USA news on Youtube Apr 11 2018

The area we are going to talk about today is shrouded in secrecy, and for that reason

it has become the focus of conspiracy theorists.

Is it a hiding place of aliens and weather control technology, or it is merely a location

where the USA develops highly advanced military machinery?

It is often referred to as a "Black Site" where "Black Projects" take place, with

black basically meaning, "highly classified."

Today we'll look at one of the most mysterious black sites in the world, in this episode

of the Infographics Show, What Do We Know About Area 51?

We are told it's called Area 51 because it was named that in some documents pertaining

to the Vietnam War.

The Central Intelligence Agency gives it a far less mysterious name and calls it Homey

Airport and Groom Lake.

This is a restricted area in Nevada, about 83 miles (134 km) northwest of Las Vegas.

In 1955, the site was first used for flight testing, but what happens there now is largely

unknown.

The down to Earth theory is that the U.S. conducts secret military exercises there,

which includes the testing of weapons that are in development.

The reason it remains so secret, of course, is because the U.S. doesn't want any of

these experiments falling into the hands of its real or possible enemies.

Before we get into any of the more outlandish theories about Area 51, we'll tell you what

we do know.

First of all, it's a restricted area, but according to most sources we can find, it

is not as heavily guarded as you might expect.

You can follow a dusty desert road close to the area, but at some point, you'll find

"No Entry" signs that warn trespassers they could take the brunt of deadly force

if they go any farther.

It is patrolled but not as aggressively as you'd think, and it's more likely you'll

be told to go back or receive a fine rather than be shot at, if you wander into the site.

You can't fly over it, and if you attempt to fly a drone over there, you will no doubt

get in trouble.

According to some sources, the area is surrounded by cameras and sensors, with one website stating,

"the base knows every Nevada desert tortoise and jackrabbit that hops the fence."

You can get up to the gates, however, and you'll have to follow the aptly named "Extraterrestrial

Superhighway" to get there.

We found there is even an 'adult entertainment club' called the "Alien Cathouse" just

west of Area 51.

What we are trying to say is that it's not as off the grid as you might think.

Ok, so we now know what kind of place we're looking at.

But what happened there in the beginning?

It was a child of the Cold War with the Soviet Union; the U.S. wanted to test its military

equipment in a far-off place.

The military wanted personnel and engineers to go and work there, and for that reason,

so we are told, they gave it the nice-sounding name of "Paradise Ranch".

The first testing would be of a high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft known as the U-2 program.

Soon the locals would spot weird things in the air, or pilots would see strange high-flying

aircraft, and this is where the speculation started regarding aliens and such.

Because the government could say nothing about this, the UFO theories seemed almost credulous.

Since then, all manner of covert operations have taken place at Area 51, which you can

find by looking at declassified documents.

These include building and testing the "Bird of Prey" black project stealth aircraft

in the 90s.

There are too many projects to mention, but no doubt aircraft are still being secretly

built and tested there today.

The latest developments are all secret, but you can check those declassified documents

to see what went down there in the past.

According to one expert, he believes present projects involve "more exotic forms of radio

communication, directed energy weapons, and lasers."

So, what is all the fuss about?

Well, some people believe it's much more than a place where aircraft is developed,

and advanced weapons tested, but a site where the USA's biggest secrets are kept – such

as where the moon landings were filmed and faked.

It's not the moon landings, however, that have attracted the most attention.

It's aliens.

If you've seen our show on Roswell and those people that say they saw aliens at the Roswell

site, one might wonder what happened to our little green friends.

Well, perhaps they were taken to Area 51 and still remain there now.

Does that sound crazy to you?

It might sound crazy if you haven't heard of the name, Bob Lazar.

Lazar is a 59-year old American engineer that told the world he had worked on reverse engineering

several flying saucers.

He made this public at first under a pseudonym when his face was blacked out in an interview

on American TV in 1989.

He also claimed he had been given briefing documents explaining that he'd be dealing

with aliens from the southern constellation of Reticulum, and that these aliens had been

on Earth for around 10,000 years.

To power their aircraft, they used the unknown element, "Element 115".

Lazar's critics say he falsified his academic records, but Lazar says they were wiped by

the government.

The only evidence is his testimony, but it must be said he is now a businessman and has

no history – that we can find – of mental illness.

In a recent interview, he said, "Look, I know what happened is true.

There is no doubt.

Period."

Of all the conspiracy theories, this has the most credibility, only because this supposed

whistleblower seems to have no reason to lie and does have a background that could put

him inside Area 51.

Whatever the case, his words certainly kicked-off years of speculation as to what goes on in

there.

From that point on, many people – without entering solid proof – have said the site

is riddled with underground tunnels leading to warehouses full of alien technology and

even captured aliens.

But not all the theories involve big-headed green men on a protracted vacation to Planet

Earth.

Others believe a group called the "Majestic 12", who we discussed in our Illuminati

show, actually disseminate alien stories about the base because it's really being used

to hatch their plan of ruling over the world.

Aliens are a cover, a diversion story.

How will they rule the world?

Well, they might start by de-populating the planet.

One of the conspiracy theories out there about Area 51 is that it is the place where weather

control is developed and practiced.

Before you get carried away, we should mention that many projects of the USA have been involved

with weather control, including Project Cirrus and Project Storm Fury, and while these were

benign, who's to say similar weather control projects couldn't be used more nefariously?

That's what the doomsday believers tell us, anyway.

What about the faked moon landings?

Why was that flag waving in the wind when there is no wind on the moon?

NASA says it's because the flag was being twisted by Buzz Aldrin.

Was filmmaker Stanley Kubrick in on the deal?

Much cheaper to hire him than actually go to the thing.

There are countless theories out there stating that the landing was a hoax, but these have

so far all been debunked.

We don't have time to go through them all, but you can easily find them on the web.

One of the non-conspiracy related issues involving Area 51 is that around the site there is a

lot of radioactive waste and people have actually died from radiation poisoning.

Civilians who worked there have complained of "rashes, racking coughs or dreadful skin

conditions."

This has led to lawsuits being filed.

In 2013 the LA Times called this, "The real cover-up."

So, yes, the American government is certainly working on some very experimental things in

Area 51, and what goes on in there is kept secret for a reason.

But it's anyone's guess as to what is happening as you are watching this show, but

there can be no doubt it is related to destructive forces.

You may have your own theories or can provide more information as to the conspiracy theories,

but we certainly cannot find any compelling evidence that supports some of the more outlandish

stories.

So, what do you know about Area 51 that we haven't mentioned here?

Let us know in the comments!

Also, be sure to check out our other video called What Actually Happens in the Bermuda

Triangle?!

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> What Happens At & What Do We Know About Area 51? - Duration: 7:11.

-------------------------------------------

Gen. Jack Keane: Russia is not looking for a fight with US - Duration: 4:38.

For more infomation >> Gen. Jack Keane: Russia is not looking for a fight with US - Duration: 4:38.

-------------------------------------------

Where Did Life Come From? (feat. PBS Space Time and Eons!) - Duration: 13:40.

Hey guys, Joe here.

Some people would argue the most important year in the history of soup was 1962, when

Andy Warhol released his soup-er soupy pop art.

But I think soup's best year came a decade earlier, in 1952, when a scientist named Stanley

Miller first cooked up primordial soup.

Miller's experiment took some simple chemicals, like those found on early Earth, bubbled them

up through a tube, zapped them with electricity, and after a few days, floating in this soup,

he found amino acids–the building blocks of proteins, and one of the essential ingredients

for life.

This idea–that life's origins could be found in a puddle of chemicals–is an old

one.

In the 1920s, two different scientists theorized about life arising from what they called a

"prebiotic soup".

And this soupy speculation even goes back (unsurprisingly) to Charles Darwin, who in

1871 wondered if life may have formed from chemicals "…in some warm little pond…"

What made Miller's experiment so special was it gave us proof: regular non-life stuff

could become cool life stuff super-easily.

But… everything "living" we see today, even the most basic bacteria, is so complex,

built of such intricate machinery, it's impossible to imagine they just popped into

existence out of some soup.

That's because they didn't.

We're going to go on a journey in search of the origin of life, and along the way there

will be a few forks in the road, maybe a couple speedbumps, and we're going to need help

from a couple friends.

We'll come to see that Miller's primordial soup isn't exactly how this story began.

But the FIRST question we should ask isn't how life started, it's when.

Life on Earth couldn't exist before Earth existed, and it formed around four and a half

billion years ago, at the dawn of the Hadean Era/Eon.

Soon after that, another planet collided with the young Earth, melted the entire crust,

and created the moon in the process.

After the crust cooled, there was even some liquid water… at least for a little while.

Because for the next couple hundred million years, Earth was showered with hundreds of

massive space rocks.

The oceans boiled away, the crust melted again, and Earth was basically no place for life…

until things settled down about 4 billion years ago, at the dawn of the Archean Eon.

This is the earliest possible time that life could have started on Earth, the beginning

of what we call the habitability boundary.

And fossil and chemical evidence tell us that early microbes existed by 3.7 billion years

ago, what's known as the biosignature boundary.

At some moment in here, non-life became life: we call this abiogenesis.

Now, I don't have a time machine.

As far as I know, no one does.

Therefore we can't go back and find that exact moment.

But if we could, what would we look for?

This brings us to the next big question on this journey… what is life?

You'd think biology would have a good definition for life, the thing it studies.

But as a biologist I can tell you this is much harder than it sounds.

In one chapter of biologist JBS Haldane's 1949 book What Is Life? he literally writes

"I am not going to answer this question."

Life is a board game, a delicious breakfast cereal, and a highway?

According to the dictionary, it's the time between birth and death.

But none of these definitions really help us.

I think we might be asking the wrong question, because life isn't a thing that things have,

life is what living things do.

In school, many people learn a checklist for the characteristics a thing must have in order

to be "alive": MRS GREN.

But this list came from looking at life as we know it today.

Life at the very beginning was probably much simpler.

A physicist, Erwin Schrödinger, looked at all these things that life does and saw something

only a physicist would see:

According to the second law of thermodynamics,  . But inside of living cells there's a

huge amount of order and complexity.

In 1944, Schrödinger defined life as a struggle against entropy– the persistent resistance

of decay, the preservation of DISequilibrium.

Since then we're learned a lot more about entropy, and it may be that the rise of complexity

is as inevitable as its decay.

That sounds pretty good.

Life creates these little closed systems where it works to keep things nice and ordered.

But this definition still leaves out one important thing: Living things evolve.

Inside the very first living things must have been molecules–chains of atoms–that carried

information–instructions for building things or codes for doing stuff.

Those molecules must have copied and made more of themselves, some a little different

than the others.

And a few of those codes and instructions must have been better at doing whatever they

did, so they made even more of themselves.

What we're describing is evolution by natural selection, Darwin's famous idea, and for

life to move forward, it must have been there from the beginning.

Life is a product of evolution.

With all this in mind, maybe we're finally able to come up with a better definition:

Life began the moment that molecules of information started to reproduce and evolve by natural

selection.

And now that we have a definition we can make some rules for what something

has to do to be "alive".

1.

A living thing must work to avoid decay and disorder

2.

To do that, a living thing has to create a closed system, or be made of cells

3.

They have some molecule that can carry information about how to build cell machinery

4.

This information must evolve by natural selection Sounds pretty good, but rules are one thing.

The ultimate question is how would this actually happen?

Let's take these rules one by one.

What would it require for these things to arise?

And–most importantly–how likely are each of these steps based on what we know from

good 'ol real, actual, hard science?!

Today, no matter where we look on the tree of life, most cell machinery is made of protein–

chains of folded amino acids.

When modern cells make proteins, they copy genes from DNA into RNA and then use that

RNA as a blueprint for making the proteins.

We call this universal pathway the central dogma of biology,

because it sounds really cool, and because it's something that all life shares.

But there's a paradox hidden in here–a puzzle.

It's a chicken and egg problem!

DNA needs proteins to make more of itself.

And cells need DNA and the instructions it holds to make proteins.

So which came first?

We can solve this paradox in a pretty simple way.

Just get rid of DNA and protein in the earliest days of life, and let RNA do everything.

RNA is the molecular cousin of DNA.

It contains the same four-letter alphabet code as DNA, only T is replaced by a similar

molecule, U.

And instead of two strings in a helix, RNA is usually found in just one string.

RNA is special, because in addition to carrying information in that 4-letter code, it can

fold up into interesting shapes and actually do stuff.

The same way that protein enzymes can do all kinds of chemical reactions, RNA enzymes–called

ribozymes–can work life's machinery too.

It's now thought that life began in an RNA world.

Before DNA became a more permanent form of storage, different RNA chains could have carried

information and been the machines for all of life's important chemistry.

Unfortunately, the RNA-only world went extinct more than 3 billion years ago, but we can

make these RNA enzymes today.

Scientists have constructed ribozymes that can copy themselves, just like DNA gets copied.

And those copies occasionally have errors or changes, so RNA can evolve too.

If you need more proof you can find it right inside your cells.

The ribosome, the massive structure that stitches amino acids into protein, is mostly RNA.

We also find nucleotides, the single molecular units of RNA, inside a bunch of other molecules

our cells need for metabolism.

This all makes sense only if the earliest days of living chemistry were dominated by

RNA.

And it solves our chicken and egg problem.

The RNA world takes care of two of our four rules: A molecule that can carry information

(3), and that can evolve (4).

To find answers for the other two, we need to ask one more question: Where did life begin?

There's been a lot of theories about where life came from, but they boil down to these:

Either life arose on Earth, or life arose somewhere else and was brought here.

It's well-known that space is full of the chemical building blocks of life, from amino

acids to DNA and RNA letters...

...buried inside meteorites like this one that fell on Australia in 1969.

It shows the chemistry that makes biological molecules can happen pretty much anywhere.

But the idea that life was delivered to Earth on space rocks, which goes by the awesome

name panspermia… well there's just no proof it ever happened, and it doesn't really

explain the origin of life anyway.

It just moves it somewhere else.

Life probably started here.

No… zoom out a little.

We know early Earth had plenty of chemical ingredients, but the problem with that old

idea of primordial soup is that soup can't do anything on its own–those chemicals can't

react without outside energy.

We get a hint of where this primordial energy came from by looking (again) at our own cells.

Instead of lightning, or heat energy, our cells pile up a bunch of hydrogen ions (protons)

on one side of a wall, let 'em flow downhill, and use this like a water wheel to push on

cellular machinery (and make things like ATP in the mitochondria)

We burn food to keep our hydrogen pump going, but the first life forms wouldn't have been

able to do this, because tacos hadn't been invented yet.

Instead, they would have needed some natural source, and they could have found it at the

bottom of the ocean.

Deep-sea hydrothermal vents are covered in microscopic little pockets, which could have

served as molds for the first cells.

Molecules with one oily water-hating end and one water-loving end have a neat habit of

forming bubbles and sheets all on their own

and there were plenty of these in the chemical soup near deep sea vents, ready to give rise

to the first cell membranes.

These vents also create natural streams of hydrogen ions near those little pockets in

the rock.

Imagine an early life form sitting there, wrapped in its little membrane bubble,

with a free source of energy flowing by, powering all the work it takes to create ordered life

and resist entropy.

But this would have been the absolute simplest form that life could take.

For this life form to become life that looks like what we know today, a lot more stuff

had to happen: it had to switch from storing its genetic information in RNA and started

using DNA.

Instead of using RNA and ribozymes to run all its cellular machinery, it had to start

stitching amino acids into proteins.

This opened up new possibilities for making and storing energy that let early life become

free-living and more complex.

One of these complex life forms is the ancestor of everything alive today, the last universal

common ancestor, or LUCA.

This is the end of our journey, searching for the origin of life on Earth.

A lot has happened since.

This story is based on things we've actually seen, not just on what's possible.

We've figured out when life could have started.

We've come up with rules for what life is.

We've found clues inside our own cells that explain how the first life satisfied these

rules, and where that life might have started.

The only question we haven't answered is why, but that's not really a question for

science, is it?

There's still quite a few gaps to fill in this story, and if you're looking for a

nice, neat answer for how life started, you're probably not going to find it.

Life is just a thing that happens.

It's still happening today, and it will evolve and continue as long as there's a

place it can happen.

Darwin didn't know it when he wondered about that warm little pond, full of chemicals,

giving rise to life, but his theory of how things change and adapt turned out to be so

powerful it encompasses life not just in its endless forms, but also in its first ones.

Stay curious.

Wow.

That was a LOT.

This is probably the deepest story I've ever done on this channel, and it's one

that involves some of the science I actually used to do, so this was a lot of fun for me.

I hope you enjoyed it too.

But this is only part of the story of how life began.

What happened before, to made Earth a place where life could happen?

And what happened after chemistry became biology, what life form lives at the bottom of our

tree of life?

For those answers, go check out these videos from our friends at PBS Space Time and Eons.

For more infomation >> Where Did Life Come From? (feat. PBS Space Time and Eons!) - Duration: 13:40.

-------------------------------------------

The BEST Way To Approach A SHY GIRL & Get Her To Open Up - Duration: 8:28.

Matt: So I got a question from a guy recently on how to deal with shy girls. So in this

video I want to talk about how to flirt with, connect with, and escalate on a shy

girl. Because I mean how do you know if she's not into you or just really really

shy? And what the heck do you do if she doesn't talk much?

My name is Matt Artisan from The Attractive Man and i'm going to teach

you how to connect with shy girls.

Anchor: He has mastered the art of seduction.

Narrator: Many boot camps encourage men to be assertive.

Matt: We've done all the testing we know what works.

www.TheAttractiveMan.com

Matt: The shy girl typically shows hesitation to engage in the interaction.

Which means it's gonna be a little bit of a bumpy ride trying to get her to

talk. Let alone give out her number to you, or go on a date. Not to worry though,

we'll solve that soon enough. Many shy girls actually create barriers

to keep men out of their life, and there are plenty of reasons for this

broken family, feeling insecure or lack of safety, low self-esteem, and even

culture. For example, in Asia, it's very uncommon for a man to approach a girl on

the streets, and oftentimes the woman will look at you like you're crazy and

be really really shy. I remember feeling like I was getting rejected a few times

when I was in the Philippines, and I know like online it's super super easy I know

you know the girls typically like me. Not to sound like I have an inflated

ego or anything, but it wasn't normal that I was getting this many rejections.

So I decided to be a little bit more persistent than I normally would, and I

got the girl's phone number even though she was looking at me like I was a

serial killer or something like that, just like, wanting to get away from the

situation. But I got her phone number and she text me something like "Oh, I'm so

sorry, I was so nervous, you know you're so handsome."

What the heck? Here's a quick checklist to let you know if you're dealing with a

shy girl - She barely maintains eye contact and keeps staring down at the

ground, crosses her arms and keeps fiddling with her fingers, very soft

almost inaudible voice when talking, *voice too soft for captions* prefers to speak in shorter sentences,

and is close ended most of the time. "What do you like to do for fun?" Jen: "Shopping."

Matt: So we're gonna have to break these barriers, but don't worry because mastering the art of

connection can get even the most shyest girl to open up, and you only really have

to keep three simple things in mind. But before I get to those things, make sure

to subscribe to this channel. If you're not already subscribed, hit that

subscribe button because I got a lot of cool videos and I don't want you to miss

them. Number one, match her energy. But you've got to do it the right way.

Mirroring is a powerful neuro linguistic programming tool to establish rapport

with a stranger. You see people tend to trust and feel

more comfortable around other people that are more like them. When you mirror

a person's energy, body language, words that they're using, facial

expressions, etc. it can create a very powerful connection but be careful doing

this with a shy girl you don't want to start mimicking her beta and submissive

body language and start acting all timid and shy, because that will seem nervous

which is not very attractive. However if you approach her as a loud high-energy

alpha it will probably scare her. The key is to match her energy and shy girls are

usually pretty low energy so you may have to crank it down a notch or two.

Even if you're at a high energy club but you approach a shy girl, lower your

energy a little bit at first to make her feel comfortable and then slowly bring

your energy back up which will lead her into a more fun, outgoing state. Tip

number two, be comfortable. You need to be totally at ease with yourself and with

her even though she might be acting a little bit strange. Most guys get nervous

around shy girls because they're not sure if the girl is interested in them

or not and then they start second-guessing themselves. Instead just

have fun and start talking, and don't be worried if she's not responding much

don't let any of that affect you. Now I've spent a lot of time in Asia where

there's a lot of shy girls, and so I go into the date with this attitude of I'm

gonna have fun no matter what even if she's really shy and kind of boring and

not contributing much I'm still gonna have a good time, I'm still gonna talk

and do things that I enjoy and I like to warm up before dates to get myself into

a social state just in case I have to do most of the talking and so I might get

to the venue a little bit early if it's a bar, just start talking to people in

the bar, to warm up or if it's during the day I might walk through the park a

little bit early and just make comments and ask questions to people around me

just to get my social juices flowing. And be okay with silence. Don't make it

awkward. She might just be taking her time to open up, so keep smiling and be

comfortable with a little bit longer than usual moments of silence. Here's a

few tips to help: Keep a friendly and warm smile and cheerful demeanor, the

less threatening you are, the better. But remember to keep a confident tone to

your voice and body movements. Maintain some distance when you first speak to

her, you want her to feel safe, so limit the

physical contact at first. You can start by reaching out and shaking her hand

after a good introduction. Tip number three, shy girls talk way less than

outgoing girls. So you'll probably have to take on the conversational burden and

talk more than her. It's actually okay to just start talking about yourself. You

can ask her questions, but if that doesn't work just start talking about

yourself. This will get things going and at least keep things interesting. But

remember to give her a chance to talk, too, if she wants. Feel free to share whatever

you want with her, including your life story. This will help her get to know you

and make her feel more comfortable with you and eventually she'll start to open

up. Well, hopefully. If I'm on a date with a shy girl one thing I like to do is

show her pictures on my phone because that way it creates more conversation, I

don't have to think of things to say, I just show her the pictures that turns

into conversation, hopefully. And I'm sitting next to her when I do that, in

fact I'll move next to her to show her the pictures which creates more physical

intimacy, plus she gets to know me better through the pictures and seeing my

lifestyle. And if she feels comfortable sitting close to you, that's a huge step

in escalating the interaction. I even like to use pictures as a way to

escalate sexually - "This is also in Japan this is the penis festival that they do

every year with a giant phallic statues." Now always give her an opportunity to

speak and open up by asking her open-ended questions. Simple ones that

she doesn't have to use too much mental energy to think of the answers, like

"What's your favorite thing to do for fun?" or "Do you have any brothers and sisters?"

Jen: "Yes." Matt: "Really? Tell me about them." Once she's opened up a bit it's time to escalate. I

recommend starting slow and just see how she reacts. Joke around with her and

gently touch her, you'll see whether or not she reacts positively to this and

you'll know she's comfortable with that. Now if she reacts negatively it's best

to just lay back for a little while and maybe escalate again later after you've

established a little bit more rapport. If it's positive then just keep slowly

working your way up maybe you put your hand on her lower back as you're

escorting her through the door or maybe you tickle her and see how she reacts to

that, just don't be creepy here. You want to be assertive, but remain a gentleman.

It often only takes one creepy mistake like cracking a sexual joke way too

early, or rubbing her leg with your hand, something like that,

to totally turn off a shy girl. If she's being receptive, then it means she's

allowing you to breach her defenses. Shy girls just tend to need a little bit

more time to warm up so don't give up. All you need to do is take it slow one

step at a time. If you want to learn more about how to escalate with shy girls, or

really any girl, I created a free Escalation Cheat Sheet that lists some

of my best ways to spark sexual attraction, turn a girl on, and escalate

all the way to the bedroom. It's filled with advanced escalation techniques that

will turn a platonic friendly vibe into a more sexual "I want to rip your clothes

off!" vibe. This is very useful when you're talking to girls and it's going nowhere.

Click the image in the bottom right of the screen right now to download your

free Escalation Cheat Sheet. There's also a link down in the description. Get it,

because you'll want to keep it handy before you go out. And if you're not

already subscribed, hit that subscribe button. And if you want us to work with

you in field make sure to check out our bootcamp schedule. My name is Matt

Artisan from The Attractive Man and I'll see you in the next video.

For more infomation >> The BEST Way To Approach A SHY GIRL & Get Her To Open Up - Duration: 8:28.

-------------------------------------------

Florida Pest Control Jacksonville - Call Us - Duration: 0:28.

Florida Pest Control Jacksonville - Call Us

For more infomation >> Florida Pest Control Jacksonville - Call Us - Duration: 0:28.

-------------------------------------------

Florida Pest Control - Duration: 0:29.

Florida Pest Control - Call Us

For more infomation >> Florida Pest Control - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

Sony A7 III in Stock and Shipping in US - MEGAPIXEL - Duration: 3:11.

Sony A7 III full frame E-mount camera now in stock and shipping from major authorized

Sony USA dealers in US.

Sony has expanded its full-frame Alpha 7 range, introducing the Sony A7 III.

With a price tag of $1,999, the camera boasts a new backside-illuminated, 24-megapixel sensor

and 4K video recording with S-Log.

It can also shoot full resolution pictures at up to 10fps and has a quad-VGA OLED viewfinder.

Sony a7 III body: $1,998 : Amazon | B&H Photo Video | Adorama.

Features at a glance: 24.2MP Back-Illuminated Exmor R CMOS Image

Sensor.

ISO range of 100 – 51200 (expandable to ISO 50 – 204800 for still images).

15-Stop dynamic range at low sensitivities.

AF system featuring 693 phase-detection AF points covering 93% of image area, 425 contrast

AF points and fast.

Improved Eye AF. 10 fps continuous shooting with either mechanical

shutter or silent shooting and full Auto Focus/Auto Exposure tracking.

5-axis optical in-body image stabilization with a 5.0 step shutter speed advantage.

High-Resolution 4K shooting with full pixel readout and no pixel binning across full-width

of full-frame sensor.

710 shots per charge with NP-FZ100 battery.

Joystick, Dual SD Card Slots, SuperSpeed USB Type-C 3.1.

Available in April for about $2000 US.

Sony a7 III Accessories: Sony VG-C3EM Vertical Grip: $348 at Amazon,

B&H, Adorama.

Sony 64GB SF-G Series UHS-II SDXC Memory Card: $119.99 at Amazon, B&H, Adorama.

For more infomation >> Sony A7 III in Stock and Shipping in US - MEGAPIXEL - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

🔴✅¿SABÍAS QUE LAS ESPONJAS PARA LAVAR PLATOS SON UNA DE LAS MAYORES FUENTES DE BACTERIAS? - Duration: 6:06.

hello and welcome to a new edition of easy remedies 24 today

we'll talk about the next topic you knew that dishwashing sponges

are one of the biggest sources of bacteria knows how to clean them and

disinfect them so do not go and stay with us until the end of

this video where we will be developing this interesting topic

do not forget to like this video share it with your family and friends

and subscribe to our channel now we go with the information

To avoid getting infected we must disinfect the sponge or the cloth with the

that we wash the dishes daily in this way, we avoid the proliferation of

bacteria in the sponges to wash are one of the most used utensils of

the kitchen by facilitating the cleaning of the dishes and helping to maintain everything

impeccable however this object that seems to be so useful and ideal to clean

can go from being one of the great allies of hygiene to being one of the

Worst enemies of health when the function is not used properly

of this element is to remove the remains of food that remain in the

dishes and after having served food

During this process a large part of these remains are absorbed by the sponge and

combined with moisture create a favorable environment for growth

bacterial especially due to the fact that it remains wet until its

next use bacteria like the collings

'Staphylococcus aureus' and salmonella can survive in the sponge during

hours and even days after the first contact

This is why the importance of

frequently disinfect this element apart from applying the common soap

sponge the dirtiest item in the home for doctor phil tender teacher

clinical of microbiology and pathology of the university of new york the thing more

dirty that may be in a house is a sponge to wash dishes even more

that a toilet lid or a garbage can this object is made with

small absorption openings that are the ones that facilitate the elimination of

waste but also those that conserve all those substances and microorganisms

that leaks in the cleaning process the remains of food that are attached to the

sponge can remain for some time when it is not disinfected and

For every 20 minutes that remains moist a new bacterium develops

the use of dish soap might be to think that the sponge remains clean and

there is no risk of rubbing it on the plates

However, this is not enough since the product can not be eliminated

complete the pathogens that are inside with the remains of food

the best way to avoid poisoning or diseases caused by a sponge

full of bacteria is by disinfection

It is paradoxical to have to wash an item that is used for cleaning

But the truth is that it is necessary and is the most effective way to eliminate

microorganisms such as cleaning and disinfecting bacteria in a

research conducted by the US agricultural research service in the

In 2007, several tests were carried out to determine which was the most

effective to eliminate the pathogens that accumulate in the sponges the first thing that

was done was to soak them at room temperature in a solution of

minced meat in order to favor the amount of microbes for

Subsequently, the analysis was immersed for three minutes in a

10% solution of bleach then in lemon juice for 1 minute is also

introduced in the microwave one minute to finish washed in a dishwasher

with drying cycle the results showed that with bleach and

lemon juice manage to reduce by 37 and 87 percent the bacteria heat it

in the microwave ends up with 99.9 percent of the microorganisms a

result similar to that of the dishwasher therefore the study concluded that the

most effective way to eliminate bacteria and mold from this utensil is

heating it in a microwave or in the dishwasher with a drying cycle to

your disinfection in the microwave should be rinsed with clean water and put

heat for 2 minutes at maximum temperature plus this can also be

take care of the following tips clean the sponge after each wash

adopt a rotation system with two sponges in order to always use

one clean while washing the other check the utensil and try to remove

all the remains of food that remain after washing the dishes after

Use the sponge to dry it to prevent moisture and growth

the bacteria if the dishes or utensils are smeared

of some type of animal fat the ideal is to clean them first with paper

disposable kitchen instead of removing the remains with the sponge you had idea of

all this ends this way another edition of your channel

remedies easy 24 do not forget to share this video with your

family and friends in your social networks leave your opinion in the box

comments and give him I like I am francisco sucre and see you in a

next video until next time

For more infomation >> 🔴✅¿SABÍAS QUE LAS ESPONJAS PARA LAVAR PLATOS SON UNA DE LAS MAYORES FUENTES DE BACTERIAS? - Duration: 6:06.

-------------------------------------------

The Second Human Buzz Out on the Moon Aldrin Passed the Test of Lie "L" Shows a UFO Seeing. Truths - Duration: 4:11.

Neil Armstrong, commander of the Apollo 11 team, who went to the Moon on July 20, 1969, was the first person to set foot on our wake. The other astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the eve then became second man. Two names, some strangers they saw

he was subjected to a lie detector because of his discourse on things. Aldrin passed this test in a frightening manner. When we think about the world of extraterrestrial life, we leave the world at a certain time of history and go far

people come to my mind. Their experience is always more effective when they say it. For example, astronauts of the Apollo 11, the first operation to successfully manage the Moon. Who knows how many times in their lives

they ask questions about aliens, and they answer how many. Obviously we do not know. The biggest question is, indeed, the greatest and most mysterious question that we have to go through,

the Soviet Union has gone bankrupt, maybe we can not think of this as a fictitious idea, but in this videomuz the members of the Apollo 11 team, which we assume you are on the moon, see the answers about seeing a UFO in space

and he passed it, so he saw a UFO. If there is not a reality, this is a fiction that will look behind the scenes in this video.

The team, commanded by Neil Armstrong, the first person to set foot on the Moon with Apollo 11, was already two, including himself. Other astronaut Buzz Aldrin landed on the surface immediately after his commander,

He was assigned. Aldrin is now 88 years old and lives in the USA. We lost Armstrong in 2012. Aldrin's claims, however, always bring UFO theories back to the agenda.

Lie detectors used to understand that someone is lying, they have a 100% stiffness. The only thing that can not be understood with them is how convinced is the thought of the person being tested. Because if something

if we can really believe, we can sing it realistically enough to forget that it is a lie. Buzz Aldrin successfully passed these tests for UFOs....

The BioAcoustic Entity in Ohio, USA, did not lie in tests conducted by three major NASA astronauts, including Ice Aldrin, Edgar Mitchell and Gordon Cooper. So they were fully convinced of what they saw.

Buzz Aldrin claims that during the Apollo 11 campaign he organized for Moon, he saw clearly a strange object with L-shape and could not explain it. Two other astronauts Mitchell and Cooper claim to have seen UFOs more than once in the interviews and tests.

To put it briefly, after these assertions, the odds of being or existence of two possibilities about UFOs have changed. They either exist or are astronauts who have succeeded in convincing themselves

They fabricated. but as I do in every videotape, the first thing to convey to you is the religious and scientific direction of the job is mentioned in the first 224,000 auctions, so many life forms are alive here, but unbelievers

Let's explain the scientific side for this reason, logically speaking, why did not they say that they saw it during the live broadcast, that was live broadcast in 1969,

Let's say that a problem does not occur in the case of silence why we say today why they say this is the question that needs to be asked this shout why these are emerging yours. If you've watched it all the way you like the video

you can subscribe to the channel or you can support me by liking the video. You can express your opinions about this issue by writing your comment on Yada comment on the next video if you want to help the next video position.