USA news on Youtube May 7 2018

RIGHT-WINGERS ONLINE LOVE TO PICTURE THEMSELVES AS VICTIMS,

SAYING THAT TWITTER IS CENSORING THEM, YOUTUBE IS CENSORING THEM,

GOFUNDME AND CROWDSOURCING PLATFORM ARE CENSORING THEM BUT

ABOVE ALL, FACEBOOK IS CENSORING THEM AND WE HAVE RECENTLY HAD

DIAMOND AND SILK, TWO PRO-TRUMP WOMEN BEFORE CONGRESS TALKING

ABOUT HOW THEIR PAGES HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN, WHICH OF COURSE THEY

HADN'T, THAT THE REACH HAD BEEN CUT WHICH OF COURSE THEY HADN'T.

WE HAVE ALL THE ACTUAL DATA ON THESE THINGS BUT THEY

HAVE BEEN SAYING IT AND THEY'VE BEEN SAYING IT FOR YEARS AND

UNFORTUNATELY, THEIR WHINING AS IT SO OFTEN DOES HAS WORKED.

SO THEY ARE NOT BIASED AGAINST CONSERVATIVES.

ALL OF THE DATA

SHOWS THAT, BUT THEY ARE GOING TO BRING ALL OF THESE

CONSERVATIVE INDIVIDUALS IN AND THEN WHAT DO

YOU THINK THE OUTCOME OF THAT WILL BE?

IT WILL BE BIAS, BUT NOT AGAINST CONSERVATIVES.

IF YOU ARE

ACTUALLY NEUTRAL OR AT LEAST SCREWING WITH EVERYONE

EQUALLY AND YOU BRING IN A BUNCH OF CONSERVATIVES, THE ONLY

OUTCOME IS MOVING AGAINST LIBERALS.

I OFTEN DEFEND THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS AND I

ALWAYS GIVE THE CAVEAT THAT LOOK, THESE GUYS ARE OUR

PARTNERS.

LET'S KEEP IT REAL.

WE ARE ON GOOGLE, YOUTUBE, AND

FACEBOOK, ETC.

I'M NOT GOING TO DEFEND FACEBOOK ON THIS.

THEY

HAVE A REALLY HARD JOB.

THEY GET ACCUSED OF HAVING A LIBERAL

BIAS, THEY BRING IN CONSERVATIVES TO HELP THEM

FIGURE OUT WHAT THE TRUTH IS AND THEY ARE LIKE, THAT'S MESSED UP,

WE CANNOT DO THAT.

FINE, WE CAN'T USE HUMANS, SO WE WILL

USE AN ALGORITHM.

THEY USE AN ALGORITHM AND THEN FAKE NEWS

HAPPENS AND THEY GET CRITICIZED FOR THAT.

THAT IS THE BACKGROUND AND AS

MUCH OF A DEFENSE AS I WILL GIVE THEM.

HAVING SAID THAT, YOU ARE

BUYING INTO THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK, AND YOU ARE ACTUALLY

VERY MUCH PRO-CONSERVATIVE.

I KNOW THAT MIGHT BLOW YOUR MIND

AND ZUCKERBERG SAYS THAT SILICON VALLEY IS AN EXTREMELY

LEFT-LEANING PLACE.

NO IT'S NOT.

LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT,

YOU HAVE TO SEPARATE THE TWO SIDES.

SOCIAL ISSUES AND

ECONOMIC ISSUES.

ON SOCIAL ISSUES, I AGREE.

SILICON VALLEY

IS LIBERAL.

THEY DO NOT HATE BLACK PEOPLE JUST BECAUSE THEY

ARE BLACK, THEY DON'T HATE GAY PEOPLE JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE

GAY, AND SO YES, THAT IS TRUE.

I KNOW THAT DRIVES

CONSERVATIVES CRAZY SO THEY MIGHT SAY NO, BLACKS AND

LATINOS, WE DO NOT HATE THEM, YOU ARE BEING UNFAIR.

LATINOS

SHOULDN'T COME INTO THE COUNTRY, THEY ARE DIRTY AND BRINGING IN

CRIME AND OBAMA WAS NOT REALLY AN AMERICAN, ETC.

BUT YOU ARE

BEING UNFAIR AND GAY PEOPLE SHOULDN'T HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS

AS STRAIGHT PEOPLE BUT WHAT YOU MEAN WE HATE THEM?

YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEM ON BIGOTRY, GOOD.

AND YOU

SHOULDN'T. YOU SHOULDN'T BE BALANCED ON THAT.

THAT IS

INSANITY.

ON ECONOMIC ISSUES, SILICON VALLEY IS VERY

CONSERVATIVE.

MOST OF THE COMPANIES DON'T EVEN PAY THEIR

TAXES.

YES, THEY FIND LEGAL WAYS TO DO THAT, GIANT

LOOPHOLES, THEY GO TO THE NETHERLANDS, IRELAND, THE CAYMAN

ISLANDS AND THEY PUSH FOR TAX CUTS SO SAYING GOLLY GEE, WE ARE

LIBERALS.

NO YOU AREN'T WHEN IT COMES TO AN ECONOMIC ISSUES.

SO WHAT DO THEY DO?

IN THIS CASE THEY HIRED A LOBBYIST, JOHN KYLE WHO IS KNOWN

AS A GUY WHO MAKES UP STUFF, A SENATOR FROM ARIZONA, IT

DOESN'T MEAN HE IS LEGITIMATE, HE IS THE GUY WHO, AMONG MANY,

BUT HE WROTE A LETTER TO THE WASHINGTON POST SAYING SADDAM

HUSSEIN IS THE ONE WHO DID 9/11.

THAT WAS A GIGANTIC LIE, ALMOST

THE DEFINITION OF FAKE NEWS AND THAT LED US TO GOING INTO IRAQ

AND ONE OF THE WORST DECISIONS THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT HAS EVER

MADE AND NOW THAT GUY IS IN CHARGE OF WHAT IS TELLING US

WHAT

FAKE NEWS IS?

BY THE WAY, THAT IS AMONG THE MANY THINGS THAT HE HAS SAID

WRONG ON PURPOSE.

HE IS THE ONE WHO SAID THE TOTAL FABRICATION

ABOUT PLANNED PARENTHOOD THAT ALL THEY DO IS ABORTION.

STEPHEN

COLBERT MADE FUN OF HIM FAMOUSLY FOR THAT COMMENT AND THE LIST

GOES ON AND ON, BUT THE THING THAT DRIVES ME CRAZY IS THEY

ONLY HIRED A CONSERVATIVE.

THEY DID NOT HIRE A LIBERAL.

WE DO

NOT NEED LIBERALS, ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS APPEASE THE

CONSERVATIVES.

YOU KNOW THAT MAKES YOU?

A CONSERVATIVE.

IF YOUR IDEA OF BALANCE IS ONLY CONSERVATIVES

AND LIBERALS, THAT DOES NOT MAKE YOU A LIBERAL.

THAT MAKES YOU A

CONSERVATIVE.

SO THEY WILL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST LIBERALS.

THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME, AND BY THE WAY, ONE OF THE THINGS, THE

MAIN THING THEY ARE GOING TO DO IS THEY ARE GOING TO SAY, CNN

YELLED AT US, SO CNN IS LEGITIMATE AND TRUSTWORTHY, NEW

YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, LEGITIMATE.

JOHN KYLE SAYS

BREITBART AND THESE INSANE PEOPLE ON THE RIGHT WHO LIED

NONSTOP, THERE LEGITIMATE BECAUSE CONSERVATIVES YELL AT US

BY GOD HELP YOU IF YOU'RE PROGRESSIVE AND INDEPENDENT.

THEY ARE COMING FOR YOU.

DOES THAT INCLUDE US?

I DON'T KNOW,

WE'RE THE LARGEST ONLINE NEWS SHOW ON THE PLANET SO MAYBE

THEY WILL GO, THAT IS FINE, OR MAYBE THEY WILL GO, JOHN KYLE

TOLD ME TO KILL OFF YOUR SHOW.

MAYBE WE SURVIVE BECAUSE WE ARE

SO LARGE BUT EVERYONE WHO ISN'T AS LARGE AS US, YOU ARE IN A

WORLD OF TROUBLE.

ALL OF THOSE PROGRESSIVE OUTLETS, THEY JUST

HIRED JOHN KYLE TO KILL YOU.

I DO NOT MEAN LITERALLY OF COURSE,

I MEAN THE KILL OFF ANY TRAFFIC YOU MIGHT HAVE ON FACEBOOK.

GET

IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL.

YOU HAVE A CONSERVATIVE ECONOMIC

BIAS, NOT A LIBERAL ONE.

THEY ARE DATA COMPANIES AND THEY ARE SO FOCUSED ON DATA IN

MANY, MANY WAYS BUT THEY ALSO DON'T LIKE TO GET PICKED ON.

I

WENT TO SCHOOL WITH A LOT OF THEM.

THEY'RE STILL NERD.S THEY DON'T

LIKE TO GET PICKED ON.

OH MY GOD, SOMEONE IS PICKING ON ME

AND THEN THE BULLIES ARE DOING THAT TO THEM AND THEY ARE LIKE

FINE, HERE IS A ROOM.

LET'S HAVE A MEETING, JUST QUIT PICKING ON

ME. AND REINFORCES THAT KIND OF BEHAVIOR, IT SHOWS PEOPLE THAT

YOUR TACTIC OF INTIMIDATING FACEBOOK IS WORKING, AND

THEY NEED TO STOP.

IT IS THIS IDEA THAT FACTS DON'T MATTER AS MUCH AS

COMPLAINTS DO AND WE SEE UNFORTUNATELY IN LOCAL NEWS A

LOT AND IT WAS ALL IN THE COVERAGE OF HOW WE COVERED COLIN

KAEPERNICK KNEELING.

FACTS DON'T MATTER AS MUCH AS COMPLAINING.

THE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS DINNER, IT BECAME THIS WHOLE

STORY ABOUT HOW SHE WAS BASHING THIS WOMAN'S LOOKS AND INITIALLY

I FEEL LIKE A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE WATCHING IT NEVER THOUGHT THAT

IT ALL AND HERE IT IS AGAIN, FACTS DON'T MATTER AS MUCH

AS COMPLAINTS DO.

HAPPENS EVERYWHERE.

BECAUSE THEY ARE AN ADVERTISING COMPANY.

YOU GUYS, YOU THINK IT IS GOING TO MAKE THE

COMPLAINTS GO AWAY?

IT IS GOING TO MAKE THEM DOUBLE.

WHY?

BECAUSE IT WORKED.

SO THEN THEY WILL LEAN MORE HEAVILY CONSERVATIVE AND THAT IS

WHY CONSERVATIVES ARE PROFESSIONAL CRYBABIES.

THEY

LITERALLY DO IT ON PURPOSE SO THEY GET TRIGGERED AND THEY NEED

A SAFE SPACE.

FACEBOOK, YOU NEED TO CREATE A SAVE SPACE.

IT IS CATEGORICALLY EMPIRICALLY NOT SURE THAT DIAMOND AND

SILK WERE DISCRIMINATED BY FACEBOOK AND BY THE WAY,

THEY WENT ON FOX NEWS AFTER IT WAS PROVEN THAT FACEBOOK

NOT ONLY DID NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THEM WAS SENT THEM

A LETTER SAYING HOW CAN WE HELP AND THEY WENT ON FOX NEWS

AND SAID THEY NEVER SENT US A LETTER.

YOU KNOW THAT IS?

THAT IS FAKE NEWS AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?

YOU ARE NOW GOING TO REWARD THAT BECAUSE YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE

BULLIED AND TED CRUZ YELLED AT YOU.

FIND, I AM NOW YELLING AT

YOU.

YOU GUYS ARE CONSERVATIVE AND YOU DISCRIMINATE AGAINST

PROGRESSIVES ALL THE TIME.

YOU ARE PUSHING AND PUSHING.

THE

GREAT MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE ONLINE AND CERTAINLY AMONG THE

YOUNG WHO ARE VERY PROGRESSIVE, YOU KEEP PUSHING THEM AWAY

SAYING WE ARE A GIANT CONSERVATIVE CORPORATION WHO

DOESN'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU.

ALL WE ARE EVER GOING TO DO IS

LOOK OUT FOR CONSERVATIVES.

WE ARE NEVER GOING TO LOOK OUT FOR

PROGRESSIVES.

I AM GOING TO GUESS THAT THAT IS NOT A WINNING

BUSINESS STRATEGY WHEN 80% OF THE YOUNGER PROGRESSIVES, BUT

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT, MARK.

For more infomation >> The Conservative Bias Of Facebook - Duration: 9:04.

-------------------------------------------

Elena Documentary 2018 - Duration: 8:07.

This is a special program featuring unique alumni of the University of Tokyo (top ranked in Japan) and their family.

We are going to feature a beautiful high-school girl, who is related to the University of Tokyo,

and was selected as a US National Team Member in a certain sport.

This girl lives in Atlanta, Georgia, which is located in the South East part of the United States.

When we visited her nice-looking house,

"Hello." "Hello."

"Nice to meet you."

"So cute..."

(She said it so naturally)

She has great-looking legs.

Viewing the living room on the right,

Walking into the kitchen,

"Here is my Mom."

(Beautiful...)

Her Mom's name is Namie.

Namie is good at cooking, and the girl says: "she is better than restaurant chefs".

Then comes her Dad, Minoru.

"He graduated from that University of Tokyo. I am proud of him..."

Her Dad received PhD from the University of Tokyo.

He now works as an Associate Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

(wow, he must be outstanding.)

This girl has been successfully raised and educated by such a smart Dad.

She is a respected Japan-born high-school student, who will turn 18 this year.

She came to the US when she was just 5 months old.

She has grown up to excel in a certain sport, becoming a US National Team Member.

"These are medals I have earned in the past 12 years."

She has earned a lot of medals,

counting more than 100!

"I got into the US National Team."

"so, to represent Team USA."

We have followed the daily life of this super high-school girl for the first time as a TV program.

"Good morning."

"I'm still sleepy..."

The first thing she does in the morning is...

to measure her weight.

"I measure my weight every day..."

She is concerned about her weight while she is growing.

This is a big clue in guessing what sport she excels in.

She goes to school before sunrise.

The class starts as early as 7:10 am.

Partially because she is raised by her smart Dad, who graduated from the University of Tokyo,

she belongs to the top academic class in the school.

"For Ka, we were supposed to have 4.57 exactly. 4.77 I think was exactly on the book."

"Alright. We got 5.01."

"Our group is notorious...." "HAHAHAHAHA..." "That's true."

They chat about so difficult matters that we could not understand what was funny.

For Art, she plays the violin in her orchestra class.

After school, she enjoys various activities like practicing K-pop dance with her friends.

She likes not only classical music, but various music broadly.

Now, let's see the face of this super high-school girl.

This is the face of the girl who was selected as a US National Team member in a certain sport!

Her name is Elena Shinohara. She is 17 years old.

So cute!

The question is about this smart girl, who is raised by her smart Dad, a graduate of the University of Tokyo.

In what sport was she selected as a US National Team Member?

"Now is the time for you to answer!"

"The video has stopped already, but you are just showing your stupid face!"

"I got confused when she was managing her weight."

"Why can't you tell with that information?"

"That was given as a big clue."

"Is she a boxer?"

"You guess she is a boxer!"

"Oh, sorry!"

"NOT AT ALL!"

She is a super-achiever in both academics and sports.

The sport she was selected as a National Team Member is ... that popular sport.

Let's see what the answer is.

The envied high-school girl, Elena Shinohara is 17 years old.

In what sport was she selected as a US National Team Member?

Elena is warming-up for something.

She is amazingly flexible!

Now, you must have figured it out.

"The answer is Rhythmic Gymnastics, for which she was selected in a US National Team."

"Elena is outstanding in rapid, sharp movements and skilled apparatus handling."

"Watch this! While doing a back walk over,

she takes back the ribbon with her left foot!"

Elena started rhythmic gymnastics when she was 6.

She obtained her US citizenship in 2014.

Then became a US National Team Member in 2015.

In the US Top-Senior Competition during this TV filming,

she amazingly won the all-around champion!

She was also selected as a member of the National Honor Society.

Elena is a top-level student with success in both academics and rhythmic gymnastics.

Her Dad, a graduate of the University of Tokyo,

has a policy in raising children.

"You may want to follow successful cases y other parents in the books."

"That can be a big mistake!"

Unless your child is in a similar situation,

a successful case of others would not apply directly to your own child.

Parents should understand the situation and environment of their child,

find out and apply the most appropriate education in the case of their own child.

In fact, Elena was facing a major stress when she was 10.

She was overwhelmed with busy school work and rhythmic gymnastics,

and was feeling questionable and stressful about learning to write Japanese KANJI characters in addition.

Her Dad noticed her stress and made a big decision.

"I started to question myself as a parent.. To what extent should she learn Japanese KANJI characters?"

"In her likelihood of living in the US permanently,

learning to speak conversational Japanese would be enough."

"We would not WRITE KANJI characters any more, but just CHOOSE them on a computer or a phone."

"Learning to choose and read KANJI characters would be enough in her situation."

"So, I made a big decision to let her stop practicing to WRITE Japanese KANJI characters."

This way, Elena's Dad noticed her undue stress,

and made a big decision to make her stop learning to write KANJI characters.

As a result, Elena was able to focus on more important school work and rhythmic gymnastics.

Elena has thus become a top-class high-school student successful in both academics and sports.

Her Dad made a right decision. Awesome!

For more infomation >> Elena Documentary 2018 - Duration: 8:07.

-------------------------------------------

Family Insider Releases HUMILIATING Secret Informative About Trump Family - Duration: 13:46.

Family Insider Releases HUMILIATING Secret Informative About Trump Family

There's Hell To Pay For This!Image may contain: 2 people, suit and closeup

The rag of a so-called news site "Liberals Unite" is now quoting the yellow press magazine

"US Weekly" although they are known for publishing fake news stories.

Here is the story from "Liberals Unite."

You be the judge.

"No matter your opinion of her, it can't be easy for Melania Trump to deal with all

of the scandals following her husband.

And with the recent news of multiple affairs after just giving birth to their son, Barron,

it isn't surprising she would be miserable.

The US Weekly article asserts that her life has gotten worse since Playboy Playmate Karen

McDougal recently described her 10-month affair with Donald, and adult film star Stormy Daniels

(whose real name is Stephanie Clifford).

Appeared on 60 Minutes and told the world about her sexual encounter with Donald in

2006 – that she spanked him with a magazine in which he was featured on the cover, and

that she and her infant daughter were threatened and told to stop talking about Trump.

Both women said the president told them they reminded him of his daughter, Ivanka.

The endless coverage has taken a toll.Image may contain: 2 people, suit and closeup

Melania made a last-minute decision to not accompany her husband on a trip last week

and took her own motorcade instead so that she would avoid photos of them together.

The US Weekly source said of Melania, "She's very independent."

Stephanie Grisham, a spokesperson for the first lady, said Melania is focusing on motherhood

and enjoying some time at Mar-a-Lago "focusing on future projects."

But an insider close to the Trump family painted a more dire picture, saying Melania is humiliated

and her emotional state is even worse, "She is very, very unhappy with her life.

If she could, she would get away from Donald and just be with her son."

This news is not at all surprising.

It was pretty clear the first lady was not happy on inauguration day after footage of

her scowling behind the president went viral."

Now lets try to figure this out.

First, Notice how they start the article "No matter what your opinion of her," meaning

our First Lady Melania Trump.

Image may contain: 2 people, suit and closeupRight there you see these liberals who write for

this so-called "Magazine" can't even manage to hide there obvious bias and disdain

for even a second.

And what has the first lady ever done to them?

Now let's move on to the "affair" angle.

Both the president and Daniels have denied having an affair but she still talked to Anderson

Cooper about the alleged relationship she had with the president back in 2006 and 2007.

Along with Daniel's own account of what went on during the alleged affair, the 60

Minutes segment also include an examination of the potential legal and political ramifications

of the $130,000 payment that Mr. Trump's attorney Michael Cohen claims he made to Daniels

using his own funds.

Daniels accepted the money in return for signing a confidentiality agreement which she now

claims isn't binding because Trump never signed it himself.

Daniels has gone on to sue in a California court claiming the confidentiality agreement

between her and the president is invalid because he allegedly never signed it,

But the president's attorneys are seeking to move the case to federal court and claim

Daniels is liable for more than $20 million in damages for violations of the agreement.Image

may contain: 2 people, suit and closeup

As far as the Melania breaking protocol lie and arriving at Air Force One in different

motorcades.

The truth of the matter is that the First Lady had a speech to give right before leaving

that day and came straight from another part of town.

As simple as that.

As you can clearly see all the fake points this liberal article makes have an explanation.

There is no "inside source" and this might very well be even faker than the Russian Dossier

the DNC and Hillary Clinton paid for during the 2016 election.

What I really can't seem to understand about all this is why what the President did over

a decade is an issue but what a sitting president did while in the Oval Office, with one of

his impressionable interns wasn't?

Why were Bill Clinton's indiscretions while in the white house none of my business but

what Donald Trump did 12 years ago.

Is supposed to bother me?

Are the Liberals actually trying to convince us now that they somehow developed a moral

compass?

Or is it just because of political expedience and the constant fight to try to get rid of

President Trump?Image may contain: 2 people, suit and closeup

Is supposed to bother me?

Are the Liberals actually trying to convince us now that they somehow developed a moral

compass?

Or is it just because of political expedience and the constant fight to try to get rid of

President Trump?

Nooooo, this can't be political, after all, the new face of the Democrat party is now

a whiny 17-year-old who is trying to bully us law-abiding American citizens to turn in

our guns and a washed-up porn star trying to extort money out

of

a Republican President.

For more infomation >> Family Insider Releases HUMILIATING Secret Informative About Trump Family - Duration: 13:46.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Obama's FBI Agent Was Officially CHARGED And That's Just The Start… - Duration: 16:24.

BREAKING: Obama's FBI Agent Was Officially CHARGED And That's Just The Start…

From the inception of the Trump Administration, they've been plagued by leaks.

Security officials have been determined to find and stop the leaks, but up until now,

it's been stopping one leak only to find another in its place.

The general theory has been that the Obama era holdovers were responsible for making

sure that the Trump Administration was neutralized by their information going out to adversarial

media outlets, almost in real time.

While several of the leaks have been found to be very close to the President, there have

been others popping up along the way as well.

However, information provided by both the Daily Wire and Fox News points to a criminal

information leak coming out of the Justice Department.

More specifically, the FBI.

Ironically, the investigation that disgruntled Democrats insisted on, following the 2016

win of President Trump, has been what uncovered the corruption on the part of federal employees

who sympathize with the leftist agenda.

According to Daily Wire, the most recent source of the leaks is an FBI agent with short ties

to former FBI Director James Comey:

"This week, the Justice Department's National Security Division charged an FBI agent based

in Minneapolis with leaking classified information to the media in a move similar to other recent

alleged leaks, including by former FBI Director James Comey.Image may contain: 1 person, standing

and outdoor

Terry James Albury, who worked in counterterrorism, was charged with 'one count of 'knowingly

and willfully' transmitting documents and information relating to national defense to

a reporter for a national news organization,' Minnesota Public Radio reported.

Albury faces another criminal charge for refusing to hand over documents to the government.

Albury is the second person to be charged with leaking classified material to The Intercept;

an intelligence contractor was charged in June 2017 "with leaking a classified report

about Russia's interference in the 2016 election."

While a search warrant that was filed in federal court did not identify the news outlet that

Albury allegedly leaked to, a review by MPR 'found the documents described in the search

warrant that Albury leaked exactly match the trove of FBI documents posted by The Intercept.'

'The FBI believes that the classified and/or controlled nature of the documents indicates

the News Outlet obtained these documents from someone with direct access to them,' the

warrant stated.

'Furthermore, reviews of the FBI internal records indicate ALBURY has electronically

accessed over two-thirds of the approximately 27 documents via trusted access granted to

him on FBI information systems.'"

This case with Agent Albury isn't the first of it's kind.

A similar case was made concerning the actions made by Comey in 2017, as Fox News reported

in January 2018:Image may contain: 1 person, standing and outdoor

"Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is pressing the Justice Department

for answers on whether James Comey violated bureau rules, saying it appears the former

FBI director leaked 'at least one' classified memo to a professor friend shortly after his

firing.

Grassley, R-Iowa, penned a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein late Wednesday,

saying he and his staff had reviewed the Comey memos which were 'created purportedly memorializing

his interactions with President Trump.'

They did so in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at the FBI and the Senate,

because the FBI deemed the 'majority of the memos' to be 'classified.'

'Of the seven memos, four are marked classified at the 'SECRET'or 'CONFIDENTIAL' levels,'

Grassley wrote, adding that 'only three did not contain classified information.'

Grassley's letter appears to back up July 2017 reports that several of Comey's private

memos contained classified material.

The Hill first reported this development; Fox News confirmed with a legal source at

the time that some material contained classified information.

The president seized on those reports at the time with a tweet saying: 'That is so illegal!'Image

may contain: 1 person, standing and outdoor

Comey admitted in congressional testimony in June 2017 that he had given his friend,

Columbia University Professor Daniel Richman, his memos about discussions with Trump in

order to have his notes leaked to The New York Times — hoping to spur the appointment

of a special counsel to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Richman told Fox News in July that he indeed received four memos from Comey, but said none

of them were marked classified.

Richman told Fox News that only the 'substance' of one memo, not the physical document, was

given to the press.

'That was not classified at the time, and remains unclassified,' he said."

No matter how many loopholes the agents and other anti-Trumpers try to jump through, much

of the interpretation of the law, and who to prosecute on behalf of it, is left the

discretion of the prosecutors themselves.

To that end, it potential leakers would do well to remember that while there are still

holdouts, the Justice Department is being run by the Trump Administration now.

It's very clear from context what is required of FBI agents.

The FBI employee agreement, which all agents must sign, states: "Unauthorized disclosure,

misuse, or negligent handling of information contained in the files, electronic or paper.Image

may contain: 1 person, standing and outdoor of the FBI or which I may acquire as an employee

of the FBI could impair national security, place human life in jeopardy, result in the

denial of due process, prevent the FBI from effectively discharging its responsibilities,

or violate federal law."

Working for the federal government means bowing to the authority you're left with, or quitting.

Hindering the carriage of justice isn't on the list of options.

Do you think agent Albury should face criminal charges?

Let us

know

in the comments.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Obama's FBI Agent Was Officially CHARGED And That's Just The Start… - Duration: 16:24.

-------------------------------------------

Hillary HUMILIATED At Who Was Just Given Better Speaking Gig! Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 14:55.

Hillary HUMILIATED At Who Was Just Given Better Speaking Gig!

Couldn't Be Better!

A heaping pile of trash just made more money than Hillary Clinton!Image may contain: 2

people

The former Secretary of State and twice failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton

was in New Jersey yesterday for what is being billed as a very rare public appearance since

she had her rear end handed to her by now President Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential

election.

Hillary has been traveling and was recently caught in a viral video falling down steps

in India.

She also had a wrist injury and spent time in a hospital.

After that, she was caught wearing a garb that covered her right arm.

But now she's back in America and up next for the former first lady is a rare speaking

appearance.

She used to do more appearances but has simmered down in her old age.

She also used to earn a lot more money for showing up to blabber, but now she's basically

working for political peanuts.

She's scheduled to talk at Rutgers University.

It's reported that they will pay Hilary Clinton $25k to speak about politics, democracy

and the way she has shaped how women are seen in politics.

The sold-out event is being sponsored by Rutgers Eagleton Institute of Politics which will

be held at Rutgers Athletic Center in Piscataway.Image may contain: 2 people This has been Clinton's

third public appearance in the state of New Jersey where she previously campaigned for

then-gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy.

NJ.com reported more on Hillary Clinton's appearance at Rutgers University: "Former

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is back in New Jersey Thursday for a rare

public appearance since she lost in her bid for the White House against President Donald

Trump.

Clinton is expected to talk politics, American democracy and her role in shaping women's

political history.

Rutgers will pay Clinton $25,000 from an endowment but use no money from tuition or state aid,

according to the university.

A Clinton spokesperson told NBC the former secretary of state plans to donate the honorarium

for the speech to charity.

Rutgers Eagleton Institute of Politics will host the event to be held at Rutgers Athletic

Center in Piscataway.

It's sold out.

Anyone interested in tickets can join the waitlist, or watch it on Rutgers University's

livestream.Image may contain: 2 people

Clinton made at least three public appearances in the Garden State since the presidential

election: She campaigned for then-gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy for governor in October,

and then returned for another pro-Murphy event that same month with her husband, former President

Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton was in New Jersey the month before for a book signing in Montclair."

Hillary's previous going rates could grab her an easy $225,000 from speaking at events.

She's been absolutely minimized down to about 10%, which is quite paltry and probably

demeaning.

Her ego must be swimming in tears, but she's still pulling in a lot of money for talking

people to sleep at their college.

Her old rates allegedly soared as high as $325,000, but several sources were in disagreement

on if she was paid around $200,000 or over $300,000.

No one seems to know except for her.

This must really have Hillary's ego in a tailspin.

She reportedly used to get at over $200k per speaking arrangement and now she has sunk

all the way down to $25k.

This means she is now making $7k less per speaking gig than Jersey Shore's star Snooki

makes on average.

Since she has now been reduced to only a "has been" she has to settle for making peanuts,

or what's considered peanuts to her.Image may contain: 2 people

Via Radar: "Matthew McConaughey was paid $135,000, Katie Couric made $110,000, Nobel

Laureate Toni Morrison received $30,000, Bill Moyers got $35,000 and — worst of all — Nicole

"Snooki" Polizzi was paid $32,000 for her wild speech!

In it, the booze-loving reality star told the graduating university students: "Study

hard, but party harder!"

Sound advice, for sure."

This is Snooki, who just got paid more than Hillary Clinton.

Business Insider reported more on her previous speaking earnings: "Hillary Clinton says

she had a "restful" time following her tenure as Secretary of State, but that doesn't

mean she didn't make a lot of money.

During that time, she made nearly $12 million by charging fees that topped $335,000 for

dozens of speeches.

Clinton's speaking fees shed light on the industries willing to shell out big bucks

for a few minutes with the former Secretary of State.

It's really a sad time for Hillary Clinton if one compares her early career to her end.

One might think that at least someone in her life would care enough to sit her down and

just tell her it's time to call it a day and retire.

As the Washington Post notes, a significant chunk of the money that Clinton made from

speeches came from tech companies.

eBay shelled out $315,000 for a speech that last 20 minutes, while Cisco paid $325,000

for Clinton to sit onstage with the company's CEO.

Salesforce.com brought Clinton back for multiple events.Image may contain: 2 people

And for discount spenders, Clinton offered a reduced price for remote addresses via satellite

video.

The former Secretary of State charged some of her lowest speaking fees to the California

Medical Association and Novo Nordisk for video speeches."

For more infomation >> Hillary HUMILIATED At Who Was Just Given Better Speaking Gig! Couldn't Be Better! - Duration: 14:55.

-------------------------------------------

First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show! - Duration: 10:30.

First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro-Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show!

This will be AWESOME if it happens!!Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, close-up

America has once again come together to show Hollywood that what we will support pro-Conservative,

decent content.

That was shown to them very clearly after the smashing successes of the pro-Trump Roseanne

re-boot that broke records earlier this week.

The show, which was a remake of a classic comedy, came back into our lives with big

success, breaking records and surprising liberals.

The all original cast (plus a few new faces) showed the world that you don't have to

be politically correct to make good on television.

Their success has in fact drawn not just views, but executives to examine why exactly we are

watching this show.

Previously.

Hollywood has been a liberal monopoly and conservatives were wary if that could ever

be changed.

Roseanne might be bringing back with it another conservative favorite that was previously

snuffed out in the prime of its life.

The Daily Caller reports that Fox Entertainment is considering bringing back it's former

hit "Last Man Standing" in the wake of Rosanne's success:Image may contain: 2 people,

people smiling, close-up

"Tim Allen's 'Last Man Standing,' could be next in line for a reboot on Fox

thanks to the massive ratings from Tuesday night's premiere of 'Roseanne.'

Over 18 million viewers tuned in to see the blue-collar Conner family return to the small

screen, and that is at least partly attributed to the fact that Roseanne is a Trump supporter.

This, according to a report from TMZ, could open the door for Allen's conservative character

Mike Baxter.

"Last Man Standing," which was produced by Fox for ABC, was canceled [sic] in 2017.

Although at the time ABC denied rumors that politics played a part in the cancellation,

Allen wasn't sure that was the case.

'There's nothing more dangerous to me, especially in this climate, than a funny,

likable conservative,' Allen said at the time.

'That was the most dangerous thing, because he was mitigated on his show by a family of

women that had different opinions — but the guy was a likable guy, a principled guy,

just about work and ethics and all this stuff.

I think there's nothing more dangerous now than a likable conservative character.'Image

may contain: 3 people, text

Allen, who always wanted Mike Baxter to be an Archie Bunker-type and 'push boundaries,'

may get a second chance to do just that.

TMZ's report suggests that 'Last Man Standing' now tops the short list, followed by 'That

70s Show' and 'Malcolm in the Middle.'

If it all comes down to Allen, the reboot is as good as made.

He told Fox News in January, 'I, along with the talented writers, wonderful crew and terrific

actors would definitely entertain the idea of bringing the show back as there is so much

gas left in the tank, more to be said, and laughs to be had.'"

Just how big a success was Rosanne, you might be wondering?

Here are some of the statistics that Daily Vine reported earlier in the week, provided

by Yahoo about how many viewers the conservative-friendly sit-com brought in:

"The first episode in the double episode opener is reported to have drawn 17.7 million

pairs of eyes and have a 4.9 rating in adults 18-49.

The second episode at 8:30 PM rose even higher to 18.6 million viewers and a 5.3 in 18-49.

For the 8 PM hour, Roseanne averaged a 5.1 in 18-49 and 18.2 million viewers.Image may

contain: 2 people, people smiling, close-up

To make the success even more impressive is the fact that this broadcast shows an audience

that was up 10% from the May 1997 finale telecast 21 years ago and topped the viewership of

the final 12 telecasts of the original run's 1996-97 season.

Despite the obviously pro-Trump main character, Roseanne scored as the highest rated show

on entertainment television in 6 years among adults 18-49 and TV's highest-rated comedy

telecast on any night in 3-1/2 years– since 9/22/14.

It is the top scripted telecast this season only behind the post-Super Bowl episode of

This Is Us."

The limousine liberals that run the left coast have all bought into the theory that their

idealistic and unrealistic visions of how they think life should be, displayed on our

TV screens, day after day, will make us want to strive for a better world.

In reality, it's just alienating their audience and making way for the more relateable genre

of programming.

What we might have hoped that the entire nation would have learned from the Trump election

is that the silent majority might not be as loud and obnoxious as their counterparts on

the left, but when something great comes along, they show up and support it.Image may contain:

2 people, people smiling, close-up That's what they saw a peak of with "Last Man Standing"

and it's what they saw in a big way in November of 2016.

Hopefully Hollywood will soon understand that any time the target audience is hardworking,

taxpaying middle Americans, conservative values will win the day.

Will you watch "Last Man Standing" if Fox produces new episodes?

Let us know in the comments and share with

your friends!

For more infomation >> First Roseanne, Now Another Major Pro Trump Actor Is Infuriating Libs With Huge New Show! - Duration: 10:30.

-------------------------------------------

After Liberal Reporter Brings Up Hillary Clinton, Sarah Destroys Her With Clinton's Worst Nightmare - Duration: 16:24.

After Liberal Reporter Brings Up Hillary Clinton, Sarah Destroys Her With Clinton's Worst

Nightmare

Sarah Huckabee Sanders held an on-camera press briefing today, where she and Kevin Hassett,

Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors excitedly discussed the tax reform bills that

are quickly working their way through Congress and heading for President Trump's desk.Image

result for After Liberal Reporter Brings Up Hillary Clinton, Sarah Destroys Her With Clinton's

Worst Nightmare

After Hassett spoke, Sarah got back up to the podium to answer a few more questions

before time was up for the day's events.

One reporter, April Ryan of CNN, questioned Sarah about

"I talked to Hillary Clinton today about the President's past and she said I really

worry about everything from his past because it tells you how he behaves in the present

and how he will in the future.'

What do you say to that as it relates to these allegations against the president."

Sarah could obviously not believe that April was asking this question considering what

Hillary Clinton's husband has been accused of in the past, but she humored her with an

answer.

"I think Hillary Clinton probably should've dealt with some of her own issues before addressing

this president."

BOOM!

The Democrats are so hypocritical they can't even see how they seem to live by two sets

of rules when it comes to this type of thing.

Hillary Clinton's husband was caught having inappropriate sexual contact with a White

House intern when he was President of the United States.

He also has several allegations against him for other sexual misconduct going all the

way back to his days as the Arkansas Attorney General.

The last thing this woman should be talking about is sexual allegations against anyone

else while she is still married to Bill Clinton.Image result for After Liberal Reporter Brings Up

Hillary Clinton, Sarah Destroys Her With Clinton's Worst Nightmare

Do you agree with Sarah?

Let's SHARE this far and wide and tell Hillary Clinton she is a hypocrite!

The third and final presidential debate has ended, and it can now be said: Hillary Clinton

crushed Donald Trump in the most effective series of debate performances in modern political

history.

The polling tells the story.

As Nate Silver notes, on the eve of the first presidential debate, Clinton led by 1.5 points.

Before the second, she was up by 5.6 points.

Before the third, she was winning by 7.1 points.

And now, writing after the third debate — a debate in which Trump said he would keep the

nation "in suspense" about whether there would be a peaceful transition of power, bragged

about not apologizing to his wife, and called Clinton "such a nasty woman" — it's

clear that Trump did himself no favors.

Early polls also suggest Clinton won.

And it's not just the presidential race.

Betting markets now predict Democrats will win the Senate.

Polls have started showing Democrats in striking distance of the House.

The GOP has collapsed into a mid-election civil war, with the party's presidential

nominee openly battling the speaker of the House.

This is not normal.

As Andrew Prokop concluded in his review of the political science evidence around presidential

debates, "There's little historical evidence that they've ever swung polls by more than

a few percentage points."

In this case, they did.

And it's because Clinton executed a risky strategy flawlessly.Image may contain: 2 people,

close-up

The dominant narrative of this election goes something like this.

Hillary Clinton is a weak candidate who is winning because she is facing a yet weaker

candidate.

Her unfavorables are high, her vulnerabilities are obvious, and if she were running against

a Marco Rubio or a Paul Ryan, she would be getting crushed.

Lucky for her, she's running against a hot orange mess with higher unfavorables, clearer

vulnerabilities, and a tape where he brags about grabbing women "by the pussy."

There's truth to this narrative, but it also reflects our tendency to underestimate

Clinton's political effectiveness.

Trump's meltdown wasn't an accident.

The Clinton campaign coolly analyzed his weaknesses and then sprung trap after trap to take advantage

of them.

Clinton's successful execution of this strategy has been, fittingly, the product of traits

that she's often criticized for: her caution, her overpreparation, her blandness.

And her particular ability to goad Trump and blunt the effectiveness of his political style

has been inextricable from her gender.

The result has been a political achievement of awesome dimensions, but one that Clinton

gets scarce credit for because it looks like something Trump is doing, rather than something

she is doing — which is, of course, the point.Image may contain: 2 people, close-up

It began in the first debate.

"Donald," she kept saying.

No one quite knows why Trump so loathes the sound of his first name, but he does.

He quickly tried to shame Clinton into showing him more respect.

"Secretary Clinton — yes, is that okay?" he said, after she once again called him Donald.

"Good.

I want you to be very happy.

It's very important to me."

Clinton's next answer: "In fact, Donald was one of the people who rooted for the housing

crisis…"

Each debate has followed the same pattern.

Trump begins calm, but as Clinton needles him, he falls apart, gets angrier, launches

bizarre personal attacks, offers rambling justifications for his own behavior, and loses

the thread of whatever question was actually asked of him.

Clinton, meanwhile, crisply summarizes the binders full of policy information she absorbed

before the debate.

The gap in preparation, knowledge, and basic competence has been evident in every contest,

and it's led to polls showing that even voters who loathe Clinton recognize she's

far more qualified and capable than Trump.

Nor does Clinton make mistakes — she's often criticized for being careful and bland

in her answers, but here it's helped her, as she's never taken the headlines away

from Trump's own gaffes.

But Trump's true meltdown was triggered in a specific moment at the end of the first

debate.

This was the beginning of Trump's collapse.

He would spend the next few days litigating and relitigating his humiliation of Machado.

He took to Twitter in the middle of the night to tell Americans to watch a sex tape of Machado

that didn't exist.

@realDonaldTrump The moment set in motion all that came next.

It set off the explosive debate about the language Trump uses to talk about women.

It was the context for the leaked audio of Trump from 2005.

It's what led Trump to go full Breitbart and try to turn the second debate into a referendum

on Bill Clinton's sexual past — a strategy that top Republicans had warned him against,

and that widened the gap between

the GOP and its presidential nominee.