USA news on Youtube May 15 2018

Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen

One wonders just how far the state of California is willing to continue to push the envelope

for illegal immigration?

Just how much is pandering to illegal aliens worth?

The Department of Justice just issued a second and final warning to the state California

sternly letting its Democrat Governor, Jerry Brown, state leadership, and the citizenry

were given an ultimatum – you can be a sanctuary state that flouts federal immigration law

or you can keep the federal tax dollars flowing … but you cannot have both.

Fox News reports- "Earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a so-called "sanctuary

state" bill which basically erects a wall between California law enforcement and federal

immigration enforcement officers.

The bill forbids California cops from providing release and other information that isn't

publicly available in response to a request for notification from federal law enforcement.

The government has been pushing for notification from local authorities about when they have

an undocumented immigrant in custody who has committed a crime, saying to withhold that

information, and then release that person onto the streets is putting local communities

in danger.

Supporters argue that sanctuary policies allow local and state law enforcement officers to

build crucial relationships with immigrant communities.

Critics say not turning over people living in the country illegally puts the public in

danger.

Wednesday's letter urges California to comply federal statute (8 USC 1373) which bars local

jurisdictions from limiting communication with federal law enforcement about a person's

immigration status or whereabouts.

The letter states that California's new law (SB54) "May violate," 1373.

Department of Justice Officials tell Fox News this situation could result with future federal

grants being withheld from California, that threat has been a common thread in this ongoing

story.

However DOJ officials also tell Fox they could "clawback" funds already awarded to the

Golden State.

For instance California received more than $18 million in federal grants from the Department

of Justice in 2016, funds DOJ officials say could be subject to a "clawback."

'In early October, the State of California codified into law a requirement that local

police release criminal aliens back onto our streets.

This law undermines public safety and national security, was opposed by law enforcement,

and potentially violates federal law,' said DOJ spokesman Devin O'Malley.

'The abandonment of the rule of law evades all common sense, especially given the multiple

high-profile incidents that have occurred in California as a result of similar policies.

The Justice Department urges California to reconsider these so-called 'sanctuary policies.'"

The so-called "sanctuary state" law, California "Sanctuary State" Bill (SB 54) –

Prohibits state and local law enforcement from holding illegal aliens on the basis of

federal,immigration detainers, or transferring them into federal custody, unless they've

been convicted inthe last 15 years for one of a list of 31 crimes, or are a registered

s*x offender: if not, they may onlybe held with a warrant from a federal judge,Prohibits

state and local law enforcement from asking anyone about their immigration status

Prohibits state and local law enforcement from sharing any information with federal

immigration authorities that is not available to the general public,Prohibits state and

local law enforcement from using any of their money or personnel to"investigate, interrogate,

detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes"

Prohibits state and local law enforcement from allowing federal immigration authorities

to use space in their facilities,Limits how and when

state and local law enforcement can contract with federal immigration

authorities

Grants discretion to state and local law enforcement to cooperate even less with federal immigration

authorities than the bill authorize them to, but not more,Is near-universally recognized

and described by both its supporters and opponents as a sanctuarystate bill: protects illegal

aliens at the expense of citizens, will increase illegal immigration to California, and sends

the message that illegal aliens are welcome everywhere in the state

The Federalist Papers took a look at all 261 sanctuary jurisdictions in the United States

at risk for defunding back in August.

All told, over $30 million in Byrne Justice Assistance Grant money, which account for

the lion's share of federal aid to states and localities for criminal justice, is at

stake.

The Federalist Papers has previously covered how this indefensible policy will continue

to affect Americans with the increase in crime, continued and increased government insolvency,

less assimilation amongst illegal aliens to American culture, and fewer jobs for American

citizens.

To many Americans, it is patently absurd that this is still even a topic for discussion,

let alone a continued debate.

How is the proposition that higher levels of government have a right to require that

lower levels of government actually enforce the law possibly controversial, especially

in light of the fact that the law is clearly constitutional and immigration clearly falls

under the scope of that office's enumerated powers?

The answer, while obvious, is not simple, in that in a sane political climate, it wouldn't

be.In response to simple common sense, the progressive left likes to claim that sanctuary

cities are somehow good for law enforcement because illegals feel freer to report crimes

if they know talking to police will not get them deported.

Yet in July that talking point took a hit thanks to the release of statistics showing

that crime actually decreased in Phoenix, Arizona after the city dropped its sanctuary

status –According to Levi Bolton, the executive director to the Arizona Police Association,

when Phoenix suspended its sanctuary city policies, instead of endangering the citizens,

the opposite happened.

"We saw a decrease in crime," said Bolton.

"It had a deterrent effect on folks because the risk of discovery went up exponentially

when we actually enforced the law."Under the new policies, law enforcement could ask

suspects if they are in the U.S. legally, and they could inform immigration agencies

about violations of federal laws.Fox News reported that the m****r rate in Phoenix fell

by 27 percent, robberies fell by 23 percent, and assault fell by 13 percent.

Even more minor crimes fell, with burglaries by 14 percent and theft

by 19 percent.

For more infomation >> Sanctuary State To Lose ALL Federal Funding – They Said This Would NEVER Happen - Duration: 14:28.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking Ice Director Just Said It Was Trump - Duration: 12:15.

Breaking Ice Director Just Said It Was Trump

The Acting ICE Director has just confirmed that President Trump has done more for the

border and law enforcement than the last six Presidents he has worked for.

Yes, you read it right … six Presidents before him

The Democrats always claimed to be against illegal immigration and it was once a huge

platform of their party.

But the moment they realized if they secretly supported it and tried to reframe it as "immigration"

they could keep getting votes.

"We've had no president in my lifetime enforce the immigration laws and talk about

improving immigration like President Trump."

ICE Acting Director Thomas Homan:

"I worked for six different presidents, none of them has done more than Donald Trump

has for border security and law enforcement."

Boom!

Go Trump!

For more infomation >> Breaking Ice Director Just Said It Was Trump - Duration: 12:15.

-------------------------------------------

Rush Limbaugh Perfectly Describes Stormy Daniels With 3 Words Democrats Will Hate - Duration: 15:19.

Rush Limbaugh Perfectly Describes Stormy Daniels With 3 Words Democrats Will Hate

Democrat party mascot.

That's the nickname that Rush Limbaugh gave to the left's favorite porn star, Stormy

Daniels.

The sad thing is that he's not exaggerating.

Liberals are staking all of their hopes on Team Daniels.

The midterm elections.

Do the Democrats have an agenda?

I'm not sure, because the only thing that the party is blabbing about is Daniels.

"I think it's fabulous.

You know their new mascot is becoming a porn star walking a runway in a G-string with a

bunch of dollar bills stuff into it," laughed Rush Limbaugh during a taping of his show.

"What could be a better modern-day mascot for the Democrat Party than Stormy Daniels

barely wearing anything with dollar bills stuffed into it while prancing around a bunch

of drunk guys next to a pole in a place like the Bada Bing?

If that's not the perfect mascot image for the Democrat Party.

Let 'em own it!"

Democrats can't figure out what they want.

The party is completely out of control.

No one likes Nancy Pelosi yet she's refusing to step aside.

Their best shot at a 2020 victory are women who claim they'll never run (Oprah Winfrey,

Michelle Obama).

The focus on Daniels and her tired old story is a big mistake.

Limbaugh's right, when Daniels isn't giving drugged-up interviews she's prancing around

in a thong begging for dollars.

It's a great gig for her.

The liberal media isn't helping the Democrats rebuild their party but it is creating a great

career for Daniels.

She's absolutely raking in cash.

"Proving my point.

It used to be Russian collusion.

Nothing there.

Used to be collusion.

Nothing there.

Now they're on to Stormy Daniels and they can't get rid of it.

Stormy Daniels in a cameo appearance on Saturday Night Live actually made an AP news story,"

Limbaugh said.

Expect to keep hearing about Daniels and her antics.

Dems don't know when to let things go.

For more infomation >> Rush Limbaugh Perfectly Describes Stormy Daniels With 3 Words Democrats Will Hate - Duration: 15:19.

-------------------------------------------

Rudy Fires A Warning Shot Against Robert Mueller That'll Have Him Running Scared - Duration: 12:15.

Rudy Fires A Warning Shot Against Robert Mueller That'll Have Him Running Scared

Rudy Giuliani, the newest lawyer on Trump's team, continued his media blitz Thursday.

He slammed special prosecutor Robert Mueller for wasting time and warned him not to attack

Ivanka Trump.

"If they do do Ivanka, which I doubt they will, the whole country will turn on him…

They're going after his daughter?" Giuliani told Fox News

When questioned about Jared Kushner, he added: "Jared is a fine man, you know that…

But men are, you know, disposable.

But a fine woman like Ivanka?

Come on."

Ivanka is at risk because of her dealings with her father.

Everyone around Trump is being scrutinized.

His personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was taken down last month.

Federal investigators raided his home, office, and hotel for incriminating information.

Giuliani also spoke about Cohen.

"I think the investigation with him [Cohen] largely fell apart, with the loss of the campaign

finance possible violation which never existed in the first place, but they sure thought

it did," Giuliani told ABC News.

"We don't hear anything, see anything, see any documents that contradict what we've

said.

Some of the recollection is a little hazy because it came during a very busy period.

But, I mean, on both sides it's pretty clear.

They may have little differences here and there but nothing important."

Giuliani has been constantly in the news the past few days.

He kicked off a firestorm earlier this week by admitting that President Trump repaid Cohen

for the money funneled to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Trump had previously said that he had no idea about the payment.

Giuliani has also bragged that he believes that he could bring the investigation to a

close.

Trump has been dealing with the nuisance for more than a year.

Mueller is tarnishing an otherwise wonderful presidency.

Expect Giuliani to continue the media

rounds

this weekend.

For more infomation >> Rudy Fires A Warning Shot Against Robert Mueller That'll Have Him Running Scared - Duration: 12:15.

-------------------------------------------

Bob Mueller Makes Massive Mistake, And It May Just End The Witch Hunt Once And For All. - Duration: 2:28.

Bob Mueller Makes Massive Mistake, And It May Just End The Witch Hunt Once And For All.

The plot thickens And now we know why Bob Mueller us taking forever to get to the point,

and release what he has he's got nothing but hot air.

How long will jeff Sessions let this miscarriage of justice continue?

From PJ Media:

You've heard that prosecutors have so much influence over grand juries that they can

"indict a ham sandwich."

An embarrassing moment for Special Counsel Robert Mueller occurred in court the other

day, when the lawyer for one of the three Russian companies, he indicted had some bizarre

news for the judge.

Concord Catering does exist today but apparently was not around in 2016, during the presidential

campaign.

It would have been difficult for them to have interfered in an election, when they had not

been created yet.

Bob Mueller made a huge mistake and indicted a company that didn't even exist when the

alleged collusion happened.

Think about that for a minute.

The company didn't exist yet he indicted it talk about out of control investigations.

From the Daily Wire:

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing

the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing

a third company listed in Mueller's indictment.

What about Concord Catering?"

Harvey asked Dubelier.

"The government makes an allegation that there's some association.

I don't mean for you to do you represent them, or not, today?

And are we arraigning them as well?"

"We're not," Dubelier responded.

"And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of

the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich."

"That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the

government," Dubelier continued.

"If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent

them.

But for purposes of today, no, we do not."

Will the liberal media report this shocking mistake by Mueller?

Don't bet on it because it would shatter their myth, that Mueller has a real investigation

not just another Washington D.C. political witch hunt.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Bob Mueller Makes Massive Mistake, And It May Just End The Witch Hunt Once And For All. - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

IN VIA DI CONCLUSIONE I TEST DEI NUOVI MISSILI BALISTICI RUSSI "BULAVA" - Duration: 4:04.

For more infomation >> IN VIA DI CONCLUSIONE I TEST DEI NUOVI MISSILI BALISTICI RUSSI "BULAVA" - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

The U.S. Embassy in Israel isn't the only reason for violence. Here are the key issues - Duration: 4:39.

The U.S. Embassy in Israel isn't the only reason for violence. Here are the key issues

Don't forget to subscribe Jonna Brandon Channel. Comment, Like and Share my videos if you like them and have the latest and breaking news in the world. Thank you very much for your kind.

The formal dedication of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem on Monday outraged Palestinians, but it's not the only reason for the deadly, weeks-long demonstrations along Israel's border with Gaza.

Protest leaders call for the right of return for Palestinian refugees to the areas they fled or were driven from during the creation of Israel in 1948.

The demonstrations, dubbed the Great March of Return, are a response to the control of goods entering Gaza by Israel, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority.

Scores of Palestinians were killed and hundreds more wounded by the Israeli military in clashes along the boundary fence Monday, the most violent day of the protests. More than 100 have died since the protests began in March.

The unrest is likely to continue Tuesday. May 15 is Nakba Day, the Day of Catastrophe, when Palestinians commemorate their ouster.

The Israeli military blamed Gaza's ruling Hamas for the violence, saying the Sunni-Islamist political organization encouraged protesters to breach the fence.

Great March spokesman Ahmad Abu Artema told Al Jazeera that the effort along the fence is designed to "send a message: The Palestinian people have not, and will not, adapt to 70 years of being refugees, estrangement and difficult conditions."

How did the Great March begin? The march was sparked by a Facebook post months ago by Artema, who suggested thousands of unarmed Palestinians walk toward the border fence.

Artema rejects Hamas' notion of eliminating Israel but wants to end the separation between Palestinians and Israelis. "I don't believe in liberation," Artema told Israel's Ynet News, an online newspaper. "I want to live alongside Israelis."

What do the Palestinians want? Palestinian leaders demand the "right of return." About 750,000 Palestinians were displaced by the creation of Israel in 1948.

About 70% of Gaza's 2 million population are descendants of those refugees, living in an area about the size of Philadelphia, according to the International Committee for Breaking the Siege of Gaza.

The committee is an association of groups that oppose the control of goods entering Gaza by Israel, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority.

Are the protests non-violent? Thousands of men, women and children gathered in tent encampments at a safe distance from the fence.

But militants joined the protest movement and urged participants to burn tires close to the fence and hurl stones and gasoline bombs toward Israeli soldiers on the other side.

According to Israeli authorities, Hamas detonated two bombs near a border patrol passing along the fence, and demonstrators were shot trying to cut the fence and enter Israel. There have been no Israeli injuries associated with the protests.

What does Israel say? Israel says it has the right to defend its borders, protect its citizens and prevent illegal infiltration.

"Responsibility for any clashes that may arise will thus lie solely with Hamas and the other Palestinian organizations who have manufactured this entire campaign," according to a statement by Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.