Sunday, February 3, 2019

USA news on Youtube Feb 4 2019

JUST IN!

DEMOCRATS CRACK ON THE WALL!

democrats crack on the wall congressional Democrats are ditching House Speaker Nancy

Pelosi's and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's ardent

opposition to any barrier or wall along the US border with Mexico as the partial government

shutdown continues and President Donald Trump takes his case directly

to the border itself if we have a partial wall if we have fencing if we

have technology used to keep our border safe all of that is fine representative Cheri Bustos

D aisle the chairwoman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee

DCCC said on CNN certainly you need barriers and we support barriers

Senator Ben Cardin DMD added Senator Jeff Merkley Dior also backed a barrier along the

US border with Mexico some fencing is useful some barriers are useful

Merkley said there's a lot of surveillance technology I've been to

some cities on the border that have triple fencing and have more personnel and have the

technology to see the people moving in the middle of the night representatives

Eric's wawel DCA and Jerry Nadler de New York the chairman of

the House Judiciary Committee said they would support fencing and barriers where necessary

along the border Senate Minority Whip senator dick durbin D

il says he believes there will be a new barrier along the border in the

future representative john garamendi dca says democrats support a barrier including a fence

democrats have repeatedly said that we will support border

security we will support all of its elements including fences Garamendi said

representative Katherine Clark deema the vice chair of the Democratic conference says that

the border would benefit from additional barriers you know

I think there are parts of the border that would benefit from repairing

fencing and other barricades that already exist there she told MSNBC these very prominent

congressional Democrats message on the effectiveness of a wall or

barrier or fence is very different from the coordinated message from

Schumer and Pelosi just two nights ago when the two Democrat leaders in Congress said

in their response to president Trump's oval office address that

the wall would be ineffective palos he called the wall expensive and ineffective

something that was an obsession of trumps while Schumer bashed

Trump's ineffective unnecessary border wall and said that America does not need a barrier

on the border for security we can secure our border without an expensive

ineffective wall schumer said in his response to trump it remains to

be seen where this fight goes from here but the fact that many democrats are messaging

in a very different way from fellow SI and schumer is particularly interesting

as the next stages of this battle heat up what do you think comment

below the video share if you find this information useful share if you agree subscribe channel

for more video

For more infomation >> JUST IN! DEMOCRATS DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON THE WALL! - Duration: 13:54.

-------------------------------------------

NO ESCAPE FOR THE TRAITOR!! SARAH SANDERS DROPS MASSIVE BOMBSHELL OBAMA OVER MIDTERM! - Duration: 13:28.

NO ESCAPE FOR THE TRAITOR!!

SARAH SANDERS DROPS MASSIVE BOMBSHELL OBAMA OVER MIDTERM!

how about we get our next visitor from the White House squeeze secretary Sarah Sanders

goes along with us now Sarah great night to you enormous race night we're pausing

for a ton of these outcomes to come in yet how are people at the White House feeling

about this so far so far we feel.

great about where we are honestly right now the president's had a fantastic night especially

when you take a gander at Mike

Braun this was an applicant that many individuals had anticipated to lose and I simply lose

by a smidgen lose by a ton this

is someone the president just went in and finalized the negotiations for the previous

evening this was additionally someone who had a fantastically.

extreme essential and promptly following the essential the president came in bound together

the gathering united them

also, you're seeing the consequences of that diligent work satisfied today around evening

time so far we like where we are however so a

difficult night to go what's your opinion about the house like what is the reasoning

at the White House and what numbers you're.

taking a gander at right now Democrats require 23 they've gotten two and we haven't made

a ton of calls along

those lines positively the house is so mid one race to take a gander at is Andy Barr

of Kentucky this.

was a race that many individuals were stating was one to watch that could be one of the

primary pointers of what the

night could resemble that has been called this is another race where the president went

in honestly the competitors who have

grasped the president and the president has gone in to battle for throughout the most

recent a little while our kenneth's that.

we're see doing today around evening time in those spots and unquestionably like where

things are going however once more

exceptionally right off the bat in this procedure however we feel entirely great about where

we are even James Carville I think said all that needed to be said.

anyone that normal a blue wave today around evening time presumably not going to get that

and I believe that is 100% due to the

president's authority and the achievement that he's had in the initial a long time since

taking office he's had

extraordinary achievement and you're seeing a ton of that result and you're seeing Americans

turned out and collectively state.

that they are glad for this president and pleased with what he's done in these two years

Sarah musings on Florida clearly the president put his load behind Ron DeSantis

truly helped him to win the essential there bigly tight race there for the governors race

and furthermore for the.

Senate right presently again that is a very close race this is a play

where individuals said that there was no chance Republicans could take both of those seats

and surely on the off chance that they do I think

that a ton of the credit will go to the president who's been in to battle for them however it's

still extremely close and a.

smidgen of time left to perceive what occurs there it's our last thing we had previous

Pennsylvania senator ed Rendell

on prior Democrat from Pennsylvania he said if Democrats get the house that is as yet

an if starting at this evening right

since that they ought to enact administer enact and not research examine explore do

you think.

that that would occur if Democrats assume control over the house I believe that is the

thing that ought to happen I feel that is the thing that

America needs to see look we have a president that will work over

walkway to complete things we like where we are in the Senate yet in the event that Democrats

take the house they shouldn't.

sit around idly examining they should concentrate on what the general population have put them

there to do there are a great deal of things

that the president would love to work with them on and ideally they'll get together and

be eager.

furthermore, not keep on being the gathering of safe block yet need to really work with

this president to understand a few

of the enormous issues that we've been driving on in the course of the most recent two years

Sarah there's been a great deal of discourse about

that the president didn't battle sufficiently hard on the issue of the economy even he said

at one point at one of the.

revitalizes you know now and then the economy isn't the most fascinating thing to discuss

he truly went in very

seriously on the issue of the band and migration is he liking that choice right currently look

the.

president discussed the economy always the issue was the media would not like to cover

the economy it's

the first occasion when you'd ever have a blasting economy they state you all didn't

discuss it enough we discussed the.

economy each and every day we're going to keep on the grounds that it will keep on doing

great under this president

in light of the tax breaks as a result of deregulation we've seen a monetary blast like

we haven't found in decades.

furthermore, I believe you're seeing that reflected absolutely in the Senate cast a

ballot today around evening time just as the president's battle to get

equity Cavanaugh on the seat I think those are two major factors in the president's initiative

that you're.

seeing happen on the decision Sarah Sanders live on the North Lawn of the White House

Sarah thank you we

value your time in the require the Democrats to control the US House agents for what reason

are we making that

call why with those white seats still out there and our net gain in the house not at

23 for what reason are we making that.

call here to clarify is Chris Taiwan out of the correctional facility of the choice I've

been brought to the important's office why

are we deciding great we're only that great I don't intend to boast however our Fox News

voter investigation and what we are.

presently beginning to see as the House races consider later and they come in recall with

these House races you

try not to have the sort of conjecture you do on the Senate level so it takes more time

for them to begin to make up for lost time however you're

beginning to see them make up for lost time and we said from the beginning take a gander

at that 6th District

in Kentucky.

For more infomation >> NO ESCAPE FOR THE TRAITOR!! SARAH SANDERS DROPS MASSIVE BOMBSHELL OBAMA OVER MIDTERM! - Duration: 13:28.

-------------------------------------------

Трамп против НАТО - Duration: 10:05.

Hello, dear friends! I am Professor Panarin Igor Nikolaevich,

Doctor of Political Sciences, and today we will look

at a very important and conceptual topic.

It is called so: "Trump against NATO." Why are

we considering it today? But the fact is that on January

22, 2019, the House of Representatives of the US

Congress, which is controlled by Democrats, adopts a resolution.

This resolution is shocking to any normal analyst. The

essence of this resolution: it prohibits Donald Trump from

taking action to withdraw from NATO. Just think, one of the

US House of Representatives demands exactly this. On

January 28, the main newspaper not only of the United States,

but also of the world, The New York Times comes out

with a global article in which says that this is not

enough for only the House of

Representatives to make such a decision!

It is necessary that the Senate, the second

Chamber, that is, the Congress as a whole, support the resolution

of the House of Representatives controlled by Democrats.

In general, she demanded that Trump should not leave NATO.

Well, it seems to any sensible person that it

comes to mind: "how can the United States in general go

out of NATO?" That's how! The fact is that back in 2016,

during his election campaign, Trump repeatedly spoke of his

displeasure with NATO. But he created a sensation in

July 2018 at the NATO summit, when he said during a press

conference: "In general, the United States should withdraw

from NATO, but for now I think it is not very appropriate."

But this statement caused a shock. Then Trump repeatedly

made statements at the end of 2018, which made the

Democrats, in fact, come to the adoption of such a resolution

prohibiting Trump to carry out actions to remove the

United States from NATO. The question arises: why is Trump

against the NATO bloc? In order to sort out this

issue, we will consider some historical aspects of the

creation of this aggressive military-political organization

that bombed, I remind, in 1999 fraternal Serbia and committed

many heinous crimes in other regions of the world. So, I

remind you that on July 1, 1945, that is, just a few months

after the defeat of fascism, Great Britain, the main

historical enemy of the Soviet Union and Russia, of historical

and present-day Russia, carried out preparations for

the attack on the USSR. Just think, the 22 German divisions

of the Wehrmacht were saved by Churchill and were to

attack the Red Army in Germany together with the British army.

The ultimate goal is to reach the borders of

Western Belarus and Western Ukraine, in the Shepetovka area,

a town on the territory of Ukraine. Here is the global

goal of this operation. This information was obtained

through the channels of Soviet intelligence and on June 27

Stalin ordered to transfer to the territory of Germany

additional tank units and several tank divisions that were

stationed on the border with the occupation zones, on the

border with British influence. This was a complete surprise

for the British. And the plan of attack on the Soviet Union,

on the Red Army on July 1, 1945 was canceled. I draw

your attention that in 1998 a part of this plan was

declassified, then, in fact, the public learned about the existence

of such a plan. But, of course, our intelligence knew

about it then. Why did the British cancel this plan? The

fact is that when our tank wedges were placed additionally

in Germany, the T-34 tanks were horrified, thinking that

this Russian group of tanks would take ticks, the entire

British army and the remnants of the Wehrmacht's army in 2

days , and will be released to the English Channel. And

it will prepare a landing operation to eliminate the main

historical enemy - Britain. And the British were confused

and canceled the attack. But they did not cancel the

common intention to harm Soviet Russia or just Russia, despite

the changing situation. The leadership of the British

intelligence MI6 began

preparations for the creation of NATO.

Maybe everyone does not

know, but the basis of NATO was 5 states.

These are the countries of the National Park

called BenNiLux: Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg,

(one of them is Holland - the British satellite has long

been like Luxembourg, well, and Belgium is partly under

British influence), Britain and France. The United States

joined this Union later. How? We had a video about a

traitor, an agent of British intelligence, Admiral Kolchak. I

recall that the representative at the headquarters of Kolchak

was Donovan, an American, the creator of the US strategic

services department. But Donovan was appointed to

this position due to Churchill's personal pressure on Roosevelt.

And Donovan from 1939 to 1940 passed an

internship in the management of special operations of the

British intelligence MI-6. And the British insisted that he

headed the Office of Strategic Services of the United States.

And Roosevelt had his own candidacy. That's exactly

Donovan and the former heads of the special operations

department of the British

intelligence MI-6 created a NATO plan.

Further, within the framework of NATO, the Gladio

project was created, and

then we will talk about it separately.

Under the auspices of this project, terrorist

acts were committed in Italy and Germany, they were accused

of communists and socialists. But the American branch of

the Gladio project was also created. I emphasize that,

by British intelligence, the Special Operations Directorate

in 1946 began, even before the creation of the NATO bloc,

the creation of terrorist networks in the territory of

Western European states and the United States. And so

Donovan began to create this Gladio network in the United States.

In this regard, we can express another hypothesis

about the gold of the Russian Empire, which the

British agent Kolchak exported through the territory of

Japan, which suddenly demands from us, according to the British

"kick", some territorial concessions, retaining hundreds

of tons (1,300 tons of gold admiral Kolchak brought out).

It is possible to express the hypothesis that Donovan

just supervised Kolchak and the export of gold of the Russian

Empire through Japan and the United Kingdom. This gold

became the financial basis for the formation of an aggressive

military-political bloc of NATO. At least, we can

assume that this gold was used by Donovan and British

intelligence MI6 in the formation of the structure of the new

aggressive military-political bloc. My version is that the

"deep state", about which people talk a lot today,

especially the Western media, is what Donovan began to create in 1946.

It has sprouted and is completely under British control.

It is a tool other than a financial instrument

of British influence on the decision-making process in the

United States of America.

Then a reasonable question arises, and the answer to this

question is: why is Trump fighting the NATO bloc? Just

NATO is a British project.

Hillary Clinton and her entire team are proteges of Britain

in the United States. This is, in fact, the political sphere

of the Gladio project, a British project in the United States.

Therefore, Trump is attempting to deal with the

NATO bloc, as with the British project, and bring America

back to its true roots, for which it has always been famous.

Thanks for attention!

No comments:

Post a Comment