Wednesday, August 8, 2018

USA news on Youtube Aug 8 2018

Hey everybody this is Randy Santel 'Atlas' with Atlas & Zeus Promotions and

proud owner of foodchallenges.com! Got my very very excited shirt on today because

i'm going for my first wet in the state of New Mexico which will be state number

48 then I will just have to get to Alaska and Hawaii! I am in southern New

Mexico I am in Las Cruces I am at Farley's I'm taking on the Farley's

Monster Burger Challenge! Now this thing is massive this consists of eight half

pound burger patties smashed into two different patties that is all covered

with a bunch of delicious looking and cheese and then on the bottom I think

there's mayonnaise but there is a ton of healthy vegetables.

We've got lettuce we've got tomatoes we've got pickles and onions I've got

one full hour to finish this thing if I fail it's going to be about thirty

dollars, but if I win I'll get the 30 dollar burger for free I will get a

sweet t-shirt down to my collection and I'll be one of the few people up on the

wall of fame. Let's get this challenge started!

All right I've been wanting to have wins and all 48 contiguous states for a long

long time so let's dominate this thing! Thank you to Farley's Food Fun and Pub

here in Las Cruces for doing the challenge for me!

Because of the holidays is January 2nd they weren't able to get the custom bun

they usually have so they went with four different regular buns that they are

using as the bun but this looks freaking delicious let's eat the record there

have only been a few people to win out of many many attempts but it's right

after 23 minutes so let's try to smash that! 1, 2, 3. . . Boom! All right knives out

let's eat some meat!

It's not one huge bun for this one so I'm going to enjoy these as burgers I

already ate the top patty now we'll just eat these with the pickles on them and

get them down!

Under nine minutes in!

Under 11 and a half minutes there's four pounds of meat on this thing

and it sure as hell feels like and it's starting to get heavy but still got room

I think we're gonna get this win!

Fifteen minutes in 45 seconds that is the new record for Farley's Monster

Burger Challenge here in southern New Mexico in Las Cruces, New Mexico it was

state number 48 my first win in New Mexico so very very excited and happy

about that been doing these since 2010 and now I've got wins in all 48 of the

main contiguous states for winning I'm going to get the $30 meal for free,

I will get a sweet t-shirt to add to my collection, which is I've got right here

it says Farley's on the front, but yeah, Farley's home of the Monster Burger

Challenge and I will be one of the few people

posted up on the Wall of Fame, so thank you to Farley's here in Las Cruces, New

Mexico and down here in southern New Mexico I did not want to have these on

the burger because they're a bit spicy and I'm probably regret this, but they

are known for their green chiles so instead of a beer cuz I have to drive

Lets chug some chili's, thank you guys for watching!

For more infomation >> Monster Burger Challenge in Las Cruces, New Mexico!! - Duration: 7:47.

-------------------------------------------

Social Security and Medicare Taxes Trending Up - Duration: 2:56.

hi I'm true was a longer blog about this subject if you go to my website at

retired guy usa.com if you need financial advice and consult your

professional I'm speaking today about Social Security and Medicare taxes which

continue to trend up in 1937 that Social Security tax and employees was 2% on all

wages up to $3,000 now you pay 6.2 percent up to 128 thousand four hundred

defend Medicare plans started in 66 an employee worker paid seven tenths of a

percent up to 66 hundred dollars of wages whereas now you pay one point four

five percent on all of your wages starting in 2013 you pay an additional

zero point nine tenths of a percent Medicare tax on your wages if you're a

higher earner Congress started taxing Social Security benefits in 1980 for up

to 50% of your Social Security could be taxed if your income was too high

1993 legislation changed that to eighty-five percent of your of your

Social Security benefits could be taxed Social Security taxes some of you twice

first you pay taxes when you're working and then when you start to draw benefits

you get taxed if you make too much money it's absolutely outrageous that somebody

wouldn't be paying taxes twice on the same income the benefit calculation is

back is biased in favor of lower income lower earning workers so the more you

earn the less is your benefit as a percentage of your earnings the full

retirement age the F ra for full benefits was age 65 it is now based on

the year of your birth so for instance the f ra is now is now age 67 for those

born in 1960 or later in short Social Security and Medicare

taxes are continuing to rise and you have to work longer you can't do much

about it you can decide how long

you're going to work and how to maximize your benefit you can vote for

representatives who will address the problem but it would be hard to find

somebody brave enough to do that support politicians who will talk about an

alternative to the current programs beware politicians who promise to save

Social Security without making tough changes that is other than other than

taxing those who make more watch out for politicians who demagogue their

opponents about this issue food for thought

this is Tripp and there's a longer blog about this subject that retired guy

usa.com thank you

For more infomation >> Social Security and Medicare Taxes Trending Up - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

The Doctors Job, Find Out What Or Why to Heal Without Harm - Dr. David Minkoff, M.D. - Duration: 8:00.

Hi Dr. Minkoff here. Last week I was seeing a patient and that patient had

been seen by another physician and had given them a solution which had been

going on for about nine years and the patient was continually getting worse

and it just hit me that this patient had presented nine years ago with a bunch of

symptoms that added up to Parkinson's disease. The brain MRI had been done

and the neurologist decided this was Parkinson's disease and had given the

appropriate prescription medication which was L-dopa and had followed the

patient for nine years and after nine years she was going downhill and she had

ended up in our office because she was looking for something that might work

better because he told her that the natural progress of the disease was

going to be a steady decline because the medication stopped working and then

there wasn't much that he could do. So it occurred to me that since our approach

is really different I'm always trying to figure out like what's my job well my

job is why do you got what you got? For most people it's not genetic. You didn't

have it two years ago or five years ago. until that point you were fine. Then

something happened or some things happened

which gave you the problem that you have

So until nine years ago this person had no appreciation that she had Parkinson's

disease. She's in her middle 60's now and up until probably 55 years old she was

active she played tennis she went out she did what she did and then she

started to feel gradually that she had less and less control over her body and

so she went to the doctor to find out why and he didn't really find out why. He

made a diagnosis based on symptoms and very little workup. So when I saw her

it just hit me of gee there's probably a lot of things that added up to her

getting what she got and so I started to investigate her to say could there be

some things that got into her body or things that were missing

her body that caused her to get what she got. The first thing I did oftentimes

dental problems can add up to neurological problems especially dental

infections so I examined her and I sent her to a dentist to get a specialized

called the cone beam CT it's a CT scan of just the teeth and I wrote on the

prescription rule-out abscess. So that report came back and it said that this

person had eleven abscessed root canal teeth. Now that's a lot of abscessed

teeth three inches from the brain. Could those

toxins from the abscess from the bacteria that are in there trickle back

and affect the cells of the brain? You bet they could! We know that almost all

people who have coronary artery disease if you ream out the plaque and you

culture the plaque or you do specialized microbiology on the plaque that almost

all of them are infected with dental infections. These could be pockets in

gums they can be from abscesses and root canals. So we know it goes all over but

this isn't very far to go. So that was well that could be a why or

a what. Then I did another test on her which was a urine test for mold toxins

and the particular that we use tests for for mold toxins. And she had the

highest levels of mold toxins that I've ever gotten and I've been testing these

things for 10 years. Like 20 times acceptable levels of mold toxins in her

body coming out in her urine which means that she's living in a really moldy

house because these molds grow and they put out these toxins and they breathe

them in and we know that mold toxins are extreme brain toxins in fact we do a

test on people with mold where we're able to have them look at a particular

image to see how well they can separate very

fine lines how close they are. It's called a visual contrast test and people

who have mold toxins think that these two things are the same and this is

crude because this is on a piece of paper but if your brain is really sharp

and it's really good you can see little really little skinny lines that are very

close to each other you can say oh yeah those are different so we know mold

toxins are a brain toxin okay so that was another one we also did a

stool test on her and we found that she was infested with two different

parasites now parasites also produce toxins that

can infiltrate into the body and cause problems she also had some pathogenic

bacteria in her gut and we were able to measure her urine for toxins that these

bacteria make and she had a lot of those so here's someone who's got these things

and then the last one was a lot of times when people have brain problems they

have problems with the upper two bones of their neck where the bones are a

little twisted and it chokes off either the blood supply coming out of their

brain or the cerebrospinal fluid flow in their brain and she had a twist of her

upper cervical vertebrae it was blocking off the normal circulation of her brain

and that was another problem so after I saw her I said boy we found a whole

bunch of what's and whys and if we fix these things there is a chance that we

can get your body to now heal because it's been suffering from these things

now I can't promise her that she'll be normal I don't know that but I know that

in the past when we've had patients similar to this they often really do

improve because when we get these toxic influences off of them

their body's natural innate intelligence will start to heal but if

you don't address those things and you just give a medication

designed to block symptoms they're not gonna heal so if you're diagnosed with

something simple let's say you've got a sore throat and you go to the doctor and

he does a swab and you got strep now that's easy okay you get a medication

for that in ten days you're fine and it's done. But if you've got something

like you're tired all the time or you can't think or you've got brain fog or

you've got Parkinson's or you've got MS or you've got cancer or you've got

rheumatoid arthritis or some other autoimmune disease it isn't a lack of a

particular medication that caused your problem it's a lack of the doctor

finding out what and why is wrong with you because you didn't have this before

and if we find the right things we can give the right treatment that will heal

without harm and improve you so if you're in that situation start looking

around because there is help available and you could get better than you are

now hope this helps

For more infomation >> The Doctors Job, Find Out What Or Why to Heal Without Harm - Dr. David Minkoff, M.D. - Duration: 8:00.

-------------------------------------------

MAJOR NEWS JEFF SESSIONS IS DONE – MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS DC - Duration: 12:25.

MAJOR NEWS JEFF SESSIONS IS DONE – MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS DC

Attorney General Jeff Sessions got the news he was dreading.

The embattled Attorney General has gone weeks without any controversy.

But one piece of paper shows Jeff Sessions is in deep trouble.

Democrats are committed to waging total war against the Trump administration.

The left will do anything to fight the President, even if it means hurting the country.

An example of this "America Last" mentality from the left is the constant court battles

over immigration policy.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the new changes to the asylum laws would cut

down on the number of economic migrants flooding into America which had resulted in wages being

driven down for native born citizens.

Sessions also reversed policies put into place by the Obama administration that allowed migrants

to gain asylum based on a credible fear of gang violence or domestic abuse.

The Trump administration is moving back to the traditional standard of granting asylum

based on membership of a group that could claim credible fear of persecution in their

home country.

This enraged the pro-open borders American Civil Liberties Union.

The ACLU is suing the Trump administration in Washington, D.C. by claiming the new asylum

rules violate the 1980 Refugee Act.

In a statement, the ACLU wrote:

The plaintiffs filed suit in Washington, D.C., under a special process Congress set up to

challenge illegal policies or procedures related to expedited removal and credible fear.

Represented by the ACLU and the University of California's Hastings Center for Gender

and Refugee Studies, the plaintiffs claim the new rules in the credible fear system

violate the Refugee Act of 1980, the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Administrative Procedures

Act, the Due Process Clause, and the Constitution's bedrock separation-of-powers principles.

When the Refugee Act of 1980 was passed, the Senate committee that approved the legislation

observed that it reflects "one of the oldest themes in America's history — welcoming

homeless refugees to our shores."

Indeed, providing shelter, safety, and a new life to the victims of persecution has long

been part of our national identity, even if not always an ideal we have lived up to.

Trump's policies, which have been implemented by Attorney General Sessions, are having a

positive effect.

TRAC Reports, Inc. – a nonprofit housed at Syracuse University – found that the

percentage of cases where migrants won asylum based on credible fear claims were half the

amount in the first six months of 2018 than they were in the last six months of 2017.

In their report they write:

These very recent data from the Immigration Court provide an early look at how the landscape

for gaining asylum may be shifting under the current administration.

Initially, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determines whether in its view the person

has a credible fear of persecution if returned to his or her home country.

This review generally takes place within days of arrival at the border[3].

If the DHS asylum officer decides after informally interviewing the individual that he or she

has not met this credible fear standard, the asylum seeker may ask that this decision be

reviewed by an immigration judge.

Here again the review generally happens quickly and the asylum seeker must explain why they

are seeking asylum.

Despite the inordinate complexities in asylum law, as a rule no attorney is allowed to help

individuals at their hearings[4].

Yet an unfavorable decision at this stage ends the process.

The judge's decision cannot be further appealed, and deportation quickly follows.

The observed decline in pass rates parallels a growing drumbeat of pronouncements by Administration

officials about "baseless and fraudulent asylum applications," and an alleged seriously

flawed system currently used to adjudicate these claims.

The ACLU is once again attempting to use a federal district court to set national immigration

policy.

This process threatens Trump's Make America Great Again agenda.

It's an un-American attack on the Constitution and separation of powers.

It's also an attack on a successful policy that has helped American workers and has restored

sanity to the immigration process.

But liberals have only one guiding light in the Trump-era, and that is complete

open borders.

For more infomation >> MAJOR NEWS JEFF SESSIONS IS DONE – MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT ROCKS DC - Duration: 12:25.

-------------------------------------------

IT'S OVER:STUNNING ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT TRUMP,LIBERALS FUMING - Duration: 11:24.

IT'S OVER:STUNNING ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT TRUMP,LIBERALS FUMING

The left's anti-Trump hysteria has only gotten crazier since the election.

Every day it seems they are finding a new way to oppose the President.

And their latest move could either be their stupidest—or their most dangerous yet.

In an act of "civil disobedience," a group of leftists are planning an anti-Trump march

from Charlottesville, Virginia to Washington, D.C.

Once in D.C., the marchers claim they will demand for Trump's removal from office.

They are claiming the rally is to show their opposition to white supremacy.

They believe that President Trump, who has denounced white supremacy many times, is actually

a white supremacist and neo-Nazi, if not Hitler himself reincarnate.

As reported by Fox News:

"PROTESTERS ARE PLANNING A MARCH STARTING FROM CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA TO WASHINGTON,

D.C. TO FIGHT WHITE SUPREMACY AND DEMAND THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.

"THE MARCH TO CONFRONT WHITE SUPREMACY" WILL SPEND TEN DAYS STARTING ON MONDAY, AUGUST

28 TRAVELLING TO THE NATION'S CAPITOL AND THEN OCCUPY IT WITH NON-VIOLENT DEMONSTRATIONS.

"FOR YEARS, WHITE SUPREMACIST VIOLENCE, RHETORIC, AND POLICIES HAVE ESCALATED AND

INTENSIFIED – EXPLODING DURING DONALD TRUMP'S RUN FOR PRESIDENT AND REACHING A BOILING POINT

IN CHARLOTTESVILLE," THE WEBSITE FOR THE EVENT READS.

WHITE NATIONALIST RALLIES IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA TURNED VIOLENT EARLIER THIS MONTH,

LEAVING ONE OF THE COUNTER-PROTESTERS DEAD.

PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS HEAVILY CRITICIZED FOR HIS RESPONSE, WHICH MANY VIEWED AS NOT GOING

FAR ENOUGH AGAINST THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS.

"WE DEMAND THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE FOR ALLYING HIMSELF WITH THIS

IDEOLOGY OF HATE AND WE DEMAND AN AGENDA THAT REPAIRS THE DAMAGE IT'S DONE TO OUR COUNTRY

AND ITS PEOPLE," THE MARCH ORGANIZERS WROTE.

"THIS WILL BE A SUSTAINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN, SO BRING WHAT YOU NEED TO STAY,"

THEY CONTINUED."

As funny as it may be to see a mass of whiny leftists yelling from the front gate of the

White House for Trump to leave, it could take a dangerous turn.

"Alt-left" radicals have proven they are willing to use violence to fight back against

Donald Trump and his supporters.

They were seen earlier this year in Washington D.C. breaking windows, lighting cars on fire,

and attacking police officers.

And just over the weekend they shut down two separate pro-Trump rallies, where they violently

beat and threw bottles of urine at Trump supporters.

While this march currently sounds like a comical waste of time, will it stay that way?

If a large enough contingency of these "alt-left" radicals show up could it become violent?

With rhetoric from the left becoming more and more heated, it's a real possibility.

Many of these far-left radicals hurling death threats at the President and his supporters

are becoming more and more radicalized by the day.

And many of them are arming up, waiting for their perceived impending civil war, or for

an attempted violent overturn of the Trump administration.

With far-left billionaires like George Soros on their side, anything could happen.

What do you think?

Will this rally remain peaceful?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

For more infomation >> IT'S OVER:STUNNING ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT TRUMP,LIBERALS FUMING - Duration: 11:24.

-------------------------------------------

The FBI Made A Shocking Admission About Prosecuting Hillary Clinton - Duration: 11:26.

The FBI Made A Shocking Admission About Prosecuting

Hillary Clinton

There are still mysteries surrounding the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's

email server.

Why wasn't she prosecuted, and will she ever be?

Now the FBI provided an answer that will shock you.

Former FBI Director James Comey announced in early July 2016 that Hillary Clinton would

not face criminal charges.

Many thought that decision was made after reviewing all the evidence.

But it turns out that was not the case.

New information released by the Senate Judiciary Committee reveals Comey made up his mind months

in advance not to recommend charges against Clinton.

Townhall reports:

"ACCORDING TO NEW TRANSCRIPTS RELEASED BY THE SENATE JUDICIARY THURSDAY AFTERNOON, FORMER

FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY MADE THE DECISION NOT TO REFER THEN DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

HILLARY CLINTON FOR PROSECUTION LONG BEFORE EVER INTERVIEWING KEY WITNESSES.

MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ALLEGE COMEY MADE THE DECISION MONTHS BEFORE FBI AGENTS WERE

FINISHED WITH THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HER MISHANDLING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION DURING

HER TIME AS SECRETARY OF STATE.

THE TRANSCRIPTS WERE REVEALED IN A LETTER SENT TO CURRENT FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY,

IN WHICH LAWMAKERS ARE DEMANDING AN EXPLANATION AND MORE DOCUMENTS SURROUNDING THE CASE.

"ACCORDING TO THE UNREDACTED PORTIONS OF THE TRANSCRIPTS, IT APPEARS THAT IN APRIL

OR EARLY MAY OF 2016, MR.

COMEY HAD ALREADY DECIDED HE WOULD ISSUE A STATEMENT EXONERATING SECRETARY CLINTON.

THAT WAS LONG BEFORE FBI AGENTS FINISHED THEIR WORK.

MR.

COMEY EVEN CIRCULATED AN EARLY DRAFT STATEMENT TO SELECT MEMBERS OF SENIOR FBI LEADERSHIP.

THE OUTCOME OF AN INVESTIGATION SHOULD NOT BE PREJUDGED WHILE FBI AGENTS ARE STILL HARD

AT WORK TRYING TO GATHER THE FACTS," THE LETTER, SIGNED BY CHAIRMAN CHUCK GRASSLEY

AND COMMITTEE MEMBER LINDSEY GRAHAM STATES.

"CONCLUSION FIRST, FACT-GATHERING SECOND—THAT'S NO WAY TO RUN AN INVESTIGATION.

THE FBI SHOULD BE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD THAN THAT, ESPECIALLY IN A MATTER OF SUCH

GREAT PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONTROVERSY."

"IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE FBI AGENTS ACTUALLY INVESTIGATING THE CASE WERE AWARE THAT MR.

COMEY HAD ALREADY DECIDED ON THE INVESTIGATION'S OUTCOME WHILE THEIR WORK WAS ONGOING.

HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION MAY BE UNDERNEATH SOME OF THE EXTENSIVE

REDACTIONS THAT THE DEPARTMENT MADE TO THE TRANSCRIPTS," THE LETTER CONTINUES."

When Comey made his announcement, Trump tweeted that this was an example of a rigged system.

He had no idea how right he was.

Comey had his mind made up not to charge Clinton.

And it would have been grounds for Trump to fire Comey when he took office.

It was one swamp creature looking out for another.

As much as the media tried to make the Comey firing controversial, it was an example

of Trump

draining

the swamp.

No comments:

Post a Comment