Wednesday, April 18, 2018

USA news on Youtube Apr 18 2018

breaking news today

welcome to USA breaking news today please subscribe and click notification

box to get all breaking news alert breaking news today Donald Trump agrees

vital deal with Russia that could ease World War 3 fears Donald Trump has

secured a vital deal with Russia that could ease World War 3 fears by allowing

u.s. airplanes to fly in Vladimir Putin's airspace it has emerged dot the

US Airlines for America trade group revealed the US State Department had

informed them of the deal the group said in a statement we have received

confirmation from the State Department that over flight approvals have been

extended through the scheduled season and carriers are continuing to conduct

normal operations through Russian airspace the US State Department added

that a six-month extension had been agreed on over flight approvals for US

airlines the body declared several US airlines have confirmed to us that they

have received approvals for these over flights dot we are also working to

schedule discussions with Russian civil aviation officials to discuss this in

other civil aviation matters our goal remains to provide as many benefits as

possible for US carriers the agreement came mere hours before the current

agreement on overflights was due to expire the deadline was at 11.50 9:00

p.m. on April 17 . State Department spokeswoman Heather nard revealed that a

meeting with Russia's civil aviation officials in Washington that was set to

discuss an agreement renewal had been cancelled this week Russia's Transport

Ministry also confirmed that it had extended approvals for cards flights

from Asia to Europe until April 20th an alternative route for flights afterwards

has been discussed however no details have yet emerged

such a deal comes during a period of incredibly frosty relations between the

US and Moscow following a devastating strike on Bashar al-assad Syria over the

weekend mr. Putin warned further attacks in the region could lead to chaos in

international relations over 100 missiles were fired in the coordinated

move from the US UK and France dhatus world tensions soar a US general

recently admitted America is ready for anything Lieutenant General Kenneth F

McKenzie JR said we're ready for it we're postured both in the region and

globally we are on the balls of our feet and we're ready for anything thanks for

watch please share like comment this video and subscribe channel for latest

news

For more infomation >> Breaking News Today⚠️Donald Trump agrees VITAL DEAL with Russia that could EASE World War 3 fears - Duration: 2:30.

-------------------------------------------

George Stephanopoulos Neglects to Disclose His Deep Clinton Ties During Comey Interview - Duration: 5:36.

George Stephanopoulos Neglects to Disclose His Deep Clinton Ties During Comey Interview.

The left is on a new mission to (once again) take down Sean Hannity.

After it was discovered that Sean has limited "business dealings" with Trump's personal

attorney Michael Cohen, they now want everyone in broadcasting to fully disclose any and

all "conflicts of interest" they may have, so the public is aware.

If that's the case, why then didn't ABC George Stephanopoulos declare his deep ties

to the Clinton when interview James Comey, who admittedly, hates Trump and did all he

could to help Hillary, who he claims was "destined" for the White House?

From Breitbart From what we know so far, conservative talker

Sean Hannity had a limited business relationship with Michael Cohen, who is also President

Donald Trump's personal attorney, and who just had his offices, home, and hotel room

raided by the FBI.

Because Hannity is a commentator with four hours to fill every day, he has a lot to say

about the raid.

But now that a partisan judge (to say the least — the swamp is deep, my friends) has

forced Cohen to reveal that Hannity is a client, everyone in the establishment media (read

those with much lower ratings than Hannity) have the knives out, because Hannity did not

reveal this potential conflict of interest.

So desperate are they to bloody Hannity, the media have just done a very good thing with

the creation of what we will call the "Sean Hannity Standard," a standard that demands

commentators and reporters disclose any and all potential conflicts-of-interest pertaining

to the story or person they are reporting on.

What a wonderful idea!

Over at the far-left Politico, Michael Calderone writes, that Hannity "should have disclosed

that he's a client of Cohen's."

What a wonderful idea!

Kathleen Bartzen Culver, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of

Wisconsin, told Politico, "commentators should still be expected to maintain independence

from subjects they covering and disclose relevant ties."

What a wonderful idea!

CNN, Media Matters, MSNBC, Everyone agrees with this wonderful idea!

And I could not agree more.

It is long past time for the media to pour sunshine on any and all potential conflicts-of-interest.

And the timing could not be more perfect.

Good grief, less than 24 hours before the creation of the "Sean Hannity Standard,"

former-President Bill Clinton's very own press secretary George Stephanopoulos interviewed

James Comey, the disgraced former chief of the FBI, about his decision not to prosecute

Bill Clinton's wife Hillary over her countless email crimes.

Naturally, neither ABC or Stephanopoulos bothered to disclose this.

But thanks to the "Sean Hannity Standard" this will never happen again.

Right?

What's more, how many so-called journalists who downplayed reported on Hillary Clinton's

scandals are friendly with Bill and Hillary, or members of their inner circle?

Now that we are entering the era of the "Sean Hannity Standard," we will finally be enlightened

with full disclosures from every political journalist commentator about their personal

relationships, with Democrat politicians and their respective handlers.

I am especially eager to hear from Andrea Mitchell, Maggie Haberman, and Joe Scarborough.

How many dinners, dinner parties, coffees, baby showers, wedding showers?

How many lunches, drinks, cocktail parties?

If you recall, Comey allowed Cheryl Mills to pretend to be Hillary's attorney, when

the FBI questioned Hillary about her rogue email server, (it was all a show Comey had

already written Hillary's exoneration).

At long last we are about to find out how many of those who reported on this particular

story are palsy walsy with Hillary's attorney.

With former Attorney General Loretta Lynch!

With Comey!

DC is an incestuous pit.

What a relief, then, that we will now be told in advance if a commentator or reporter has

ever shared a lawyer, literary rep, children's prep school, public relations firm, investment

manager, or agent, with the public figures they report on.

Jake Tapper's wife was a regional field manager for the abortion mill Planned Parenthood.

Chuck Todd's wife is a Democrat activist.

CNN regularly reports on Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).

Thank heaven the public will now be informed that CNN chief Jeff Zucker's 14-year-old

son was awarded stock options potentially worth millions from Booker.

Claire Shipman, a senior national correspondent at ABC News, is married to no other than Jay

Carney, who was Obama's White House Press Secretary.

Virginia Moseley, a CNN Vice President and Washington Bureau Chief is married to Tom

Nides, who was a Deputy Secretary of State under Barack Obama.

CBS News president David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, a top foreign policy adviser

to Obama — the man behind the Benghazi cover-up and the disastrous Iran deal.

Barack Obama attended the wedding of Marth Raddadtz, a senior correspondent at ABC news

who moderated the 2012 vice presidential debate.

How exciting that these glaring conflicts-of-interest will no longer remain hidden.

What's more, if attorney-client privilege is no longer sacred under the "Sean Hannity

Standard," that can only mean that we will finally say goodbye to confidential and unnamed

sources.

Not all of them.

Just those with a conflict-of-interest, those whose leaks further their own agenda which

pretty much means all of them.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> George Stephanopoulos Neglects to Disclose His Deep Clinton Ties During Comey Interview - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

Judge Nap Reveals How Comey's Book Could UNRAVEL Mueller's Witch Hunt - Duration: 2:17.

Judge Nap Reveals How Comey's Book Could UNRAVEL Mueller's Witch Hunt,

Many people are scratching their heads in disbelief that disgraced former FBI Director

would write a "tell-all" book…Especially at this time.

What was he thinking?That's precisely what Jude Nap pointed out, during an appearance

on Fox & Friends, where he pointed out that Comey, who is not known for "picking his

words" carefully, could bring down Mueller's entire witch-hunt.

From Daily Caller

Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said former FBI Director James

Comey may end up damaging special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, by continuing

his publicity tour while he's still a witness for the grand jury.

"I'm actually surprised that Jim Comey is doing this now while he is still a witness

before the grand jury that Bob Mueller summoned and therefore still under the control of Bob

Mueller," Napolitano said on "Fox & Friends" Tuesday.

"He could very well say something in one of the many dozens of interviews and book

signings he's about to have, which will contradict something he told Mueller.

Or contradict something he told to the grand jury."

"We don't know if he's testified already but we do know that he's had many, many

debriefings by Bob Mueller and Bob Mueller's team, which consists of federal prosecutors

and former FBI agents who used to work for him," Napolitano continued.

"If anyone of us had been a witness for Bob Mueller, we would have an agreement with

Mueller not to discuss the testimony in public, for fear of some contradiction coming back

to bite."

Napolitano said Comey is likely motivated by money and a desire to hurt President Donald

Trump, but should still be cautious about how he handles himself in public going forward.

"You are not subject to a federal prosecutor … I know you want to sell the book but the

more you talk the more you're going to hurt our case.

That's the conversation I expected Bob Mueller and Jim Comey had," he concluded.

"I don't know if they had it.

I don't know if they had it.

It's an unusual situation that he's in."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Judge Nap Reveals How Comey's Book Could UNRAVEL Mueller's Witch Hunt - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

Travel video blog by Stefan with Dalmatian Ole - Worldwide destinations and Boston videos - Duration: 0:39.

For more infomation >> Travel video blog by Stefan with Dalmatian Ole - Worldwide destinations and Boston videos - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

⚽ SPORTING vs FC PORTO | Taça de Portugal 2017/18 | MEIA-FINAL com ABERTURA de SAQUETAS - Duration: 5:23.

any find my buttons smaller price goes on this purpose I have

while 5% the store using the code 2018 all links in good sun description

that arose in beans keeps 20 amazon With you guys, can you see today?

here provision of cup final portugal I export in good Portuguese but I want

You leave it down. who do you think will reach the final

of the cup portugal exports in comfort and also leave the result you think

will be in this game and you already know who has the comment right treatment comment on

spiritual top I also think I have a big yes for

Please, I know it's difficult but we let's build and I do not like

many bytes way the tube in which yours like 2008 works one way

of engagement that is to say l'équipe comment but only

When I ride if you want, you can be covered tasty but never tabet comment

What time is it? then make prediction of the good sporting

port

personal injury that our team does not always with three teams that can see that three

different we have here is from Ze the F-35 football 2006 2007 and both here too

35 is prudent personal hygiene and are the only ones I have with

port sporting and this is not why even this one is like this and this one has a

port sporting in or out players of these two teams and

Let's see who has the most letters from the port of the sportem is the

Winner I'm not repudiating this - I'm only beneficial for a good football match

as they are always two great teams and the piling neighborhoods here for 55 2017

which are then from last year between port and sporting boats that were present

Let's see, we have a letter here. gildo doctor is tomorrow and after not

have a lot of top here and everton in a europe and belgium deference

this collection was anything much very good that the light dns of the

ferencváros we have gonzalo castro azul porto 0 0 in the first leg of football

2007 any little thing and it's the sporth goal

we have a goal here for the honey himself but it does not matter to portugal the sporting

and to be 100 the sport after the roni to wood national

ernani the game at the port right now I was in the guimarães victory so

on one I apologize to you, you know that

performed so mixed it so it twisted very coherent because in the first

games and now playing in Genoa Mauritius and we have the

pedroca we see our last jacket that port but with a Spanish goal

brand the people are in the cup final portugal for now we have here and there

martinez's unique bar uses artur alvim on the river plate

we have sergio but the psg and ended in port in port or capable of making a

goal was the fourth goal of the draw and a cap give the port to the cup final

Portugal and we have here with the player Moroccan game virtuoso of sesi is by

this to the touch a goal to the sporting and the people of the port are 2000 and 2007 and

change everything becomes sad

For more infomation >> ⚽ SPORTING vs FC PORTO | Taça de Portugal 2017/18 | MEIA-FINAL com ABERTURA de SAQUETAS - Duration: 5:23.

-------------------------------------------

Jeff Sessions Dropped A Hint About His Future With Shocking Decision - Duration: 12:42.

Jeff Sessions Dropped A Hint About His Future With Shocking Decision

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is under fire.

Insiders continue to speculate that Donald Trump will one day oust him as Attorney General.

But Sessions just revealed his future with one shocking decision.

One of the reasons Sessions has been able to hang onto his job this long is because

he's committed to implementing Trump's 'Make America Great Again' immigration

agenda.

And Sessions just took another step toward cracking down on illegal immigration by ending

a legal aide service for illegal aliens.

The Washington Post reports:

"THE U.S. IMMIGRATION COURTS WILL TEMPORARILY HALT A PROGRAM THAT OFFERS LEGAL ASSISTANCE

TO DETAINED FOREIGN NATIONALS FACING DEPORTATION WHILE IT AUDITS THE PROGRAM'S COST-EFFECTIVENESS,

A FEDERAL OFFICIAL SAID TUESDAY.

OFFICIALS INFORMED THE VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE THAT STARTING THIS MONTH IT WILL PAUSE THE

NONPROFIT'S LEGAL ORIENTATION PROGRAM, WHICH LAST YEAR HELD INFORMATION SESSIONS FOR 53,000

IMMIGRANTS IN MORE THAN A DOZEN STATES, INCLUDING CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL ALSO EVALUATE VERA'S "HELP DESK," WHICH OFFERS TIPS

TO NON-DETAINED IMMIGRANTS FACING DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS IN THE CHICAGO, MIAMI, NEW YORK,

LOS ANGELES AND SAN ANTONIO COURTS.

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, WHICH RUNS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S IMMIGRATION

COURTS, SAID THE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO "CONDUCT EFFICIENCY REVIEWS WHICH HAVE NOT TAKEN PLACE

IN SIX YEARS."

AN IMMIGRATION COURT OFFICIAL, WHO SPOKE ON THE CONDITION OF ANONYMITY BECAUSE THE AUDIT

HAS NOT BEEN FORMALLY ANNOUNCED, SAID THE REVIEW WILL EXAMINE THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS

OF THE FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS AND WHETHER THEY DUPLICATE EFFORTS WITHIN THE COURT SYSTEM.

HE NOTED, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT IMMIGRATION JUDGES ARE ALREADY REQUIRED TO INFORM IMMIGRANTS

OF THEIR RIGHTS BEFORE A HEARING, INCLUDING THEIR RIGHT TO FIND A LAWYER AT THEIR OWN

EXPENSE."

Programs like this are a magnet for illegal immigration.

Illegal aliens enter the country knowing there is legal aid to help them stay.

Jeff Sessions was right to end this program.

Sessions came under fire from Trump and his supporters when he recused himself from the

Russia investigation.

Recusing himself allowed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint special counsel

Robert Mueller.

But he has faithfully carried out President Trump's immigration policies.

And that has allowed him to keep

his job.

For more infomation >> Jeff Sessions Dropped A Hint About His Future With Shocking Decision - Duration: 12:42.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Caught Ignoring A Major Clinton Scandal - Duration: 13:35.

Robert Mueller Caught Ignoring A Major Clinton Scandal

It is clear to most that Robert Mueller's Russia investigation has major political motivations.

The entire left-wing is cheering for Mueller.

And Mueller just proved he's on their side after he was caught ignoring a major Clinton

scandal.

One of the latest attempts to tie President Trump to Russian collusion is a $150,000 donation

to Trump's charity in 2015.

The donation came from Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk.

It came following a short appearance by then Presidential candidate Donald Trump at a conference

that he attended via video.

Mueller is trying to claim this is proof of some form of interference between Trump and

Russia.

But there's one major problem with this claim.

While $150,000 may be a large sum of money, it pales in comparison to the contributions

Pinchuk had given to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary

of State.

The billionaire has contributed $13 million to Hillary Clinton's infamous charity, giving

him direct access to her as she was serving as Secretary of State.

As reported by The Daily Caller:

"THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE IS INVESTIGATING A $150,000 DONATION A UKRAINIAN BUSINESSMAN

MADE TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S CHARITY IN 2015, ACCORDING TO A NEW REPORT.

THE DONATION, FROM STEEL MAGNATE VICTOR PINCHUK, PALES IN COMPARISON TO CONTRIBUTIONS HE GAVE

TO THE CHARITY BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON SET UP.

THE BILLIONAIRE HAS CONTRIBUTED $13 MILLION TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION SINCE 2006 AND HAD

ACCESS TO HILLARY CLINTON WHILE SHE SERVED AS SECRETARY OF STATE.

BUT SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER IS NOT INVESTIGATING THE CLINTONS.

INSTEAD, HE IS CONDUCTING A BROAD INVESTIGATION OF DONALD TRUMP, INCLUDING THE FLOW OF FOREIGN

MONEY INTO VARIOUS TRUMP-CONTROLLED ENTITIES.

MUELLER BEGAN INVESTIGATING THE PINCHUK DONATION AFTER RECEIVING DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO A

SUBPOENA ISSUED TO THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION — THE REAL ESTATE COMPANY TRUMP RAN BEFORE

ENTERING POLITICS.

IN SEPTEMBER 2015, TRUMP APPEARED VIA VIDEO LINK AT A CONFERENCE PINCHUK HOSTED IN KIEV.

TRUMP'S PERSONAL ATTORNEY, MICHAEL COHEN, NEGOTIATED DETAILS OF THE EVENT WITH DOUGLAS

SCHOEN, A FORMER CONSULTANT FOR BILL CLINTON, ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK TIMES.

TRUMP DID NOT INITIALLY REQUEST PAYMENT FOR THE APPEARANCE, BUT COHEN CONTACTED SCHOEN

AT ONE POINT TO REQUEST A $150,000 HONORARIUM, THE TIMES REPORTED.

IN A SEEMINGLY UNRELATED MATTER, THE FBI RAIDED COHEN'S MANHATTAN OFFICE AND RESIDENCE ON

MONDAY.

THE SEARCH WAS REPORTEDLY CONDUCTED FOR RECORDS RELATED TO COHEN'S PAYMENTS TO STORMY DANIELS,

A PORN STAR CLAIMING TO HAVE HAD AN AFFAIR WITH TRUMP IN 2006.

THE VICTOR PINCHUK FOUNDATION ISSUED A STATEMENT TO THE TIMES, DOWNPLAYING THE DONATION TO

TRUMP.

THE CHARITY REACHED OUT TO TRUMP AND OTHER WORLD LEADERS IN ORDER TO "PROMOTE STRENGTHENED

AND ENDURING TIES BETWEEN UKRAINE AND THE WEST," IT SAID.

CONTACT TO TRUMP WAS MADE AT A TIME WHEN "IT WAS BY NO MEANS ASSURED THAT MR.

TRUMP WOULD BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE IN 2016," THE FOUNDATION POINTED OUT."

Hillary Clinton was well known for her "pay to play" mentality while serving as Secretary

of State.

It seems Pinchuk is another player in that scandal, but the special counsel, led by Robert

Mueller is too busy trying to find proof that Russians interfered in the election to help

Donald Trump.

Do you think Hillary Clinton should be investigated?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments

section below.

For more infomation >> Robert Mueller Caught Ignoring A Major Clinton Scandal - Duration: 13:35.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy Said Something About Replacing Paul Ryan That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 13:35.

Trey Gowdy Said Something About Replacing Paul Ryan That No One Saw Coming

Paul Ryan stunned political observers when he announced his retirement.

Now the race is on to see who will succeed him.

But Trey Gowdy stopped everyone in their tracks when he uttered these remarks about the next

Speaker.

Gowdy set off a firestorm of speculation when he reacted to Ryan's declaration that he

would not run for re-election.

The South Carolina Congressman stated that anyone – you don't have to be a member

of the House of Representatives – could be Speaker of the House.

This led some pundits to wonder if Gowdy – who has also announced he is not running for re-election

in 2018 – would be willing to throw his hat in the ring to be the next Speaker.

The Daily Caller reports:

"CONGRESSMAN TREY GOWDY REMINDED EVERYONE WEDNESDAY THAT THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE DOES

NOT NEED TO ACTUALLY BE A SITTING CONGRESSMAN.

THE CONSTITUTION DICTATES "THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SHALL CHOOSE THEIR SPEAKER

AND OTHER OFFICERS," BUT IT DOES NOT STIPULATE THAT YOU HAVE TO BE A SITTING MEMBER OF CONGRESS

TO RUN FOR THE LEADERSHIP POSITION.

GOWDY CONVENIENTLY POINTED THAT OUT AT THE END OF HIS STATEMENT ON SPEAKER PAUL RYAN'S

DECISION NOT TO SEEK RE-ELECTION AT THE END OF HIS TERM.

AFTER CALLING RYAN THE "SMARTEST KID IN THE CLASS" AND WISHING HIM HIS WIFE AND

THEIR THREE CHILDREN "ALL THE BEST," THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN ADDRESSED "THOSE

WITHIN CONGRESS WHO ALWAYS SEEMED TO HAVE A BETTER IDEA OR A SMARTER STRATEGY, NOW IS

YOUR CHANCE TO RUN FOR SPEAKER."

"TO THOSE OUTSIDE OF CONGRESS WHO ALWAYS SEEMED TO HAVE A BETTER IDEA OR A SMARTER

STRATEGY," HE ADDED.

"YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BE A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE TO BE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE AND HENCE, NOW

IS YOUR CHANCE TO RUN FOR SPEAKER."

Ryan was a complete disappointment as Speaker.

He presided over a Congress that spent more time investigating the President than trying

to pass his agenda.

And because Ryan failed to wage even one ounce of a fight to fund Trump's border wall and

enact his Make America Great Again agenda, Republican voter enthusiasm is depressed ahead

of the 2018 midterms.

Gowdy seemed to suggest that someone outside of Congress – who recognizes these flaws

– should try and mount a campaign to succeed Ryan.

Reporters immediately went to his office to ask if this meant Gowdy wanted to be the next

Speaker.

But his spokesman shot it down with a forceful denial.

The Daily Caller also reports:

"WHEN ASKED FOR COMMENT ON THE POSSIBILITY HE BECOMES THE FIRST NON-SITTING MEMBER TO

BECOME THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IN U.S. HISTORY, A SPOKESWOMAN FOR HIS OFFICE RESPONDED SIMPLY

"NOT A CHANCE."

Would you like to have seen Trey Gowdy replace Paul Ryan?

Let us know your thoughts

in

the comment section.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Said Something About Replacing Paul Ryan That No One Saw Coming - Duration: 13:35.

-------------------------------------------

Here's Further Proof Comey May Have Been Playing Dirty In the Clinton Case - Duration: 12:42.

Here's Further Proof Comey May Have Been Playing Dirty In the Clinton Case

The now fired FBI Director James Comey is in the spotlight once more with the release

of his memoir detailing what it was like to work for President Trump.

While Comey plays coy with the real reasons he was fired, many believe he was playing

dirty in the Clinton investigation, and caused the Clintons to walk free.

But now, his newest statement may have just proven how close he really was to the Clinton

family–and sealed his fate for good.

James Comey just confirmed that his wife Patrice wanted Hillary Clinton to be the first female

president, and was "devastated" when Clinton lost.

He also claimed his children wanted her to win as well, and that the females in his family

were avid feminists who participated in the Women's March.

The Daily Caller reported:

"I didn't take a poll among all the kids, but I'm pretty sure that at least my four

daughters, probably all five of my kids, wanted Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president,"

James Comey said.

"My wife and girls marched in the Women's March the day after President Trump's inauguration,"

he continued.

"There was a lotta passion in this house for Hillary Clinton," Comey told ABC's

George Stephanopoulos as he tried to make the point that he "wasn't making decisions

based on political fortunes."

His wife, Patrice, claimed she was devastated after the loss, not only because she wanted

a female president, but because many of her friends worked for Clinton as well.

The Daily Caller continued:

Patrice Comey told ABC, "I wanted a woman president really badly, and supported Hillary

Clinton.

A lot of my friends worked for her, and I was devastated when she lost."

Despite attempting to claim he did not make any executive decisions based on his personal

attributes, Comey seems avid in his advancements against President Trump still.

The media is currently in a frenzy over Comey's impending release of his memoir, entitled,

"A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership."

Supposedly, the book is a tell-all regarding the President and his interactions with Comey

and his cases.

But many are against the release of the book, and assume it is just another liberal spreading

lies for profit.

Do you believe Comey purposefully misled the Clinton investigation to let his friends walk

free?

Leave us your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more infomation >> Here's Further Proof Comey May Have Been Playing Dirty In the Clinton Case - Duration: 12:42.

-------------------------------------------

DEOEN - "JBL" [Official Audio] - Duration: 2:43.

For more infomation >> DEOEN - "JBL" [Official Audio] - Duration: 2:43.

-------------------------------------------

ITALY vs AMERICA - FOOD! [SUB ITA] - Duration: 14:33.

Hi guys it's Debbie! As I've lived in Italy nearly my whole life and I've been

living in the United States for around seven months now, today I would like to

start a series of new videos in which I speak about different topics such as

driving, going to the cinema, food, the education system... And I would like to

explain how these things work in my home country and how they are here in the

United States. Also I was originally born in England from a British mum so half of

my culture and tastes are influenced by the British culture, so if the topic

allows it I would also like to introduce my perspective as an English person. Also

last thing: with these videos I don't mean to offend anyone or judge a culture,

just as a foreigner living in a different country I thought I could

offer my perspective and maybe raise a discussion about certain topics. Today I

would like to begin with a big concept both for Italy and the United States:

food. The first difference that can immediately be pointed out between the

two countries is the access to food and the different relationship the two

countries have towards it. In America you have access to any type of food nearly

24/7: wherever you go at whatever time there will be restaurants offering cheap

food, even all night long. Or you can just pull up an app on your phone and deliver

it straight to your door. Let's take for example the town right next to the one

in which I'm staying now and the one in which I carry out most of my daily

activities. It has 15,000 inhabitants so a small to medium town and let's see what

it has to offer. Chili's, Burger King, Wendy's, McDonald's, Blaze Pizza,

Applebee's, Panda Express, two Dunkin Donuts and then many other generic

restaurants which wouldn't necessarily be included in the fast-food sector but

which just show how many choices a person could have. In Italy there is not

this immediate access to food, especially fast food. The country is depicted as

very proud of its food but on a refined level: Italians carry pride in offering

and eating very high quality food. Here we are mostly speaking of the concept of

eating out, but even when preparing food most

supermarkets aren't open until very late at night, in the smaller towns they even

close for a lunch break for a couple of hours. Italians in general have very high

standards when it comes to eating and they do not view food as something fast,

a product to consume just like any other. But we'll get back to that later on. Most

towns in Italy do not have fast food chains, they just have local pizzerias or

restaurants which open around 6:00 p.m. and closed around midnight,

some even earlier during the week. Also sometimes they will be open for a couple

of hours at lunch time. There quite a few kebab shops, chip shops in the larger

cities and in the more touristy areas there is a wider choice to accommodate

different tastes and restaurants might be open all day long. There are many

small family-run places to eat and especially in the south you can see many

street food vendors, but on the contrary of what they appear to

offer, which appears as this very hearty calorie loaded food, in reality most of

their products are very very healthy. But for example in the city where I lived

(Verona) there were two McDonald's and one Burger King serving a population of

300,000 people, and the Burger King only opened a few years ago. Then we have

another couple of McDonald's and Burger King serving the surrounding area which

includes a 700,000 people and that's it. No Dunkin Donuts, no Papa John's, no

Five Guys, no Taco Bell, no Chipotle, no Wendy's, Pizza Hut, Popeyes...

All of these shops don't even exist in all of Italy. I think there might be one

Starbucks in Rome and I'm not even sure about that. You just get kebab shops,

there is one subway in Verona, there are hamburger restaurant, sandwich shops but

unless you live in the centre of the city or in general in a pretty inhabited

area, you'll have to pick up the car and drive for a while, because by the way

Uber doesn't exist. Most of the fast-food options are

ice-cream shops, small cafes so what we would usually call a "bar". They usually

serve small pastries, sandwiches, coffee, drinks. There are many many pizzerias

(even more than necessary) but they're usually dine-ins where you will pay a

full regular restaurant price and you will have to pay more for drinks, for

the cover service. There are pizza takeaway places but they're still considered more

of a treat rather than something fast to take away. So if you're hungry at an

inconvenient time or an inconvenient location, too bad for you. And I lived in

the north of Italy, a very industrialised area. In the south of Italy the situation

is even more different: you can go through town after town without seeing

one fast food shop. There will be old family style run restaurants. In Italy

they aren't even that many apps to order online. You can call a pizzeria and speak

with somebody and order delivery, but there's no Seamless,

no Postmates. Around two years ago Just Eat was introduced and in the town where

Simone (my boyfriend) lived which has over 30.000

inhabitants, one restaurant was available on the app. So in general the

first difference between Italy and the United States when speaking about food

is the relationship people have towards it. In America unless you live on in the

wilderness on the border with Canada, you can always find somewhere to eat, to grab

a fast bite. And as a matter of fact food is seen as a fast, an easy thing. In Italy

instead, eating food bought from a restaurant is seen more as a treat. Most families

don't often order food at home and if they do it's never pasta, never meat and

never sandwiches. It will usually be pizzas from an actual pizzeria and it

will usually be on the weekend or when they have friends over or

it's a birthday, a cause for celebration let's say. So Italians, starting from a very

young age, don't have the concept of eating out often. People do eat at

fast-food restaurants but for example for teenagers, which are the biggest

clients of these places, it's more during the weekend because they're in the city

or they're on a school trip, or they're meeting up with a friend, they

went shopping and they couldn't afford anything else. If I were now to call my

ten year old brother back in Italy and tell him we're about to all go out to

eat together, he'd probably ask me why?Why, what are we celebrating?

When in America many people eat out as part of their regular meal plan. I think

this distinction depends on the difference on the meal structure.

In Italy there are nearly rules surrounding what you eat, how you eat

and when you eat. And when it comes to mealtime everything else must stop and

everybody (from toddlers to grandparents) must interrupt the daily activities and

come to the table and eat together, dedicate that time, their time to food. So

already as a child a meal is seen as a ritual, a part of the day and usually

something your family made rather than something delivered to your door. It's

not something fast. There are approximately three standard

times to eat and it goes more or less like this: 6:00 to 9:00 in the morning

for breakfast, 12:00 to 2:00 for lunch and 6:30 to 8:30 in the evening for

dinner. And meals are a big thing, it means sitting down all together at a

completely well laid table, kids and adults eat all together. And the food

will be pasta or rice, meat or fish, vegetables, mozzarella, soup, bread. You

will never be invited over to a friend's house and the offered hummus, chicken

teriyaki, udon noodle soup. You will find wonderful and delicious variants of

what you know, but hardly ever it will be something completely exotic and uncommon.

In America instead people are more flexible about this: pita bread and avocado,

dinner time might be at 5:00 and the next day at 8:00. The children might eat earlier

than the parents later, the family might skip completely a meal and eat another

larger one after, they might eat one big meal in a day or ten smaller snacks.

That's why restaurants in the United States are more flexible, they're open at

different times. If this were to happen in Italy outside of the standard times

restaurants would probably be empty. Let's talk a bit about the food in

itself. First things first: ninety percent of the

food in America which is labeled as "true Italian" is not. It is an Americanised

version of the food. There is nothing wrong with this, this happens with every

country, food is adapted to the tastes of paying customers. But as we are now

speaking of American food and Italian food, I thought it'd been necessary to

point out that many foods which you believe are Italian just aren't. We don't

usually eat spaghetti with meatballs (or if we do it's in a completely different

manner), we don't eat garlic bread, we certainly

never ate alfredo sauce, chicken with pasta as a side. There's nothing wrong

with this, it's just a complete misconception about what we actually eat

in Italy. And it is an important concept for all of this video.

In reality Italian cuisine is very simple, it's very basic, it doesn't

contain many adventurous sauces, it doesn't contain too much sugar or salt. As I was

saying before, pasta or rice, meat or fish. vegetables, mozzarella, bread, soup and so on.

There is a huge choice within these basic pieces, there are some interesting

local traditions all over the country, but at the same time there are

some big staples everybody is familiar with and which everybody eats wherever

you go in Italy: carbonara is carbonara, ragù is ragù wherever you go.

I have noticed that the south of Italy has some very particular dishes and the people

are famous for being more adventurous with food, there is some very

experimental street food going on down in the south. But there is not that huge

variety and fusion of different types of food as there

in America. This is due to the fact that America is a melting pot of cultures and

everybody has bought a taste of their own country. You can find anything from

popular Mexican, Thai and Japanese to more uncommon cuisines such as Brazilian,

Syrian, Sudanese... you name it. Obviously for the purposes of the video I am

highlighting the most notable features of both cuisines and what you would

notice visiting the country, but definitely both in American homemade

dishes and brought dishes you can notice the influence of different cultures

bought from immigrants over the decades and centuries. In Italy the waves of

immigration have been intense over the years, Italy is home to many different

cultures and everybody has brought a part of their home country with them.

When speaking of food I have seen (and eaten) at many middle eastern

restaurants, for example the kebab shops, there are many halal stores, then the

north of Italy has many dishes which are more similar to the German or Austrian

cuisine (for example potatoes and speck) and the south of Italy is more

similar to North African food, for example cous cous. But generally speaking

Italian food has not been changed that much.

Now let's talk a little about junk food- Unfortunately one of the stereotypes I

had heard about America, and that is of shops offering a wide variety of junk

food is true. But there is also a silver lining to this, so hear me out. I've been

to a variety of supermarkets in the United States and I have found things

such as... corn dogs with blueberry batter, spray cheese,

spray butter, pop-tarts and I've heard there is such thing as deep-fried butter. If you

walk down the drinks aisle you will find dozens and dozens and dozens of

different types of fizzy drinks, any flavour of Fanta, ten types of coke, 7up,

Dr. pepper, Mountain Dew, Pepsi, Sprite. The seasoning aisle: classic

ranch, peppercorn ranch, homestyle ranch, buttermilk ranch, bacon ranch, three

cheese ranch, spicy ranch... The same goes for crisps, frozen pizzas, cookies.. There

is anything possible and for everything there are ten different variations,

different flavours. In Italy no supermarket stocks that many junk food

options. A quick note to the side, in America for example water is served for

free at restaurants and is never considered the main drink.

Waiters will serve water at the table and then will

insist on asking what would you like to drink. And when drinking water people

will often choose different types, such as blueberry water, pomegranate water. In

Italy people just don't have that many options, and I don't think they even want

them. You either drink regular water, tea (of three types peach, lemon or green tea),

regular Diet Coke, same for Pepsi, regular Fanta, regular Sprite, juices and

that's about it. Even if you go to stores in Italy which are similar to these American

ones which offer these options, for example there is one

discount shop called Lidl which in my opinion is quite close to Walmart (in a

smaller size), the array of junk food will still be limited to discount fake Coca

Cola, cookies, crisps and a few different frozen pizzas. Overeating and indulging

in Italy can never become extreme because society there considers

indulging and overeating eating chocolate ice cream, eating a couple more

cookies, Mozzarella sticks, cheese puffs. There is just not the offer of anything

more "extreme". But the big difference with America is that there aren't any shops

like Whole Foods or Trader Joe's, which are huge chains which offer organic and

healthy food. There is one chain in Italy which is NaturaSì, but it isn't

available everywhere and it is ridiculously expensive. I think that

these supermarkets aren't so widespread back in Italy because you can pick the

healthy and organic options at regular supermarkets. So all in all is Italy

really this super, the healthiest place on earth where people

are stick-thin and just eat mozzarella and organic tomatoes? And is America a

hell made of deep-fried pizzas? NO! For example I gained most of my weight in

Italy and I lost most of it in America, it just depends on the attitude of the

person. And if you really do want to eat junk food, wherever you are the world you

will find it. And many households in America

choose a completely healthy lifestyle, probably more than other families for

example in Italy. Not everything is as bad as stereotypes want it to appear.

On the contrary, because of this varied offer you can easily pick an

interesting and healthy lifestyle. But I must say that the temptation in America

is much stronger and the healthy food to unhealthy food offer in the two

countries is completely different. And I sometimes feel that in America there is

no in-between. You're either buying the healthy super

expensive super foods, or you're forced to buy your groceries at the discount

shop which obviously offers unhealthy options. I feel that instead in Italy

it's more in between, I feel that everybody can access all the stores

which offer healthy options at a reasonable price. And even if you do

indulge and overeat, it will never be this ridiculous amount of fats and sugar. I

also think that in Italy society tends to be very (sometimes too much) strict

about food and about the rules it imposes on it. People will turn their

noses at even the idea of a completely odd and different food, or they will

refuse to eat at different times of the day. I hope I managed to unravel

most of my thoughts about this topic. Let me know what you think about it and also

as all of you come from different countries, I would love to hear more

stories about food in your country, so feel free to leave a comment down below.

Thank you for watching, if you want to see more videos make sure to subscribe

and I'll see you soon, bye!

For more infomation >> ITALY vs AMERICA - FOOD! [SUB ITA] - Duration: 14:33.

-------------------------------------------

ᴴᴰ HOW BRITAIN RULES the WORLD? England Is A Parasite Of All Countries - Duration: 22:43.

England rules the world, and the US her puppet

A small smiling "grandmother" Queen Elizabeth, recently

celebrated the 62nd anniversary of the on the throne.

The whole world is told that in England, the constitutional

monarchy, that is, absolute power Elizabeth is limited by the parliament.

The queen herself is a certain symbol, a tribute to tradition,

talisman, political whose powers are not great ...

We used to believe in official sources.

This is only officially considered, that in the UK "constitutional

monarchy".

As if limited.

But…

The English Queen has the right to declare war (without

legislative restrictions and without explaining the reasons);

The English queen has right to resign

government (similarly); The English queen has

the right to dissolve parliament;

Once a year she performs before the parliament and voiced

their demands for the near future time (that is, in fact

forms the policy of the state and, importantly, the colonies,

being the queen of all territories-states,

subject to England)

"In the" home affairs "authority Crowns are more than wide.

The appointment of ministers, secret advisors, members of executive

bodies and other officials persons.

In addition, the monarch is head of the armed forces

(British army, royal fleet, the Royal Air Force and

intelligence service).

The prerogative of the Queen (Sovereign) - to declare war, conclude

peace, send military actions.

Concerning the prerogatives of the queen and foreign affairs: discuss

conditions and ratify agreements, unions, international

agreements;

Parliamentary decisions Not needed.

The Queen also accredits British high commissioners

and ambassadors, and accepts foreign diplomats.

Also the Queen is revered source of justice,

and appoints judges to all kinds of cases.

The general law states that The crown "can not be mistaken";

The monarch can not be judged In court for criminal offenses.

In fact, the queen controls all branches of power - legislative,

executive and judicial.

And, finally, the monarch is the Supreme ruler of the Anglican

church and can appoint bishops and archbishops

(that is, the head not only secular, but also spiritual

power, which is not found anywhere in the peace, even in Iran). "

Greater concentration of power no one

man in the world.

Even the Korean "Juche" democratic

Media »set an example dictator, nervously smoking

in the corridor.

Another say that England a democratic country,

which position itself.

What democracy, what you?

The rigid vertical of power, not controlled by anyone.

So ... grandmother Lisa J

And they show us

Now about ... more banal, but not less interesting.

Anyone will say which currency in the world the most stable,

most ..., well, in general, the most-most.

Well, of course, it's Grandma's "Pound" - Pound sterling.

With whose only state currency, which just did not happen,

but with a pound, looking at all these "merrymaking" chuckles

grandmother Lisa.

And, that, has the right - she the same woman, first of all,

moreover, the Queen of Peace.

Yes, yes, I did not make a reservation - exactly so - the Queen

The world.

Ever wondered, how much land belongs to

grandmother?

Guys, a lot, a lot.

Judge for yourself.

Data for the year 2012.

From 1876 to 1947 the monarch of Great Britain also had the title of Emperor

(Empress) of India.

Currently, Queen Elizabeth II is a monarch

16 states.

The British Empire is the largest from ever existed

states in the history of humanity with colonies

on all inhabited continents.

In Europe

The British Empire. 1897.

Ireland, including Ulster Helgoland (1807-1890) (now

part of Germany) Malta (now independent

state) Gibraltar

Minorca (she's also Menorca, now part of Spain)

Ionian Islands (now part of Greece)

Cyprus (including Akrotiri bases and Dhekelia)

Crowned Lands Bailiwick Jersey

Bailiwick of Guernsey Isle Of Man

In Asia

Mesopotamia (mandatory territory),

future Kingdom of Iraq, modern Iraq

Palestine, including the Transjordan (now Jordan) and Palestine

Kuwait Qatar

Bahrain Burma

Oman The contractual Oman (now

United Arab Emirates) Aden (now part of Yemen)

Afghanistan British India

Ceylon Maldives

Malaysia, including Singapore British Malaya

Sarawak British North Borneo

Sabah Labuan

Brunei Hong Kong (now Hong Kong,

autonomous region of China)

In Africa

Egypt Anglo-Egyptian Sudan

British East Africa Kenya

Uganda Tanganyika (now part

Tanzania) Zanzibar (now part

Tanzania) British Somalia (now

formally part of Somalia, de facto Somaliland)

Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe)

Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia)

Nyasaland (now Malawi) British South Africa

South African Union Cape Province (now

part of South Africa) Natal (now part of South Africa)

Orange Free State (now part of South Africa)

Transvaal (now part SOUTH AFRICA)

Bechuanaland (now Botswana) South-West Africa (now

Namibia) Basutoland (now Lesotho)

Swaziland Seychelles

Archipelago Chagos (British Indian territory

ocean) Mauritius

Gambia Nigeria

British Cameroon - small part of modern Cameroon

and Nigeria Gold Coast and British

Togo - (now Ghana) Sierra Leone

the island of St.

Helena, Ascension, Tristan da Cunha

In North America

Canada (including Quebec) Newfoundland (now part

Canada) Bermuda

Thirteen colonies in 1776 the United States

New England New Hampshire

The colony of Massachusetts Gulf and Plymouth colony

(later Massachusetts and Maine) Rhode Island

Connecticut

Medium Colonies

New York (later New York and Vermont)

New Jersey Pennsylvania

Delaware

Southern Colonies

Maryland Virginia

North Carolina South Carolina

Georgia

In Latin America

British Virgin Islands islands

Dominica Barbados

Trinidad and Tobago Anguilla

Saint Lucia Antigua and Barbuda

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Grenada

Saint Kitts and Nevis British Guiana (now

Guyana) Mosquito shore (1655-1859)

British Honduras (now Belize)

Cayman islands Jamaica

Bahamas Turks and Caicos Islands

The Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

islands Montserrat

In Australia, Oceania and Antarctica

Australia Mainland territories

N.S.W. Queensland

Victoria

South Australia

Land of Van Dimen (Tasmania) Western Australia

Northern Territory External territories

Papua (now part of Papua - New Guinea)

Territory of New Guinea (now part of Papua New

Guinea) British Solomon

islands Nauru

Christmas Island (now part of Australia)

Norfolk (now part of Australia) Cocos (Keeling) Islands

(now part of Australia) The Australian Antarctic

territory (not recognized international community)

New Zealand Tokelau (now part of the New

Zealand) Niue (now part of the New

Zealand) British Samoa

The Land of Ross in Antarctica (not recognized by the international

community) Cook Islands (Protectorate

Great Britain in 1888-1901 years, in 1901-1965 - as part of the

New Zealand is now free associated state

with New Zealand) Fiji

Gilbert and Ellis Islands (now Tuvalu and part of Kiribati)

New Hebrides (co-ownership with France, now Vanuatu)

Pitcairn Tonga - the protectorate of Great Britain

while preserving your own monarchy in the years 1900-1970.

British Antarctic territory (including Southern

Shetland Islands and South Orkney Islands)"

What small island the state north of

Europe, where peace and quiet is a little harmless

grandmother Lisa.

Is it really harmless?

Everybody used to think that world "rule the US" - a phrase,

bored to the point.

Used to not just Count, but sincerely believe

in this ... fairy tale.

In all used to blame USA.

It is possible prosecutors right - we can observe

US actions, but who acts as a puppeteer .... So

whose puppet named USA?

Do not waste time time for some proceedings,

search for evidence, collection facts - this is all in discussion,

but do not mention ... English banks - I can not.

"The banking system of Great Britain - one of the oldest.

It is characterized by a high degree of concentration and

specialization, well-developed banking infrastructure,

close relationship with international the market of loan capitals.

In the world financial center - There is more work in London

foreign banks than English.

This, above all, American and Japanese banks.

The share of deposits in foreign currency in banks of Great Britain

is much higher than in other countries of the world.

English banking the system owns the widest possible

in the world network of foreign branches. "

Attention was drawn to "politics pound "?

No?

But in vain.

He's the same .... mummified.

He also teases and controls any currency of any state.

Do not believe me?

Have to - he manages and subjugates the very same

notorious, scandalous, but everyone is so ardently loved

dollar.

Again you do not understand the essence question?

The dollar rules all the mined resources - and where do they get it?

Return to the list of colonies England, ask

structure of the banking system of England - it only

only two-level, not requiring foreign

banks in territory of England, but ... full

approval and recognition of the - Bank of England.

Further even easier - all sorts of there are devaluations, defaults,

playing evil jokes with any currency of the world, never

Touch and do not touch to ... "pound", because everything

its assets are foreign banks are kept in ... England,

and what is the currency there?

And, what's with the "pound" course?

Do you know what this dependence is?

Just do not try buckle

her to ... household.

Dependence - is complete and unconditional submission.

But now about the main thing - so who is most interested

in unleashing wars, seizures territories?

The answer is simple to the contrary - The owner of the World, the ruling

the column is a small one Island state

with its smog - England, and, therefore, a small smiling

the woman is Lisa's grandmother.

There is such an expression "Friendship friendship, and money apart. "

Talk about friendship, but not simple, but ... dependent.

So who's there in "girlfriends".

Well, of course, the USA!

Did not know?

Now you will know.

As they say - "The World rule money. "

And so not only the World and peace, but also by war.

Having become addicted, moreover, and such a "friendly"

obey not just have to as a faithful dog, but ... forced,

even girlfriends.

It so happened that before as long as there are

money, people (in overwhelming most of them, with the exception of

of the individual righteous and crazy) will strive

to possess them.

For anybody not news, that all politics and economics

In full and unconditional depending on two clans

are the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

Do you know such people?

Well, who would doubt - their they know EVERYTHING!

But the fact that all the capital these "guys" are kept

in the Bank of England - for many can be news.

But, alas, this is so.

I think, to continue the conversation about the obvious, which is clear

to each or all ... Then Listen.

There are such kind of amateurs - Rothschilds and Rockefellers

- live, live, pockets stuff, but sometimes they

have a good time.

They are someone's policy Manipulate, then someone's

the economy is ruined, under themselves pile up.

And suddenly it turns out that scale is no longer the same, a little

im, it is not enough, it would be necessary more ...

Thought, thought and thought: "Ah, what would we do with Russia?"

not to play?

Is she too self-conscious loudly began to declare?

I ought to have her head back and forth shove it, or else you see

... The money she earns decided!

Right now she's dreaming! "

Thought "guys" is not easy take away, withdraw, ruin,

but also in ... dependent girlfriends to attach.

Do you know where, before, everything is torn?

Exactly!

There, where it is thin.

And where is Russia's most vulnerable a place?

Precisely - petrodollar.

And where does he go there so smartly?

Correctly, by territory Ukraine.

Here it is necessary to take it away, and Ukraine does not need to be demolished

only from the card, but from the face of the earth.

Whom to this event to urge

it is not necessary - this, of course, dependent girlfriend - USA.

Here is Lisa's grandmother, with all his smiling shyness

and gave the order to the girl-friend - you want further live under a warm "grandmother's

shawl "- forward to the barricades.

Grandmother wanted one more colony, yes closer to the ill-fated,

uncontrollable and stubborn Russia.

Wanted - then so and be!

A girlfriend, a faithful dog, do not get used to such "games"

for health and well-being beloved grandmother - old age

must be respected.

And then, do not bring the Lord, with old grannies on the nervous

So ... Or suddenly the granny left foot in the morning is not it

will decide and decide against beloved girlfriend his "sadness-sadness"

to send?

Yes, and one of the largest shareholders of the largest

oil and gas companies England "Eclairs Group" and "JKX Oil & Gas"

Mr. Kolomoisky already A long time in the waiting room and waiting for the team

"Fas!", Ready for cutting Ukraine.

Continue?

Or is everything obvious?

So what do we have with Ukraine?

Who rules the ball?

Just do not be touched merits crowned

grandmother - she is a woman in old age, little

Is that ... Suddenly offended, And her wrath ... Look

to Ukraine.

And if he decides to hunt the dogs?

England is very curious a country in the history of mankind.

It seems that it was in England were developed and

In life, all those steps that upset

empire of the Golden Horde, then there is Russia - and the world has become

to rule the mind-ego.

Notice, in our world it is England is the main

carrier and stronghold of Western values.

Now all views attract to the US, but in fact

the gray cardinal who rules the world, is

England.

The US has a brute force, and the mind is in England.

Let's pass on significant events in the history of England, which

correspond officially accepted chronology.

XIII century - Great Charter liberties (for the feudal lords)

and the creation of parliament.

In the middle of the same century from English disappears

the dual number (the first swallow among other European

languages).

A dual number like we know, is responsible for the whole

perception of the world.

Interestingly: first disappeared a dual number, but only

then the parliament was created.

It turns out that the parliament in our time serves as a

instrument balancing separated opposites?

That is, the language used to connect and counterbalanced the opposites,

and when the dual number disappeared, it was necessary to create

public institution parliament to English

society could live and develop farther.

Three hundred years later, in the 16th century, England starts the war on

the sea against the Spanish domination.

We do not seem to concerns, but, according to studies

on HX (very reasoned; facts cited by the authors

HH, historians are in no hurry refute; , Spain was

stronghold of the Golden Horde on West.

Everyone knows that England defeated in this war.

From this moment begins expansion of dominance

England in the world: England is becoming empire.

Further.

In the XVII century, many significant events: the first bourgeois

revolution; first execution King Charles I - and Bill

about the rights; the creation of Isaac Newton's theory, which

divided a single universe on bricks, interaction

between which accidentally (people are taught this vision

throughout the world until now); the creation of a conceptual mind,

who shared the word and the image (i.e., living tissue

the world divided, and between put a dead concept).

In parallel, the science, displacing religion

from a warm place, which it occupied people's minds.

XVIII century: first application steam engine, the creation

factories, mechanization of labor, capitalization, insurrection

Luddites against machines, that is against the dead

labor.

XIX century: Darwin's doctrine of struggle and species survival.

Enough, I think, that see England on the other

side.

And who is our biggest a lover of antiquities?

The English, of course.

Everywhere, wherever you look, lead or lead

excavations of the British.

You say: "Well, what's up such? "

And the fact that the one who leads excavations, he also interprets

find value, establish necessary chronology and

assigns historical names of places that

do not have any relations.

And the one who digs, always there is the possibility of forgery.

For example, some scientists express serious

doubts about the authenticity tomb of Tutankhamun, and

it was the Englishman who unearthed it.

The English came first to India, Egypt (displacing

from there Napoleonic troops), Japan, China, to

conquer them.

All these countries included in the empire of the Golden Horde

and carried a culture, which they got from

her inheritance.

What was it for? to the English?

To take the necessary knowledge and

the history of these countries - I so I suppose.

By the way, in this they are actively helped the Vatican.

Further.

It was the English pushed foreheads Russia and Turkey still

in the XVII century, and yet until the middle of this century

Turkey and Russia were allies (see the books on HX).

Turkey and Russia squandered strength in the struggle with each other,

and their enemies calmly watched for what is happening, collecting

fruit.

It belongs to the British famous principle of "Divide

and rule. "

Where in the modern world nor the conflict flared up,

there once or quite The British have recently visited

and made their dividing mite - you can check it yourself.

Countries and peoples within should be separated.

There is a conflict and ... who is winning?

Someone definitely wins.

You can feel in this force that feeds on

due to division and discord?

And I believe that it is in England is the main

the brain that manages peace.

"But what about the Jews?

- you ask.

- After all, everyone knows that they rule the world.

They have money and, therefore, power".

Yes, they have money, Jews are stretching to money by virtue of its nature,

but, as I see it, they were chosen "Whipping boys"

to look away from those who actually rule

peace.

There is not enough money to to rule the world, we need

особый склад ума — и у англичан он есть.

Он называется властность — власть носить.

Англичане по своей природе властная и безжалостная

нация.

Они, ни секунды не сомневаясь, применяют силу, если затронуты

даже малейшие интересы их империи, нации или страны.

В прошлом они беспощадно уничтожали каждого, кто

вставал на их пути, в наше время их методы изменились,

но ненамного.

У евреев во все века были деньги, но евреи-ростовщики

как миленькие по первой же просьбе ссужали их власть

имущим и правителям.

Потому что власть стоит над деньгами.

Именно эту власть англичане и искали всюду, куда они

приходили.

Искали на земле и искали под землёй.

Что искали?

Материальные носители власти.

Власть — это магия ума — могия ума, — и у неё есть

материальные носители, потому что всё, что существует

в Нави, имеет своё материальное воплощение в Яви — таково

устройство нашей вселенной.

Власть стояла и всё ещё продолжает стоять над деньгами,

но деньги приобретают всё большую самостоятельность.

Всё чаще можно слышать выражение: «У кого деньги,

у того и власть», а в правительство и парламент беззастенчиво

лезут те, у кого карманы набиты деньгами.

Это плохие симптомы, потому что деньги по своей природе

любят только себя и живут только для себя.

Им никто и ничто не нужно, кроме самих себя, потому

что они лишены сознания — мёртвая сила.

Они готовы уничтожить всё вокруг, лишь бы умножить

себя, и им законы не управа, потому что они уже сами

создают законы через прессу и лобби в парламенте.

Мёртвая сила денег берёт сознание людей, и они слепо

следуют за ней, превратившись в марионеток.

Джинн вырвался из бутылки.

Поэтому мы сейчас стоим на пороге перемен.

No comments:

Post a Comment