Swamp - Duration: 11:06.

Report Hillary And Obama's FBI Cover-Up Revealed, Sets Fire To Washington Swamp

We've been waiting for years, haven't we?

We've been waiting for someone to finally stand up and say, officially, that Hillary

Clinton and Barack Obama's Department of Justice broke the law.

We've been waiting for an investigation to prove what many Americans already suspect:

that these two always thought they didn't have to follow the rules.

Well, it has finally happened:

Inspector General Michael Horowitz told Congress this week that he has completed his report

into the Justice Department and FBI's 2016 email server probe, which involved then-presidential

candidate Clinton.

And though the finished report hasn't yet been made public, one source believes Horowitz

will make a bombshell announcement that'll rock Washington to its very core.

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry, former D.C. bureau chief for Investor's Business

Daily, posted his stunning piece of info on Twitter.

Horowitz says he is "prepared to provide a briefing and testify publicly" about the

report's findings as soon as everything comes to light.

But thanks to Sperry, it appears the cat is already out of the bag.

The report is going to really slam top DOJ officials, and that includes former Director

James Comey.

Simply put, the findings are going to turn some heads, as a former Justice Department

official told CNN:

"It's not going to be good, it's just a question of how bad it's going to be."

As I said above, we all knew, didn't we?

We knew the FBI was scheming behind the scenes, trying to find a way to clear Hillary.

And we all knew Obama's team was probably well aware of everything, and helped direct

the evasion proceedings.

Democrats have been dirty for years.

They'll do absolutely anything to remain in power.

But it hasn't worked.

Despite the leftist media spreading propaganda on a daily basis, the American people have

grown sick and tired of the liberal regime that has decimated a once-proud country.

Well, no more.

Let's just hope this soon-to-be-released report makes

a huge splash!

For more infomation >> Report Hillary And Obama's FBI Cover Up Revealed, Sets Fire To Washington Swamp - Duration: 11:06.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Realized He Was In Big Trouble When He Saw This Interview - Duration: 11:06.

Robert Mueller Realized He Was In Big Trouble When He Saw This Interview

Robert Mueller and his team of Democrat all-stars figured they had Donald Trump cornered.

The special counsel's office believed they had an airtight plan to trick Trump into falling

into their perjury trap.

But Mueller realized he was in big trouble after this interview.

Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani appeared on Laura Ingraham's Fox News channel and stunned

observers with a defiant attitude toward an interview with Robert Mueller.

Giuliani stated that Trump would only submit to an interview with a very narrow scope of

questions—and only if James Comey was being investigated and treated in the same manner.

Breitbart reports:

ON WEDNESDAY'S BROADCAST OF THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL'S "INGRAHAM ANGLE," TRUMP LAWYER

RUDY GIULIANI STATED THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP MIGHT SIT DOWN FOR AN INTERVIEW WITH SPECIAL

COUNSEL MUELLER IF THEY KNOW WHAT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE WANTS CLARIFIED, AND SAID

IF THEY KNEW WHAT MUELLER WANTS CLARIFIED, "AND THEY TOLD US, THAT IF WE GAVE THE EXPLANATION

THAT WE'RE PROPOSING, HE WAS — THEY WERE GOING TO END IT, FINE."

HE ALSO STATED, "I DON'T THINK WE WOULD SIT HIM [THE PRESIDENT] DOWN FOR AN INTERVIEW

UNLESS COMEY WAS INVESTIGATED AND TREATED IN THE SAME WAY."

GIULIANI SAID, "THERE WOULD BE A NARROW AREA WHERE WE MIGHT AGREE, IF THEY COULD TELL

US WHY THEY NEED IT.

THEY HAVE HIS EXPLANATIONS OF EVERYTHING.

THEY HAVE 1.4 MILLION DOCUMENTS.

THEY HAVE THE WITNESSES..IF THEY'RE GOING TO DISBELIEVE HIM, THEY'RE GOING TO DISBELIEVE

HIM. AND THE FACT IS, WE WOULD HAVE TO KNOW WHAT IS IT DO YOU WANT CLARIFIED?

IF WE KNEW THAT, AND THEY TOLD US, THAT IF WE GAVE THE EXPLANATION THAT WE'RE PROPOSING,

HE WAS — THEY WERE GOING TO END IT, FINE.

WE'RE TRYING TO GET HIM TO END THIS."

HE LATER ADDED, "[A] LOT OF THE PRESIDENT'S STATEMENTS CONTRADICT COMEY.

THEY'RE MORE LOGICAL THAN COMEY'S, BUT THEY CONTRADICT HIS.

IF YOU WANT TO JUST BELIEVE COMEY, THEN YOU'RE WALKING INTO A TRAP.

AND COMEY'S NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED.

SO, I DON'T THINK WE WOULD SIT HIM DOWN FOR AN INTERVIEW UNLESS COMEY WAS INVESTIGATED

AND TREATED IN THE SAME WAY." Trump supporters do not believe the President

should speak with Mueller.

Mueller is an anti-Trump zealot whom critics believe is part of a palace coup to remove

the President.

There is nothing to gain from speaking to an opposition agent.

And there is everything to risk.

If Trump misstates a fact about a meeting or a conversation, Mueller will claim he lied

to investigators and recommend Congress impeach him.

Trump is right to stay far away from any interview with Mueller and his team of partisan Democrat

investigators.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Realized He Was In Big Trouble When He Saw This Interview - Duration: 11:06.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton Is Only Days Away From Her Worst Nightmare Being Revealed - Duration: 11:11.

For more infomation >> Hillary Clinton Is Only Days Away From Her Worst Nightmare Being Revealed - Duration: 11:11.

-------------------------------------------

A Bombshell Report Revealed A Clinton Cover Up That Will Send Big Names To Prison - Duration: 11:11.

A Bombshell Report Revealed A Clinton Cover Up That Will Send Big Names To Prison

Millions of Americans were outraged that the FBI allowed Hillary Clinton to escape felony

charges for mishandling classified intelligence.

Former Director James Comey and his leadership figured they got away with covering up her

criminal behavior.

But one bombshell report is about to drop and you won't believe who could go to jail.

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz was tasked with investigating the

FBI's conduct during the 2016 election.

Horowitz's report has already led to the firing of Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for

lying to investigators.

Now journalist Paul Sperry reports that McCabe's dismissal just scratched the surface of Horowitz's

bombshell report.

Sperry tweeted that Horowitz found multiple criminal violations and that he referred them

for prosecution.

Huber refers to the prosecutor Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed to investigate the

claims that the FBI abused their power by employing the fake news Christopher Steele

dossier to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Breitbart reports:

IN RESPONSE TO GROWING CALLS FOR A SECOND SPECIAL COUNSEL TO PROBE THE CLINTON EMAIL

PROBE, ALONG WITH FISA ABUSES THAT TOOK PLACE DURING THE 2016 ELECTION, ATTORNEY GENERAL

JEFF SESSIONS ANNOUNCED IN MARCH THE APPOINTMENT OF UTAH'S TOP FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, JOHN HUBER,

TO PROBE POTENTIAL WRONGDOING.

IT WAS REVEALED THIS WEEK THAT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S HIGHLY-ANTICIPATED REPORT WAS

SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.

"THOSE INVITED TO REVIEW THE REPORT WERE TOLD THEY WOULD HAVE TO SIGN NONDISCLOSURE

AGREEMENTS IN ORDER TO READ IT, PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTER SAID.

THEY ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE A FEW DAYS TO CRAFT A RESPONSE TO ANY CRITICISM IN THE REPORT,

WHICH WILL THEN BE INCORPORATED IN THE FINAL VERSION TO BE RELEASED IN COMING WEEKS,"

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL REPORTED.

MULTIPLE REPORTS SUGGEST THE REPORT WILL BE MADE PUBLIC BY THE END OF MAY."

The FBI went easy on Clinton because the Bureau's leadership was convinced she was going to

win the election.

Critics believe Comey and others did not want to risk angering the person who was expected

to be their next boss.

So Comey and his cabal let her skate.

Now those decisions could come back to bite the conspirators within the FBI.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments

in

this story.

No comments:

Post a Comment