Thursday, December 6, 2018

USA news on Youtube Dec 7 2018

GENERAL 'MAD DOG' MATTIS GOES ROGUE – SHOCKS NATION WITH MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT

Democrats love to hurl the "liar" smear at Donald Trump and anyone who works for him.

But if there is anyone in the administration you do not cross, it is Secretary of Defense

James "Mad Dog" Mattis.

And one top Democrat learned that lesson instantly after calling Mattis this awful word.

Democrats and their tag team partners in the fake news media latched onto the murder of

Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer and Washington Post contributor, Jamal Khashoggi, at the

Saudi Arabia consulate in Turkey.

Saudi Arabia – led by its crown prince Mohammad bin Salman – played a key role in Donald

Trump's strategy to contain Iran and bring peace to the Middle East.

The pro-Iran echo chamber in Barack Obama's Deep State pounced on this killing to extract

a political pound of flesh as revenge for Trump tearing up Obama's Iran nuclear deal.

Obama loyalists embedded within the intelligence community leaked that intercepted communications

had implicated the Crown Prince in the killing.

But when Secretary of Defense Mattis and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo briefed the Senate on

the administration's intelligence assessment, they backed up Donald Trump's assertion

that the evidence was not definitive.

Mattis told reporters at the Pentagon that, "We have no smoking gun that the crown prince

was involved.

Not the intelligence community or anyone else.

There is no smoking gun."

The Secretary of Defense also informed the press that he had read all the intelligence

before arriving at this conclusion.

But some Senators were singing a different tune after CIA Director Gina Haspel had briefed

10 Senators who held key positions on the National Security Committee.

Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy came out of the briefing with both guns blazing.

Murphy smeared Mattis as a liar and accused him of "misleading" the Senate.

Appearing on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Murphy ranted that the four-star former Marine Corps

General intentionally misled the United States Congress.

"I think the secretary of Defense and Secretary of State are in a bad spot because the president

has given this bear hug to MBS and to the entire Saudi regime, so they are bound to

carry out his bizarre policy," Murphy exclaimed.

"But at the same time, it's sort of hard to call this a cover-up given the fact that

everybody in that briefing last week knew that Pompeo and Mattis were misleading us,

knew there was no way this murder happened without the consent and direction of MBS."

No one could believe Murphy would accuse Mattis of such a thing.

Throughout his distinguished career in the military and in the government, Mattis has

earned a sterling reputation.

Murphy instantly knew he had stepped in it and tried to walk back his attacks on Mattis

48 hours later.

The Connecticut Democrat tried to say that Mattis had been much more careful with his

language than he initially gave him credit for.

"They were very careful in the words they used in that hearing.

They didn't say that Mohammed bin Salman had nothing to do with it.

They said there was no smoking gun.

But in the meeting, they clearly left the impression by using that phrase that they

did not have evidence from the intelligence services that proved that he did it," Murphy

explained.

"Again, this is an elite unit that he formed that has been at his direction, and open reporting

now tells us that he was talking to them all throughout the day.

I think [Pompeo and Mattis] they were very careful in the words that they chose because

they knew what the president said only a few days before."

But no amount of tap dancing can save Murphy.

Mattis was clear when he spoke to reporters and said there was no smoking gun linking

the Crown Prince to Khashoggi's murder.

We will keep you up to date on any new

developments

in this

ongoing story.

For more infomation >> GENERAL 'MAD DOG' MATTIS GOES ROGUE – SHOCKS NATION WITH MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT - Duration: 10:15.

-------------------------------------------

SUPREME COURT DECLARES BORDER WALL RULING – MAJOR UPSET FOR TRUMP - Duration: 10:51.

SUPREME COURT DECLARES BORDER WALL RULING – MAJOR UPSET FOR TRUMP

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rebuffed a challenge by three

conservation groups to the authority of President Donald Trump's administration to build a

wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a victory for Trump who has made the wall a centerpiece

of his hardline immigration policies.

The justices' declined to hear the groups' appeal of a ruling by a federal judge in California

rejecting their claims that the administration had pursued border wall projects without complying

with applicable environmental laws.

The groups are the Center for Biological Diversity, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and Defenders

of Wildlife.

Their lawsuits said construction operations would harm plants, rare wildlife habitats,

threatened coastal birds like the snowy plover and California gnatcatcher, and other species

such as fairy shrimp and the Quino checkerspot butterfly.

Brian Segee, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said he was disappointed

that the court would not hear the case.

"Trump has abused his power to wreak havoc along the border to score political points,"

Segee said.

"He's illegally sweeping aside bedrock environmental and public-health laws.

We'll continue to fight Trump's dangerous wall in the courts and in Congress."

Trump has clashed with U.S. lawmakers, particularly Democrats, over his plans for an extensive

and costly border wall that he has called necessary to combat illegal immigration and

drug smuggling.

Congress, controlled by the president's fellow Republicans, has not yet provided him

the amount of money he wants.

The president has threatened a government shutdown unless lawmakers provide $5 billion

in funding.

On Saturday, Trump said congressional leaders sought a two-week extension of funding ahead

of a Dec. 7 deadline to fully fund the U.S. government and that he would probably agree

to it.

Mexico has rejected Trump's demand that it pay for the wall.

Illegal immigration was a central theme of Trump's presidential bid, and he repeatedly

invoked the issue ahead of the Nov. 6 congressional elections as a caravan of migrants from Central

America made their way toward the United States.

Trump deployed 5,800 U.S. troops to the border.

The three conservation groups sued last year in San Diego after the Department of Homeland

Security authorized projects to replace existing border fencing at two sites in southern California,

as well as the construction of prototype border walls.

The dispute centers on a 1996 law aimed at countering illegal immigration that gave the

federal government the authority to build border barriers and preempt legal requirements

such as environmental rules.

That law also limited the kinds of legal challenges that could be mounted.

The groups argued that Trump's wall projects did not fall under that law, and that the

measure was unconstitutional because it gave too much power to unelected Cabinet officials

to avoid laws such as the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy

Act.

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel in February ruled that the administration had not exceeded

its powers.

The groups appealed the judge's decision to the Supreme Court.

The groups have said that giving the federal government unfettered power to waive applicable

laws and limit judicial oversight is ripe for abuse.

With such power, the plaintiffs argued, officials could theoretically give contracts to political

cronies to build walls with no safety standards using child migrant labor, and "kill bald

eagles in the process."

The Trump administration urged the justices not to take up the appeal.

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department on Monday declined to comment.

Trump criticized Curiel in 2016 in a different case, a lawsuit accusing his now-defunct Trump

University of fraud.

Trump, while running for president, accused Curiel of being biased against him because

of

the

Indiana-born judge's Mexican heritage.

For more infomation >> SUPREME COURT DECLARES BORDER WALL RULING – MAJOR UPSET FOR TRUMP - Duration: 10:51.

-------------------------------------------

Steyn reacts to school principal banning candy canes - Duration: 4:04.

For more infomation >> Steyn reacts to school principal banning candy canes - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Kalavai Kalisaave | Chapter Two Lag Jaa Gale | 2018-2019 Web Series | A Musical Journey - Duration: 7:07.

My life is like a song.

Charan, its me Sruthi.

(Microwave beep)

Pallavi…Pallavi…

Don't make me nervous, tell me what happened right now.

I don't know how to say this to you.

Pallavi is no more.

She committed suicide.

♪May be we never meet in this life again♪

♪Give me a hug♪

(Microwave Beep)

Hey, what's with the sad song early in the morning?

Are you planning to kill me in my sleep itself?

Someone shared in FB tagging it as a superb song.

I am just looking at it

But, why are you crying?

Why are your eyes watery?

My girlfriend died dude.

You…and girlfriend?

When did that happen?

In my dream

What's that beep, it's been going on for 30 minutes.

Did you put something in the microwave and forget?

Me? I haven't even stepped down from the bed.

I just finished covering WhatsApp updates.

FB isn't completed yet.

I think there are thieves in our room early in the morning.

Let's go take a look.

Have started robbing our room first thing in the morning?

Isn't the grocery store nearby?

Couldn't you get something Mahathalli?

Not Mahathalli. It's me Sruthi, Mr.Chicago Subbarao.

(Background voice) Charan, it's me, Sruthi.

Why is his face like that as if he cried and washed it just now?

These are the Funbucket faces I told you about.

Her Youtube madness is growing by the day.

This nuisance is a daily thing, who is that girl?

Didn't I tell you that I am getting a new room mate…

She landed yesterday.

Hey, I'm Raag

Say that you are Raghavendra Swamy.

You and your US Citizen behavior

(New roommate) Hi

I am Pallavi

Hi

(Background voice)Pallavi?

Pallavi in my dream and now Pallavi in the hall.

What's this coincidence? Is it some kind of a sign?

Would that dream come true? What if it does?

That girls life would end.

It's better to avoid her.

Till today, girls avoided me.

And now, I am forced to avoid that girl!

Hey Vinod,

There is a nice sunset point nearby in Dallas downtown

But forget that it didn't work for Amit few days back

The sunset is pretty good at Lewisville lake thats nearby too.

Take her there and give here a nice gift and propose to her.

She will say Yes

But dude, what if she says No?

You jump in the lake.

Don't you get even a single positive thought?

Why do people like you come to USA?

Cut the call.

So pathetic I say. Pathetic.

Hi Pallavi, whats up?

Actually, there are no groceries in our room.

Sruthi went to her office.

If one of you could come with me,

I could get some groceries.

Oh, is it. Sit.

Charan too is getting ready for grocery shopping,

Once he comes out, both of you can go together.

What else?

When is the orientation? Are you getting homesick?

Orientation is next week.

Hey, don't worry, you will get used to it.

We, friends are here for you.

You can come here whenever you want to.

(Lag jaa gale song playing tv)

(Pallavi humming the song)

Bro...

Take Pallavi too to the grocery store with you.

No, I have some other work on the way.

I can't do it.

Ah…maybe he has some work.

Give me 10 minutes. I will take you.

----Subtitles provided by Srikanth----

No comments:

Post a Comment