USA news on Youtube Apr 18 2018

CA Governor Jerry Brown Backs Off Pledge For Border, Trump Has Savage Reply.

Communist California's Governor Jerry Brown has backed off of his commitment to send National

Guard troops, in response to President Donald Trump's call for more border security.

Now, Trump has a savage response to Brown.

You won't want to miss this.

On April 11, 2018, Democrat Governor Jerry Brown pledged to send 400 National Guard troops,

in response to Trump's call for 2,000 to 4,000 from the border states.

Brown made that commitment via a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen,

and Secretary of Defense James "Mad Dog" Mattis.

The letter from Governor Brown indicated that he would send the 400 troops, to help in an

ongoing program to combat transnational crime.

The troops authorized by Governor Brown were to help support law enforcement operations

against transnational gangs, drug smugglers, and human traffickers.

Governor Jerry Brown's letter did not specify how many of the 400 new troops were to join

the 55 guardsmen, already stationed on the border.

"The location of Guard personnel, and number specifically working in support of operations

along the border, the coast and elsewhere in the state will be dictated by the needs

on the ground," a spokesperson for the governor's office told Daily Caller in an email.

Like most things that come out of California, Governor Brown's pledge was worthless.

The crap hit the fan on Tuesday, April 17, 2018, after an official from the U.S. Customs

and Border Protection named Ronald Vitiello told reporters, that Governor Brown was no

longer interested in sending troops.

"The governor determined that what we asked for is unsupportable, but we will have other

iterations," Vitiello said.

This is huge flip-flop on Governor Brown's part, which is not only an embarrassment to

the people of California but also to our country.

It's truly a shame when a governor won't support federal efforts to make our country

safer.

Governor Jerry Brown originally indicated that he would support the deployment of National

Guard troops, to the border as long as they did not involve themselves in supporting immigration

enforcement efforts.

That alone is a tragic point of view for any elected official to have, but that is the

sad state of affairs in Communist California.

It didn't take long for President Donald Trump to jump on Twitter and hammer Governor

Brown, with a brutal response that he truly deserved for backing out of his pledge to

send 400 troops, according to the New York Post.

What kind of governor makes, a fool of himself on such a grand scale?

It would have to be Brown.

"Looks like Jerry Brown and California are not looking for safety, and security along

their very porous Border.

He cannot come to terms for the National Guard to patrol and protect the Border.

The high crime rate will only get higher.

Much wanted Wall in San Diego already started!" Trump wrote.

The blatant unwillingness of liberals in our country to secure our borders, and keep out

illegal immigrants is something our Founding Fathers would have never imagined could happen.

California is the only border state to refuse Trump's request.

The Republican Governors of Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico have already answered the call

for troops in the honorable fashion one would expect from state leaders.

The majority of California's ultra-liberal leadership is all on board Brown's crazy

train, and they are greasing the tracks.

Governor Jerry Brown's refusal is a tremendous disservice to the citizens of his state and

to our country.

There was a time when cowards like Brown would be run out of office and shamed into hiding.

Unfortunately, those days are over until the people paying the price for such destructive

policies decide they've had enough.

The economic consequences and higher crime rates caused by mass illegal immigration will

continue to plague California, and the fact of the matter is that Democrats thrive in

such conditions.

In order for their political model to work, the population must be brought under government

control through the brutal removal of their sovereignty.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> CA Governor Jerry Brown Backs Off Pledge For Border, Trump Has Savage Reply - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

Exposed! George Soros' Secret Plan To Have Sean Hannity Fired Backfires - Duration: 4:26.

Exposed!

George Soros' Secret Plan To Have Sean Hannity Fired Backfires.

Fox News host Sean Hannity had a tough day after it was discovered that he had asked

President Donald Trump's attorney, Michael Cohen, for legal advice.

The attacks against him have George Soros' fingerprints all over it.

The discovery was made during Cohen's hearing, which was attended by porn star Stormy Daniels

and her attorney Michael Avenatti.

Hannity was attacked by liberals for not disclosing that he had a relationship with Cohen as he

has been defending him on his primetime program.

The revelation of their relationship came to light after New York Judge Kimba Wood pressured

Cohen at Monday's hearing.

But, now, secrets about Judge Wood and her relationship with Soros and former President

Bill Clinton have cast a shadow on her performance in the Cohen case.Judge Wood presided over

the 2013 wedding of Soros and his 42-year-old bride Tamiko Bolton, The Washington Times

reported.

In lieu of gifts at the wedding, guests were encouraged to donate to the liberal charities

that Soros supports, like Planned Parenthood.

The wedding was attended by noted liberals like U2 frontman Bono and House Minority Leader

California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the Times reported.

Soros is a globalist, who is anti-borders and has supported numerous Democrats, including

President Trump's opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton.

Judge Wood's Democrat connections do not end there.

Judge Wood was also former President Bill Clinton's failed nominee for U.S. Attorney

General in 1993, the Times reported.

Judge Wood, like President Clinton's first nominee Zoe Baird, had hired an illegal alien

and failed to pay taxes on the employee.

The White House and the media, which protected the Clintons and continues to protect them,

said that she hid the fact that she hired an illegal alien as a nanny, but Judge Wood

said that she did tell them about it.

None of this mattered to some Fox News contributors who took the opportunity to scold Hannity

for not revealing the relationship he had with Cohen.

On Monday, Alan Dershowitz chastised Hannity on his own show, saying, "I really think

you should have disclosed your relationship with Cohen."But, Hannity argued that he

had the "right to privacy" and said that he sought advice from Cohen on real estate

and "not politics."

Dershowitz argued that Hannity still had an obligation to disclose that information because

he talks to millions of people on his program.

On "The Five," a popular Fox News program that airs hours before Hannity's prime time

show, Juan Williams, the resident liberal, also criticized Hannity.

"Why, when Sean was on the air strongly an advocate for President Trump — not saying,

'Hey, I've got a relationship with the lawyer,' I think that's a question,"

he said.

Hannity, not one to back off from a challenge, defended himself on his show on Monday.

He again said that his relationship with Cohen was informal and that he had asked Cohen for

real estate advice, reiterating that he never represented him in a legal matter."I tell

you why they're going nuts," he said of the liberal media.

"They're assuming – because I guess he did some type of work for some Republican

guy – they're figuring, 'Oh, he must've done a big settlement case for Hannity.'

That's not – no, that's not what happened.

Ever," he continued.

"Not one of any issue I ever dealt with Michael Cohen on ever — ever — involved

a matter between me and any third party," he said.

And, on Tuesday, Fox News issued a statement of support for its embattled host.

"While FOX News was unaware of Sean Hannity's informal relationship with Michael Cohen and

was surprised by the announcement in court yesterday, we have reviewed the matter and

spoken to Sean and he continues to have our full support," the statement read.Sean Hannity's

interactions with Michael Cohen were minor, and the campaign against him, which mirrors

the campaign against Laura Ingraham two weeks ago, is a reflection not of the seriousness

of the issue but of the fact that the liberal media, who Hannity crushes in the ratings,

will stop at nothing to have every conservative supporter of the president taken off the airwaves.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Exposed! George Soros' Secret Plan To Have Sean Hannity Fired Backfires - Duration: 4:26.

-------------------------------------------

Clinton & DNC Exposed For Money Laundering, You'll Never Believe Who Covered It Up - Duration: 5:32.

Clinton & DNC Exposed For Money Laundering, You'll Never Believe Who Covered It Up

A new lawsuit exposes a scheme by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

It confirms what we've known about them all along, but you'll be shocked to learn

who tried to cover it up.

Not that long ago, former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile dropped a bomb of a revelation.

She told the world that Hillary Clinton took over the DNC, one year before she was nominated.

It was an ugly violation of how the process is supposed to work.

It humiliated the many voters who thought their primary votes counted.

Obviously, they were fooled.

Clinton conspired with the DNC to take over while she was running for the nomination.

Bernie Sanders and his supporters were just a joke.

He was never supposed to win.

It was shocking and terrible, but technically not illegal (since it concerned the inner

workings of the Democratic Party).

You can add that to the mountain of close-calls Hillary's had avoiding prosecution.

But it turns out her scheming did, in fact, violate the law.

Hillary and the DNC hatched a scheme that would fill her campaign coffers with endless

dollars.

In fact, this scheme was reported, yet nothing was done.

Now, a lawsuit has been filed that aims to bring this corruption to light.

Who ignored Clinton's money scheme?

Only the Federal Election Commission itself.

The Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee allegedly used state chapters

as strawmen to launder as much as $84 million in an effort to circumvent campaign donation

limits, and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing the practice,

a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

The Committee to Defend the President (CDP), a political action committee formally known

as Stop Hillary PAC, filed its complaint with the FEC in December 2017 with the claims that

the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) solicited cash from big-name donors, and allegedly sent that

money through state chapters and back to the DNC before ending up with the Clinton campaign.

[Source: Fox News]

There are limits to how much a person or group can donate to a campaign, and it's for good

reason.

A politician is not supposed to be indebted to a donor.

That could lead to obvious conflicts of interest when in office.

This is a joke, I know, since most of our elected officials kowtow to big donors.

But still, laws are in place to limit that kind of corruption.Hillary and the DNC found

a clever way to get around that.

The money would be filtered through smaller chapters of the party.

It would appear that the money was going to other campaigns for other candidates.

It was then sent back to the DNC, where it would — conveniently — end up in Hillary's

hands.

She got all the money.

The rest of her party was left in the dust.

What's even more shocking is that CDP alerted this scheme to the FEC months ago.

Yet nothing happened.

The FEC is responsible for investigating this very kind of fraud.

All this time has passed, and there is no word that even an investigation has opened.

The political action committee claims that even though the FEC acknowledged receipt of

the complaint and claimed that an investigation would be conducted, the needle has barely

moved.

"The Clinton machine has escaped accountability for its illegal practices for far too long,"

Ted Harvey, CDP chairman, said to Fox News.

"After months of review, the FEC has refused to address the Clintons' $84 million money

laundering scheme that violated several campaign finance laws."

On Monday, the CDP filed a lawsuit against the FEC with the U.S. District Court for the

District of Columbia.

They claim that the commission failed to act, calling the inaction "arbitrary, capricious,

contrary to law, and an abuse of discretion."

[Source: Fox News]

Hey, remember how President Donald Trump's lawyer's office was raided by the FBI over

nothing?

Remember how we've had to put up with a bogus "special investigation" by Robert

Mueller targeting the President, based on a debunked and fake dossier?

How much American tax dollars have been spent on needless attacks on the President, based

on nothing but liberal hearsay?And how many times have we learned about corruption from

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and cabinet members from his administration?

The DOJ and FBI perverted justice under his watch to help Clinton.

And yet there have been zero investigations aimed at these crooks.

Now, we have real evidence to suggest Clinton was laundering money.

The FEC does nothing.

Kind of makes you angry, doesn't it?

Scratch that, it should make you furious.

How are we expected to take our government seriously when they behave this way?

Once again liberals show they can get away with all kinds of crimes.

Hillary Clinton can use illegal email servers, employ sex predators, defend rapists, and

steal money.

Nothing happens.The media invents stories about President Donald Trump and all kinds

of investigations are launched.

Where is the justice in that?

Perhaps we need a greater change in our government before anything happens.

The mid-terms are coming up…

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.