Thursday, June 21, 2018

USA news on Youtube Jun 22 2018

Mueller Now Connected to a Covered-Up Bribery Scheme Involving Hillary Clinton

Well, well, well.

It looks as if former FBI director Robert Mueller, who is now special counsel in charge

of the Justice Department's Russia investigation, allegedly hid evidence that was collected

as early as 2009 which shows Russian officials were involved in a bribery scheme with Hillary

Clinton's charity in order to expand their atomic energy business within the U.S

According to The Hill:

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry

to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as

early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes

and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents

show.

Rather than bring immediate charges for the scheme though, the FBI and Justice Department

decided to continue "investigating" the issue for four more years – leaving the

American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during

a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin's commercial

nuclear ambitions.

The details were revealed in a report earlier this week.

Apparently, the evidence was withheld from lawmakers while they were questioning the

Obama administration's approval of the sale of Uranium One to Russia's nuclear giant

Rosatom in 2010, which ultimately led to Russian control of 20% of U.S. uranium supply.

Then, in 2011, the administration approved Tenex, a subsidiary of Rosatom, in partnership

with the United States Enrichment Corp., to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power

plants.

Prior to that, Tenex was only allowed to sell reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled

Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s "Megatons to Megawatts" peace program U.S. nuclear

power plants.

An anonymous person who worked on the case informed The Hill, "The Russians were compromising

American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all

of which raised legitimate national security concerns.

And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions."

"Former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chaired the House Intelligence Committee during the

time the FBI probe was being conducted, told The Hill that he was never told of anything

regarding "Russian nuclear corruption," though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned

about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton's State Department.

"Not providing information on a corruption scheme before the Russian uranium deal was

approved by U.S. regulators and engage appropriate congressional committees has served to undermine

U.S. national security interests by the very people charged with protecting them," Rogers

said.

"The Russian efforts to manipulate our American political enterprise is breathtaking.""

For more infomation >> Mueller Now Connected to a Covered Up Bribery Scheme Involving Hillary Clinton - Duration: 12:45.

-------------------------------------------

Ex FBI Agents Reveal A Shocking Truth About The Spy Sent Into The Trump Campaign - Duration: 12:55.

Ex-FBI Agents Reveal A Shocking Truth About The Spy Sent Into The Trump Campaign

The FBI's spygate is not going away.

In fact, every day new revelations come to light that show the FBI cutting corners in

their scheme to spy on Donald Trump.

Now former FBI agents are speaking out and what they have to say is bad news for Comey

and the anti-Trump FBI.

Cambridge professor Stefan Halper has been named in published reports as the spy who

worked to insert himself into the Trump campaign.

Halper contacted three Trump campaign aides – Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Sam

Clovis – to try and build a relationship.

That was bad enough.

But now a bombshell report reveals that Halper was both an on and off the record source for

the media where he attacked Trump confidante Lt. General Michael Flynn and used fake news

to claim Flynn was involved with a Russian agent.

Halper – who apparently sees Russian spies in every closet and under every bed – was

apparently an unnamed source for stories claiming Flynn's relationship with Svetlana Lokhova,

a researcher at Cambridge who studied Russian intelligence, had crossed the line.

Flynn – who sat next to Lokhova at a dinner when he visited Cambridge in 2014 – was

the subject of media speculation for failing to disclose to intelligence authorities his

contact with a foreign national.

Halper played up the allegations and went even further by claiming Lokhova was a spy.

But the two merely sat next to each other at dinner, and such a contact would not have

warranted disclosure.

Lokhova tweeted that the accusations were meant to smear her.

Halper resigned from the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar in 2016 by making a public statement

about how the group had been infiltrated by Russians.

There is no evidence this is the case and Halper did not provide any proof to back up

his allegations.

The Daily Caller contacted two former FBI agents – James Gagliano and Ron Hosko – and

both blasted the FBI for allowing Halper to be a media source.

Gagliano told the Daily Caller that these press interactions could harm any legal case,

"This is something that is highly irregular and not something that I would have ever tolerated

with any of the folks working for me.

The road is fraught with peril when somebody is speaking off the cuff or speaking to the

media and putting themselves in a position where that can then be used as discovery material

when we do bring a case."

Hosko went further saying Halper speaking to the press could undermine his credibility,

telling the Daily Caller, "an informant's interactions with the press could create circular

reporting that would serve to make their information 'appear more valuable or more true" than

it actually is."

Halper – and the FBI's – credibility are in tatters.

The Bureau allowed an asset to violate protocol on how a spy should operate.

That calls into question what other shortcuts they used in this matter.

And Halper has established a reputation of being a wild-eyed academic who sees Russian

infiltration around every corner.

Halper has twice made baseless accusations of Russian spies lurking at Cambridge and

falsely accused one Trump campaign aide – Michael Flynn – of being compromised by the Russians.

Critics wonder if Halper was chosen to spy on Trump campaign aides precisely because

of his history of overhyping Russian plots—knowing they could count on him to provide hyped intelligence

that could be used to justify further spying on the Trump campaign.

There is evidence this could be the case.

A FISA warrant against Carter Page was renewed multiple times and finally ended in September

2017.

Coincidentally, that was the month Halper cut off contact with Page.

Did the FBI use an unreliable spy to cook the books on the intelligence used to justify

the warrant to spy on Page?

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this

story

For more infomation >> Ex FBI Agents Reveal A Shocking Truth About The Spy Sent Into The Trump Campaign - Duration: 12:55.

-------------------------------------------

The Democrats Sealed Their Own Doom In 2018 With This Fatal Mistake - Duration: 11:09.

The Democrats Sealed Their Own Doom In 2018 With This Fatal Mistake

Democrats and the media rejoiced over Donald Trump's new executive order ending family

separation for illegal aliens caught crossing the border.

But Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi's glee was short lived.

That's because the party sealed their own doom with this fatal mistake.

Trump's new executive order demands that families remain together in detention facilities

while they await their criminal proceedings to play out.

This new order will run up against the 1997 Flores decree which mandates that illegal

alien children can only be held for 20 days.

A 2015 U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee – who was appointed by Obama – extended that protection

to illegal alien children who tried to enter the country illegally with their parents.

Trump's executive order instructs the Justice Department to argue before Gee that she should

lift her order, but few experts believe that will be successful.

But Democrats overplayed their hand.

After Trump signed his executive order, prominent Democrats blasted out statements making it

clear that what they really objected to was immigration enforcement of any kind.

California Democrat Kamala Harris – a top-tier contender for the 2020 nomination – ripped

Trump's decision and made it clear she is staking her ground on complete open borders

and amnesty for any illegal alien who can successfully sneak into America.

Harris tweeted:

"TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT FIX THIS CRISIS.

IT GIVES NO SOLUTION FOR THE THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN TORN AWAY FROM THEIR

FAMILIES AND REMAIN SEPARATED."

Journalists also whined.

MSNBC's Kasie Hunt complained that illegal immigrants would still be prosecuted for a

crime:

"THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT END THE ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY — EVERYONE WILL CONTINUE

TO BE PROSECUTED WHICH PUTS A SERIOUS STRAIN ON RESOURCES."

Republicans took note that Democrats don't really care about family separation or treating

children humanely.

What they want is open borders—an issue to club Republicans with in the November election.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio tweeted:

"THE INK ISN'T EVEN DRY ON THE NEW EXECUTIVE ORDER ENDING SEPARATION POLICY & SOME DEMOCRATS

ALREADY ARGUING THAT KEEPING FAMILIES TOGETHER ISN'T ENOUGH.

NOW THEY WANT THEM & THEIR PARENTS RELEASED AFTER UNLAWFUL ENTRY KNOWING FULL WELL THAT

HIGH % WILL NEVER APPEAR FOR HEARING."

But Democrats are walking into a trap.

If Judge Gee strikes down Trump's executive order, then the terrain shifts to much more

favorable ground for the President and the Republican Party.

In a recent Economist/YouGov poll, Trump's zero tolerance policy had a 46 percent approval

rating, with just 37 percent of Americans disapproving.

And when Americans were presented with four options – not enforcing immigration law

by releasing the families, detaining the families together until their deportation hearing,

separating children from their parents, or sending the adults to jail and the children

to juvenile detentions centers – Trump's new plan of detaining families until their

deportation hearing received the most support at 44 percent.

The Democrats plan of open borders and "catch and release" won the backing of just 19

percent of Americans.

The Democrats position is a fringe position, and Trump's position is the one supported

by a plurality of Americans.

Once the fight shifts to enforcing the law – and keeping families together – or effectively

dissolving America's borders, it will be the Democrats who are on the run.

That's why red state Democrats – ten of whom are running for re-election this year

– sounded notes of caution when asked if the Democrats unified opposition to Trump's

plan was sustainable.

Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen told Politico he was not certain the Democrats could remain

united once Trump's more popular proposals took center stage:

"BUT ASKED WHETHER DEMOCRATS WOULD REMAIN UNITED AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION'S LATEST

MOVE, VAN HOLLEN SAID THAT "WHERE THAT CONVERSATION WILL GO, I JUST CAN'T SPECULATE UNTIL I

SEE THE DETAILS."

Democrats may have celebrated too soon.

Trump may have ceded one inch of territory to gain a mile of favorable ground.

If the 2018 midterms are contested over the clash between open borders or enforcing the

rule of law, Trump and the GOP could blunt the expected

blue wave.

For more infomation >> The Democrats Sealed Their Own Doom In 2018 With This Fatal Mistake - Duration: 11:09.

-------------------------------------------

Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 06-18-2018 01:51:21 1648 Weigel Dr, Marrero, LA 70072, USA - Duration: 7:36.

For more infomation >> Autoboy Blackbox : Dashcam App - 06-18-2018 01:51:21 1648 Weigel Dr, Marrero, LA 70072, USA - Duration: 7:36.

-------------------------------------------

Brit Hume: Charles Krauthammer was one of a kind - Duration: 2:47.

For more infomation >> Brit Hume: Charles Krauthammer was one of a kind - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

Bret Baier opens up about his friendship with Krauthammer - Duration: 3:20.

For more infomation >> Bret Baier opens up about his friendship with Krauthammer - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

Tucker Carlson: Fox News viewers loved Charles Krauthammer - Duration: 1:18.

For more infomation >> Tucker Carlson: Fox News viewers loved Charles Krauthammer - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

"Time" reagiert auf Trumps Grenzpolitik - Duration: 3:06.

For more infomation >> "Time" reagiert auf Trumps Grenzpolitik - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

È la prima volta che accade negli ultimi 41 anni. L'accusa aveva chiesto una pena pesante - Duration: 3:17.

 Per la prima volta in Usa da 41 anni, e da oltre 80 in California, un giudice criticato per aver inflitto una pena lieve ad un giovane stupratore è stato rimosso dagli elettori dopo una petizione

Si tratta di Aaron Persky, nel 2016 aveva comminato solo 6 mesi ad uno studente di Standford, Brock Turner, per aver abusato di una compagna dopo che i due si erano ubriacati ad una festa

Il caso sollevò grandi polemiche negli Usa, anche sul presunto miglior trattamento giudiziario dei bianchi ricchi, come Turner

       Il giovane rischiava sino a 14 anni di prigione, l'accusa ne aveva chiesti sei

La sentenza a soli sei mesi (più tre anni in prova) aveva quindi suscitato scalpore

Gli abitanti della contea di Santa Clara, California, si erano mobilitati raccogliendo le firme necessarie (il 20% dell' elettorato in 160 giorni) per mettere al voto la rimozione del giudice, arrivata oggi forse anche sullo sfondo del movimento #Metoo

     REUTERS  Brock Turner, lo studente finito sotto processo per le violenze        Persky aveva detto recentemente che non aveva rammarichi per la sua decisione e che aveva seguito le linee guida processuali e la giurisprudenza

Un giudice, aveva sostenuto, deve aderire al «ruolo della legge, non della pubblica opinione»

La commissione californiana che esamina le performance giudiziarie lo aveva assolto dall'ipotesi di cattiva condotta

All'epoca della sentenza, il giudice l'aveva motivata con la giovane età del reo (20 anni), con il fatto che era incensurato e che entrambi erano sotto l'effetto dell'alcol

La vittima (22 anni all'epoca) era in stato di incoscienza al punto da non ricordare lo stupro ma quando lo venne a sapere ne rimase scioccata

    

For more infomation >> È la prima volta che accade negli ultimi 41 anni. L'accusa aveva chiesto una pena pesante - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

Coca Cola Plus Coffee No Sugar - Duration: 0:19.

Say hello to Coca Cola Plus Coffee No Sugar.

Created with real Brazilian coffee,

this coke will leave you with an extra buzz.

It's perfect for when you need that

ice cold hit of caffeine this summer.

And once you've had a sip

you'll have no problem saying

"Coca Cola Plus Coffee No Sugar"

No comments:

Post a Comment