Tuesday, August 7, 2018

USA news on Youtube Aug 7 2018

We are back with our "Is it Safe?" series, following shows on China, Russia, Mexico,

and Syria.

Today's show might be the most controversial yet, given that many of our viewers are American.

If you're an outsider or have never visited the U.S., you might think every day is fraught

with dangers, given how parts of the country are often portrayed in movies and documentaries

as hives of criminality and daily violence.

The prisons are overflowing and no country locks up so many of its citizens, while the

police themselves are often seen in viral videos seemingly beating down people with

extreme prejudice.

Add to that political divisions, high school massacres, organized crime, seemingly more

gangs than zip codes, and America might look to some like an unsafe place.

Today we'll find out if that's true, in this episode of the Infographics Show, Is

it safe: To Live in the USA.

First of all, as we told you in our other shows about a country's safety, how much

danger you might face as a visitor or a resident all depends on where you live and what kind

of lifestyle you have.

Someone visiting Pleasant Grove, Utah, to see the Strawberry Days festival will no doubt

be in safer hands than someone going to Baltimore with the express intention of getting in on

the local heroin dealing scene.

We will talk about some parts of the country, but look more at general statistics, what

the media says, and what governments say about visiting the USA.

As we've looked so many times at what the American government says about visiting other

countries, let's now see what other governments say about the safety of America.

The UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office opens its section about the U.S. with something

about volcanos going off in Hawaii, but we are not too concerned about that.

Visitors to the US have as much chance of being cooked in hot lava as a piano falling

on their head from a high building.

"Around 3.8 million British nationals visit the United States every year.

Most visits are trouble free," we are told.

So, what other dangers are there?

Terrorism could occur anywhere and attacks are indiscriminate.

You might contract the Zika virus in Florida or Texas, or you might have to watch out for

Hurricane season in some parts of the country.

But again, these are small concerns.

What about crime?

Well, according to the FCO, very few visitors have been involved in America's notorious

gang/gun crimes, although some have been caught up in drug-related violence close to the Mexican

border.

Brits are also told to not walk into areas off the beaten path in big cities alone at

night, but on the whole, unlike many countries the FCO talks about, the U.S. has no extreme

warnings for Brit visitors.

The Australian government mirrors that opinion: if you exercise normal safety precautions,

i.e. don't go looking for trouble, the USA poses no great risk for travelers.

Again, a handful of terrorist attacks are mentioned, and gun crime is also mentioned.

You are also warned to read about the place you will be visiting regarding crime, but

you are told visitors are very rarely the target of violence in the U.S.

So, looking at those sites, you might think the USA is a very safe place to visit.

But how much crime exists in the country?

After all, OECD data for 2018 tells us America locks up more of its population than any other

country by a large margin.

It's said that in 2018, for every 100,000 people in the USA, 655 people are imprisoned.

Prison Policy tells us, "The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people

in 1,719 state prisons, 102 federal prisons, 1,852 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,163

local jails, and 80 Indian Country jails."

By the way, the UK locks up 138 people for every 100,000, and that was the 14th placed

country on the list.

In second place was Turkey at 287 per 100,000.

Does this mean America is unsafe, though, or are too many people in prison for small

non-violent crimes?

Let's look at violence.

If you compare world homicide rates, the USA has nothing on countries like Venezuela, El

Salvador, Jamaica, Brazil, and its next-door neighbor, Mexico.

The FBI hasn't yet released its full report for 2017, but in 2016, it says regarding murder

and nonnegligent manslaughter, there were 5.4 instances per 100,000 people.

Assaults were 250.6 per 100,000.

Rapes were 25.1 or 41.2 per 100,000, depending on legacy definition and revised definition,

respectively.

If we compare the murder rate to those countries we mentioned before, it is very low in the

USA.

Mexico is around four times higher, and Venezuela is around 18 times higher.

But what about other developed countries?

The UK murder rate was 1.2 per 100,000 in 2016.

In fact, most developed nations hover around 1 per 100,000, so you could say the U.S. murder

rate is very high given how developed it is and how rich it is.

In terms of rich countries regarding GDP, China has a low murder rate, and India has

a low-mid murder rate ( at 3.2 per 100,000).

Russia and Brazil are two other rich nations with high murder rates.

If you really want to stay out of the way of violent crimes in the USA, maybe don't

go where they are most prevalent.

FBI data tells us where those places are.

1.

Baltimore, Maryland (at 98.6 violent crimes per 10,000 people).

2.

Memphis, Tennessee (at 97.4 violent crimes per 10,000 people).

3.

St. Louis, Missouri (at 91.5 violent crimes per 10,000 people).

4.

Little Rock, Arkansas (at 87.4 violent crimes per 10,000 people).

5.

Birmingham, Alabama (at 86.1 violent crimes per 10,000 people).

Are those rates of violence high?

It depends on how we define violence.

We guess it's all kinds of violence that ended with an arrest.

If so, the 2017 stats for London, UK, where street fights are common, we are told for

every 1,000 people, there were 22 violent crimes.

That's 220 per 10,000.

And who would not visit Buckingham Palace because they thought London was unsafe….no

one.

So, perhaps the USA is not all that dangerous if indeed you don't do anything stupid.

What about where all the people want to visit?

Statistics tell us that New York City and Los Angeles are the most visited cities in

the USA.

Are you safe to visit those places?

Most websites seem to think so, even though we are told there are some areas you perhaps

might want to miss when out alone at night.

Walk of New York says crime is way down in NYC, and forget about all those old movies

that depict the city as a hotbed of violent crime.

We are told violence against tourists is very, very rare.

One person on Tripadvisor was concerned about walking the streets at night.

A New Yorker responded as follows: "Your family should stop watching crime TV shows

and movies.

You have nothing to worry about."

Other respondents didn't disagree.

What about LA?

Surely this city is full of hidden dangers.

Well, some websites do say you might avoid Skid Row or a night walk alone in South Central,

but still the website Safe Around doesn't give LA a high danger rating in any categories.

A Brit asked on Tripadvisor in 2016 if he would be safe wandering around LA at night.

One person replied, "You'll have wandered into dodgier areas of Blackpool more times

than you're ever likely to wander into a dodgy area of LA!"

Most people said it is safe, but being so large, just check out where you are visiting

and be sensible.

That way you'll almost definitely stay out of harm's way.

While there are still certainly many Boys in the Hood, it's generally thought LA is

safe on the whole.

We even looked at warnings for the popular Venice Beach, and the website warned us about

ear infections from swimming… it didn't mention getting held at knife point by skinheads

or shot to ribbons for your shoes.

One person on Tripadvisor did say it wasn't safe at night, though.

Again, we think if you exercise caution, many of LA's hotspots should be fine.

Ok, let's not paint too much of pretty picture here.

In 2018, Reuters wrote that the USA came 10th in a poll of countries in the world where

women "risked sexual violence, harassment and coercion into sex."

PBS opens a story in 2017 stating, "Racism remains a prevalent problem in the United

States."

But that was based on a poll about how people think, and not necessarily related to aggression.

In general, it's thought the USA is LGBT friendly, but a 2017 article in the New York

Times points out that that isn't the case in all parts of the country.

What the story was referring to though was how LGBT people have more rights and are protected

by more laws in some states than in others.

Hostel World tells us New York City and Washington DC are very LGBT friendly, but many cities

in the USA should be ok.

If you want to drive from city to city, is it dangerous to do that in the USA?

In 2016 there were 11.59 deaths per 100,000 people in the US.

How does that compare to other countries?

Well, it's a bit like the murder rate, it's quite high for a developed country but not

so high compared to nations that don't have the same advanced infrastructure and modern

law enforcement.

We might add that if you come from a small nation, driving on some of the USA's highways

for the first time can be a little scary.

Driving around LA for instance can get confusing.

As for other dangers, you won't get malaria, although there's a minuscule chance of contracting

dengue fever in some states.

It's nothing to worry about, though.

Depending on where you are, you could also get eaten by a bear or an alligator, bitten

by a rattlesnake or a black widow spider, or have your leg munched on by a great white

shark.

But Jaws was just a movie and we can say again that these things might happen to you as much

as that piano might drop on your head.

So, in conclusion, we think that the dangers present in America are much less than movies

and TV might have you think.

There certainly is a lot of gun crime for such an advanced country, but much of that

happens in certain areas, and visitors are unlikely to get caught up in it.

If you don't exercise caution and decide to run wild, you might find yourself in trouble,

but if you take it easy, you should have no problems in the U.S.

As for where the country comes on our danger list.

We think the list now goes like this, from safest

to most dangerous: 1.

China, 2.

USA, 3.

Russia.

3.

Mexico.

4.

Syria.

So, do you agree with this list?

Do you take issue with what we've said in this show?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

Also, be sure to check out our other video called Could You Be a Police Officer?!

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> Is It Safe: To Live In The USA? - Duration: 10:47.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Prepares To Expose Deep States Worst Nightmare In Massive Declassification Move - Duration: 11:27.

Trump Prepares To Expose Deep States Worst Nightmare In Massive Declassification Move

The war with the deep state is just getting started – don't think otherwise for one

second.

The war will be fought in the court of public opinion and will most assuredly be fought

in the US court system.

All the way to the Supreme Court will the legal battle go while the PR campaign will

rage in the media.

Trump's team will fight everything, as they should, even of the strict definition of is

there even a crime that started the whole Mueller charade.

The battle will also be fought in Congress if the Democrats prevail – it will be a

ruthless campaign fought for the soul of the country.

Expect Mueller to make his move soon – before Labor Day to meet DOJ guidelines and expect

Trump to do the below before that, or shortly after.

From Patriotbeat:

Former D.C. bureau chief for Investor's "Business Daily" just dropped a BOMB on

Twitter.

Paul Sperry tweeted out that this month President Trump will be declassifying a stack of documents

that will drag the Deep State down.

Sperry also claims that Trump may release emails between Ohr and Steele, which will

prove the collusion between Obama's DOJ and a foreign entity, pushing a phony dossier

in hopes of destroying President Trump.

As well as the entire unredacted Carter Page FISA warrant!

Buckle up, folks!

A storm

is coming…

For more infomation >> Trump Prepares To Expose Deep States Worst Nightmare In Massive Declassification Move - Duration: 11:27.

-------------------------------------------

Judge Jeanine Predicts D C 's Next Major Scandal - Duration: 10:31.

Judge Jeanine Predicts D.C.'s Next Major Scandal

The Democrats made a huge mistake by asking James Comey to testify.

The Senate hearing clearly revealed that the Russian narrative is a witch hunt.

Judge Jeanine Pirro roasted former FBI Director James Comey on Fox & Friends for leaking sensitive

information to the press.

"He is an operator.

He is part of the Washington elite," chided Judge Jeanine, calling him a "predator"

(via Dennis Michael Lynch) "It's clearly about revenge.

This is a setup," says Judge Pirro about Comey's decision to leak information about

his private conversation with Trump.

"This is a predator who is setting up the president."

Former FBI Director James Comey admitted Thursday to the Senate Intelligence Committee that

he was the source of a classified memo leaked to the failing New York Times.

According to the memo — which has not been verified — President Trump asked to meet

alone with James Comey to seek the FBI director's loyalty.

The supposed memo also claims that the president asked Comey to go easy on Trump's friend,

and former national security advisor, General Michael Flynn — who was being investigated

for "connections" to Russia.

We may never know for sure whether the contents of the memo are true, or a fabrication of

Comey's — but it is obvious that the information was leaked to get revenge on President Trump.

James Comey was humiliated when he learned of his termination through a news broadcast

while addressing a room of FBI agents.

The former director originally thought his firing was a joke.

Comey was even more inflamed after President Trump questioned his leadership and claimed

that the FBI lost credibility under his watch.

So, Comey leaked the memo to The New York Times out of a thirst for revenge.

Comey admitted that President Trump was not under investigation, but he thought he could

force one by leaking the memo.

The plot worked, and a special prosecutor was appointed to investigate Russian collusion,

thus wasting the president's valuable time.

James Comey is a member of the Washington elite, and he was clearly attempting to protect

his buddies in the establishment — just as he was accustomed to doing as FBI director.

Comey is a shrewd political agent, and his childish routine is not fooling anyone.

For more infomation >> Judge Jeanine Predicts D C 's Next Major Scandal - Duration: 10:31.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy's Stunning Move Left Robert Mueller Speechless - Duration: 13:21.

Trey Gowdy's Stunning Move Left Robert Mueller Speechless

Robert Mueller's Russia investigation hinges on one question.

Did the Trump campaign collude with Russia?

But Trey Gowdy just made a move that could answer that question once-and-for-all.

The collusion narrative gained traction in the media when BuzzFeed published the unverified

Christopher Steele dossier.

The memo – commissioned by the mysterious Fusion GPS – claimed Russia had compromising

information on Trump and that his campaign colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 election.

But what were the origins of the dossier?

Who paid for it?

Was Fusion GPS also being paid by the Russian government when they commissioned the memo?

And was Steele on the FBI payroll when he put this document together – and did the

Bureau use the document as the basis for their counterintelligence investigation into the

Trump campaign's ties with Russia?

These are serious questions currently being stonewalled by both the FBI and Fusion GPS.

Now the House Intelligence Committee – which Trey Gowdy is a member – has subpoenaed

documents they believe will shed light on these matters.

The Washington Examiner reports:

In the most significant escalation yet in the wrangling between Congress and the FBI

over the Trump dossier, the House Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed the bureau and the

Justice Department for documents relating to the dossier, the FBI's relationship with

dossier author Christopher Steele, and the bureau's possible role in supporting what

began as an opposition research project against candidate Donald Trump in the final months

of last year's presidential campaign.

The subpoenas are an indication of growing frustration inside the committee over the

FBI and Justice Department's lack of cooperation in the Trump-Russia investigation.

The committee issued the subpoenas — one to the FBI, an identical one to the Justice

Department — on August 24, giving both until last Friday, September 1, to turn over the

information.

Neither FBI nor Justice turned over the documents, and now the committee has given them an extension

until September 14 to comply.

Illustrating the seriousness with which investigators view the situation, late Tuesday the committee

issued two more subpoenas, specifically to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney

General Jeff Sessions, directing them to appear before the committee to explain why they have

not provided the subpoenaed information."

Trey Gowdy explained why these documents are so crucial.

The Examiner also reports:

"We got nothing," said committee member Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who is taking a leading

role in the Russia investigation.

"The witnesses have not been produced and the documents have not been produced."

In a telephone interview Tuesday, Gowdy said the FBI has said it needed more time to comply,

and also that complying might interfere with the investigation of special counsel Robert

Mueller.

Whatever the reason, the documents haven't been produced.

"A subpoena is a tool of last resort in Congress," Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor,

said.

Like investigators with the Senate Judiciary Committee, who are also pursuing information

about the dossier, the House committee wants to know the origin of the FBI's involvement

in the creation of the document.

They are particularly interested to know whether the FBI or Justice Department ever presented

information from the dossier — unverified, possibly from paid informants — to a court

as a basis for obtaining a surveillance warrant in the Russia investigation.

"I want to know the extent to which it was relied upon, if at all, by any of our intelligence

agencies or federal law enforcement agencies," Gowdy said, "and to the extent it was relied

upon, how did they vet, or either corroborate or contradict, the information in it?"

Gowdy's answer is revealing.

The Bureau cited Mueller's investigation as a reason they have not yet produced the

documents.

But if the documents show the whole investigation was based on a fake news memo – or that

the FBI paid the man who put this together, it would drive a stake through the heart of

Mueller's probe.

We will keep you updated on any new developments in this story.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

No comments:

Post a Comment