Wednesday, June 6, 2018

USA news on Youtube Jun 6 2018

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Hi.

June 29th, "The Crew 2" will release on all platforms.

But for our players, this is just the beginning.

"The Crew 2" is here for the long run,

with many exciting updates.

Today, I'm really happy to unveil the content that

will be released post-launch for all our players,

including free updates and also the season pass.

First, we want to deliver new content from day one.

We want all our players to enjoy the full game's experience.

That means no paywall, no community split.

Each month, two new vehicles will

be added to existing lineup.

Now, let's talk about our Season Pass, our VIP experience.

Season Pass owners will be able to get

these monthly new vehicles with seven days' early access.

At day one, they will get three exclusive vehicles

to get the best possible head start.

With the Gold Edition, you get the season pass and three days'

early access to the full game.

Let's talk about our major free updates available for all

and designed to renew the experience.

We want to constantly surprise our players,

changing the way they play the game.

Each three months, a new live update

will bring new activities, features, and disciplines.

Get ready for September 2018 and our first live update,

"Gator Rush," a tropical cocktail of bounty fun.

Master a brand new discipline, the hovercraft,

in the heart of the southern swamps.

Get your hands on five new vehicles,

and test your skills in a wacky new event..

This first live update will also include a new rarity level

for vehicles part.

To recap, each month, two new premium vehicles drop.

Season Pass owners get those directly in their collection

seven days before everyone else.

Then, each three months, one live update

with one new discipline and one game feature,

such as the new PVP mode in December.

Our strong and active community is

one of the pillars of the "Crew 2" development.

That's why we will organize the recurrent test phases

and give opportunity to players to share their feedback on all

this new content before its release.

I'm thrilled that we are about to launch "The Crew 2,"

and really happy we are offering all this extra content

post-launch.

It is only year one, and we intend

to keep challenging the way players are enjoying the game.

There's a lot more to invade, so stay tuned.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

For more infomation >> The Crew 2: Post Launch Content & Season Pass | Trailer | Ubisoft [NA] - Duration: 2:49.

-------------------------------------------

Karl Rove: Republicans certainly not drowning in a blue wave - Duration: 3:09.

For more infomation >> Karl Rove: Republicans certainly not drowning in a blue wave - Duration: 3:09.

-------------------------------------------

Sen. Rand Paul: Why have we been in Afghanistan 17 years? - Duration: 11:16.

For more infomation >> Sen. Rand Paul: Why have we been in Afghanistan 17 years? - Duration: 11:16.

-------------------------------------------

US Amb. to NATO on potential trade war between US and allies - Duration: 7:24.

For more infomation >> US Amb. to NATO on potential trade war between US and allies - Duration: 7:24.

-------------------------------------------

Check In At The Airport - The 7 Questions YOU MUST KNOW - Duration: 8:17.

For more infomation >> Check In At The Airport - The 7 Questions YOU MUST KNOW - Duration: 8:17.

-------------------------------------------

Meth deaths on the rise in Georgia - Duration: 0:49.

For more infomation >> Meth deaths on the rise in Georgia - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

First Look at Apples iOS 12 for iPhone and Giveaway Details - Duration: 12:52.

For more infomation >> First Look at Apples iOS 12 for iPhone and Giveaway Details - Duration: 12:52.

-------------------------------------------

Sara Carter Reveals FBI and DOJ's Sinister Plot to ALTER the IG Report - Duration: 5:28.

Sara Carter Reveals FBI and DOJ's Sinister Plot to ALTER the IG Report.

Investigative journalist Sara Carter just released an explosive report on the FBI and

DOJ's corrupt efforts to thwart the upcoming IG report.

According to Carter's report, FBI and DOJ are purposely trying to "slow walk" and

redact significant portions of the IG report.

From Sara Carter

The Department of Justice and the FBI are deliberately attempting to slow roll and redact

significant portions of DOJ Inspector General, Michael Horowitz's report on the bureau's

handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation, according to numerous congressional officials

and investigators.

The 400-page report, which was completed several weeks ago and addresses Clinton's use of

her private server for government business, is currently being reviewed by the DOJ and

FBI.

According to sources, individuals mentioned in the reports are also allowed to review

the document.

It is expected to be "long and thorough" and will criticize the handling of the investigation

by former FBI Director James Comey, who has spent the better part of the past several

months promoting his book A Higher Loyalty.

It's been almost a year and a half and it is time that Congress receives the IG report,"

said Congressman Ron DeSantis (R-FL), who has been on the front lines of the battle

against the DOJ and FBI's stonewalling of lawmakers requesting documentation.

"This has gone on long enough and the American people's patience is wearing thin.

We need accountability," said DeSantis.

Another congressional official, who's been fighting to obtain documents from the DOJ

and FBI, said it is no surprise that they are putting pressure on Horowitz.

According to the official, "They continue to slow roll documents, fail to adhere to

congressional oversight and concern is growing that they will wait until summer and then

turn over documents that are heavily redacted."

Former FBI Deputy Director, Andrew McCabe is also expected to come under fire in Horowitz's

latest Clinton report.

In April, McCabe was fired by Attorney General Jeff Sessions after the inspector general

released a scathing report and a criminal referral for lying under oath.

On Tuesday, President Trump expressed his frustration with the delays regarding Horowitz's

report and hinted that the inspector general may be feeling pressured to redact the document

or change portions of it to weaken the blow once it is released.

Last November, Horowitz's office told Congress that they expected the report to be released,

"in late winter/early spring," noting that the latest release date would be in April.

However, according to U.S. officials with knowledge of the report, the IG originally

delayed turning over the report until after Comey finished his book tour promotion.

Apparently, the most recent delay has to do with the review process that is taking place,

the officials stated.

"What is taking so long with the Inspector General's Report on Crooked Hillary and

Slippery James Comey," the President tweeted on Tuesday.

"Numerous delays.

Hope report is not being changed and made weaker!

There are so many horrible things to tell, the public has a right to know.

Transparency!"

The President also hammered Sessions, who recused himself from the Russia investigation.

According to several sources, Sessions' recusal when he accepted his appointment to

the DOJ was based on poor advice from colleagues.

The IG report is expected to reveal Comey's handling of the bureau's investigation into

Clinton's use of a private email server.

He faced enormous scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans for his handling of the case

during the election and his decision to hold a press conference in July 2016 to not bring

charges against her.

In a turn of events, Democrats later changed their position on Comey after President Trump

fired him at the request of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who stated that he

failed in leading the investigation into Clinton.

"The director was wrong to usurp the Attorney General's authority on July 5, 2016, and

announce his conclusion that the case should be closed without prosecution," Rosenstein

wrote in his May 9, 2017 letter.

The letter continued:

It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement.

At most, the Director should have said the FBI had completed its investigation and presented

its findings to federal prosecutors.

The Director now defends his decision by asserting that he believed Attorney General Loretta

Lynch had a conflict.

However, the FBI Director is never empowered to supplant federal prosecutors and assume

command of the Justice Department.

There is a well-established process for other officials to step in when a conflict requires

the recusal of the Attorney General.

On July 5, however, the Director announced his own conclusions about the nation's most

sensitive criminal investigation, without the authorization of duly appointed Justice

Department leaders.

Now, however, it is Rod Rosenstein who is overseeing Special Counsel Robert Mueller's

investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, as obstruction

for firing Comey.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today.

For more infomation >> Sara Carter Reveals FBI and DOJ's Sinister Plot to ALTER the IG Report - Duration: 5:28.

-------------------------------------------

Polski minister do Amerykanów: „Nowelizacja ustawy o IPN nie ma nic wspólnego z antysemityzmem" - Duration: 6:13.

W rozmowie z Wessem Mitchellem dałem jednoznacznie wyraz braku akceptacji niektórych elementów wypowiedzi Georgette Mosbacher, w szczególności sprowadzenia problemu antysemityzmu w Europie do decyzji podejmowanych w Polsce – powiedział w radiowej Trójce wiceszef MSZ Bartosz Cichocki

Cichocki przebywa od wtorku z wizytą w USA. W środę spotkał się z asystentem sekretarza stanu USA ds

europejskich i azjatyckich Wessem Mitchellem. Pytany w radiowej Trójce o to spotkanie, wiceminister odpowiedział: „Nie wchodząc w szczegóły, dałem jednoznacznie wyraz nieakceptacji niektórych elementów wypowiedzi pani Mosbacher, w szczególności sprowadzających problem antysemityzmu w Europie do decyzji podejmowanych w Polsce"

„Nowelizacja ustawy o IPN nie ma nic wspólnego z antysemityzmem. I jest, na tle sytuacji w Europie, pozytywnym przykładem skutecznej walki z antysemityzmem i otwarcia na kulturę żydowską, na współpracę z Izraelem" – podkreślił

Jak dodał, zwracał też uwagę na „niepokojący charakter wypowiedzi dotyczących zapowiedzi pani Mosbacher, że będzie ingerowała w decyzje, suwerenne decyzje Polski dot

praworządności – czy ogólniej mówiąc poszanowania demokracji". „Dopytywałem się, czy coś się zmieniło w stanowisku Stanów Zjednoczonych ws

polityki migracyjnej, bo tutaj też pani Mosbacher użyła zaskakujących sformułowań

Reakcja mojego rozmówcy utwierdziła mnie w przekonaniu, że te elementy wypowiedzi pani Mosbacher nie odzwierciedlają stanowiska Departamentu Stanu

Zwróciłem uwagę, że byłoby pożądane, gdyby zostało to publicznie sprostowane czy doprecyzowane" – relacjonował Cichocki

Dopytywany, czy dostał obietnicę, że będzie to „publicznie sprostowane czy doprecyzowane", odparł: „To jest na tyle bliska więź i stosunki między nami, że ja nie oczekuję obietnic, natomiast sądzę, że Departament Stanu będzie wiedział, jak zareagować w tej sytuacji"

Mosbacher, kandydatka na ambasadora USA w Polsce, zapytana podczas wtorkowego posiedzenia komisji spraw zagranicznych Senatu USA, czy wie, co się dzieje w kwestii antysemityzmu w Europie Wschodniej, odparła: „Tak

Niestety zostało to wywołane niedawno przyjętą ustawą o Holokauście". „Nie możemy tolerować żadnego rodzaju fanatyzmu, to ma fundamentalne znaczenie dla naszych wartości i będę pracować wspólnie z Polską, aby upewnić się, że nie włączają tego rodzaju rzeczy do swojego ustawodawstwa" – dodała

Poproszona o powtórzenie ostatniego zdania, podkreśliła: „Będę pracowała z Polską, aby upewnić się, że zanim wprowadzą jakiekolwiek zmiany legislacyjne, nie będą one wzniecały fanatyzmu"

„To jest niedopuszczalne, brak tolerancji w każdej formie" – dodała. Uchwalona przez Sejm w styczniu nowelizacja ustawy o IPN zakłada m

in., że każdy, kto publicznie i wbrew faktom przypisuje polskiemu narodowi lub państwu polskiemu odpowiedzialność lub współodpowiedzialność za zbrodnie popełnione przez III Rzeszę Niemiecką lub inne zbrodnie przeciwko ludzkości, pokojowi i zbrodnie wojenne, będzie podlegał karze grzywny lub do trzech lat więzienia

Taka sama kara grozi za „rażące pomniejszanie odpowiedzialności rzeczywistych sprawców tych zbrodni"

Przepisy te wywołały krytykę m.in. ze strony Izraela i USA. 6 lutego prezydent Andrzej Duda podpisał znowelizowaną ustawę, a następnie w trybie kontroli następczej skierował ją do TK

Prezydent chce, by Trybunał zbadał, czy przepisy ustawy nie ograniczają w sposób nieuprawniony wolności słowa oraz, aby przeanalizował kwestię tzw

określoności przepisów prawa. Zmienione przepisy obowiązują od 1 marca. W marcu Onet podał, że Amerykanie wprowadzili szczególne sankcje wobec polskich władz – do czasu przyjęcia zmian w ustawie o IPN, prezydent, ani wiceprezydent USA nie będą się z nimi spotykać

Portal twierdził, że ultimatum zostało sformułowane przez wysokiej rangi oficjeli amerykańskich na spotkaniu z polskimi dyplomatami; kluczową postacią na tym spotkaniu miał być Wess Mitchell

Informacje te zostały zdementowane m.in. przez Departament Stanu USA oraz polskie władze; zaprzeczył im m

in. premier Mateusz Morawiecki. Po majowym spotkaniu z sekretarzem stanu USA Markiem Pompeo w Waszyngtonie szef polskiej dyplomacji Jacek Czaputowicz zapowiedział, że oficjalna wizyta prezydenta Andrzeja Dudy w Stanach Zjednoczonych odbędzie się jeszcze w tym roku; jako jeden z możliwych terminów wymienił wrzesień

(PAP)  

For more infomation >> Polski minister do Amerykanów: „Nowelizacja ustawy o IPN nie ma nic wspólnego z antysemityzmem" - Duration: 6:13.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Foreign Firm Flagged By US Intelligence Got YOUR User Data For Horrifying Reason - Duration: 6:59.

BREAKING: Foreign Firm Flagged By US Intelligence Got YOUR User Data For Horrifying Reason.

Facebook user engagement has been in a freefall downward slide leaving the company scrambling

to figure out new methods for boosting its user engagement since it came under fire for

the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Zero Hedge reported on Facebook's recent "dirty trick" for trying to boost its

user engagement numbers – using phone numbers provided for two-factor authentication to

send users data they can "engage with" but didn't sign up for receiving via text

message.

They told "the story of Gabriel Lewis, who tweeted that Facebook texted "spam" to

the phone number he submitted for the purposes of 2-factor authentication.

And no, he insists he did not have mobile notifications turned on.

What's more, when he replied "stop" and "DO NOT TEXT ME," he says those messages

showed up on his Facebook wall."

Now in the latest bombshell revelation, we find that Facebook has also provided unrestricted

access to user data to at least four Chinese electronics companies, including government-linked

telecom giant Huawei.

These relationships were discovered and revealed as a part of a data sharing partnership program

which included a minimum of 60 major device manufacturers, including but not limited to

Apple, Amazon, Blackberry, Microsoft and Samsung.

This data sharing partnership allowed these companies to integrate various Facebook features

into their operating systems, thus giving them access to user data and that of the data

of the users' friends and family without their knowledge or consent.

Of particular concern is Huawei as lawmakers in Congress and top intelligence officials

have previously raised red flags over whether or not the Chinese government might be able

to demand access to data stored on Huawei devices or servers.

Naturally, Huawei denies any such claims, yet the Pentagon chose to take definitive

action and ban the sales of Huawei smartphones on U.S. military bases stemming from such

concerns.

According to the Washington Post – Facebook data was only ever stored on Huawei servers,

only directly on devices.

WaPo notes – "A spokesman for Huawei did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Facebook late Tuesday confirmed that it had worked with Huawei, as well as three other

Chinese firms, Lenovo, OPPO, and TCL.

Facebook said those arrangements were "controlled from the get-go — and we approved the Facebook

experiences these companies built.

Facebook's statement followed a day of silence about its relationships with Chinese firms,

which drew a sharp rebuke from Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va).

Warner said in a statement Tuesday that Facebook's relationships with Huawei and TCL raise 'legitimate

concerns, and I look forward to learning more about how Facebook ensured that information

about their users was not sent to Chinese servers.'"

Amid the fallout from this most recent discovery, Facebook claims they plan to wind down their

relationship with Huawei by the end of the week.

According to a New York Times report from Sunday evening, the data-sharing agreement

allowed manufacturers to access information on relationship status, calendar events, political

affiliations, and religion, among other things.

An Apple spokesman further revealed that the company relied on its private access to Facebook

data to allow users to post on the social network without opening the Facebook app itself.

This allowed manufacturers to access the data of users' friends and family without their

explicit consent.

This is all in spite of Facebook insisting to all and sundry that they would not and

had not allowed outside companies to access user data.

The NYT reports – "Facebook's view that the device makers are not outsiders lets the

partners go even further, The Times found: They can obtain data about a user's Facebook

friends, even those who have denied Facebook permission to share information with any third

parties.

In interviews, several former Facebook software engineers and security experts said they were

surprised at the ability to override sharing restrictions."

Despite significant public outcry and even Congressional interviews and the supposed

winding down of these partnerships up to and including the posting capabilities used by

Apple, Facebook continues to defend the data-sharing agreements.

They claim the data sharing agreements are in full compliance with the company's privacy

policies, as well as in compliance with a 2011 consent decree issued by the FTC.

Facebook officials claim they do not currently know of any cases where user information has

been misused.

"These partnerships work very differently from the way in which app developers use our

platform," said Ime Archibong, a Facebook vice president.

Unlike developers that provide games and services to Facebook users, the device partners can

use Facebook data only to provide versions of "the Facebook experience," the officials

said.

"These contracts and partnerships are entirely consistent with Facebook's F.T.C. consent

decree," said Archibong.

Yet it seems former FTC official Jessica Rich fully disagrees with Facebook's assessment

of the situation, stating – "Under Facebook's interpretation, the exception swallows the

rule.

They could argue that any sharing of data with third parties is part of the Facebook

experience.

And this is not at all how the public interpreted their 2014 announcement that they would limit

third-party app access to friend data."

Rich is now currently employed by the Consumers Union since leaving her position with the

FTC.

The NYT further discovered that because Facebook does not consider the device makers to be

outsiders, the data sharing partnerships go even a step further, allowing these companies

to access user data of a Facebook user's friends and family, even if they have previously

denied Facebook permission to share their personal information with third parties.

Zero Hedge reports of this additional breach discovery – "The discovery of the manufacturer

data-sharing agreements comes on the heels of a massive data harvesting scandal in which

the social media giant allowed third-party apps to gather massive quantities of user

information for various political and marketing purposes.

In March, political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica was revealed to have misused the

private information of tens of millions of Facebook users.

The Cambridge Analytica ordeal shed light on the pervasive collection of data which

has come under growing scrutiny since the scandal began in March.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Foreign Firm Flagged By US Intelligence Got YOUR User Data For Horrifying Reason - Duration: 6:59.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Brodská bez obalu: Brejchová ji lezla na nervy, Bróďa trenérem v Americe? - Duration: 1:37.

„Trému ani ne, spíš mi maminka lehce lezla na nervy svou přehnanou péčí. Mezi obrazy mne neustále kontrolovala, zda jsem najedená, teple oblečená a tak dále

Bylo to legrační. To její počínání ale naštěstí trvalo jen chvíli, později jsme k sobě začaly už přistupovat víc profesionálně, jako normální kolegyně," odpověděla Tereza Brodská (50) na otázku revue

idnes.cz, zda měla z Jany Brejchové (78) na place trému.    Při nečekaně otevřené zpovědi zavzpomínala Tereza samozřejmě i na svého tatínka

Vlastimil Brodský (†81) prý mohl skončit jako trenér dětiček amerického výrobce legendárních vozů Ford

„Málokdo například věděl, že tatínek byl vynikající tenista a přátelil se s legendárním Karlem Koželuhem, díky kterému dokonce dostal před válkou nabídku odjet do Ameriky trénovat Fordovy děti

Tatínek ale naštěstí odmítl, takže zaplať pánbůh za to, jinak bych se možná ani nenarodila

"

No comments:

Post a Comment