USA news on Youtube Jan 19 2018

BREAKING INTERVIEW: LEAD AUTHOR OF �DIRTY VACCINES� STUDY SPEAKS OUT

In a remarkable new study with potentially immediate and earth-shattering effects on

the vaccine industry and the regulatory agencies that oversee their safety, researchers at

the National Council of Research of Italy and the International Clean Water Institute,

USA have found extensive and inexplicable widespread contamination of vaccines with

particles that, according to the authors of the study, clearly should not be present.

The study, published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, examined

30 vaccines (44 samples in total), and found particulate matter, in aggregates and clusters.

The composition of those clusters, the researchers say, are consistent with �burnt waste�.

They also found red blood cells of unknown origin, and extensive metal contamination,

including lead, chromium and tungsten.

These findings come at time when vaccines are under increasing attack for their likely

role in sudden-onset and long-term disorders, including autism, ADHD. HPV vaccines have

been linked to Guillan-Barre syndrome, premature ovarian failure (sterility). There is also

now a consistent pattern of reports of contamination of vaccines with unwanted viruses and retroviruses,

residue from human and pig tissues, and pathogens like bacteria. And while ongoing controversies

surround both the vaccine safety science, the US District Court (Eastern Pennsylvania)

is reviewing allegations that Merck spiked human serum samples with rabbit antibodies

to increase the apparent efficacy of their MMR vaccine to avoid entry of competitor�s

vaccines into the market.

The authors are certain that no contaminants of this type should be present in any vaccine.

In fact, in the one veterinary vaccine tested, the results came back clean � no particulates,

aggregates, clusters, metals, or red blood cells.

Lead author Dr. Antonietta Gatti was kind enough to engage Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, CEO

of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (ipaknowledge.org), and author of �The Environmental

and Genetic Causes of Autism (Skyhorse, 2016)� in an interview on their study.

JLW: Your study has remarkable finding that could have, and some say should have, profound

and immediate impact on public health policies around the globe. What was your motivation

for the study?

AG: In fact, we did not have any motivation, at least at the beginning. Our analyses on

vaccines started by accident about fifteen years ago when the university hospital of

Mainz (Germany) asked us to analyze samples of an anti-allergy vaccine they administered.

Their problem was the formation of painful swellings around the injection point, and

those wheals would not go away.

JLW: What did you find?

AG: With our electron-microscope technique we analyzed the samples of both vaccines and

wheals and found solid particles inside both of them. Those particles should not have been

there.

JLW: What were you most surprised to find?

AG: We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem

did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act

of faith on which it sounded impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated

our analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence.

JLW: What is the medical significance of finding aggregates and clusters in the vaccines you

studied?

AG: Certainly the particles, be they isolated, aggregated or clustered, are not supposed

to be there. They are foreign bodies our tissues can�t recognize and, because of that, they

are perceived as potential enemies. The biological reactions are expected to be fairly complicated,

with macrophages that try to engulf them the way they do normally with bacteria and parasites.

Unfortunately, though, the particles we found then and keep finding now in vaccines are

not biodegradable. So, all macrophages� efforts are useless and, also depending on

the chemical elements involved, the particles may be especially toxic. Cytokines and pro-inflammatory

substances in general are released and a granulation tissue forms enveloping the particles. This

involves inflammation, and, in the long run, such a chronic condition can lead to cancer.

In the case of vaccines, besides the local problem we checked for Mainz, there are three

more possibilities: one, the most likely, is that those particles spread throughout

the body and, because of their small quantity in such a comparatively huge volume, they

don�t immediately trigger any clinically visible reaction. The next, certainly rarer,

possibility is that they are carried by the blood and move to the central nervous system

and, more in particular, to some of the different compartments of the brain. Depending on the

point they reach, the reaction is obviously different. So, conditions like, among others,

autism are impossible to rule out a priori.

The last possibility is that particles or other contaminants reach the microbiota. In

that case, unlike what happens with the brain whose reactions become visible in a few hours,

nothing can be seen before weeks or a few months. The bacteria that form our microbiota

are essential to synthesize enzymes, many of which are indispensable for the proper

functioning of some of the numerous activities of the brain. If that is the case, that production

can be wrong and the chemistry of the enzymes be not what it should be. The supply of enzymes

containing, for instance, mercury or other pollutants takes time to be delivered and

that�s why the reaction is not immediately detectable.

JLW: Who funded the study?

AG: Besides for very rare cases where groups of citizens have approach us to analyze samples,

and, once, a prosecutor�s office repaid our expenses, we put our own money into this

research.

JLW: How do you suppose those substances got into the vaccines?

AG: That�s a question we can�t answer. The only way would be to be able to inspect

the laboratories where vaccines are produced, but no pharmaceutical company would allow

us. Generally speaking, GMP, i.e. the procedures of good manufacturing practice those laboratories

are obliged to follow, are focused on organic and biological matter, but disregard inorganic

particulate.

JLW: Can you tell us why you think it looks like a mixture of residues from �burnt waste�?

AG: When you burn waste, the particles produced are made of different substances that are

rarely seen in combination. In some cases, unusual mixtures of different elements are

simply due to chance, depending on the atoms or small molecules that come mutually in touch,

and, at least in a number of circumstances we keep coming across, particles with an odd

composition is what is present also in vaccines. That does not mean that the origin is the

same.

JLW: Is there any reason why government agencies do not routinely perform such screening?

AG: An embarrassing question. Do you mind if I don�t answer?

JLW: Correct me if I�m wrong, but you reported that the veterinarian animal vaccine was clean,

but the human vaccines are contaminated. Why do you think this is so?

AG: As a matter of fact, Feligen, the only vaccine for veterinary use we analyzed, proved

to be free from particles. I have no explanation for that. The only thing I can say is that

it is evidently possible to produce a clean vaccine.

JLW: What do you say to people who are concerned that you didn�t run any �control� samples?

AG: I wonder how they can say that. Of course I did.

JLW: Do you think the aluminum levels in pediatric vaccines are safe?

AG: Aluminum is notoriously toxic. Babies are probably more likely to be affected by

levels of aluminum seen in vaccine, but aluminum is unsafe in any case.

JLW: What must be done about this?

AG: From my point of view, which is a merely technical one, it�s easy: you learn how

to check vaccines, you are properly taught to understand what you see and you forbid

polluted vaccines to be distributed. This would immediately ensure that producers take

appropriate counter-measures, for example by working in a truly clean environment and

by carrying out their analyses the way that should be done.

JLW: Is there anything else you would like the general public to know?

AG: The only things I can say is be properly informed and always ask for the evidence of

what you hear say. Always read the leaflets that are mandatorily contained in the vaccine

packaging and that the doctor is obliged to make you read. Always pose all the questions

that you feel like posing, and do not be satisfied if they do not really respond to everything

you want to know. Never make acts of faith and never trust who do. Don�t ever give

your health, and the health of your children, to anyone.

For more infomation >> BREAKING INTERVIEW LEAD AUTHOR OF 'DIRTY VACCINES' STUDY SPEAKS - Duration: 10:16.

-------------------------------------------

There's Clean (Frozen) Water on Mars! - Duration: 5:22.

[ ♪ Intro ♪ ]

Okay, let's be honest: We have found a lot

of water on Mars.

The planet has vast underground ice deposits, enough polar ice for a global flood, and maybe

even some sort of liquid water flowing every now and then.

By now, no one really doubts that Mars used to be wet, and that ancient water is still

trapped in or on the planet.

What they do argue about is whether future astronauts would be able to use that water,

or whether it's too inaccessible or dirty to even try.

But according to a paper in last week's issue of the journal Science, at least some

places on Mars have gigantic drinkable glaciers sitting just below the surface.

So get your space pickaxes ready.

When we hear someone say there's ice beneath Mars's surface, it's easy to imagine buried

glaciers of pure frozen water.

But that's not always what scientists mean.

Many of them have traditionally pictured Mars's ice closer to a sort of concrete, with ice

crystals mixed with dust grains and rock fragments.

Still, it's been hard to tell if that's right because so much of the ice is underneath

layers of dust and rock.

We know it's there because of indirect measurements, but those measurements don't tell us tons

about how mixed it is with the surrounding rocks.

So in this new study, the authors looked for a more direct way of understanding Mars's ice:

Pictures.

They used photos from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to investigate eight hills where erosion

has revealed what's beneath the surface dust -- sort of like seeing the layers of

rock in the Grand Canyon.

Each hill had a layer of pretty much pure ice -- with hardly any rocks or dust mixed

in -- sitting within a couple meters of the surface layers.

The scientists found the ice by looking at enhanced-color images, since everything on

Mars is tinted red with dust.

And in those images, the hillside ice practically glowed blue like a glacier on Earth.

The team also confirmed it was ice using other methods, like measuring what sorts of electromagnetic

radiation it gave off.

And they found that the ice layers were tens or even a hundred meters thick.

Those ice reserves could be vital sources of drinking water of course for future astronauts.

But by splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen, the ice could also help produce

breathable air, too.

But the ice sheets didn't just appear on Mars.

Models show that they probably came from gigantic snowstorms millions of years ago.

So like on Earth, future scientists could also drill into these ice layers and learn

how the Martian climate has changed over time.

And that could answer some surviving questions about why the Red Planet is so dry.

Still, before we can even think about using that water, we should probably figure out

how to safely send people to Mars.

Baby steps.

Besides looking at Mars, astronomers have also been working on a much larger mystery:

why galaxies give off so much light.

Specifically, certain wavelengths of infrared light.

They've known about this for years, but they've had trouble identifying the culprit.

See, no one molecule or small group of molecules seemed to exactly match the observations.

But another paper in the same issue of Science has helped zero in on where all that extra

light is coming from.

With this study, the authors were trying to confirm a previously proposed idea: that the

glow wasn't just from one or a few molecules, but a huge class of them.

This class is called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs.

These are rings of carbon atoms surrounded by nothing but hydrogen.

There are over a hundred different PAHs, and the larger ones tend to emit similar kinds

of infrared light when they move around in empty space.

So it's possible that the glow astronomers saw from galaxies could be the combined light

of dozens of distinct but similar PAHs.

But no one has ever conclusively seen one of these molecules in outer space, and scientists

weren't sure how they'd form.

Also, their light blends together so well that it's hard to tell if any one specific

molecule is actually out there.

That's where this new study comes in.

Instead of looking for individual PAHs, the researchers used radio telescopes to search

for light given off by precursor molecules that can easily react to form them.

These molecules are sometimes known as PA(N)Hs, where the "N" stands for a nitrogen atom

where there would be a hydrogen in a true PAH.

The additional nitrogen makes these molecules sort of off-balance, so they rotate and vibrate

more distinctly than a lot of the symmetrical molecules do.

And that makes them give off more light.

To search for these molecules, the researchers looked at the Taurus Molecular Cloud, a cloud

of gas and dust about 400 light-years away.

There, they found one of these building blocks, known as benzonitrile.

It isn't a big molecule -- it only has thirteen atoms -- but it is important, and finding

it in outer space means we must be on the right track.

Benzonitrile reacts easily with other molecules to produce exactly the kinds of PAHs that

could make galaxies glow in infrared.

So it could explain how the PAHs ended up in space in the first place.

Now, there's still some way to go before this mystery is completely solved.

For one, we'd like to actually identify a PAH in space.

And there's still some uncertainty about where these precursor molecules, like benzonitrile,

would come from.

But now, we're at least more confident that all those steps are somewhere on the ladder.

We just need to fill in the details.

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Space News!

If you would like to get the latest updates from around the universe every week — along

with some other cool space science — you can go to youtube.com/scishowspace to subscribe.

[ ♪ Outro ♪ ]

For more infomation >> There's Clean (Frozen) Water on Mars! - Duration: 5:22.

-------------------------------------------

NunixCoops Often Сhallenge Dance 🔥 Best Viral Lit Dances Compilation #nunixcoopschallenge - Duration: 3:27.

NunixCoops Often Сhallenge Dance 🔥 Best Viral Lit Dances Compilation #nunixcoopschallenge