Saturday, August 4, 2018

USA news on Youtube Aug 4 2018

Supreme Court Victory – Trump's Former Opponent Delivers Him A Resounding Win

It's a good day when Donald Trump's former opponent in the 2016 election decides to support

the president in a major decision.

It was Senator Rand Paul who stated that he will officially support Trump's Supreme

Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

This was decided, apparently, during a meeting that Rand Paul had with Brett last week.

Trump's position as the president puts him in the middle of the Democrats and Republicans

as any decision he makes is fair grounds for being supported or not.

Some Republicans have chosen not to support the president, such as John McCain.

Even though Trump ran on the side of the GOP, he still found himself to be a target of many

who were supposed to be on his side.

Rand Paul was considered a swing vote in just about anything Trump attempted.

Paul's support of Kavanaugh is what makes it a win for Trump.

Each time the president makes a decision, it's as though he's being watched with

a hawk's eyes and then pounced upon at every little mistake.

Each president makes mistakes, big or small, but it sometimes seems like Trump's mistakes

are exaggerated by mainstream media.

That's just my opinion on it, not to be mixed or perceived as a fact.

Rand Paul supporting Trump's decision on Kavanaugh is a good thing for Trump.

It shows that some people are not afraid to support their president.

It's also good that it took some time for Paul to come along.

That means Rand Paul may have been weighing his options and thinking about his decision

instead of automatically accepting or supporting the decision.

It's better for people to put some thought into their own actions before making a supportive

announcement of any type.

Rand Paul might face some opposition, but that seems to be fair game in the political

world these days.

After all, isn't facing opposition in politics all part of a days work?

Trending: Major Pop Star Actually Just Fled America To 'Escape' Trump – Realizes

Big Mistake Too Late

Fox News stated on Paul's decision: "I believe he will carefully adhere to the Constitution

and will take his job to protect individual liberty seriously," Paul said in a statement.

The Kentucky senator was one of the few Republicans considered a possible swing vote on Kavanaugh's

confirmation.

Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, also are being closely watched.

But with Paul voicing clear support — and Collins and Murkowski signaling potential

support in recent weeks — Kavanaugh's prospects appear to be improving as GOP leaders

aim to engineer a swift confirmation by the fall.

In another sign of congressional outreach, Kavanaugh is having his first meeting Monday

with a Democratic senator since becoming Trump's high court nominee.

He plans to sit down with Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, one of a handful of Democratic

senators who could cross the aisle to vote for Kavanaugh as most Democrats line up against

him.

Paul, meanwhile, has taken issue with Kavanaugh's record supporting the warrantless collection

of telephone metadata.

"I have expressed my concern over Judge Kavanaugh's record on warrantless bulk collection

of data and how that might apply to very important privacy cases before the Supreme Court,"

he said Monday.

But he said his vote is not a "single-issue" decision and voiced confidence in Kavanaugh's

record on other issues.

"My conversation with Judge Kavanaugh reinforces my belief that he will evaluate cases before

the Supreme Court from a textual and originalist point of view," Paul said.

"On issues such as property rights and reining in the administrative state, Judge Kavanaugh

has a strong record and showed a deep commitment during our meeting.

… Finally, his strong defenses of the First and Second Amendments in landmark cases show

someone who isn't afraid to challenge the status quo and will fight with backbone.

Judge Kavanaugh will have my support and my vote to confirm him to the Supreme Court."

Republicans, with a 51-49 majority, have little wiggle room on the Kavanaugh vote.

And with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., out battling brain c****r, GOP leaders cannot spare a single

vote unless they attract Democratic support.

The Associated Press contributed to this report."

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> Supreme Court Victory – Trump's Former Opponent Delivers Him A Resounding Win - Duration: 18:05.

-------------------------------------------

You Won't Believe Who In The Deep State Leaked The Russia Dossier To CNN - Duration: 10:59.

You Won't Believe Who In The Deep State Leaked The Russia Dossier To CNN

When someone in the Deep State leaked the Christopher Steel Russia dossier to CNN, it

kicked off a media firestorm surrounding the collusion storyline.

Now the identity of leaker is about to be made public.

And you won't believe who it is.

Last January, CNN revealed the existence of the fake news Russia dossier.

They didn't publish it, the publication was laundered through Buzzfeed, and once its

existence became public, the rumor of collusion – despite no evidence – began to swirl.

But who leaked it to CNN?

Now there is an answer.

Firstly, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee are set to release a report with

several key findings.

Chief among them is that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and

Russia.

But sources familiar with the report and the investigation told investigative journalist

Sara Carter that James Clapper – Obama's former Director of National Intelligence – was

the individual who leaked the dossier's existence to CNN.

Carter writes:

"Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper allegedly leaked information

to CNN early last year regarding the classified briefings given to then President-Elect Donald

Trump and President Barrack Obama on the salacious dossier claiming the Russians had compromising

information on the president-elect, according to government sources, who noted the evidence

of the leak was collected during the House Intelligence Committee's Russia investigation.

Clapper, who was one of four senior Obama administration officials to attend the briefing

with the presidents, also stated his "profound dismay at the leaks" in an official statement

issued in January, 2017 and warned that the leaks were "extremely corrosive and damaging"

to national security, according to his press release…

… But according to government sources Clapper, who is not mentioned in the report released

Monday, had spoken to CNN at roughly the same time Jake Tapper broke the first story regarding

the briefings conducted by senior intelligence officials with Trump and Obama on the dossier.

Tapper's story, which published in January 2017, created a snowball effect of allegations

in the media that Trump's campaign had allegedly colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election

and that Russia had compromising material on Trump, sources with knowledge of the investigation

concluded.

Clapper was one of four senior Obama administration officials to brief Obama and Trump on the

dossier in December 2016.

FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Administration

Director Mike Rogers were also present at the December briefings…

… But it was when CNN published the first report that Trump and Obama had been briefed

the dossier's findings that other news agencies began to report on it.

The committee found evidence that Clapper, who is now a contributor at CNN, contacted

CNN shortly before the story was published by Tapper, Evan Perez, and Jim Sciutto.

The story detailed the briefings given to Trump by the senior officials on the contents

of the dossier and "gave the dossier legs and news agencies began to publish its contents

because it had now become official news," one congressional source told this reporter.

Shortly after CNN published the report, Buzzfeed made the decision to post the entire 35-page

dossier and referenced the CNN report in its decision to publish it, according to the website.

On Jan. 11, Clapper issued a press release stating that the leaks in the media regarding

the briefing on the dossier were "extremely corrosive and damaging to national security."

This is the second time Clapper was caught misleading the public.

In 2013, he falsely testified before Congress that there was no domestic spying program.

Edward Snowden's disclosures proved that was false.

And now Americans will learn that Clapper was one of the Deep State operatives working

to sabotage the President too.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends

and family.

Thank you.

For more infomation >> You Won't Believe Who In The Deep State Leaked The Russia Dossier To CNN - Duration: 10:59.

-------------------------------------------

Rank And File FBI Agents Mueller's Indictments Are "100% Fabricated" Here's Proof - Duration: 18:05.

Rank And File FBI Agents: Mueller's Indictments Are "100% Fabricated" (Here's Proof)

A large number of rank and file FBI agents have slammed Robert Mueller's latest indictment

of 12 alleged Russian "operatives", claiming the evidence has been completely fabricated

by Mueller's team.

According to journalist Thomas Paine, a number of U.S. intelligence agents, including some

working within the FBI, have blown the whistle on how Robert Mueller and his team deliberately

fabricated evidence in order to pursue the Russia witch hunt.

Truepundit.com reports: Whether you understand IT or not, the evidence Mueller claims points

to Russia actually also points to India, Pakistan and of course China.

Funny though, Mueller never mentions that in his indictment.

Wonder why?

President Trump has called it a witch hunt.

And a number of spooks now are backing that claim.

The evidence in Mueller's indictment DOES NOT check our.

Any defense attorney will have a field day with this.

If they even care to counter the charges since the defendants are in Russia.

Here is a collective breakdown we orchestrated and pieced together proving Mueller's case

is a fabricated hoax.

****Circling the wagons around the Russian HOAX****

In Mueller's July 13, 2018 Indictment he lists Organization 1, which from here on out

we're going to assume is Crowdstrike.

CrowdStrike is the private 3rd party company that the DNC hired after multiple warnings

by FBI that their systems were compromised.

CrowdStrike is the company that did the analysis on the servers.

The same servers that the DNC wouldn't give to the FBI for independent analysis.

CrowdStrike eventually gave the FBI a "system image", which Comey, for some odd reason,

deemed acceptable.

Windows uses BIOS/EFI for standard system imaging, which is not a forensic backup.

BIOS doesn't allow corrupted information to be saved for recovery.

Forensic imaging of a hard drive is obtained by using a separate set of controls that bypass

safety protocols that BIOS would use during imaging.

Simply put, the system image obtained though BIOS is wholly unacceptable for forensic analysis

and would not be considered for analysis, nor would adhere to proper traceability of

the original state of the system during the "hacks."

President of CrowdStrike Services & CSO was and still is Shawn Henry.

September 15, 2010 FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, III named Shawn Henry Executive Assistant

Director of the the FBI's Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch (CCRSB).

March 2012, Shawn Henry named President of CrowdStrike Services & CSO.

Bloomberg has Shawn Henry listed on the Board of Directors of SignatureLink, Inc. with his

"Primary Company" listed as the FBI.

CrowdStrike didn't only make headlines on the DNC hack, they also came out with a report

on December 22, 2016 called "Danger Close." where they allege Russian's hacked Ukrainian

military android phones that used a D-30 howitzer application for targeting, using Fancy Bear

X-Agent; one of the same tools they also reported being used in the DNC, DCCC 'hacks.'

Needless to say, they did a major rewrite after the Ukrainian Defense Minister called

them on their BS analysis and report.

VOA shows the HUGE walkback of shame from CrowdStrike.

NOTE: When a cyber tool is used, it NO LONGER can be attributed to whoever claims development

of it.

Once it's out, it's out and ANYONE can do what they want with it, so attributing

all attacks using X-Agent to "Fancy Bear" from Russia does not make any sense.

NOTE: X-Agent first showed up on the scene in 2012 targeting Windows.

In 2014 a Linux variant came out.

In 2015 a variant for Apple iOS and later Android, and in 2016 X-Agent was found on

DNC servers.

Mueller claims, or rather CrowdStrike (aka Comapany 1) that X-Agent was used to communicate

with GRU-registered linuxkrnl[.]net domain.

Many ran a basic "whois" on that domain and came up with an Amazon server in Ashburn,

VA with IP 52.45.178.122.

It took some extra steps and came up with the below.

Profiling linuxkrnl[.]net returns 3 profiles linuxkrnl[.]net

linuxkrnl[.]net.tumblr[.]com (username = linuxkrnl[.]net, url = tumblr[.]com)

mail.linuxkrnl[.]net When performing initial DNS history for linuxkrnl[.]net

with multiple historical data loggers we get:

Tracking nameserver information, well, the information we could get outside of what Amazon

wiped out (possibly directed to do so), we find ns1.carbon2u[.]com & ns2.carbon2u[.]com,

ns1.hostkey.ru & ss.hostkey.ru associated with domain linuxkrnl[.]net.

Would you be surprised that there are over 500 domains that have been registered within

the "zone file" that ns#.carbon2u[.]com is attributed to, where the majority have

a Mail Exchange (MX) in Malaysia, AND used HOSTKEY-NET (Mueller's indictment states

"GRU" used MX in Malaysia), including linuxkrnl[.]net?

Many of these domains go back as far as 2011, some before that.

When cross-referencing the above DNS History chart with ns#carbon2u[.]com we pick up some

more info: NOTE: When it comes to "first seen" & "last

seen" dates, multiple databases need to be checked.

The logging times fluctuate from one to the other and depend on the time zone too.

All of the nameservers at "DUMMY[.]com" resolve back to Amazon Technologies Inc. in

Dublin, Ireland.

See (*) in first graph.

ns#.carbon2u[.]com = carbon2u[.]com.

(associated with APT28/Fancy Bear) See DNS History trace below:

Note: domain carbon2u[.]com is registered with Internet Domain Service BS (internet[.]bs),

a Bahamas based domain registrar, who is owned by CentralNic out of London since 2014.

*Mail Exchange (MX): 91.218.247.100 = mail.carbon2u[.]com, and reverse DNS = anemone12.steeldns[.]com.

Note: anemone is a flower genus, aka buttercups.

Also it's a song on a rock album by "Virgin Steele" out of New York (The House of Atreus,

Act 1 & Act 2); It's no "Crossfire Hurricane" by the Rolling Stones out of London, but to

each their own.

DNS history of steeldns[.]com: These are *proxy registered route objects.

DNS server records

for steeldns[.]com (Shinjiru Technology) ns1.steeldns[.]com (101.99.72.47)

ns2.steeldns[.]com (111.90.144.253) mail.steeldns[.]com (111.90.144.132)

Reverse DNS on above IP's ns1.steeldns[.]com 101.99.72.47

ns2.steeldns[.]com 111.90.144.253 prawn23.ip-asia[.]com 111.90.144.132

All resolve to Malaysia and all have the owner Shinjiru Technology within our target time

frame.

linux[krnl[.]net domain on IP 52.45.178.122 shows as first seen July 15, 2018, so this

can be mostly discarded as it's not a target within our time frame.

linuxkrnl[.]net.tumblr[.]com (first post March 20, 2018) belongs to an Indian programmer.

Basic steganalysis on a few posted images doesn't seem to show *obvious* embedded

malicious code, but there are inconsistent binary strings in some jpg images, which could

be due to many things.

Since the first post was this year, we didn't bother going any further.

NOTE: X-Agent first showed up on the scene in 2012 targeting Windows.

In 2014 a Linux variant came out.

In 2015 a variant for Apple iOS and later Android, and in 2016 X-Agent was found on

DNC servers.

X-Agent, at this point, cannot be attributed to the original developer.

No one knows who Guccifer 2.0 is.

No one knows who APT28 players are, but by golly Mueller and Crowdstrike sure seemed

to hobble some sh*t together and crack the case by pointing it at 500+ domains registered,

most proxies, with netblocks in Russia, attributed to IP's that all host malicious sites and

links, predominately for phishing, and grab that one little linuxkrnl[.]net out of the

bunch and say it's Russian military intelligence.

Sounds good, anyway …right …

Hell, they even know what computers were used!

Amazing! if the perps didn't know how to spoof their user agent(s), utilize a virtual

machine on their host system in conjunction with a VPN or proxy chains, which renders

2 different IP's (or more if they're dynamic or rotating), and allows the user to use MULTIPLE

operating systems on the host computer.

But whatever.

That's just standard.

The output is only as good as the input, and Crowdstrike has junk input in their analysis.

Remember what they did to the Ukraine with their "Danger Close" "analysis?"

There's plenty more data that can be hashed out but it's outside of this scope.

This could just as well be connected to the Steele-Fusion GPS dossier operation, or Chinese

APT, Indian APT, Pakistani APT, you name it.

You think Russia is special when it comes to espionage and cyber attacks in the U.S?

Ha, take a look at China.

Guccifer 2 used a cracked version of Microsoft Office Suite from "Grizzli777", likely

on a Windows 7 virtual machine setup.

1000's of cyber criminals & freeloaders alike, from different continents use the exact

same setup using the well known Grizzli777's pirated software.

See, this whole thing is a witch hunt and a hoax, and the 3rd party analysts exclusively

used to tout the 17 intel agencies theme, who solely relied on these DNC "for hire"

private companies "analyses" are lacking in their sophistication.

DNS can be spoofed, masked, or encrypted.

Caching can be set up locally instead of at the ISP.

User agent can be changed.

MAC address can be spoofed or temporarily changed.

IP's are *rarely* used for tracking, it's the DNS that matters and as stated, all of

that can be pointed wherever the attacker wants, ESPECIALLY if you own the servers like

the GRU would.

Why transfer over the transoceanic cables anyway!?!

Answer, you wouldn't unless you're just a low level cyber criminal group.

Where's the NSA on this?

Yeah, exactly.

They don't want to be linked to this hoax or prop it up.

So they are keeping quiet.

Too late now.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and

is instead promoting mainstream media sources.

When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content.

Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your

friends

and family.

Thank you.

No comments:

Post a Comment