Monday, September 3, 2018

USA news on Youtube Sep 4 2018

good evening and welcome to a special

and we think pretty fun addition of

Tucker Carlson tonight we're gonna

feature some of our favorite debates

from the past year we don't know if

Democrats will take Congress in the fall

or who the Democratic nominee is going

to be in 2020 but we do have some idea

of what they're planning to run on

impeaching Trump throwing open the gates

to the prisons those are two obvious

ones many Democrats are also proposing

to eliminate ice that's the government

agency tasked with enforcing our

immigration laws we've spoken to several

people this summer who support that plan

and here's part of the conversation

people are calling for eliminating the

agency so let's say that happens

tomorrow the Democratic Left you get

your wish and ice is gone and there's an

illegal alien who's been busted for

drunk driving should he be deported

simple questions your people who are

here illegally who get busted for DUI

should they be deported that's we have

to sort of I think what we have to do is

think about abolishing ice and then copy

into something else I think what was the

question again

well should someone and the question is

should an illegal alien busted for drunk

driving be deported that's too vague of

a question I mean the criminal justice

system though it's a very easy usage

with crime no no it's a very specific

question the criminal justice with

immigration for a living no I'm asking

what do you think we should do because

we're at a moment where we're remaking

it's a revolution we're remaking

everything anew well let's get rid of

Isis okay so what are the new rules I

get I'm here legally I get busted for

DUI

should I be deported very simple gene

that person could have a severed ear why

should be deported immigration law is

very complicated Tucker that person

could have an asylum claim they could

have many different types of reasons why

they might be able to stay in the United

States beyond their DUI the criminal

justice system can handle crimes right I

mean American citizens but no or illegal

aliens who commit crimes without ice I

think if ms-13 or any gang member

violently commits a crime kills someone

they should spend the rest of the life

in prison

that's what if you know someone's

if you believe someone's a member of

ms-13 and is here illegally you don't

think that's enough to deport him well

what are we going to really accessory

beers we're just come over there and

maybe we could come back you know it's

the logic that we need to see we can

exacerbate a problem by sending it so we

created it's America's fault yeah we

created I am for abolishing ice because

ice has been undermining American values

ice has been tearing apart families this

is not who we are but while I say that

we need to abolish ice I am still for

strong borders and as we still have

Customs and Border Patrol and and still

have limited and humane immigration and

enforcement in this country let's

remember Isis here let me ask you Isis

but yes sir ice has been here for 15

years Tucker it's a 15 year experiment

right prior to that we were able to

enforce our immigration laws humanely

and in a limited way we need to get back

so the laws haven't changed much weight

I mean just to dig down since you're

getting the ice question all more deeply

is there something immoral about the ice

employees a lot of Democrats have

compared them to Nazis do you think

they're bad people that's absurd that I

made some sir Chuck are we're talking

with it's absurd because you're not

calling for it wait but hold on it's

uncertain so ice carries up the laws

passed by the Congress you want to serve

in the Congress but you're not calling I

noticed four different laws you're

saying you want to get rid of this one

specific agency but keep other agencies

to patrol the border in some as you said

limited way what's specifically wrong

with ice there's something wrong with

the pie ice going on buses and asking

for papers ice now going to schools and

churches and taking people off the

street read a what are you reading about

someone what do you think they're doing

is it that they're that's the point and

that we created this the answer you're

the one : I'm I'm here to learn from you

you want to get rid of them but why do

you think they're doing this stuff the

ice is out of hand in its approach in

terms of how before when why and

enforcement it was both

easy to see my white if I know you mean

I know because you already have

I want it wait I want to get you to

answer this question which is why do you

think they're that way you say that

they're doing these horrible things why

do you think they're doing those

horrible things because it's been an

agency set up solely around enforcement

rather than set up and it was a set up

and in 2003 rather than an agency set up

to both to govern and enforce

immigration rules in this country Tucker

we are a country of immigrants that hold

I mean I am sorry it weird maybe it's my

fault for wanting specific answers but

what does that mean it's a law

enforcement agency that shouldn't just

in for example have a for undertake for

example what we had before under the

previous I'll talk about ice you want to

abolish ice help me here how about this

in your position I do want to do things

other than enforce the law what should

those things be Tucker a way we had it

before under ina something like that we

can enforce our immigration laws through

another mechanism not ice which is out

of hand which is now I'm trying I'm

trying

look if you're ever in Washington call

me I would love to hear more about this

because I'm still confused but thank you

for coming on I appreciate that the

incoming president of Mexico is a

left-wing populist who repeatedly said

in the campaign trail that the

population of the world has an absolute

right to move to America and America has

an obligation to let all of them in we

spoke to Univision anchor Jorge Ramos

about the new president just before the

Mexican election tell me a little more

about this right of all the people in

the world to come to the United States

where does that right come from well let

me just say right at the beginning I'm

an independent journalist I don't speak

for the Mexican government nor for Lopez

Obrador or any other presidential

candidates but Lopez Obrador he's ahead

of the polls Rennell talker he's

reaching almost 50 percent he's a

leftist candidate he's 64 and what he

has said is that he's vowing to be a

president for the 130 million Mexicans

in Mexico and for the about 12 million

Mexicans here in the

States so don't expect a la posada to be

a spineless and weak president my

opinion either is going to be a

completely different relationship

between Lopez Obrador

if he wins I'm president Donald Trump it

sounds that way but but why as it but I

mean unlike you I'm an American I only

vote in this country I only can I'm only

a citizen of this country and so why

would I or any of the other American

citizens watching tonight think that

it's a good thing that a president of

another country is declaring that the

world has a right to move here that's a

hostile act aimed at us why would we be

for that IIIi don't know why he said

that but what I can tell you is that he

wants to protect the 12 million Mexicans

living here and 35 million people in

this country from Mexican origin so so

it's going to be different you remember

we wouldn't pick opinionated at the

current president he invited them

candidate Donald Trump to the to Los

Pinos the Mexican White House and and

Mexicans were outraged by doing that

Lopez Obrador is going to be completely

different as a matter of fact just

recently Lopez Obrador said that the

this policy of family separation is

racist so in other words if he becomes

president and it would be December 1st

it would be completely different than

companion yet with Donald Trump okay so

we're getting another racism lecture

from a rich white Mexican ruling class

member okay just want to clarify that

wait get racism lectures from any

Mexican official who preside over one of

those races countries in the world most

Americans don't understand that I've

spent enough time there but it's racist

some people finally separate but it is

racism let me just let me just say why I

mean what are the number of Americans

kids in cages right now it's zero and

what's the number of Central American

Mexican kids in cages or detention

centers okay only 300 no change because

of the color of his skin this isn't

Mexico in Mexico

and they're being rise to levels of

prominence because it's too racist as

you know so again Mexican citizens are

no position to lecture Americans about

racism let's just start there some what

is happening this it's not racism that

that's that's that's absurd if Mexicans

come here to assimilate and become

Americans which is what we're always

being told they want a part of the

American dream then why is the guy

running for the President of Mexico

campaigning among them it doesn't feel

like they're assimilating it sounds like

there's Mexican citizens extracting what

they can from our country well there are

two things you first of all on under

Mexican law Mexicans live in abroad they

are allowed to vote and many many

including me we're going to be doing

that on on July 1st if they believe in

America and if they're assimilated in

chocolate be voting yo you can actually

see any part of the United States and

still believe that you can participate

politically in Mexico that's those are

the laws they can but you wouldn't

participate in election unless you had

skin in the game unless you felt that

that politician was representing you but

if you were an American and you really

identify with the United States then

what they do in Mexico doesn't really

concern you so I'm gonna be assimilated

in America and still be voting in a

foreign election that's just it does not

but it does because you would expect in

this case the President of Mexico to

defend Mexican immigrants or Central

American or Latin American immigrants if

something happens to them and if we just

have the crisis running right now at the

other border so you would expect the

Mexican President to defend you if

something happens to you in the United

States of course I'm even more confused

if those are his people his citizens

he's representing them he's

losing their votes which he is doing why

doesn't he want them to live in Mexico

well many of them left for many

different reasons and as you know

immigration has to do with supply and

demand and if there are jobs for them

Mexicans contribute billions of dollars

to the economy to the Mexican immigrants

well the left has moved way over the

line and the question or immigration but

that's not the only topic that they've

gone crazy over now some prominent

liberals say we ought to institute

socialism because that works well and

empty the prison's we'll show you what

they're saying next

welcome back to a special edition of

Tucker Carlson tonight the term

Democratic Socialist is everywhere all

of a sudden numerous prominent Democrats

including Bernie Sanders and Alexandria

Acacio Cortes of New York have recently

embraced the phrase but what exactly

does it mean professor Cornel West is

maybe the most prominent democratic

socialist in America he joined us

recently to define the term so to give

us some sense of what democratic

socialism is can you point to an example

an extant example of it that works

Venezuela seems like an example of

democratic socialism would you say that

it is and if so does it work no I don't

think that democratic socialism as an

ideal has been able to be embodied in a

larger social context there's different

forms of it some more bad some are

mediums some are better but the

fundamental commitment is to the dignity

of ordinary people and to make sure they

can live lives of decency so it's not an

ism though brother it's about decency

it's about fairness it's about the

accountability of the powerful visa vie

those who have less power to workplace

women being with the household gays

lesbians trans black people indigenous

peoples immigrants how do we ensure that

they are treated decently and that the

powerful don't in any way manipulate

subjugate and exploit them well I mean

if that's what democratic socialism is

that I'm basically on board I do think

that ordinary people middle class people

ought to have dignity and I think that

our current systems make it hard for

them to have dignity so I grab saluted

but the detail in that precisely why

that's why Albert Einstein Helen Helen

Keller Norman Thomas Eugene Debs mana

Luther King jr. Ella Baker we didn't go

on and on they're all democratic

socialists Michael Harrington one of the

great founders of I understand but has

it struck you as interesting that it's

never actually worked anywhere so the

question is not what our nipples our

goals are the same course how do we get

there is the question so what happened

in Venezuela they call that democratic

socialism but they don't have toilet

paper

and it's less equal than alpha but part

of the problem is though brothers at any

time there's been attempts of ordinary

people to engage in self-determination

they can get crushed by external Nations

look at US policies toward Venezuela has

been very very ugly Nicaragua in the

same way we saw that in so many other

instances where countries try to engage

in self-determination and neither get

crushed they either get coerced and they

end up oftentimes responding to that

kind of authoritarian treatment so we've

never had a chance to really pull it off

so it's only been a movement so far it's

an attempt to resist the greed at the

top the racism the sexism the homophobia

the various ways in which human manatee

is violated rather than affirmed so if a

government's obligation is to its own

citizens and you drop the borders and

have no border enforcement at all what

would happen to this country what would

happen to the poor people in this

country with their lives get better

would they become more prosperous no

this country would become poorer dirtier

impossible to manage it would be flooded

with the poor of the world and it would

destroy our country instantly so why

would you say no borders well that means

again no you got a variety of voices in

the Democratic Socialist of America we

like a jazz orchestra you've got

different perspectives and orientations

we all don't agree on one particular

policy all the time this is true in

terms of Israeli occupation of

Palestinian some are in the middle some

are much more critical like myself the

question is how do you keep track of the

rich Humanity of Mexican brothers and

sisters of those comes from Latin

America those come from Africa those

come from Haiti and those come from

Europe and Asia that's the important

thing we know the history of America

that indigenous peoples and Africans

who've been enslaved was to open the

borders the green folk in - how do you

think

not a matter of no borders at all it's a

matter of how you ensure that their

dignity is affirmed when they arise so

that you don't end up as we had

neo-fascist policies of the Trump

administration separating these precious

children from their their mother decides

that's silly as you well know but how do

you think that the descendants what

Americans say well what is it like the

descendants of American slaves benefit

when you bring in 25 million illegals

illegal immigrants from the third world

does that elevate poor Americans I don't

see any evidence that they get richer or

happier when you bring in more poor

people you ignore their problems that's

why we don't pay any attention but if we

were having this discussion 100 years

ago and you had millions of people

coming from jew-hating Europe Irish

hating Britain and Ireland I mean all

the folk who came into the making of

slices of this nation they did not allow

for the kind of coming together with

poor and working people would be able to

straighten their backs up and speak with

dignity and decency about issues that

affect all of us that's the history of

the nation with the exception of the

African slaves and the presence

indigenous people so the idea that

somehow now that the immigrants are here

and a lot of the immigrants have only

been here one or two generations now

become the definitive Authority defining

what it is to be an American how

hypocritical can you get I've been here

nine generations coming out of enslaved

people and I can still embrace my

Mexican brothers and sisters I can

embrace the whole host of others coming

from around myself as a question of

making sure their dignity is affirmed

when they get here Cornel West ladies

and gentlemen well the New York Times

has a question for you is it okay for

your kids to be friends with white

people they actually ask that will tell

you why coming up

live from America's News headquarters

I'm Alicia Cunha tropical storm Gordon

gaining strength it's now expected to be

a hurricane by the time it makes

landfall in the central US Gulf Coast

late Tuesday a hurricane warning is in

effect stretching from the mouth of the

Pearl River in Mississippi to the

Alabama Florida border

president Trump criticizing Attorney

General Jeff Sessions over the recent

indictments of two GOP congressmen

tweeting to long-running Obama era

investigations of two very popular

Republican congressman were brought to a

well-publicized charge just ahead of the

midterms by the Jeff Sessions Justice

Department two easy wins now in doubt

because there's not enough time good job

Jeff the indicted congressman are duncan

hunter of california and chris collins

of new york I'm Alicia Cunha now back to

our special edition of Tucker Carlson

tonight

welcome back to a special edition of

Tucker Carlson tonight can your children

be friends with white people that's an

actual question posed by an actual

person in an actual newspaper The New

York Times the author wasn't optimistic

about the answer quote I will teach my

boys the lessons generation old he wrote

I will teach them caution I will teach

them suspicions I will teach them

distrust I will teach my boys to have

profound doubts that friendship with

white people is possible those doubts of

course mirrored the writers own as he

put it quote history has provided little

reason for people of color to trust

white people the piece remained one of

the most popular on the new york times

weds website four days after it ran law

professor ikaw yep Janka wrote the piece

and we spoke to him here it is you're

making generalizations across racial

groups so you say for example I will

have to discuss my boys whether they can

truly be friends with white people

histories provided a little reason for

people of color to trust white people I

profound doubts that friendship with

white people as possible again weren't

your right you know I was mugged as a

pizza delivery boy and I told my

children that they should never trust

anyone who looks like the people who

mugged me that would be I would never do

that I think that would be immoral but

it would be the definition of racism

because I would be equated the people

who mugged me with everyone else who

looks like that I think if that's the

only part of the article you read it

might sound like that but of course the

article has a much richer argument and

the argument I make is look in a country

where it turns out that when the most

vulnerable people of color under threat

those who they count on are nowhere to

be seen or at least for some group of

people and I speak explicitly about the

political moment we're in today right so

if we have a president who marshals

forces of hatred and anger and

divisiveness and frankly just danger

quite aside from who he is I'm not

particularly interested in who he is if

the people who call themselves your

friends are not going to push back

against that

then maybe you can tell me why it is I

should trust those people so I guess

what you're saying is that people who

don't agree with your politics can't be

your friends which i think is an

unfortunate conclusion to reach but it's

different from the one you articulate

here you're making again

for the third time generalizations based

on race and the truth about the last

election is this is not a defensive

Donald Trump merely an acknowledgment of

the fact that he received more

african-american votes in any Republican

since 2004 to get 8% of african-american

men so that's not a huge people are they

in the same category too can you not

trust them I mean I do a really

understand if you're saying it's less

drunk voters fine white people I mean

that's a grotesque generalization I'm a

little worried that you keep reading the

same parts without I mean you would make

it seem as though the entire piece was

just that paragraph so the piece goes on

to say title of the piece and it's in

separate graphs yeah so I have no

problem standing beyond the title of the

piece but it is worth pointing out as I

have again and again what the piece says

is when those who count themselves as

your friend see that others put you in

danger it is their opportunity to prove

they're your friend and if we have app

let's be let's just speak plainly about

this Tucker you have children like I do

right I do and if your daughters were I

don't know friendly with a group of

people and it just turned out that

repeatedly when they went out and your

daughters were in danger those group of

young men just disappeared

I think at some point you tell your

daughters look it's fine to be friendly

with them but these are not your friends

because I'm not a racist what I wouldn't

say is anybody of a certain race falls

into that category I would never do that

again

if one of my daughter's was mugged by

someone of a certain color I would never

say to my daughter that's more evidence

you can never trust anyone who looks

like that because I would be inculcating

race hatred in my children as anymore so

what well I mean obviously I deny that

look what I said over and over was we

live in a country where we ought and

pretend that these divides have not

consistently been on racial grounds and

we see that over and over and over when

black people are in danger when yeah

when black

in danger from say addiction we get

policing when white people are in danger

from diction they get rehabilitation

when black people don't have jobs we get

stories about why we're making the wrong

choices when white people's don't have

jobs we get a presidential campaign

about the Forgotten class except them

I'm gonna go ahead and I'll finish and

then I'm happy to hear your point of

view so if it's the case that we live in

a country where these divides have

always consisted in racial then I think

it's not only delusional but it would be

dangerous of me not to teach my boys

that when they walk out in the world

there'll be a world that treats them

differently should I say the same thing

to my children yeah African American law

professors who dislike you because of

your color and you should just like him

back yeah all african-american law

professor I would never say that because

that's grotesque if I don't teach my

boys how to be cautious how to be

careful how to be perceived in the right

way all right

I'm not just risking their feelings

being hurt I'm risking their bodies

being should I teach my kids that you

don't teach your daughters to be

cautious until they can be sure that the

men around them are trustworthy you

don't that's not what the conversation

is about it's not about sex it's about

race right so I don't serve them that

they owe them to be sure is between the

races so to be sure it's fine for you to

care for your daughters and make sure

that they're healthy and well but if I

care for my sons

ladies and gentlemen we're out of time

thank you professor I appreciate it

you're coming on and explaining that

thank you a prominent New York feminist

says that opponents of abortion want to

force women to get pregnant somehow

so explain their rates because of her

first accident Liberty Mutual Insurance

forcing women to have children now let's

let's get this line because I wonder how

many people actually but I mean I think

most our viewers know that what you're

saying is pure lunacy and dishonest and

you do too but let's just sort of just

for fun reverse engineers for a second

so who is taking away the right to have

an abortion I think the law I don't

think I know because I just I read it

the proposed regulation change would

just make it less likely that taxpayers

have to pay for abortion is that the

same payers do not pay for abortions in

this country tax payers do not pay for

abortion they don't well a billion

dollars to largest

your pay for abortions in the content

right in the case of rape and if a woman

is dying those are two situations since

1977 look you're you're spewing

propagate here it's like we pay tax

payers at gunpoint half a billion to

Planned Parenthood which provides

commits more abortion than anybody else

in the country so now they say it

doesn't point I'm not joking you just

talk about is it what is it gunpoint if

you don't pay your taxes they come and

arrest you the cops arrest you so you

don't pay your taxes voluntarily you do

it because the government backs it up

with the threat of force give me a

moment to speak it what everybody should

understand also is planned parenthood

works just like any other medical

provider they don't they get reimbursed

for the procedures they perform that are

approved by the government

so they get they get a reimbursement for

an STD testing they get reimbursed for

all those other services they do but not

for abortion but I want to talk about

the what hold on you take it a lot of

moments to talk so let me just ask you

one question which is four minutes you

think you think abortion is a

constitutional right I think the right

to bear arms is because I've read the

bill of rights

why shouldn't taxpayers be forced to

subsidize the NRA or buy my guns now who

is talking lunacy

and who is being dishonest was that a

for Ana for your giving the moral

lecture but it's my question I think

it's interesting question I want I want

viewers to know that one and for women

in this country have an abortion you're

not I'm not answering your question no

because it's question dear viewers and

I'm trying to speak to them one in four

women had an abortion in this country

the reason why it's gone because we have

teen pregnancy prevention programs that

have been successful

no no but them and right now that's ask

you a question why I never liked to talk

to abortion people because they just

shocked I didn't see programs don't make

me turn you off please they're gonna

they wanted to convert that to

abstinence only education

all right Sonia I tried it was a

good-faith effort I'm really tried I

hate cutting people off but you were

just too obnoxious I'm sorry the left

wants cheap banned straws and put you in

jail for using him not making that up by

the way what's going next

welcome back to a special edition of

Tucker Carlson tonight first they came

for your Winston's then your big gulps

then your incandescent light bulbs now

liberals want to take your straws here's

what Straub an advocate do knives had to

tell us about it I don't think it's

crazy to worry about what plastic does

to sea animals and I'm really bothered

by the effect that straws have on

turtles honestly I mean it sounds maybe

dumb to some of our viewers I don't like

that I guess what bothers me is the

solution

now the overwhelming majority of plastic

waste in the ocean does not come from

the United States we're not a big

littering country it comes from Asia as

you know so why not put pressure on the

Asian countries that are dumping this

crap into the oceans and leave American

restaurant diners alone well first it's

really a pleasure to be on the show to

talk with you about plastic pollution

and you're right America is in the top

20 of polluters of plastic when compared

to all the other countries around the

world yeah we should be focusing

everywhere at the same time so our

campaign when we started it just two

years ago it wasn't an anti straw

campaign it was really intended to raise

awareness about the state of plastic

pollution not just in the United States

but elsewhere and since we've launched

it we've had requests from folks in

India Indonesia Taiwan Vietnam even in

China which might be a surprise but even

in China to say well what can I do about

the plastic pollution crisis not

necessarily the straw but really the

plastic pollution crisis overall and

again I think I'm kind of for that I

guess what bothers me is the emphasis so

threatening diners or restaurants in

Santa Barbara with jail time if they

give out straws probably less effective

than saying to China

hey you're despoiling the earth , which

they are , and nobody ever says anything

about it because they're like a

third-world country and we feel super

guilty and we can't tell them what to do

but they're responsible for the bulk of

the pollution in the world and you guys

never say anything about it I actually

hate pollution I hate littering right I

hate

and I don't think you should hurt

animals if you don't have to I really

believe that okay so I conceded that but

let's just be real for a second of all

the problems that we face like fifty

thousand people died of opioid Odie's

last year our straws in Santa Barbara

really kind of in the top hundred

problems like why aren't we focusing on

the things that matter most well I think

focusing on plastic pollution now is

important to do we're expected to see an

increase in plastic production and still

not an increase in waste management

infrastructure globally over the next 10

to 15 years it's only going to get worse

Tucker and as you know as a Fisher the

last thing you want to do is you want to

see plastic pollution in the waters

where you feel ok but but honestly if I

mean the law of unintended consequences

cannot be repealed so if you ban straws

companies start making plastic sippy

tops which is more plastic than the

straws did so maybe that's not a success

right ok so I mean sort of like banning

drinking except out of your hands what's

the solution there well then we would

all need plastic bibs to be able to

protect our clothes and that wouldn't be

part of the solution either would it

what I'm really excited for there are

companies like Dell corporation human

scale interface others that actually are

working with countries like Indonesia

and Chile and even in the Philippines to

say how do we take all of that plastic

waste that's on your beaches on your

river beds and your shorelines

and how do we help you build

infrastructure and then take that waste

product and actually turn it into chairs

is meat murder our next guest says yes

it is and we should be required to give

it up for good that's next

so breaking this evening on this Labor

Day the president appears to be working

over his attorney-general yet again

tweeting this a short time ago to

long-running Obama era investigations of

two very popular Republican congressman

were brought to a well-publicized charge

just ahead of the midterms by the Jeff

Sessions Justice Department two easy

wins now in doubt because there is not

enough time good job Jeff so the latest

attack comes on the eve of a monumental

day for this president just hours from

now the confirmation hearings for his

nominee to the Supreme Court Brett

Kavanaugh will get underway reports

indicate Cavanaugh spent the weekend in

a building not too far from here he went

through the so-called murder board

gauntlet getting ready for what is sure

to be an intense round of questioning

they are so thorough they reportedly

included fake protesters to make sure

that Cavanaugh knows how to handle

himself in the event of an outburst if

confirmed Cavanaugh would solidify a

conservative majority on the Supreme

Court presumably for decades to come and

Democrats not gonna let that happen

without a fight

already slamming these hearings before

they begin earlier I spoke with all

about all of this with chairman of the

Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Chuck

Grassley let's start with judge

Cavanaugh and get your thoughts on that

so the Democrats are very upset that a

hundred thousand documents are being

withheld basically due to executive

privilege in fact chuck schumer tweeted

this on saturday saying we're witnessing

a Friday night document massacre

he called it president Trump's decision

to step in on the last moment and hide a

hundred thousand pages from the records

is not only unprecedented in the history

of SCOTUS noms it has all the markings

of a cover-up Amy Klobuchar here she is

on Meet the Press talking about some of

the documents that she saw the contents

of and she thinks other people should do

you could ask some very interesting

questions about these documents that I'm

unable to even say because I'm not able

to make them public so why are they

being withheld yeah I've told every

member that

that if they have some documents that

under the presidential Records Act

cannot be made public for personal

reasons or for presidential reasons that

all they have to do is ask us and we'll

get those documents and it happens that

senator Klobuchar asked for about 12

pages of documents she has them she'll

be able to ask questions based on those

no other senators asked for any

documents whatsoever so she will be able

to raise what she read in there and ask

questions based on it it's not being

hidden no so she's not telling the truth

and the only thing that would be

different is if there's something in

there that needs to be secured then we

would have to close the doors and get

people out and have it asked in the

executive session but she's going to be

able to ask those questions all right

and Dick Durbin yesterday was talking to

Chris Wallace he said you know it's

unprecedented to only get 6% of the

documents with regard to the work that

Judge Cavanaugh did when he worked in

the White House both as the secretary to

the President and as counsel that's six

percent is of what the archivist said is

possibly going to be a total number that

would be available but because of

computer software and the immolation

elimination of duplications and for

other reasons that's there's a much

smaller number for instance I originally

said back in July there might be a

million pages available getting rid of

duplicates and for other things that you

don't need we have a down now to about

four hundred and eighty eight thousand

pages but remember this is more

documents than the last five Supreme

Court nominees have had total if you add

them all together this is more document

so it's just false

that's because he has a much deeper

paper trail of course he does he works

in the White House for a long long time

so they ought to say praise the Lord

we've got more to ask for besides don't

forget three hundred and seven opinions

he wrote and

both Schumer and Leahy have said like

lay he said this in cases sort of my ear

we know what you stand for because

you've got a lot of opinions that's the

best basis for making your judgement if

you ought to be on the Supreme Court

well the Kavanagh has been on this

circuit court for 12 years and has a

massive number of pages I think 16,000

pages of decisions he's written that's

the best way to make a decision whether

it's sure you should be on the court so

I think you're hearing from a lot of

people they can't find anything wrong

with the qualifications that Cavanaugh

and so many Democrats have said even

before he's nominated they were going to

vote against anybody that was on that

list so the bottom line is how much more

do you need to know vote no a good

question one of the potential hot-button

areas is going to be his take on whether

or not a sitting president can be

indicted

he went after President Clinton hard

when he worked for Ken Starr and then he

later said a president who was concerned

about an ongoing criminal investigation

is almost inevitably going to do a worse

job as president so doesn't that

contradict the stance that he took with

President Clinton I think those

statements say exactly what we want on

the Supreme Court somebody in his

instance said Congress needs to

legislate in this area he's not a person

that's going to be on the court to fill

in the details that Congress left vacant

that's not his job he's not a super

legislator he's supposed to interpret

law so he's telling Congress fill in the

details he's not saying a president is

above the law he's saying that when

you're president United States you might

not be prosecuted but you soon as they

get hot being president all right I want

to go to a tweet that you sent out and

we'll put this up it says at POTUS and

at FLOTUS my prayer is that our

president can be as disciplined in his

discourse in speeches like the last two

weeks before his election then we will

be successful in the next two months

like he was successful and you saw the

what he just said about just sessions I

read it as we came into the segment here

it doesn't sound like he's listening to

you well he needs to think in terms of

what did it take to win the election

because going up to about three weeks

before the election it didn't look like

he was going to win and then he followed

a very disciplined approach to it and he

got over the hump

and he can help the Republican Party a

lot by being the same disciplined person

coming up to the midterm election I

thought I was interesting that you also

employed the help of the first lady in

that tweet as well you wrote it to both

of them

Barbara Grassley has a lot of influence

on me I assume that mrs. Trump has a lot

of influence on him all right what about

Jeff Sessions do you think he should lay

off or should he let Jeff Sessions go

well I think for one thing this is the

president's choice I have always said

that a president should be able to have

who he can be comfortable with I

consider Jeff Sessions a very personal

friend I think that that he could be

more aggressive in running the

department are you surprised that that

the prosecution's are going forward

against Chris Collins and Duncan hunter

during the run-up to the midterm

election not because maybe they didn't

do something maybe they did something

wrong but the reason why is I thought

that the that the the ethics or the

standards within the Justice Department

is that after getting close to election

you didn't prosecute people you

prosecutor in the math to the election

so you didn't interfere with you know I

have Jeff sessions on this the president

was I don't know whether I'd be critical

of sessions on this because he expects

his people he puts in as US attorneys do

their job it's just my understanding

it's contrary to what the Justice

Department normally does things that you

don't do things that would influence an

election senator Grassley thank you for

being here good to see you tonight thank

you

coming up next Elizabeth Warren is one

of the president's favorite targets

Pocahontas is not happy she's done

she's the worst but newly released

documents about that name-calling

stirring up a whole new controversy

tonight we'll be right back

No comments:

Post a Comment