Priceless: Trump Just Turned The Tables On Corrupt Mueller, Judge Delivers Major Victory
It turns out that President Trump has been right all along that his presidential campaign
has been the victim of spying, and planted moles who were, in fact, FBI informants or
undercover agents.
He is demanding a full investigation into the matter as more and more people come forward,
and facts are uncovered and as the Mueller witch-hunt drags on.
Republican congressional leaders are furious that senior officials at the Department of
Justice, and the FBI have stonewalled in turning over documents that could very well reveal
the political origins, of the current criminal investigation of the President by Special
Counsel Robert Mueller.
Judge Andrew Napolitano, who I revere as a constitutional originalist, is asking some
very pointed questions over all this: "Can the President intercede in a federal criminal
investigation of which he himself is a subject?
Can Congress intercede in a DOJ criminal investigation?"
When this was all started more than a year and a half ago, Mueller was named Special
Counsel so he could investigate serious, and demonstrable evidence of Russian government
interference in the 2016 presidential election.
None of that has ever been found or proven to date.
Trump neither sought, accepted or facilitated foreign intervention.
If he had, it would have been uncovered long ago.
From the very beginning, Mueller has been trying to prove that there was some kind of
agreement between the Trump campaign and foreign entities.
If the agreement plus actions to enact it had been proven, those involved would be guilty
of conspiracy, even if the agreed-upon result never materialized.
Trump has denied all of this many times over.
Though Mueller and his team of prosecutors and FBI agents have not uncovered a conspiracy,
they have turned up evidence of other crimes.
They have obtained 19 indictments, some for financial crimes, some for lying to FBI agents
and some for foreign interference in the election.
They have also secured four guilty pleas for lying, in which those who pleaded guilty agreed
to assist the government.
But some contend this was done under duress.
Nine of the indictments are against Russian intelligence agents.
Ironically, the President himself sanctioned these individuals by barring their travel
here, and their use of American banks and commercial enterprises.
Though he considers Mueller's investigation a witch-hunt, Trump has taken steps to ensure
that Russian interference in our affairs is curtailed.
Mueller has also potentially come across evidence of obstruction of justice by the President
while in office, and financial crimes prior to entering the office, all of which Trump
has denied.
Obstruction of justice consists of interfering with a judicial proceeding for a corrupt purpose.
The logic here is tangled.
Trump was within his purview to fire Comey if he did not trust him or if he wanted his
own person in the position.
However, if it can be proven that he fired Comey because he was the subject of a criminal
investigation, his purpose is corrupt and obstruction of justice comes into play.
Mueller is looking into bank fraud and money laundering, or the passage of ill-gotten gains
through numerous bank accounts to make the gains appear lawful.
These, too, Trump has denied.
As Mueller and his team keep digging, they find more things to potentially pile up.
As lawyers and as federal prosecutors, Mueller's team members have ethical obligations to uncover
whatever evidence of crime they come upon and, when professionally feasible and legally
appropriate, either prosecute or pass the evidence on to other federal prosecutors,
as they did in the case of evidence of fraud against Michael Cohen, a former confidant
and lawyer for Trump before he was President.
However, Mueller has strayed far beyond the scope of his original task and all he has
so far is circumstantial, unverified incidents to use against Trump.
Judge Napolitano addressed the spies and moles issue this way:
"The President cannot interfere with criminal investigations against himself without running
the risk of additional charges of obstruction of justice, interference with a judicial process
(the gathering of evidence and its presentation to a grand jury) for a corrupt purpose.
Nor can members of Congress see whatever they want in the midst of a criminal investigation,
particularly if they might share whatever they see with the person being investigated.
"Prosecutors have a privilege to keep their files secret until they reach the time, that
the law provides for them to go public.
Because Mueller is faced with the legal equivalent of assembling a 10,000 piece jigsaw puzzle,
he is not yet ready to show his cards.
If his cards contain materials from confidential sources people whose identities he promised
not to reveal, or if his cards contain evidence he presented to a grand jury, he may not lawfully
reveal what he has until it is time to exonerate the President, indict him or present a report
to Mueller's DOJ superiors that is intended for the House of Representatives.
"Can the President investigate his investigators?
"Yes but not until the investigation of him is completed.
That's because no one can fruitfully examine the legitimacy of the origins of the case,
against Trump without knowing the evidence and the charges.
Trump's allegations are of extreme scandal the use of FBI assets, by the Obama administration
to impede his presidential campaign.
Yet if he is exonerated, those allegations will lose their sting.
If he is charged with crimes or impeachable offenses, that do not have their origins in
politically charged spying, then his allegations will be moot.
But if he were to force the DOJ to turn over raw investigative files now to politicians
who want to help him, he might very well be impeding the criminal case against him.
That would be profoundly threatening to the rule of law, for it provides that no man can
be the prosecutor or the judge in his own case.
Even Trump's lawyers acknowledge that he could not lawfully do that."
This is one of the reasons that Trump does not fire Mueller and is letting this play
out.
In the end, Trump will be exonerated.
However, I somewhat disagree with Judge Napolitano.
I believe that Trump will be even more likely to go after those who spied on him and will
be well within his rights to do so.
This is a scandal that far surpasses Watergate, and I think that the President will go after
those who violated the Constitution, and tried to turn our Republic into a Banana Republic.
He's turning the tables on Mueller and the hunter will become the hunted.
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
top stories today.
For more infomation >> Trump vows to lower prescription drug costs - Duration: 4:22. 
For more infomation >> Nunes Announces FBI Evidence That Will End The Investigation On Trump - Duration: 12:12. 
For more infomation >> BREAKING Trump Grants Next Presidential Pardon, Liberal Minds Are Going to Implode - Duration: 12:12. 
For more infomation >> Iran Lists Tough Conditions For Europe and Russia vs China To Save Nuclear Deal - Duration: 2:27. 
For more infomation >> CAM Video:Mengjie Yu - Duration: 0:40. 
No comments:
Post a Comment