Thursday, May 17, 2018

USA news on Youtube May 17 2018

Mad Maxine About To Lose It All After Trump Busts Her In BIG Lie – LOCK HER UP For Good!

Maxine Waters was rated one of the "most corrupt" members of Congress in 2005, 2006,

and 2008 by the George Soros-funded watchdog CREW named "Citizens for Responsibility

and Ethics in Washington."

And In 2008, she was charged with three counts of ethical violations after allegedly helping

OneUnited Bank secure $12 million in federal bailout funds while hiding the fact that her

husband owned stock in the bank.

But to add to all those ethics violations we now learn that Waters has an issue which

is called "Projecting."

Because her own daughter has gotten more than $600,000 working for Maxine's campaign.

A campaign which runs on public donations.

Karen Waters has been on her mother's campaign committee payroll, Citizens for Waters, since

2006, and she oversees an operation called "slate mailers," or "endorsement mailers."

The slate mailer operation is a lucrative enterprise where an established politician

like Maxine Waters gets paid to endorse a political candidate.

Politics is that dirty and California Democrats may have the cornered the market on that.

"The daughter of Rep. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) was paid nearly $70,000 by her mother's

campaign during the 2016 election cycle.

Karen Waters has been on the payroll of her mother's campaign committee, Citizens for

Waters, since 2006.

She has pulled in more than $600,000 for her services since that time.

Karen is in charge of endorsement mailers, known as "slate mailers," for her mother's

campaign.

The slate mailer operation has generated hundreds of thousands of dollars for Waters' federal

campaign committee in recent years.

In order to appear on a Waters' slate mailer, candidates for political office must pay Citizens

for Waters from their own political committees.

If a candidate does not directly pay Waters' campaign committee, they must credit their

own campaigns with in-kind contributions from Waters.

The mailers are sent to almost 200,000 constituents in the South Central Los Angeles area, where

Waters holds considerable sway.

The mailers consist of an "official sample ballot" with quotes from Waters about candidates

and measures she supports.

Waters' campaign received more than 20 payments totaling $297,500 for slate mailer endorsements

in 2016.

The largest payments, worth $35,000, were made by the Democratic State Central Committee

of California and Yes on Measure M, a group that pushed for an interconnected transportation

system in Los Angeles.

Measure M was approved with 70 percent of the vote on Nov. 8.

Democrat Kamala Harris, the former California attorney general who won a seat in the Senate

this November, paid Citizens for Waters $30,000 to appear on the endorsement mailers, campaign

finance records show.

This was not the first time Harris has paid for Waters' endorsement.

Harris made two payments totaling $28,000 to Waters in 2010 to appear on the mailer

when she was running for attorney general.

A number of California ballot measure groups and judges also paid Waters tens of thousands

for her endorsement this past election cycle.

Prior to 2006, Karen ran the operation from a state committee called LA Vote.

The Federal Election Commission issued an advisory opinion in late 2004 stating that

Waters could run the slate mailers through her own federal campaign committee.

Karen pulled in $65,287 overseeing the slate mailer operation in 2016, making her the third-largest

recipient of Waters campaign funds that cycle.

Karen, together with her firm Progressive Connections, has received over $600,000 in

payments from the Waters campaign since 2006.

The Washington Free Beacon reached out to Waters' office for comment on the payments

last week but did not receive a response."

The corruption in California seems to run deep.

Maxine Waters allegedly went after the daughter of a sitting president for no reason while

she pays her own daughter $750k to send out 200,000 mailers.

Really?

Either she carried those mailers to each address herself or Waters is just getting a really

bad deal.

Should this be investigated?

Does anyone believe it costs that much to mail a few items?

It seems like quite an expense that may have come with a side order of fraud.

Will you share this with someone who might be interested?

Do you think Maxine Waters is wrapped up in fraudulent activity?

What would happen if the "mailers" situation was looked into further by the authorities?

Share your comments below so you can join in the conversation about it.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

USA facts today

For more infomation >> Mad Maxine About To Lose It All After Trump Busts Her In BIG Lie – LOCK HER UP For Good! - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State - Duration: 14:39.

With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State

Despite being weakened, the deep state is still at war with President Trump.

Their operatives are lurking in the corners of the White House, waiting to strike.

But with one question that Trump hadn't even considered, Rand Paul may have destroyed

them for good.

Virtually every high-level official with anti-Trump loyalties has been taken down.

But the anti-Trump movement is still working to creep their way back into the higher levels

of the Trump administration.

And in a shocking turn of events, somebody who Trump nominated could actually be an agent

of the deep state.

On the surface, CIA director nominee Gina Haspel seems to be a good fit in the Trump

administration.

That's why every single Republican Senator is supporting her.

Well, every Republican Senator besides one.

Senator Rand Paul is refusing to support Haspel, and for good reason.

Paul is wondering whether Haspel was involved in spying on Donald Trump during his 2016

presidential campaign.

His suspicion is well warranted.

Haspel was very high up in the CIA as the spying was going on.

It is not only possible, but extremely likely that Haspel either knew it was going on, or

was directly involved.

As reported by Politico:

"RAND PAUL HAS ONE LAST QUESTION FOR CIA DIRECTOR NOMINEE GINA HASPEL: WAS SHE AT ALL

INVOLVED WITH ANY SURVEILLANCE OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP DURING THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN?

THE KENTUCKY SENATOR SENT HASPEL A LETTER ON TUESDAY LAYING OUT HIS SUSPICIONS.

THE MISSIVE AMOUNTS TO A LAST-MINUTE EFFORT TO DERAIL HASPEL BEFORE HER EXPECTED CONFIRMATION

BY ATTEMPTING TO GET THE PRESIDENT'S OWN CIA NOMINEE TO ADMIT TO BEING AWARE OF THE

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MONITORING THE PRESIDENT.

"SHE'S HIGH ENOUGH UP IN THE CIA.

I THINK WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT SHE KNOWS ABOUT WHETHER THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WAS SURVEILLED

UPON," PAUL SAID ON FOX NEWS.

"BEFORE SHE'S APPOINTED, IF SHE IS INDEED APPOINTED, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT DOES

SHE KNOW ABOUT THE SURVEILLANCE OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND WHY WAS THE CIA INVOLVED?"

TRUMP IN 2017 ACCUSED FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA OF HAVING HIS "WIRES TAPPED" IN

TRUMP TOWER IN NEW YORK.

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LATER SAID THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SUCH WIRETAPS.

ONE TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER, CARTER PAGE, WAS THE SUBJECT OF FBI SURVEILLANCE, AND OTHER

TRUMP ADVISERS HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE WHO WERE BEING MONITORED.

PAUL IS THE ONLY REPUBLICAN SENATOR WHO OPPOSES HASPEL RIGHT NOW.

ENOUGH DEMOCRATS HAVE COME OUT IN SUPPORT OF HER THIS WEEK TO SEAL HER CONFIRMATION

BEFORE THE END OF THE MONTH."

If Haspel was indeed directly involved in spying on the President, that would be relevant

information for him to know.

And if she knew it was going on, she should at the very least be required to explain herself.

This new revelation could be a serious warning sign about her future in the Trump administration.

She currently has enough support, as a number of Democrats have decided to support her nomination,

and could be confirmed by the end of the month.

Do you think that Trump should look into whether his CIA nominee was involved in spying on

his campaign?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

For more infomation >> With One Question Rand Paul May Have Destroyed The Deep State - Duration: 14:39.

-------------------------------------------

Family Makes Tragic Announcement About Sen John McCain - Duration: 10:54.

Family Makes Tragic Announcement About Sen. John McCain

An announcement about Arizona Senator John McCain has just been made that indicates that

he may be nearing the end of his battle with cancer.

Fox News reported that McCain has announced that he does not want to be buried at Arlington

National Cemetery, where his father and grandfather are buried.

Instead, he would like to be buried next to his old Navy buddy Chuck Larson in Maryland.

In his memoir "The Restless Wave," McCain wrote that he wants to be laid to rest "in

the cemetery on the Severn (River) in Maryland, back where it began."

"I want to smell the rose-scented breeze and feel the sun on my shoulders," McCain

wrote.

"I want to watch the hawks hunt from the sycamore, and then take my leave bound for

a place near my old friend Chuck Larson, in the cemetery on the Severn (River), back where

it began."

A spokesman for the Naval Academy confirmed that McCain has a dedicated plot at the cemetery

that is close to Larson.

The two were lifelong friends after meeting at the Naval Academy, and they remained close

until Larson passed away in 2014 at the age of 77.

In his memoir, McCain wrote that Larson was someone he "looked up to since we were boys,"

and called it a "privilege and an honor, as a young man and an old one, to serve in

Chuck's shadow," in a statement at the time of his Navy friend's death.

This comes as McCain continues to battle a glioblastoma, which is an aggressive form

of brain cancer.

"I don't know how much longer I'll be here," McCain said.

"Maybe I'll have another five years.

Maybe with the advances in oncology, they'll find new treatments for my cancer that will

extend my life.

Maybe I'll be gone before you hear this.

My predicament is, well, rather unpredictable.

But I'm prepared for either contingency, or at least I'm getting prepared.

I have some things I'd like to take care of first, some work that needs finishing,

and some people I need to see."

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

For more infomation >> Family Makes Tragic Announcement About Sen John McCain - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

Bill O'Reilly to Return to Television With Brand New Show Says Report - Duration: 10:54.

Bill O'Reilly to Return to Television With Brand New Show Says Report

Former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly held the 8 p.m. Eastern slot for more than ten

years.

He beat out all of his competitors in cable-news when it came down to ratings.

Things have changed drastically since these days.

O'Reilly has been on a kind of hiatus from primetime for about a year now, but things

may be changing very soon.

It was reported by the New York Post on Monday that the former Fox News host has been talking

with Newsmax TV.

They have been discussing the possibility of a new show.

It was reported by the Post's Page Six website that Newsmax is also talking to former Fox

News hosts Eric Bolling and Greta Ban Susteren about hosting their own shows on the network.

The Western Journal reported on May 3 that Bolling struck a deal with Conservative Review's

CRTV.

He] will be hosting a digital show for the service, which runs on subscriptions.

Emily Smith, a reporter for Page Six, quoted a source, claiming that there have been no

deals signed as of yet, however there are talks between Newsmax and all of the former

Fox News hosts mentioned.

She wrote that they "are in the advanced stages, certainly with O'Reilly."

On top of that, Bill O'Reilly, Bolling, and Van Susteren are speaking with Shawn Spicer,

former White House Press Secretary, about the possibility of him hosting a show which

is based on panel discussions regarding politics.

Smith's source told her, "The thinking is, following a 6 p.m. news show, Greta would

anchor the 7 p.m. hour, O'Reilly would be back at 8 p.m., and Bolling could smoothly

continue on at 9 p.m. Spicer and his cohorts would go on at 10 p.m., with the later slot

allowing the show to be looser."

Western Journal reports:

Newsmax has a reach of approximately 50 million homes via DirecTV, Dish Network, various cable

services and a handful of over-the-air channels across the country.

Its programs also stream free online.

Despite having the highest-rated cable news show, O'Reilly was fired from Fox News on

April 19, 2017 following an investigation into claims by multiple women over sexual

harassment.

Just weeks prior to O'Reilly's dismissal, The New York Times ran a story claiming five

women had been paid a total of $13 million to settle harassment claims against the anchor.

Since Bill O'Reilly was let go from Fox News, he has been laying fairly low, but there

have been multiple rumors recently of him making a comeback to television.

One America News Network reported in June that they had offered the former Fox Host

a show on their network.

They rescinded the offer when O'Reilly's agent never responded to them.

O'Reilly was said to be talking with Sinclair Broadcast Group in October in order to host

a daily show that would last two hours.

The show would be "syndicated via Sinclair's network of U.S. broadcast stations.

Sinclair owns more than 170 channels in 80 marks across the country.

However, Sinclair announced in November it was not pursuing a deal with O'Reilly."

O'Reilly was interviewed by radio host Glenn Beck last June, when he admitted that he did

have interest in making a comeback to television, but only if he were to get a show on a competitive

network.

"It has to be the right vehicle.

It has to be a vehicle that's competitive, because I'm having fun," O'Reilly explained

to Beck.

"I never wake up and say, 'Gee, I wish I could commute to New York City today for

an hour and a half and walk into a tension-packed cauldron."

For more infomation >> Bill O'Reilly to Return to Television With Brand New Show Says Report - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

Tampa Bay teacher qualifies for Olympic trials after marathon - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> Tampa Bay teacher qualifies for Olympic trials after marathon - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

The Coriolis Effect Thinks It can Have Its Cake and Eat it Too - Duration: 1:01:11.

and then later on Foucault was given credit for inventing what this guy had

already invented sounds like mysterious death to me yeah oh I don't need that

digging into Foucault real quick I you know what building he hung that pendulum

forgot that pendulum from it was the French pantheon out of all the buildings

he could've hung it from why did he have to hang it in a building called the

temple of the gods so sounds kind of like a religious ceremonial thing like

they're they're given opulence to these gods or something to help empower the

lies they're telling sort of like NASA naming their program after Apollo

apollyon revelation that the lord of the pit I mean it really all it all kind of

you always trace it back to some kind of spirituality or belief system uh yeah

these guys are every single one of these guys is a cultic to the max man uh

everything when you start digging through their history and we've all me

and him have only scratched the surface on these guys I mean there's a list of

72 names and we're only like a quarter of the way through the first couple

names that we decided to take a look at

hi Brian Brian di hey how's it going it's going good what's up was Brian are

Brian's the master gunner yes Brian yes hello

so Brian how long did you guys train to account for the Coriolis effects when

you were learning to shoot never never that's that means never

why not Brian if the Earth's rotating then would when you have to take that

into account would that affect earth where he did what were you shooting 120

and below okay so what's the next distance on those things yeah

pretty far would you say farther than your standard or average rifle

oh yeah several miles okay so we have to take the 40 miles back into account for

ballistic missiles and ballistics our actual field manuals which are very hard

to get all them the actual training manuals ever mention this and none of

this whole people we've talked to every gateway I got I gotta correct you on

that there is a Coriolis effects I've seen them just never use them never

had to use them so you actually seen them in a real manual not major public

release not labeled top-secret than me it's called a firing table it's called a

firing table yeah okay there is supposedly in there but we never used it

ever we told not to use it now just there

isn't because he doesn't he like you don't have to start counting for it

until they like over a thousand yards or whatever

right no I mean no I should lopper i shoot further than that or not it's kind

of like if you ask a geodetic survey or when does he use the mass for the

curvature they know it it's one of those things are taught but they've never

actually used it so this I'm saying does this table take an account for different

places like maybe if you're stationed you know in South Australia the spin

rate of yours far different than say if you're stationed Texas it doesn't it

doesn't see the problem I've had with it is it takes in latitude of where you are

and longitude but it doesn't take in effect which way you're firing which

would technically that would have you have to know which direction you're

firing no matter which way you are because east and west would be exact

opposites reaction right so then that's actually in manuals it there is a

calculation in manuals that you can find but ironically it's not used here's my

quick question real quick what does this hang out what a man what did you all

join me and why I'm just glad you answered that glad you answered a great question

this is the Roast of Brian Burton did you hear here's the thing okay there is

calculations in the manuals and all that however it's just like my tanks and the

tanks they have computers that calculated all this shit supposedly we

got we got gyros and everything else okay however when shit hits a fan I have

manual ways of doing things and nowhere do I put in where I am on the planet as

they call it or which direction or Coriolis effect or anything else nowhere

do I ever do that a manual calculation there is

form you let it do it but never had to do and I've never missed so I'm not sure

worried about so no I do not those stories of snipers taking effect

and all that never happen I've known snipers and they've never

done it either so these are your YouTube gun works type snipers that shoot tin

cans out in the backyard okay I'm talking about military-grade snipers

that actually shoot so the military-grade snipers do not take into

account the Coriolis effect I guess I've never met one to actually do it I was

talking to a marine on Saturday at the meet up with Jaron in Palmdale and thank

you though he's still in it he still does he's an instructor and he's still

not for the military anymore but just private right and we were talking about

like the Coriolis and the curve of the earth the earth and all that and yeah

bunch of crap this it's a bunch of crap so then if that is in your manual Brian

then do they explained in the manual how aircraft would be able to land again if

they have given you calculations for the Coriolis effect and ballistic firing no

see here's the funny thing they don't really explain so when I calculate where

excuse the animals when I calculate where all around goes they give us this

formula and there is a spot to put quote your latitude longitude but when you do

the math it's irrelevant is it's almost doesn't matter it doesn't matter it

really doesn't it's a dummy equation almost they don't tell you that they

just this is what you do and this is what we do we do go through the stuff

but you never take effect of where you are on the I'm going to have to use

global term sorry where you are on the planet and which direction you're facing

and how high up you are and with decay the calculations aren't there it's

almost a dummy equation in there we don't need it you really don't I've

never had to use it mmm never had a problem okay

well that is interesting Brian I appreciate you sharing that with us you

know then and that's my thing if those calculations were needed then

my thing is airplanes would also be affected and exactly airplanes we need

it all right out there balloons all kinds of things and there's no way a

helicopter airplane or balloons going to land on something that can spin much

faster than what it's rated to fly and also you got to figure to think about a

guy on the ground there is no way he can calculate or have the instrumentation

not only to figure out where he is exactly which direction he's firing and

to do the calculation for how fast it's turning and it's that's a heck of a math

problem maybe a computer could do it but a guy on the ground now so have you been

in combat situations before yes and so when you're in combat

situations isn't reaction-time important yeah if you don't we actually die it's

pretty simple okay so we only wouldn't have the ten minutes or so to sit there

figuring all that out no no or our manual the way I fire my tank manually

and all that no we set everything a prior for a manual shooting but like I

said once I go to manual there's nowhere I am on the planet there is no which

direction I'm firing is it going north east west for the spin or anything it's

not there none of its there and you've never had issues no matter where you're

at doc you laid the quarry also that never Wow

this is good section to hang out guys if anything we should cut this part out

with the things when I told us it's uh put that on our channel is it some good

stuff because I I did a thing on earth spin and a flame landing and I'm just

not buying the fact that the Earth's rotating as fast as they claim if at all

if the earth was rotating like they said in all if it play devil's advocate if it

was and everything then they're lying to us on how they calculate it it's

basically my background is most of the shit they tell us is a lie because it

doesn't make sense by their own terms it doesn't make sense when you compare it

so in the military they they give you the manuals and the stains but they

don't enforce the things they know is a bunch of nonsense is that kind of what

you're saying well you're trained on how to do things

and then when it happens you do it and if you're wrong and they go back and

double-check you but I've never known anyone to be wrong by not using any

Coriolis effect that makes sense yeah correct so that's kind of strange that

they would have that into manuals it is but it's almost like they talk about

gyros on planes and self correction on gyros which doesn't make sense

send the manuals but in practical use I've never seen it practically applied

so I guess the word to be used okay so it's like it's written in there to

explain a question but it doesn't really it's not used

that's so this how you can have a whole bunch of the boys working at NASA and

and still be clueless as to what's going on if they never apply themselves

compartment ties everything and can go well how do we the gyroscope stays

physical in space how do we take account for when it goes around and it goes well

using this calculations you should automatically we'll adjust it then uh

but it's never actually used you know I'm saying right so like I've always

like I talked to geodetic survey or once for about an hour a friend of mine and

he was explaining me and he explained to me all the things he learned about the

curvature of the earth and the calculations and all that he let him

talk for like an hour seriously he explained everything to me and then I

asked him one question when did you practically ever use it he

pause well I never have I was like okay but you learned it I got it and I got

you all your knowledge but you've never actually used it why and that was the

end of the conversation amazing because they didn't actually think about it they

know what they were taught but when you actually comes to use it sound like a

pilot flying if you ask them the question will you ever nose up or nose

dive or whatever and they go no they just you don't think about it when

you're doing the jobs half the time you just you're doing your job you're doing

it the way it works and all that and you just don't think about all the other

stuff so your jobs to make sure you're accurate and keep safe and keep the

people your wish safe to the best your ability and none of this other stuff

comes into play never had to use it that's some amazing information Brian

thank you I mean maybe someone's used it but I've never met anybody use it I'll

tell you that and you've met a lot of people that had

an opportunity to use these things oh yeah

it's a shame at the time I never asked the question really but I know we've

never used it you know I'm saying right like again you're doing your job you

never think about flat or curved you just doing your job so you never thought

about it amazing anybody else got questions for Brian that's some great

stuff I know there's more people on there yeah I'm here I talked to Brian

every day I was gonna say I'm probably Brian are you gonna be on later tonight

after Mark show as well mark show by the way will be a rerun tonight Oh Oh then I

won't feel so bad if I'm streaming over it that's why I strained early today

because I knew everybody was gonna be over there so I didn't want to do

he blew his computer up he's got a new one coming in tomorrow but he'll be a

rerun tonight works they already got him in trouble in college and now they got

him in trouble again now his computer was probably like I am overworked and

underpaid good night my profession he's an old it's an old computer and he

finally did it hey Josh did you read that article about the longest shot you

sent to me or the link you posted I didn't read it yet I'm on my phone that

was just a list of the longest sniper shots Hoosier flatty actually I think

posted the link that you were talking about yet the world's longest sniper

kill the enemy shot dead at 3,800 71 yards over two miles away

yeah in May 2017 the sniping community was rocked by incredible news of

Canadian sniper team operating in the Middle East made a successful kill at a

distance of more than two miles where do you put that in my I believe I heard

that one before I just I'd like to I'd love to talk to them and see if they

have anything about coriolis here at candy if you want all off with this this

link to this article in the back chat okay where did he put it I have it it's

in the chat like you're you're sorry when I was downstairs and then also

you know what's funny is the Wikipedia article needs to catch up there's that

article right now said this was happened in mid 2017 and this Wikipedia article

is given a shot from 2009 the hell my gosh this is why we don't depend on

Wikipedia I didn't say I did you know I know em too much but I don't know what

could be is at least a good stepping off point my Wikipedia is just regular user

people putting stuff in here well that's why it isn't the end-all

be-all of my research it's usually where I start to see what other people are

saying about it you know oh yeah that's good it's always a good idea to double

cross check your facts of notes so while you're on the subject and while I'm here

if y'all checked into the net sorry that was a joke sailboat races no I want you

to look up I want you to look up the fastest sailboat race the fastest the

world record for sailing around the equator going west to east look up that

how long it the world record for that no no 40 days 40 days and the world record

for sailing the Antarctic race around Antarctica by sailboat just guess let

him guess rooms I'll let you guess it takes 40 days

there's a world record to go around the equator now that's actually even from

Europe going through the Mediterranean I guess 80 you take like two years to go

around an article no no this is actually happen last year you tell me when you

want me tell you and I'll tell you I want to I'm starting to think that I may

be heard it was over 100 that's my guess around 124 month

I'll tell you when you're ready mix everyone candy how many days 20 days

nope clothes around the world in 80 days past

four - no that's that's a movie all right

it's a hundred two days do we have do we have a map of both races you can pull it

up if you google them right now seriously there's a world record the

Antarctic race goes around around this I think it's a 60 degree parallel around

the just around Antarctica bolter sailboats okay and I already guys

marathon or something like that and art a cup or something like that we're doing

this would not know that we're going around the entire world because it's

Antarctica all weekend for the baggage so they're really going around right how

could it take six for two-thirds the distance right

okay so basically they just circle around Antarctica yes roof of the eye

quality but it takes almost it takes you know over twice as long to go around in

our car than it does the equator dodging the continents around the equator you

can't go around India and the Philippines and back up through the

Panama Canal and

hey you think it'd be faster how simple math would say was faster cuz it's no

but well I'm saying okay so it would be double the distance from around the

equator because it's two times as far out yeah third thing that's why

committee that's about as proof if I can hit that's where I came up with a

hundred and twenty days yeah 102 days you're close

does anybody have a estimated size of baseball just carry on the rough guess

about 30,000 miles I don't know let me change runs real quick to get

that at calculation I'm just fucking around guys I'm not really anybody know

the scene yeah well let's see that's the funny thing because if you take the

speed and their distance supposedly it's too slow around Antarctica it's just

today I'm slow for those speed race boats I think we calculated about three

or four miles an hour or something like that I don't know but it's too damn slow

and this sounds like they were stealing backwards hey you said simple math how

far would you travel at three miles an hour in 102 days so that's about 60

that's about 70 miles a day you're not even going like a thousand miles yeah I

can't what is but the big factor here all yeah look at it it's like I said

forty days around the equator here in two days around Antarctica

if it's a globe it should be smaller yeah for sure I just want to I'd like

we're still we're still missing a whole lot of miles if it's an ice wall no

that's the thing here doing some calculations right gotta figure out how

fast if it's an ice wall at the s moguls equity business projection we are still

missing prep time two miles wait a second

they race around the 60 degrees so not all the way guys walk

I mean that we need to know the factors of why they're taking so Gripen long to

write are they running into ice because you can't run an ice at that parallel

you can but look at that here's the funny thing

this is a race that happens every year the world records 102 days right right

so that's fine it takes them that long with whatever however how come you can

go around the entire almost equator and actually you have to go extra mileage

because kink or on the equator cuz of landmass you gotta go through some

canals and around the continents in less than half the time think about that for

a second those are the two records right so there's some factors here and I'm

glad you brought this up because we were discussing the earth map the last

several days here yeah so it's something to look into

yeah that's why I say it's just something to look into just the two

quick records somebody explained why it takes so much longer thinking longer

doesn't necessarily mean anything depending on conditions I think you're

absolutely right but it could somebody cuz I'm noticing

on Facebook there are a lot of anti azimuthal equidistant posts now a lot of

flat earthers are fed up getting beat to death over that map

and yeah and the media just really eats us alive but oh yeah we live in a dump

snow globe with an ice wall I mean makes this sound like complete total idiots oh

yeah let's be honest it's no more idiot than just saying the world is flat

period I mean from their point of view it's a same level it is but you got to

realize though how can you measure distance in the ocean

supposedly we have the UTM grid system which is far as we can tell is accurate

it's a satellite based system for GPS and all that right but really if you

stretched it out through the oceans because you can't physically run a wheel

or walk or measure because you're going against currents and water and

everything else so the basic distance is based off of star projections of

triangulation and whatnot that's the only way and assuming it already is a

curve because you have to put the curve factor in there for those distances well

it's kind of the amazing thing about the UTM grid nobody uses polar coordinates

they don't hand you a ball and tell you to plot your tank trajectory or your

plane trajectory on the ball you're handed a flat map with a UTM grid system

right with a mouse right so the UTM grid is accurate on a flat Mercator style map

on a globe it takes a very complex math to translate those coordinate systems

from a polar Polar perspective yeah because they drop off lines merge and

whatnot right but the grid system is in perfect same sized squares all the way

across the Mercator map we checked it we count up the squares the distances from

sitting to Santiago measure up they're accurate and so the and so now we're

like well GPS works so what's up with the map because there's no curvature

rate and the muffle equidistance our GPS would not

work at all because the grid system would not even begin to fit well

actually here's your here's your issue

Hemisphere whether it's your AE map or either globe because it's the same in

the Northern Hemisphere and the southern hemisphere the only way you can actually

check it is if you have a big enough landmass to cross we don't because then

you go to the ocean and you can talk to many people who actually sail to like

Australia or something like that and they'll tell you their their time going

into the southern ports is what you're saying Brian as we all band together

debunk Australia tell everybody else billions not real no I'm just the

problem that a map is we can't figure out the distances in the ocean which is

the majority of southern hemisphere but what what happens if those distances are

correct according to a flat Mercator projection weapons at the UTM grid is

correct weapons if the distance from Santiago to say Sydney is accurate first

to Johannesburg I mean over the Indian Ocean the only logical explanation would

be it would have to be a ball I mean it would have to be but what happens if

it's not it's not a ball there's no curvature r8d you ever are you a

Christian at all Brian yes I am so what happens if scripture is actually

accurate and scripture like ecclesiastics 1:5 that tells us sunsets

sunrises getting hastens back to this place in other words the Sun resets

according to Psalm 19 the Sun starts a circuit again and resets every day this

and we have video of double Sun and sunset this occurs over the Pacific what

happens if somehow the earth repeats

well that is such I mean I'm not gonna go into there because that is such us

I mean you're talking like I don't know out of my league for like I don't doors

or dimensional portals to jump you back over no no I got you and I can't I'll

say this I don't believe it but I can't debunk it right you know a lot of lot of

fly directors that claim to be Christians like the book Enoch in the

book and he talks about the two portals of the east and west that son goes

through we have video undeniable that on my desktop of a Sun setting and Sun

rising again just like scripture tells us and BG we got a Mexico we got them

from the North and South Pole this event only occurs over the Pacific you'll find

these and YouTube videos called planet narubu boo-boo Planet X or whatever they

claim it is and and so that's correct in Scripture

so NASA also has this theory about magnetic portals to the Sun on either

end of the pole these magnetic portals just instantly get you to the Sun 93

million miles away of course and so you know this is what we are looking at

because the azimuthal equidistance was a great idea to start but it's not

matching of what we know to be true photography wise and I have I talked to

a qf 2827 Island I met him up all places on Midwest sight medibot org but he sent

me all the 747-400 plane data and he's not lying unless his planes lying to him

I got it right off the term but also there has to be something else there

hiding there has to be something else with missing there has to be something

else we need to know yes definitely there is something else but that's why I

was sick it's like the race okay why somebody explain why that's all I ask is

why is it taking almost three times as long to go around Erica

I'm missing something you're absolutely right if it's not flat fine

why definitely and I'm glad you brought that dos tres this up because that is

something I could have been looking and research because I need to know the

history Brad right I mean most of our questions you have to understand the

biggest problem between globalists and Flat Earth is we ask a question it's

just like just explain to us why and we'll accept it but we don't get the

explanation yeah okay you know that area in Pacific I told you where the Sun

resets according to scripture scripture tells us the Sun does this I believe I

am the Christian guy you know I'm not a fan of Enoch I know some are so that's

fine and Enoch talks about these portals and

all that I can only prove possibly one but operation fishable they were on

Johnston Island that is west of Hawaii correct and they were on an island close

to Fiji all right the corrugated some southern

corrugated reach and some some that is the area where people have seen this

double sunset they just happen to be there this is what they write they write

there they're looking at a roars and they're and they're dealing with Earth's

electromagnetic field because you know if everybody's been falling Bob and

Sharon and blow Buster's and all the other talk I think we're all sort of

settling on the fact we live in electromagnetic universe is everybody

with me here yep yes all right good I didn't I didn't accept it at first I

thought well it can't be because gods weren't this and the moons are physical

this that God God they just don't understand man and then I had to wake up

because it's like the universe you know I it took me a while to come to this

conclusion to but these are they're on these two regions right Brian Johnston

Island and then on the other side the atmosphere and the southern corrugated

reaches just east of Fiji and this is what they said the aurora associated

with the high altitude nuclear explosion especially the roars that appear almost

instantly far away from the explosion in the opposite hemisphere were not clearly

under joy in other words they created an

Aurora on Johnston Island and this Aurora would flip over on the negative

polarized side of Earth the negative bill NB C over on the southern

hemisphere as it like it portal Dover they're testing in this area for reason

and they're testing Earth's magnetic field this is the same place we see the

sunset and rise again this is the same place that some of us may believe or

earth repeats and this is all I'm saying we have some kind of clues that maybe

would make us look into this a little bit more it all needs to be researched

more you have to just ask the questions and then figure out find the answers and

that's the issue with everybody so what you're telling me is I need to go hang

out on an island in the Pacific only if you bring me only if it's in Fiji and if

you're buying the drinks yes okay but seriously thinking about what's

logically creaking and the things that aren't physically possible it is how

would that be huh how would that work all right Kane let me ask you this what

do you know is physically possible well I mean anything's possible but I just I

don't I don't think how it works how

mainstream science has quote the laws of physics and everything else that we've

always gone by or we've taught up till the last ten years right you've taught

basic laws of physics you know kantrelle fashion light blah blah blah all the

other garbage and then they've introduced quantum physics right now

what does quantum physics do our religion it changes the rules they said

well they're you can't do this unless this happens we've discovered this is

theoretically PUC so they can change the rules that you think is logical that

they go by and they've done it all throughout history you know if

you know if someone can heal somebody they're a witch oh wait now we

understand it it's a matter of understanding it all eventually in the

mainstream science the problem you have with scientist is they have to make

their money and they've got to get published and all that so they come up

with theories and most of the theories are not repeatable learn it their

theories it's a great thought it makes you feel good but they're just series

I'm not proven right in a magnetic field candy a a magnetic field you can have a

portal a total field wrap around that is theoretically possible NASA they never

talk about the quantum mechanics of the physics NASA is always interested in the

electromagnetic field that's why they spray all that barium and chemtrails up

in there so they can track the magnetic field of Earth and so looking at

Scripture looking at the Katara fee of Earth I am going to take the stance that

it is possible with some evidence we have though it's little that this is a

possibility and NASA's already told us they have magnetic portals but nobody

questions that you know the only question if a flat earth or says some

crazy like you're three beats wait when did nasus say we have magnetic portals I

missed that one yes please I'd be interested in looking at that

they mentioned lots of things about magnetics and portals it's like they're

like tell me something you know if you want to if you want to mess with you on

their own turf when you start mentioning stuff like this I'm not saying I got

your theory I'm not saying it's impossible but if you want to mess with

them just ask him but what about your science of folding space and warp speed

yes yeah yeah they're working on that it's the same thing it would be the same

thing as quote your portals from one side of the earth to the other it would

actually be the same thing it's a folded space or write whatever you want

if you want to talk about traveling to another galaxy but you bring it up down

here and like no well it's the same thing so couldn't you apply it can I put

the link in Google thing yeah that's all I'm saying because we have to explain it

and I have to explain earth in my opinion to to account for what the Bible

says and the Bible definitely says the Sun resets runs his race he goes back to

his tabernacle and does it again the earth the deferment of the earth was

spread over where the Fermin ends or things okay so now I don't know

understand Johnston Island why the portal would be magnetically north to

south I don't understand what they were doing there and why the portals reversed

so honestly I don't understand everything but you don't

did you have the answer you'd be rich and famous and I would yes I realize me

I just stick to the the more physical things that can actually be proven and

explained curvature of the earth and whatnot and it's like that and we still

can't get the answers on that you know why can we see Chicago skyline without

it being inverted why can't we measure the curve why don't surveys measure the

curve there is no Coriolis effect stuff like that right it's a tangible argument

that we can have way proof you know like I always say I can't go find out what

the sun's made up because I can't build a rocket to theoretically even try to go

up there and get through a dome if there is one and everything I can't do that so

we can argue about it all day long but can you explain to me why we can't

measure the curve all right what about airplanes that are flying from one side

to the other I mean they there's the thing that they're doing for portal 2

because that would have to be possible right well not not a like a portal like

we see on like science fiction it just wraps around it just sort of like just

continues but the Sun does have a reset position see free

she believes their two portals I have no evidence of two portals I have this

buggy as it released it yet you know and I'm not gonna say anything it's free

energy but the thing is scriptures does say the Sun does reset and the Sun only

goes to the end of the earth that's it that's in Psalm 19

and so if Scripture is correct and I believe it is then there has to be some

kind of repetitive motion east and west of the earth which would explain why 80%

of our observations can can be explained on the globe model well if not all of

them but how would you explain on there on your theory I mean just to bring it

up something you gotta research I know you won't probably have you answer so

when you're in the northern hemisphere like all the way up there can't Alaskan

Russian all that which you can almost walk around where how would you get to

reset there on a landmass I'm saying right and another thing 24 hours Sun if

we can get a 24 hour Sun from the North Pole

that that sort of would you know what does the Sun do I've got a son that

resets and the South Pole you you see the Sun skip across the sky okay but I

don't have a North Pole and so you know we just thinking there's a nice portal

in the Pacific somewhere it may be a little more complex than that it would

have to be I mean they've done it wrong I love your theory to work it out and I

think you should strive and work it out but the question is like I said to

northern the 24 hours on the north and what not right it's it's nothing to

discourage or to drop from but it is again it's those questions that you have

to be honest and ask exactly and that's what we're looking at but Scripture is

always going to be right the Sun is going to reset Earth is going to only

spread out to be into heaven that's the fact and so and so then we have to

observe those facts and make sense of them somehow well here's your problem -

no offense I'm not cuz I am a Christian but arguing Scripture

with a lot of globalist or atheist or even just hardcore scientists the

problem is is you from their point of view okay from their point of view

you're taking the word of somebody that wrote something down and just going with

it absolutely and that's why I have lovely people on here like Karen and you

know and she Lou the wand and other wonderful flat earthers to step in

because I'm not sure I believe in violence

right throwing that out there okay you're not so sure you believe in

what the Bible okay and so I guess now we can add candy to the mix so we got

these other people I'm not sure I don't know that's where I'm at right and we

got Bob and Jerry I mean so you know that we've got other perspectives here

we've got others perspectives that are just as valid okay and and so that you

know I think that's a good point actually I'm talking to a sociologist or

what entrepot mother whatever he is he's looking at the Christian flat earther

aspects the and the non-christians and the social social aspect of Flat Earth

that's what he's studying and so having this diversity in itself is the key to

getting answers for sure I actually I I connected with that guy

on skype I'm probably on talk to him next week he is a cool guy Karen you

like yeah he was very nice and yeah and so and you are by choice Karen I could

have talked to Sandra but he wanted a female so

all the females no offence candy but Garen came up you are part of the Flat

Earth core right still yes yes I am that was ok ok I just can do okay so you

were definitely the choice then since he wanted a female perspective well I

appreciate that I'm glad you thought of me and well the other females I know are

kind of emotional and get distraught and post things on Facebook it's - wait that

wasn't you was it candy yeah that's me I know stuff on my post stuff on Facebook

to start stirring up the hornet's nest so I could start deleting people that's

what I do

planners rough man I get this ticket tapered comments all day tell me I'm fat

stupid religious Jesus is it real and

that wasn't me because I did tell him but we were not live but I was about to

give up on live streaming but no I didn't post it off but that was personal

reasons though it's people for the people who you think are friends kind of

turning on you without you even knowing it and then you find out like we all

need a break man we all need a break right it gets a little much he gets a

little much I can deal with this now I just laugh at them the funny but it was

more the people that I thought were friends

turning behind me when I'm not looking that's what I got started so now just

know that nobody really a friend I have a couple that are just a cover

okay so somebody's coming here so yes let's cover I took a lot of heat from

wolfies video Karen oh yeah yeah and I did examine it I did talk to Wolfie

he gave me supposedly all the facts so I am going to share my screen and I'm not

going to go through all the numbers or everything that he gave me supposedly

this was the Lion out I'll use Imperial measurements the line was out at 16

miles it was a p900 supposedly the camera was 30 feet 33 feet above water

and I'll share my screen and hopefully I won't share I don't see my picture here

so let me look at that maybe it'll pull it up I don't want to share the Hangout

and I did all the math but it modeled it okay so does everybody see my screen yes

yes good good yeah I have a bad habit of destroying angles that way I was trying

to stop that in my life so people asked me back but the bottom line is that if

this boat is under the curvature of the water we're missing 15 to 20 feet of

curvature that's what all the math came out to be okay and I did that by getting

all the dimensions of the boat doing the earth calculation and curvature rate and

I sent this to Wolfie where you see this blue line should be the water line

and Wolfie accepted it he did not he couldn't refute it because he's the one

that gave me the curvature rates and the math and all the numbers and I said

you're missing a bunch of curvature right here but here's the thing because

we don't know for a fact how the guy knew his camera was 33 feet above the

water or the fact that this boat was actually 60 miles out exactly we don't

have exact numbers I told Wolfie it's kind of inconclusive we're missing

curvature rate according to the numbers you gave but will he's getting the

numbers off of somebody else because he just murdered the video all right so

that that was that issue solved I'm gonna put that to rest and what we did

not argue or disagree with me at all he knows the numbers he knows the deal so

so I actually get along with Wolfie and he actually helped me make a video one

time about the low model and gets it back straight in there so that's what

happened with all that it's not a perspective issue the video was not

tampered I did check that I'm really good at that that's I debunked NASA like

the video wasn't tampered it wasn't faked so this is what you would expect

to see okay but we are not on that picture I got a question on that picture

yeah sure there's two boats there right why is one so low when it's so close to

the other one well it's not close to the other one it's quite a few distance out

zoomed in with the p900 it's not that far out from it because if

you look at it again the size of the conex is compared to the boat and the

whole of the boats that you can see it's not that far away well once again if the

boat was not that far away then we would bust them on showing too much curvature

but how low it is compared to the first boat right look at it look at it and you

can see the Conn axes and whatnot on it

sis let me drop this picture in our thing so everybody can kind of look at

it you know at their leisure okay all right so the pictures in the Google

thing can all look at that and I'll drop my picture into some measurements that I

had made and modeled in saying I didn't know the camera was 33 feet above water

that that that information came in just today oh yeah by the way our cameras

live well that benefits their position of course but still didn't help them

there there's my other picture yeah what is going on in that picture what picture

so you don't think that he faked that video then no the video is not faked the

Sun when you put this through the test the Sun the shadows all match the boat

up front to fake that would take a tremendous amount of work and and you

still get it perfect I'd catch something you know I help Bob and Jerry debunk the

guy that smashed the plate with his mind Bob got in touch with me so and I showed

them how they did it and showed them where they did it in the video that's

what I'm good at the video is not faked it's just you know just because it both

looks like sits behind a curb does it necessarily mean there's curved because

one thing globe earthers forget the earth is curved because the earth has a

curvature rate and so if you're going to have curvature there needs to be a rate

of curvature and this is what they never take an account on so then we know that

the bow looks like it's behind the curvature because you're the scribe is

simply because of that non-uniform density line or whatever sander talked

about this in a paper the nuts line or the boats just Mirage that we don't see

the Mirage effect just because of the angle of the camera but it's there

nevertheless yeah I'm just looking at that and I'm just thinking those two

boats are not as far apart as you think they are

judging from the sizes of the konnex one compared to with the other one well

that's the other issue the the boat 16 miles out that's a really nice picture

for a p900 even its I know they can zoom in amazingly but that's very good

quality for sixty miles out over water with all the hitch atmospherics and so I

question if they gave me the correct distance where that boat was because the

further deeper to put it out that they hurt the case either way I mean that

boat looks like it's fairly close be honest with you but I don't know how

close it is to that I'm just looking between the two boats a distance between

the two boats themselves isn't that far supposedly it's the 60 miles far between

their boats between the two boats yeah cuz the boat in you're looking at in the

distance supposedly 60 miles away supposedly there is no I've just taught

my head okay I knows no way to be that boat the first boat that clearly that

big and still see the conex is that clearly from 16 miles away

I agree just assumed in because it's one picture so those comics they should be a

lot smaller if you have that because I mean perspective distance those con axes

that are quote in this sinking boat of what I'm gonna call it right it's it

they're too big to be 16 miles apart and I agree I agree you know but that's what

Wolfie was given okay so he doesn't have any other information I I can't just

make up stuff I just I can tell you was it faith I can tell you that but I can't

and that's why I told Wolfie I said I don't have correct distances here but

according to your distances will be you're missing 15 to 20 feet of

curvature all right and so he agreed he there's nothing he could say he couldn't

debunk debate me on it and he was very polite about it but

that's what it is it's not a perspective thing it's just I don't have the right

measurements I believe yeah either okay no way though it's to most

of that far apart and if I had the right measurements then we're missing all that

curvature you know we do expect the boat to look like it's going down over the

horizon though just due to the non-uniform density lie which in effect

yeah you know it will Karen knows you know Sandra had talked about that you

know and we know it's that ideal what that is right things look like in a

fairy or Mirage that's what it causes you know I'm gonna post another picture

here and possibly maybe I should share this one no I'll share this one here

there's a little shared thing here okay yeah yeah yeah okay you see this picture

you see this guy walking does everybody see this yeah yeah okay is this guy's

legs vanished behind the curvature rate of the earth no no but you can't even

see his legs but you can see the top of the road but this is the effect of what

happens when this mirror surface hits and a physical object

it creates an inferior Mirage and this is the same effect we see we both go out

on the water every single time they're not going

behind the curvature they're just getting cut off like this man's lakes

here is so you can imagine if this road can cause this effect think about all

the refractive properties in the heat differences of the water in the air out

over the ocean yeah so so regardless I don't think I got the right distances I

think Whoopie was given the wrong stuff he just mirrored it and I regardless of

it that boats not going behind the curvature radians okay it's just not

it's it's the same effect as you saw the guy with the cutoff legs I'll put that

picture in there previous to keep so you can see that but that's what we have and

I think planet Earth course done an excellent job

in the area of refraction they've done some amazing work in that area and

helping explain why we see some of the things we do especially over water

and here's another refractive picture there so that's what we have so we

solved the boat history of boats vanishing over the curve they actually

do not vanish over the do you think there was some lensing going on there to

some magnification during the atmosphere and that's why the boat looks so big you

and that was so far yes Karen I'm glad you brought that up there does

absolutely look like there's some atmospheric lensing occurring and kind

of both kind of bubbled out for the camera lens yes absolutely

you know and I and but once again there's so many factors out there over

water it's really hard to tell what is affecting like how far was the boat but

yeah that thought and actually crossed my mind that we did have some

atmospheric winds a yoke on because the boat almost looked like it was magnified

to the camera you know it kind of looks like that doesn't it yeah that's what

makes me think is going on in that picture when I look at it anyway right

yeah it's ain't here I thought the same thing and but once again you know I how

can you conclusively prove that and I'm talking to Wolfie right Karen so you

know how that kinda goes right you kind of have to have all your facts in order

and put him in a place that he can't say it's not you see what I yeah I can

imagine and that's the place I put him in but you know he's very polite about

he goes okay did he agree that that curvature rate was missing if the

numbers are right but then you know now you know he's in a position to say well

maybe all the numbers weren't correct you see what I'm saying

the earth is still curved we just didn't have the right numbers or whatever you

know how it goes these people five Ryan talk to you later Brian hey

Brian thank you sir waiter bride no problem y'all have a

good one I'll catch y'all a little later all right I'll talk to her

For more infomation >> The Coriolis Effect Thinks It can Have Its Cake and Eat it Too - Duration: 1:01:11.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller Is Done! Trump's Team Just Announced What They're Doing To The Entire Case! - Duration: 7:00.

Mueller Is Done! Trump's Team Just Announced What They're Doing To The Entire Case!

Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's attorney, and longtime associate, just dropped a bombshell

on Wednesday.

Appearing on Fox News on Wednesday Giuliani revealed Special Counsel Robert Mueller should

be wrapping up his investigation, into the so called collusion with Russia by the Trump

campaign.

Giuliani states Mueller "has nothing."

Giuliani stated to Laura Ingraham "It's been a year, he's gotten more than 1.4 million

documents, he's interviewed 28 witnesses, and he has nothing which is why he wants to

bring the president into an interview."

Mueller has notified President Trump's legal team, that he will follow Justice Department

guidance and not seek an indictment against the president.

"All they get to do is write a report," said Giuliani.

A former federal prosecutor and mayor of New York City, Giuliani further revealed that

Mueller's investigators have not responded to five information requests from the president's

team.

That has forced President Trump's legal team to push off making a decision, about

whether the president will sit for an interview with the special counsel a decision they had

hoped to reach by Thursday.

As laid out in a Justice Department memo, federal prosecutors are barred from indicting

a sitting president.

Giuliani states Mueller has no choice but to follow its guidance.

Giuliani states: "They have only exculpatory information about us.

I've been through the documents.

So it's about time to get the darn thing over with.

It's about time to say, Enough.

We've tortured this president enough.

Giuliani states the president's legal team is at this point demanding that Mueller's

investigators, "tell us what you have to get from an interview that you don't already

have, because he has all the facts to make a decision.

We're trying to get him to end this.

This is not good for the American people, and the special counsel's office doesn't

seem to have that sort of understanding, that they're interfering with things that are

much bigger than them or us."

Meanwhile, the special counsel's office and Trump's legal team continue to hash

out the conditions under, which the President will communicate with investigators.

According to Fox News: "Giuliani joined Trump's legal team last month and has repeatedly

warned, that an in-person interview of the president by the special counsel's team

would constitute a perjury trap.

Complicating matters, Trump himself has refused to rule out agreeing to an interview with

Mueller.

In an interview with Fox News Sean Hannity earlier this month, Giuliani said that the

Mueller team had ruled out allowing the Trump team, to submit written answers to the special

counsel's questions.

Giuliani said last week that the president's legal team would oppose, any subpoena unless

they could reach agreement on the ground rules.

He argued that Trump could invoke executive privilege, and the team would point to Justice

Department opinions in fighting a subpoena and on both law and the facts, we would have

the strongest case you could imagine."

Giuliani adds that he is personally ready to challenge any reports issued by Mueller

and his team, stating in a challenge to the special prosecutor, "I think that they have

the facts on which they can write their report.

If you're going to write a fair report, fine, write it.

If you're going to write an unfair report, write it and we will combat it.

We are ready to rip it apart."

Giuliani has pointed to the fact that the Trump team has handed over 1.2 million documents,

to Mueller as evidence of cooperation with the probe, which marks its one-year anniversary

on this week.

Thus far, Mueller's probe has resulted in the resignation of National Security Advisor

Michael Flynn, the arrests of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, and the indictment of 13 Russian

nationals on allegations of hacking the 2016 election, along with the raid of Trump's

personal attorney, Michael Cohen.

Earlier this month, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who is officially in charge

of the Russia investigation admitted, that President Trump cannot be indicted, stating

"The Department of Justice has in the past, when the issue arose, has opined that a sitting

President cannot be indicted.

There's been a lot of speculation in the media about this, I just don't have anything

more to say about it."

According to the NYT: "In a series of memorandums, the Justice Department's Office of Legal

Counsel concluded, that indicting a sitting president would violate the Constitution by

undermining his ability to do his job.

Those memos, too, though, said the answer was a matter of structure and inference.

The Justice Department's regulations require Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, to follow

the department's rules, regulations, procedures, practices, and policies.If the memos bind

Mr. Mueller, it would seem he could not indict Mr. Trump, no matter what he uncovered."

No American court has ever addressed the matter, however elements of the issue were argued

before the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon, in a 1974 case in which Richard

Nixon was forced to comply with a subpoena from special counsel Lee Jaworski, during

the Watergate investigation, however, the issue of an indictment was not ruled on.

"

Giuliani states: "This case is essentially over.

They're just in denial."

He also spoke on President Trump's newly filed financial disclosure which confirms

that President Trump did indeed reimburse his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, for

a $130,000 payment he made to adult film star Stormy Daniels just prior to the 2016 presidential

election.

Giuliani stated of the confirmation of his previous disclosure that the President was

fully aware of the situation "The president was fully aware of it, and endorsed the strategy.

We wouldn't do it without him.

He's the client after all and has a tremendous judgment about things like this."

Giuliani added that the disclosure to the Office of Government Ethics "vindicates

our original strategy," but added that he didn't think the payment should have been

made public in the first place.

He stated "I think it was an expenditure that had to be reimbursed.

They say it's a liability I don't agree that it's a liability because I know the

nature of it, [but] it doesn't matter at this point."

Cohen is the current subject of an ongoing criminal investigation by federal authorities

in New York.

The FBI recently raided his office, apartment, and hotel room as part of that investigation,

however, Giuliani states the Cohen case does not concern President Trump's legal team.

"Not a lick.

We're completely uninvolved in that.

We've gotten assurances that we're not involved with it," he said.

"It's only about Mueller getting the darn thing over with and he owes that to the American

people."

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

top stories today.

For more infomation >> Mueller Is Done! Trump's Team Just Announced What They're Doing To The Entire Case! - Duration: 7:00.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Meghan Markle's mom heads to London ahead of royal wedding amid family drama - Duration: 3:25.

The yoga instructor and social worker is expected to meet with Markle before being introduced to members of the royal family later in the day

She met Prince Harry last year at the Invictus Games in Toronto. After recent family drama, Ragland has been widely speculated as the person who will be walking Markle down the aisle at St

George's Chapel on Saturday. Markle's father, Thomas Markle, told TMZ earlier this week he won't be attending the royal wedding after he suffered a heart attack and was caught staging paparazzi photos in an attempt to fix his public image and make some money

MEGHAN MARKLE'S FATHER REPORTEDLY CAN'T ATTEND ROYAL WEDDING DUE TO SCHEDULED HEART SURGERY He told the gossip site he didn't want to further embarrass the royal family by attending his daughter's wedding

Then hours later, he said he had a change of heart after receiving text messages from Markle in which she said she loved him and was concerned for his health

He flipped his decision once again, telling TMZ on Tuesday he is scheduled for heart surgery and can't travel to Britain

Kensington Palace refused to comment to Fox News Monday on the report that Thomas wasn't walking the "Suits" actress down the aisle

The palace released a statement saying it was a "deeply personal moment" for Markle

WHO WILL WALK MEGHAN MARKLE DOWN THE AISLE AT THE ROYAL WEDDING IF HER FATHER CAN'T ATTEND? The pre-wedding drama has caused a huge riff between Markle's parents, who divorced when Markle was six years old

A source told The Sun Ragland and Thomas Markle are "barely speaking" to each other

"Their relationship had been hanging by a thread for months before the staged photo scandals," the source said

"He had told friends that he wanted to come with the peace gesture for an appeasement before the wedding and his daughter's big day, but his recent actions have crushed that

" MEGHAN MARKLE'S FAMILY DRAMA CAUSING A STIR AMONG LONDONERS According to reports, many of the royals were allegedly not happy with the idea of breaking tradition with a mom and daughter routine down the aisle and are instead favoring Prince William for the job

Prince Charles could also step in to walk Markle down the aisle. Kensington Palace previously said Ragland will stay with her daughter at the Cliveden House Hotel, about nine miles from Windsor Castle, the night before the wedding

Fox News' Tyler McCarthy contributed to this report. 

No comments:

Post a Comment