USA news on Youtube Feb 14 2019

MUELLER GOT SERVED ,FORMER TRUMP LAWYER DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER

A former attorney for President Trump is predicting that when all is said and done, the Mueller

probe will end with Robert Mueller silent, and President Trump cleared of any wrongdoing.

Fox News reported that the veteran criminal defense attorney John Dowd has savaged Robert

Mueller's Russia probeas a "terrible waste of time" and questioned whether a report

will ever be produced.

Dowd, who served as a member of President Donald Trump's legal team from June 2017

until March 2018, made the explosive comments during an interview with ABC News.

"I will be shocked, if anything regarding the president is made public, other than,

'we're done'," the 77-year-old said.

The veteran criminal defense attorney who headed President Donald Trump's legal team

during a crucial stretch of the special counsel investigation believes the entire affair will

end in silence from special counsel Robert Mueller, and called the massive two-year probe

into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign "a terrible waste of time."

"I don't think there'll be a report," John Dowd told ABC News in a wide-ranging

interview for the premiere episode of "The Investigation," a new podcast focused on

the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller.

"I will be shocked if anything regarding the president is made public, other than 'We're

done.'"

Dowd, 77, left his role as Trump's lead attorney last March over differing views about

how cooperative to be with prosecutors.

But after spending nearly a year guiding the president's legal strategy, he forged a

close relationship with Trump and continues to speak with him about the Russia probe.

In one of his most in-depth interviews since departing Trump's legal team, he offered

a view of the probe very much in line with that of the president -– namely, that it

lacks merit.

"I know exactly what [Mueller] has," Dowd said.

"I know exactly what every witness said, what every document said.

I know exactly what he asked.

And I know what the conclusion or the result is," he said, describing the sweeping efforts

by Trump's legal team to assess the case by speaking to dozens of witnesses.

Based on that knowledge, Dowd said, "there's no basis.

There's no exposure.

It's been a terrible waste of time."

Dowd's overall view of the investigation — he called it "one of the greatest frauds

this country's ever seen" — echoes Trump's claim that it is a hoax or a witch hunt.

That differs sharply from Justice Department officials, who have had a window into the

probe, which, to date, has pried guilty pleas out of five former Trump advisers, and indicted

26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, a California man (for assisting Russians in

faking their identities), another Trump adviser, and a London-based lawyer.

In appearances on Capitol Hill, a series of senior administration officials have disputed

President Trump's repeated dismissals of the probe.

"I do not believe special counsel Mueller is on a witch hunt," FBI Director Christopher

Wray told Congress in June, a sentiment shared by Rosenstein — and more recently — by

the man appointed to take over the Justice Department, William Barr.

Even acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker defended Mueller's work in an appearance

before the House Judiciary Committee last week.

"I do believe he's honest," Whitaker said of Mueller.

"I have been on the record about my respect for Bob Mueller and his ability to conduct

this investigation."

Known for his cantankerous demeanor and aggressive legal tactics, Dowd is a former Marine and

a veteran of high profile Washington investigations and legal disputes.

He helped clear Arizona Sen. John McCain's name during a 1989 corruption scandal, known

as Keating Five, involving improper influence on behalf of the savings and loan industry.

And he led the Major League Baseball investigation that resulted in a lifetime ban for Cincinnati

Reds star Pete Rose.

Trump brought Dowd in to lead his legal defense team one month after the president fired FBI

Director James Comey and Mueller was subsequently appointed to serve as the special counsel

overseeing the widening probe into Russian interference.

Dowd told ABC News that the president cooperated with the investigation, even producing communications

with the White House Counsel that Mueller requested.

"There's no time in history has anybody had this kind of look at communications with

the president," Dowd said.

Where Dowd said he drew a line in terms of executive branch cooperation was having Trump

consent to an interview.

"What I was worried about is that he really couldn't do it," Dowd said.

"He couldn't do it"

One concern was that it would set a precedent that would open the current president and

future presidents to this kind of interview.

"You cannot treat the president like anybody," he said.

But a deeper concern, he said, was that prosecutors might try to set perjury traps for the president

– a pattern he maintained was on display in the indictments that Mueller's team was

filing earlier in the investigation – cases brought against Trump advisors for lying to

investigators.

For more infomation >> MUELLER GOT SERVED ,FORMER TRUMP LAWYER DROPS MASSIVE NUKE ON MUELLER - Duration: 5:44.

-------------------------------------------

CONGRESS BLINDSIDES HILLARY – DEMOCRAT PLAN FOR TRUMP GETS CLINTON INSTEAD - Duration: 7:28.

CONGRESS BLINDSIDES HILLARY – DEMOCRAT PLAN FOR TRUMP GETS CLINTON INSTEAD

Democrats thought they would catch Donald – but they caught Hillary.

For years we've known Trump did not collude with Russia.

But the media and hacks in Congress kept stoking the flames.

Now both houses of Congress have cleared his name.

Big surprise you didn't hear about it from the mainstream media.

But their investigations are uncovering real collusion with Russia.

And it had nothing to do with Trump.

From The Hill: Now that both the House and Senate investigative

committees have cleared Donald Trump of Democrat-inspired allegations of Russian collusion, it is worth

revisiting one anecdote that escaped significant attention during the hysteria but continues

to have U.S. security implications.

As secretary of State, Hillary Clinton worked with Russian leaders, including Foreign Minister

Sergey Lavrov and then-President Dmitri Medvedev, to create U.S. technology partnerships with

Moscow's version of Silicon Valley, a sprawling high-tech campus known as Skolkovo…

The collaboration occurred at the exact same time Bill Clinton made his now infamous trip

to Russia to pick up a jaw-dropping $500,000 check for a single speech.

SHARE to tell Trump to make Hillary pay for working with the Russians!

Clinton was deeply involved in this project.

A big donor to the Clinton Foundation, Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, led the Russian-side

of it.

Congress has discovered that the Bill Clinton speech worried State Department officials.

They uncovered emails where they were worried about the connection.

In fact, intelligence documents showed the Skolkovo project and the infamous Uranium

One deal raised serious security concerns.

But no, Trump was colluding with Russia because Hillary Clinton said so!

Just think about it, the FBI and other agencies launched costly investigations framing Trump

as some kind of traitor—over a bogus dossier that was proven to be fake.

Yet Hillary and her husband had extensive relationships with Russian agents.

Vast amounts of money were exchanged—as well as land and technology.

AND THERE WAS NOT A SINGLE INVESTIGATION.

And the media wonders why Americans chant, "Lock her up!"

It's disgusting to see that Democrats can get away with this kind of corruption.

You don't have to be a detective to see what Hillary was up to.

She was getting big bucks from Russia in exchange for our resources, land, and technology.

She later worked with Russia agents to craft a fake dossier in order to frame her political

rival.

Yet Mueller has spent over $32 million persecuting Trump and his allies.

The swamp is deep, my friends.

For more infomation >> CONGRESS BLINDSIDES HILLARY – DEMOCRAT PLAN FOR TRUMP GETS CLINTON INSTEAD - Duration: 7:28.

-------------------------------------------

2/14/19 6:05 PM (4402 Ten-Ten Rd, Apex, NC 27539, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> 2/14/19 6:05 PM (4402 Ten-Ten Rd, Apex, NC 27539, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

2/14/19 6:00 PM (5201 Sunset Lake Rd, Holly Springs, NC 27540, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> 2/14/19 6:00 PM (5201 Sunset Lake Rd, Holly Springs, NC 27540, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

2/14/19 6:10 PM (7405 Holly Springs Rd, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA) - Duration: 3:42.

For more infomation >> 2/14/19 6:10 PM (7405 Holly Springs Rd, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA) - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

2/14/19 5:56 PM (1924 Bass Lake Rd, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> 2/14/19 5:56 PM (1924 Bass Lake Rd, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

2/14/19 5:51 PM (7616 Purfoy Rd, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

For more infomation >> 2/14/19 5:51 PM (7616 Purfoy Rd, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526, USA) - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

REVEALED: Moment that 'HAUNTED' Sarah Ferguson's adult life - 'She suffered a lot' - Today News US - Duration: 3:18.

 Sarah Ferguson "suffered" as a result of her mother Susan Barrantes's shock departure and was left to look after her father and sister, according to royal expert Juliet Rieden

The Duchess of York has previously blamed her parents for her fragile emotional state, which royal experts said impacted much of her adult life

Ms Rieden, author of The Royals in Australia, explained: "Her mother left them and literally walked out with a polo player and she was left to be raised by her father who was devastated that his wife walked out

Royal FEUD: How Prince Edward FUMED about Sarah Ferguson 'making a . Sarah Ferguson SHOCK: How Fergie was branded 'VULGARIAN' by Queen's

 "In many ways, Sarah had to look after her father. "It was a very rackety upbringing

She suffered a lot from the loss of her mother." Hosting The Windsors podcast with the royal experts, Nine News' Kerri Elstub said the 59-year-old former royal's "unhappy" childhood "haunted her in her adult life"

 Fergie has said the trauma prompted her to turn to compulsive eating to try to "find a fix for the hole in my heart

" Despite the tumultuous upbringing, Fergie has previously said her 1986 marriage to Prince Andrew was "the best thing I ever did"

 But Royal commentator Victoria Arbiter said the Duchess' zest for life, which was what attracted Prince Andrew to her, also was the cause of her public "downfall"

 Ms Arbiter said: "I think he was utterly charmed by her. She was like nothing the Royal Family had ever seen before

 "Fergie was funny and boisterous and brash, and she approached life with such a zest for life and enthusiasm

 "And that, in the beginning, was utterly charming. Of course, it led to her downfall

" In a TV interview with U.S. show Modern Hero, Sarah Ferguson discussed how she was affected when her mother Susan left her father Ron to live with polo player Héctor Barrantes in Argentina

 Fergie said: "Suddenly she'd gone and she never came back and I never saw her again really

 "I built a huge wall to the real Sarah. And I believed it's because I was worthless

 "Why would you leave your child? You wouldn't."

For more infomation >> REVEALED: Moment that 'HAUNTED' Sarah Ferguson's adult life - 'She suffered a lot' - Today News US - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

L2 GS Team #7 MAH01413 - Duration: 7:00.

- St. Mary's College, Bus. Ed. 123,

Financial Management: Goldman Sachs,

Team Seven, take seven and action.

- Hello, my name is Jake Pavicich.

I'm the financial advisor,

and this is my financial analysis (quietly mumbles).

And today we're doing a report on Golden Sachs.

So whether or not you should buy the stock.

But since it's a premium 16.1 percent,

we say that you should buy that stock.

- Our overview for today is over background and leadership,

operation and services.

We will be going over bank ranking,

SWOT analysis, financial standings, financial evaluation

and our recommendation.

- So little bit of background about Goldman Sachs is

they're trading publicly on the NYSE ticker.

They were founded in 1869 by Marcus Goldman,

and the current CEO is Marcus Sol- or David Soloman.

The head quarters are in New York City, New York.

And they're investment banking

and other financial services.

- They have 36,000 employees worldwide.

916 billion dollars in assets

and some of them in market.

They focus on five main business principles.

Extraordianry client service.

They value their integrity and honesty between the clients.

They provide a competitive working environment.

Dedicates their employees

and their focus on results they share to the shareholders.

- A little bit of the leadership,

top shelf of the bit company is that

CEO is currently

David M. Soloman.

with the President in Chief

operating officer is John Waldren.

The Chairman and the former CEO Lloyd C.Blankfein.

And Richard Gnodde is the Vice Chairman as well.

Steven Scherr is the Executive Vice President

and the chief finanacial officer,

and Timothy J. O'Neill is also the Vice Chairman

and global co-head of the Investment Committee.

Some of the operation services:

Their main focus at 39 percent of the business

is institutional client services,

They also do investment banking, investment management

and investing in money.

- So the bank ratings.

Goldman Sachs is one of the

top five banks, currently,

with .9 million dollars

or trillion dollars in assets (mumbles quietly).

As you could see, the JP Morgan is absolutely dominating

and worth 2.4 trillion as well.

The SWOT analysis.

Some of their strengths are they focus on their ...

They have a strong brand name,

and they have a financial position.

They're well-represented geographically across the world.

They have diverse operations

and are very strong compared to their competitors,

and they have a strong amount of employees.

Some of their weaknesses include

some legal issues, fluctuating markets

can be a problem as well.

There are also controversies.

Underwriting bonds and things of that nature

and also (mumbles).

- And then the opportunities, just one, for example

is the expansion and emerging economies.

And one of, a threat that ...

An example of a threat

is the changing government regulations

in the financial crisis like recessions

that is going to happen in 2020.

- Um, so, overall for the financial conditions.

Their net margin interest is pretty good

compared to their competitors.

Their R-way is very good.

ROV is good.

And their asset turnover is good.

Their debt to equity ratio is excellent.

So, overall, they're very good competitors.

- Uh, the technical analysis of their stock.

So, as you could see,

it's actually on the downfall right now

with the peak already been hit.

So, as you could see, the upward trend went until about

I believe that's March of 2018,

and it's on a decline,

so if we said that ...

as well as the arc side and the Map D

are currently both downward trend.

So, we're looking at a longterm,

we're projecting a longterm, upward momentum,

but currently, there is a short-term, downward momentum

with the discount of 20 percent

at target price at 170 dollars.

- The Deter Valuation or Perpetuity Model

our risks for rates at 3.4 percent.

The Beta at 1.6, 1.1.

The expected market is nine percent and CAPM at 13.3.

We take the nine percent at the ROV at 216 dollars.

And that would be in human range.

- With that being ...

- With a premium of 5.6 percent.

- For Gordon Growth Model, Gordon Growth Model,

we also took the nine percent.

We had a CAPM of the same 13.3 percent.

Used the risk-free rate of 3.4 percent

which is just a little bit higher than what it's been

over the past few years.

So, we took the nine percent,

and we came out with 243.1 intrinsic value

for the Gordon Growth Model

which has a premium of 18.8 percent.

- Moving on to the Multiple Approach,

we took it at a 12 exit fee ratio

that was at, that put the stock value at 233 dollars

and 40 cents.

And that was the medium range with a premium at 14 percent.

- And finally, for our DCF Model,

we had a weight distribution of 55 percent,

weighted equity of 45.

Our ratio of that was 5.5 percent,

and our ratio at equity was nine percent

with our lap being seven percent.

And we decided to go with the nine percent black

with the stock value of 242.3 dollars

with a premium of 18.4 percent,

'cause it was also in the meeting range.

- So, weighted stock valuation was

or perpetuity was at five percent.

Gordon Growth was at five percent.

Multiple Approach at 40 percent

and Discounted Factual at 50 percent.

Our intrinsic value for that was 237 dollars and 50 cents,

and our recommendation was to black

with a premium at 16 percent.

- So, for our recommendations,

we have a total of 12 traits here,

and we recommend to buy this stock

with a premium of 16.1 percent.

Don't get scared that it's on a downfall right now.

It will jump back up.

It's part of the economic cycle.

So, with our indices, we say buy four is buy futures,

buy calls on futures,

great puts on futures before.

For our ETS, we say buy.

Buy on margin, buy calls and buy puts

for a total of four trades as well.

And then for stocks, we said buy.

Buy on margins, buy calls and write puts

for a total of four end stocks

equals 12 traits in total.

- And these are references for having better data.

Are there any questions?

- Thank you, guys.

Is there any questions?

(class clapping)

For more infomation >> L2 GS Team #7 MAH01413 - Duration: 7:00.

-------------------------------------------

Valkyrie Profile: Lenneth (Undub) - Nanami - Duration: 6:21.

Minayo, please grant me strength.

I thought I had more anger and sadness than anyone.

Minayo?

Is that you, Minayo?

What can a person do, when they've lost what matters most?

Enough.

This is all I can do.