USA news on Youtube Feb 3 2019

Some of you subscribed to this channel because you've seen these

technical videos in which I explain how

cars or motorcycles work or tutorials where

I give driving tips... and then? Did I stop doing them?

Have I then decided to focus solely on vlogs?

which according to the numbers, are liked by many

but aren't perhaps the reason why some of you subscribed in the first place

the answer is: no!

You don't know this but for the past year I've been writing

a series of about 70 technical videos

on cars and motorcycles, about

mechanics, physics, technical functioning,

driving tutorials... I mean, lots of things!

All of this to tell you that I'm working on it

and of this season's projects is this one

so if you're interested in this sort of videos, and you're not subscribed to the channel yet

do it now, because in just a bit

where's gonna start with a bang!

In today's video we're gonna talk about a topic we've hear of often

which most of you already know of, but perhaps not

everyone know exactly

how to apply it to driving, that is:

the weight transfer

What's the weight transfer? I'm gonna tell you right now

a part of the physics phenomena that are at the base of this topic,

I already address in the video

in which I explained why the front brakes brake more than the rear ones

So here I will address them quickly

In case you didn't see that video and some passage is not clear

I advise you to go check it. There's the link below

When a motorcycle

or a car go on at any speed, the Physical Principle of Inertia applies.

When a body is moving and you want to slow it down,

it will resist the slowing down

in the same way

when a body is moving or is still and you want to speed it up

it opposes resistance to acceleration

so we take our vehicle that is going to 100 km per hour

and we hit the brakes

it is as if we apply a force at ground level that goes in the opposite direction

that pulls our vehicle backwards

as I said, however, due to the inertia effect

our vehicle opposes this force with a force equal and opposite in the other direction

placed in the center of mass of the vehicle

since these forces are not on the same plane, the vehicle would tend to tilt forward

but

this tilting is is dampened by the suspensions

So it happens that when braking the front suspensions are compressed

while the rear ones are stretched

So the front suspensions are much more loaded,

while the rear ones are unloaded.

the so-called weight transfers occurs

the load of the car moves to the front wheels

which are thus crushed to the ground

when instead we accelerate it happens exactly the opposite

The rear suspensions are compressed

while the front ones loosen.

We have a weight transfer to the rear

Now, the motorcycles are a bit

bitches, 'cause when we accelerate

Also, if there is a load transfer at the rear

the rear suspension tends to loosen

This is a very special phenomenon that I do not want to go into right now,

but I'll make a video for it because it's a bomb

So let's go back to our weight transfer. Now that we understood what it is

What do we need it for? Let's start with the cars

when we brake, as I said, we have a weight transfer on the front

So the front tires, when braking, are much more crushed to the ground

Now, as I explained in that video

the more the front tire is crushed to the ground the more grip it has, therefore

if we start to

turn while the car is still braking

the car has more much grip in front, so it turns more

it can enter the curve much faster

while instead if we

release the brake with the car straight and then steer

the car

will make more effort to do the curve because

we unloaded the front, and it has less grip in front

so the drivers, in order to go fast on the track

tend to brake as late as possible

and bring the braking right into the curve

to allow the front tires to load and enter the curve faster

easy, right? Not exactly.

Because we've focused on the front, but

we forgot about the rear. If the front loads

and has more grip, the rear will unload

so it has less grip.

So what happens is that if we exaggerate with

bringing the braking into the curve.. see the movement I'm doing?

the car tends to lose the rear

and we spin

Or another unpleasant thing could happen

As we turn the steering wheel,

if we have too much pressure on the brake,

the front wheels are too stressed, the block, and the car

goes straight

The skill of a driver is to find the right limit in loading the front,

at that limit

that allows him to enter the curve fast

without blocking the front and without losing the rear axle

while when we accelerate, the opposite happens, that is

the rear has more grip

bringing back the load to the rear

can be very useful because

we stabilize the car,

and this is especially useful when entering the big fast curves

if we're entering in a big curve, fast,

we feel the car that tends to

leave behind, if we give some gas

we bring load to rear, we make it more stable

and the car does the curve much better

if instead in the big fast curves

we feel that the car does not turn, then we

must give load back to the front, so we just have to let go of the gas pedal

to bring the load back to the front, or

slightly touch the brake pedal.So this makes you understand why

when driving in the track

you don't do the turns just with the steering wheel, but also

by helping the car by moving the load

in the front or in the rear, using the accelerator and the brake

And what about on the street? On the road

the keyword is "safety". You don't go looking for the limit

you don't try and do the curve as fast as possible

you try to get to your destination... alive.

and what we often hear is "don't brake

in the curve, ever". Is that true? It's not forbidden

I've personally hit the brake

in the curve, but this is because my experience

on the track taught me

how to brake in a curve, and how to handle the car in case it were to swerve.

Those who don't have experience risk killing themselves. Why?

because when we do a curve, for example, on the left

we know how our body goes right

that is, the weight of the car is transferred to the side

so we have the external tires that are very stressed

if we were to brake in that moment

the weight transfers entirely

on the right front tire

while the right rear tire unloads

so it has grip in front, but not in the back,

and car risks spinning.

this one you've just seen is one of the worst

accidents I've ever had, when

I did the season on the 500 Abarth, and this

accident demonstrates how much the weight transfer

can be dangerous

in the morning during free tests I had four used tires

and so in the curve where I had the accident

I simply removed the gas, I threw the car inside and I accelerated,

and the car stayed.

For the qualifying, having

no one giving me advice about what to do,

I did the mistake

of making the technical choice that is usually done in the small tracks like Franciacorta

that is putting new tires

in the front, and the used ones in the rear

so that I had more grip in front, so that the car turned better

that is okay in small tracks, but it's suicide in big ones

so what happened? as soon as

I let go of the accelerator

and I inserted it

there you see me putting the foot on the accelerator, but I didn't press on it

letting go of the accelerator, caused

a weight transfer on the front, in that moment

I steered, and having the new tires in front

and the used ones behind,

I had too much grip in front, this allowed for the car to

swerve, did a spin, and then unfortunately

it started flipping over.

And the other serious mistake I made

caused by inexperience, because I was just starting out

was that of braking once the car

started swerving, 'cause by braking I

made things worse,

I unloaded even more the rear and I increased the swerve

since it was a front traction, had I

fully accelerated

I would have probably avoided the crash, 'cause

1) by accelerating I would have given back some load to the rear

the rear would have had some grip back and it would have gone straight again

2) since the traction was in front,

by accelerating, the front

would have gone back to the right position

and this accidents proves how important it the weight transfer

because by

simply playing with accelerator and brake

we can either regain

control of the car in a dangerous situation

or put the car in a dangerous situation

And often it happens to me on the highway to see people who think they have entered the curve too fast

and they hit the brakes in the middle of it

and this is very dangerous because if there is wet on the ground

or if maybe touches a white line that's a little wet

or maybe there is someone behind who is driving faster and needs to hit the brakes

you risk an accident

paradoxically, what is the safest thing to do in a curve?

accelerating a bit

why? the moment you keep slightly accelerated and

you keep a constant speed

you have the same weight

both in front and in the rear

so the car is perfectly stable.

So it's much safer to brake before the curve

let go of the brake, and when you enter the curve

keep the accelerator a bit open, so you keep a constant speed

Ok but we know

emergency can happen on the road, it might happen that

we enter a curve and feel we're too fast

what do we do in this case? the best thing

is to let go of the accelerator

because the moment you let go of the accelerator two things happen

1) the car slows down

so slowing down is like braking a little, so it slows down

and it turns more, moreover

by slowing down a bit of load goes to the front

having the front more loaded allows the car to turn more

if instead you feel like you've entered too fast

and you're going off road, you're fucked.

nothing much you can do then. The best thing to do is

not to hit the brake,

otherwise you unbalance the car and you turn, or you block the tires and go straight

but you should brake

gently,

anyway, try it. take your car, go on

a road with big curves, like the highway

look for a big curve, and try entering the curve

by getting ready for the curve and pressing slight on the accelerator, constantly

at some point during the curve

keeping the steering wheel in the same position

let go of the accelerator. You'll notice that

the car - by keeping the steering wheel in the same position -

will start turning more. In this way you'll start to

see how the weight transfer influences

the car's behaviour.

Ok so what about on a motorcycle? More or less the same things apply for the bike

although on the bike there are more complex dynamics

for example the bike, by accelerating or braking,

it stretches or shortens

the bike never has the same length,

to make a curve then you need to lean, and by leaning the suspensions compress

so it's not just the weight transfer that determines the behaviour

but there are many other phenomena.

But more or less the basics are the same

as we explained in the video with Canepa, in fact

when you brake you

give load to the front

as you can see in this picture of me from Misano, notice that

when braking the rear part stretched

but in front is compressed

so when you ride on the track and you enter

a curve with the brake in hand, the front has more load

and more grip, and holds better.

And the bikes turns better.

Of course you can't have too much brake, otherwise..

I know all about it

Something that instead on a bike

I've found out

it's very useful when I analysed the comparison between Luca Salvadori and me

is aiming the gas

if you didn't watch that video, do it, 'cause I did a huge analysis

if you recall, when Luca is leaning

before accelerating, what does he do?

He opens the gas, and then he accelerates

why? because by opening the gas

he transfers weight to the rear tire

he crushes it to the ground, and gives it more grip

so when he'll accelerate

and unload 200HP to the ground,

the tire is ready, it's already crushed, it already has grip

hence there's less chance to slip, and this thing

I've tested on the pit bike. I was used to

the R1 that has 200HP

so you gotta accelerate when the bike is straight,

so curve, when I had to exit a curve I put the pitbike straight, and I accelerated

and the experts told me "that's not necessary,

you do that with a 1000! Here you have 14HP"

you can give it full gas

even with the bike fully leaning

but first you gotta open the gas to load the rear tire

and then you can give it all

in the famous crash where I gave life to that work of art

I fell because

in the heat of reaching those in front, with the bike leaning, I

accelerated all right away

I didn't load the rear tire

I didn't give it time to get grip, --- and it slipped

Finally, the weight transfer explains why

the powerful cars have rear traction. Why?

When you accelerate

the load transfer to the rear

and the front unloads. So, if

the front is unloaded and you have too much power

the tires don't have load, no grip,

and they can't unload the power, on the contrary

the more power you have, the stronger

the acceleration is, the more load the rear tires have

the more they are crushed to the ground, the more grip they have

the more they can unload the power to the ground

this is the reason. And to conclude

I want to clarify that using the braking

to load the front and enter the curve

depends also on the tires used

every pilot

needs to adapt his driving according to the tires

for example, when we drove the gp3,

they told us that the Pirelli they use there

when braking, don't work well sideways

but they work well only in this direction

so with these tires, instead of bringing

the braking right into the curve, it's much better to 100% brake

when the car is straight, let go of the brake

and enter. Because those tires

work like that. Ok! I hope you liked this video

on the weight transfer

I hope you learned a few things to apply to your driving

either on the track or the road,

and if you wanna see more videos like this one, subscribe

to the channel 'cause they are coming up

For more infomation >> IL MIO INCIDENTE PEGGIORE 😭 - COS'E' IL TRASFERIMENTO DI CARICO E COME SI USA IN AUTO E MOTO - Duration: 15:42.

-------------------------------------------

SCARY BETRAYAL LEFT DONALD TRUMP REELING,IT'S ALL OVER - Duration: 11:00.

SCARY BETRAYAL LEFT DONALD TRUMP REELING,IT'S ALL OVER

Mitt Romney's election to the U.S. Senate spelled big trouble for Donald Trump and conservatives.

The failed 2012 GOP Presidential nominee led the RINO "Never Trump" revolt in 2016.

But that was nothing compared to Romney executing this scary betrayal that left Trump reeling.

Fake news reporters and Never Trump Republicans celebrated Romney winning a Senate seat in

Utah.

They view Romney as their ideal Republican – one that values "civility" and "playing

by the rules" and doesn't engage in cultural fights because "losing with honor" is

the value they cherish above all else.

Romney also understands that the establishment views the GOP as the Washington Generals of

politics – second class citizens out to put on a good show, but will ultimately lose

to the Democrats.

But Romney – a failed politician who has lost virtually every race he ever entered

– finally stumbled into the one election he couldn't lose.

As a Mormon running in Utah, Romney was guaranteed a cake walk election.

And now that he is in Washington, he's planted his flag as the leader of the movement to

kneecap Donald Trump's Presidency.

Out-going Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, who served as Romney's disastrous Vice Presidential

nominee, passed on the torch of GOP sellouts to Romney.

Ryan praised him as the next John McCain.

Romney jumped at the chance to accept that mantle.

"I believe that I will speak my views as well from time to time.

I don't think I'll be able to do what John McCain did," Romney recently declared.

Trump supporters cringed at those words.

John McCain spent his political career stabbing conservatives in the back.

He supported open borders and amnesty.

The Arizona RINO also supported gutting the First Amendment with disclosure rules and

other restrictions to make political speech illegal.

McCain always played the role of useful idiot for the liberal media whenever they needed

a "Republican" to go on the air and condemn conservatives.

Romney has already demonstrated an eagerness to pick up where McCain left off after his

death.

When Antifa and Black Lives Matter fought with white nationalists in Charlottesville

where a young woman was killed when a white supremacist ran over her with his car, Romney

condemned Trump for pointing out that the left wing thugs were also to blame for the

violence.

And more recently, Romney tweeted out a stunning statement stabbing Trump in the back on Saudi

Arabia.

Trump dismissed the Obama echo chamber's calls to end the U.S. alliance with Saudi

Arabia after the murder of pro-Muslim Brotherhood activist Jamal Khashoggi because Saudi Arabia

is a key part of Trump's plan to contain Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Some pundits speculate that this means Romney is gearing up for a primary challenge to Donald

Trump.

Never Trump RINO pundit Mike Murphy said Romney challenging Trump is well within the realm

of possibility.

"Trump seemed like a bumbling incompetent in many ways, so what's the opposite of

that — who is a comfortable Republican, super-confident, safe, no drama choice?

It's Mitt," Murphy stated on The Jamie Weinstein Show podcast.

And even if Romney loses, Never Trumpers like Murphy could achieve their goal.

The last four Presidents who faced serious primary challengers – Lyndon Johnson, Gerald

Ford, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush – all either withdrew from the race or were defeated

for re-election.

Romney launching a kamikaze mission against Trump would satisfy the desire of Democrats

and establishment Republicans to see Trump out of the picture and the globalists once

again clutching the levers of power.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

For more infomation >> SCARY BETRAYAL LEFT DONALD TRUMP REELING,IT'S ALL OVER - Duration: 11:00.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING ROBERT MUELLER MOVES AGAINST TRUMP , THIS IS TERRIFYING - Duration: 15:06.

BREAKING ROBERT MUELLER MOVES AGAINST TRUMP , THIS IS HORRIFYING

Bob Woodward, an investigative reporter who works for The Washington Post, has been in

the business of 'dirty little secrets' so long that he was part of the team who cast

a light on Richard Nixon during Watergate.

In fact, once Fox News even called him a Watergate legend.

Well, it has become quite obvious that now he has his sights set on President Trump and

his administration.

In fact, he makes it very clear where he stands when it comes to President Trump in his new

"secret" book, 'Fear'.

Yes, it was a secret because he told no one about it for the past 19 months he's been

writing it.

He wanted to keep a 'low profile' while he researched what he planned to include in

the book.

There was a press release for 'Fear' that described the book as "an unprecedented

look into the harrowing life inside Donald Trump's White House and how the president

makes decisions on major foreign and domestic policies".

Woodward claims that he engaged in "hundreds of hours of interviews with firsthand sources".

It is for this reason, we can tip a hat to the man's work ethic despite the difference

of opinion we have with him regarding President Trump and the administration.

I am going to show you why right now.

Bob Woodward had an interview with Hugh Hewitt recently, in fact just a few days ago.

In this interview what he revealed arguably gives President Trump supporters a very good

reason to send a fat "IN YOUR FACE!" telegram to Democrats.

Check this out!

"So let's set aside the Comey firing, which as a Constitutional law professor, no

one will ever persuade me can be obstruction.

And Rod Rosenstein has laid out reasons why even if those weren't the president's

reasons.

Set aside the Comey firing.

Did you, Bob Woodward, hear anything in your research in your interviews that sounded like

espionage or collusion?"

Hugh Hewitt asked Woodward.

"I did not, and of course, I looked for it, looked for it hard," Woodward answered.

"And so you know, there we are.

We're going to see what Mueller has, and Dowd may be right.

He has something that Dowd and the president don't know about, a secret witness or somebody

who has changed their testimony.

As you know, that often happens, and that can break open or turn a case."

"But you've seen no collusion?"

Hewitt asked again to confirm."

"I have not," Woodward affirmed."

Hewitt would once again ask Woodward about collusion at the conclusion of the interview.

"Very last question, Bob Woodward, I just want to confirm, at the end of two years of

writing this book, this intensive effort, you saw no effort, you, personally, had no

evidence of collusion or espionage by the president presented to you?"

Hewitt asked."

"That is correct," Woodward said."

Now if that isn't satisfying to read, I don't know what is.

Not once, but twice Woodward clarified that he did not find ANY evidence of collusion

during his research.

This is coming from the same investigative reporter that was called at one time 'a

legend' for his work.

I mean, this is a man who is known for his extensive interviews with first witnesses,

and research into documents, meeting notes, calendars, and even diaries.

He is praised for how he constructs seamless narratives of events that he tells through

the eyes of actual key participants.

Even the left knows this about him.

So, you can bet that him saying not once, but twice that he found zero evidence of collusion,

is going be a real slap in the face for the left.

Maybe if we listen very carefully we will be able to feel the tremor being caused by

a nation full of 'triggering' liberals right this very second!

But I digress…

Despite this, there is still a lot of manipulative work he put into the book as well.

For example, the petty stuff he made sure to include, was absolutely ridiculous.

Things such as:

"Fear: Trump In The White House also details President Trump's explosive rants."

"He is said to have called Attorney General Jeff Sessions "mentally retarded", allegedly

adding: "He's this dumb Southerner.

… He couldn't even be a one-person country lawyer down in Alabama."

I'd like to give a moment now to Trump, to clear things up on this.

There were also many schoolyard claims about White House Chief John Kelly such as the following:

"White House chief of staff John Kelly frequently lost his temper and referred to President

Donald Trump as "unhinged" and an "idiot," author Bob Woodward writes in his new book

"Fear: Trump in the White House."

We can clear that up to, since the book's release Kelly has had something to say about

this claim.

"Kelly, in a statement Tuesday, denied the claims as simply "not true."

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders also refuted the book's claims."

"Kelly said in his statement that "the idea I ever called the President an idiot

is not true . . . . As I stated back in May and still firmly stand behind: 'I spend

more time with the President than anyone else, and we have an incredibly candid and strong

relationship.

He always knows where I stand, and he and I both know this story is total BS.'"

"I'm committed to the President, his agenda, and our country," Kelly said.

"This is another pathetic attempt to smear people close to President Trump and distract

from the administration's many successes."

"Sanders said Tuesday that "This book is nothing more than fabricated stories, many

by former disgruntled employees, told to make the president look bad."

Needless to say, the book 'Fear' is just another 'he said, she said' work created

with the purpose of adding fire to the left's agenda and casting doubt upon the shoulders

our President, but do you think it will have that effect at all?

We want to know what you think!