BUSTED: Obama Gave Iran Secret Access to U.S. Financial System.
The truth behind Obama's disastrous "Iran Deal" just keeps getting worse and worse.
As more information bubbles to the surface, we're truly discovering what an abject failure
Obama was, and how dangerous his legendary "deal" is, and most importantly, how SMART
President Trump was to end it.
A new report out states that Obama screwed over the American people even more than we
realized by giving Iran, State Sponsors of Terror, access to the U.S. financial system.
More treasonous moves by America's most sinister president ever.
From AP
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit
briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after
the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no
plans to do so.
An investigation by Senate Republicans released Wednesday sheds light on the delicate balance
the Obama administration sought to strike after the deal, as it worked to ensure Iran
received its promised benefits without playing into the hands of the deal's opponents.
Amid a tense political climate, Iran hawks in the U.S., Israel and elsewhere argued that
the United States was giving far too much to Tehran and that the windfall would be used
to fund extremism and other troubling Iranian activity.
The report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations revealed that under President
Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously
disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in
Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars.
If the Omani bank had allowed the exchange without such a license, it would have violated
sanctions that bar Iran from transactions that touch the U.S. financial system.
The effort was unsuccessful because American banks — themselves afraid of running afoul
of U.S. sanctions — declined to participate.
The Obama administration approached two U.S. banks to facilitate the conversion, the report
said, but both refused, citing the reputational risk of doing business with or for Iran.
"The Obama administration misled the American people and Congress because they were desperate
to get a deal with Iran," said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, the subcommittee's chairman.
Issuing the license was not illegal.
Still, it went above and beyond what the Obama administration was required to do under the
terms of the nuclear agreement.
Under that deal, the U.S. and world powers gave Iran billions of dollars in sanctions
relief in exchange for curbing its nuclear program.
Last month, President Donald Trump declared the U.S. was pulling out of what he described
as a "disastrous deal."
The license issued to Bank Muscat stood in stark contrast to repeated public statements
from the Obama White House, the Treasury and the State Department, all of which denied
that the administration was contemplating allowing Iran access to the U.S. financial
system.
Shortly after the nuclear deal was sealed in July 2015, then-Treasury Secretary Jack
Lew testified that even with the sanctions relief, Iran "will continue to be denied
access to the world's largest financial and commercial market."
A month later, one of Lew's top deputies, Adam Szubin, testified that despite the nuclear
deal "Iran will be denied access to the world's most important market and unable
to deal in the world's most important currency."
Yet almost immediately after the sanctions relief took effect in January 2016, Iran began
to complain that it wasn't reaping the benefits it had envisioned.
Iran argued that other sanctions — such as those linked to human rights, terrorism
and missile development — were scaring off potential investors and banks who feared any
business with Iran would lead to punishment.
The global financial system is heavily intertwined with U.S. banks, making it nearly impossible
to conduct many international transactions without touching New York in one way or another.
Former Obama administration officials declined to comment for the record.
However, they said the decision to grant the license had been made in line with the spirt
of the deal, which included allowing Iran to regain access to foreign reserves that
had been off-limits because of the sanctions.
They said public comments made by the Obama administration at the time were intended to
dispel incorrect reports about nonexistent proposals that would have gone much farther
by letting Iran actually buy or sell things in dollars.
The former officials spoke on condition of anonymity because many are still involved
in national security issues.
As the Obama administration pondered how to address Iran's complaints in 2016, reports
in The Associated Press and other media outlets revealed that the U.S. was considering additional
sanctions relief, including issuing licenses that would allow Iran limited transactions
in dollars.
Democratic and Republican lawmakers argued against it throughout the late winter, spring
and summer of 2016.
They warned that unless Tehran was willing to give up more, the U.S. shouldn't give
Iran anything more than it already had.
At the time, the Obama administration downplayed those concerns while speaking in general terms
about the need for the U.S. to live up to its part of the deal.
Secretary of State John Kerry and other top aides fanned out across Europe, Asia and the
Middle East trying to convince banks and businesses they could do business with Iran without violating
sanctions and facing steep fines.
"Since Iran has kept its end of the deal, it is our responsibility to uphold ours, in
both letter and spirit," Lew said at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
in March 2016, without offering details.
That same week, the AP reported that the Treasury had prepared a draft of a license that would
have given Iran much broader permission to convert its assets from foreign currencies
into easier-to-spend currencies like euros, yen or rupees, by first exchanging them for
dollars at offshore financial institutions.
The draft involved a general license, a blanket go-ahead that allows all transactions of a
certain type, rather than a specific license like the one given to Oman's Bank Muscat,
which only covers specific transactions and institutions.
The proposal would have allowed dollars to be used in currency exchanges provided that
no Iranian banks, no Iranian rials and no sanctioned Iranian individuals or businesses
were involved, and that the transaction did not begin or end in U.S. dollars.
Obama administration officials at the time assured concerned lawmakers that a general
license wouldn't be coming.
But the report from the Republican members of the Senate panel showed that a draft of
the license was indeed prepared, though it was never published.
And when questioned by lawmakers about the possibility of granting Iran any kind of access
to the U.S. financial system, Obama-era officials never volunteered that the specific license
for Bank Muscat in Oman had been issued two months earlier.
According to the report, Iran is believed to have found other ways to access its money,
possibly by exchanging it in smaller quantities through another currency.
The situation resulted from the fact that Iran had stored billions in Omani rials, a
currency that's notoriously hard to convert.
The U.S. dollar is the world's dominant currency, so allowing it to be used as a conversion
instrument for Iranian assets was the easiest and most efficient way to speed up Iran's
access to its own funds.
For example: If the Iranians want to sell oil to India, they would likely want to be
paid in euros instead of rupees, so they could more easily use the proceeds to purchase European
goods.
That process commonly starts with the rupees being converted into dollars, just for a moment,
before being converted once again into euros.
U.S. sanctions block Iran from exchanging the money on its own.
And Asian and European banks are wary because U.S. regulators have levied billions of dollars
in fines in recent years and threatened transgressors with a cutoff from the far more lucrative
American market.
what do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
USA facts today.
No comments:
Post a Comment