Friday, August 25, 2017

USA news on Youtube Aug 25 2017

Death Note review: live-action adaptation strips away everything that made the original

version work.

Netflix's Death Note can be summed up by the film's first murder, which takes place

hardly 10 minutes in.

Light Turner (Nat Wolff), newly in possession of a book that lets its owner kill anyone

whose name and face they know, picks a target.

He writes the name down, and the victim dies by decapitation moments later, through a twisted

series of circumstances.

This murder — rapid, weightless, and unnecessarily gory — is Death Note in a nutshell.

Death Note is an adaptation of the popular anime and manga franchise of the same name.

The film, like its source material, dictates that anyone with the magical notebook is granted

the power to mete out justice as they see fit.

After it literally falls from the sky, with no explanation ever offered, Light begins

using it to kill people he deems evil.

Then he invents Kira, a god of justice who claims credit for the killings.

Eventually, he attracts the attention of law enforcement, especially an eccentric detective

who just goes by "L" (Lakeith Stanfield).

Netflix's take on the cat-and-mouse game of murder is riddled with problems from start

to finish.

If the film's writers or director Adam Wingard envisioned Light as a likable character, the

on-screen version is a spectacular failure.

Light falls somewhere between an unhinged sadist and whiny teenager.

Given Wolff's portrayal, it's often hard to tell whether a given line is meant to be

comedic or serious.

Mostly, he speaks with a pained, constipated look that doesn't fit someone contemplating

the complexities of murder.

But his performance just builds on the fact that his motivations for using the "death

note" are never especially strong in the first place.

A few throwaway lines address that issue — his mother was murdered, so he has a vague desire

to kill "bad guys" — but these topics are never explored on any significant level.

That basic lack of motivation extends to nearly every character in the film, from Light's

father to his accomplice girlfriend, Mia (Margaret Qualley).

Mia has a large part to play in the story that her shallow character never learns.

Furthermore, her desire to help Light murder people is never explained — at best, she

seems like a bored teenager with unresolved anger issues.

Light and Mia make out and commit murder seconds apart, without an ounce of remorse or humanity.

Their love is central to the plot, and yet they fight and whine relentlessly throughout

the film, with no real romantic chemistry.

Death Note's characters tend to bleat out their innermost feelings in bursts of forced

exposition, but those feelings aren't always reflected in their actions.

There's a constant clash between their lives, and how they explain their lives.

And while they're all hollow adaptations, the film suffers the biggest loss through

its lead.

In the anime version of the story, Light is a charismatic, popular student who discovers

his dark side, and the strength of his villainy stems from his charm.

He schemes while hiding in plain sight.

He uses those closest to him to get what he wants.

His fall from grace belongs not just to him, but those who love him.

Wolff's version of the character, on the other hand, is simply a stock loner with a

reputation for acting out.

He's arrogant and annoying.

In a curious turn from the source material, Wolff's Light also seems eager to inflict

violent deaths upon strangers.

Instead of relying on the notebook's stock death, a simple heart attack, this version

of Light plans out detailed, grotesquely public endings for many of his victims: decapitations,

roof-jumping mass suicides, and so on.

The film revels in these moments, with Wingard showing bodies exploding on pavement every

chance he gets.

His unexplained brutality makes him a protagonist who's too simplistic and obvious to be interesting.

This gets to the core problem of Wingard's Death Note.

His vision of the worldwide remote-murder phenomenon is uninspired and disappointing.

In its original form, Death Note is compelling because it's a game of wits.

The death note is full of rules, and Light is constantly testing the bounds of his power

by exploring the limitations those rules place on him.

His defiance makes each evasion of the rules clever and interesting, and every gain by

L — who's trying to participate in a game where he can't see the field — all the

more impressive.

This conflict allows for a dynamic relationship between Light and L. There's a grudging

respect between them, and they recognize each other as worthy foes.

But the film never gives Light and L the opportunity to develop a similar rapport.

Lakeith Stanfield, so excellent in Atlanta and Jordan Peele's Get Out, is wasted in

the part.

He's hardly a real threat to Light, whose irritating nature does more damage than anything.

Their encounters are anticlimactic affairs, free of real tension.

And Wolff's version of Light is neither clever nor gifted in any obvious way, making

every moment he escapes capture more puzzling than the last.

And as for Ryuk, the god of death voiced by Willem Dafoe?

Barely a presence of real importance.

What little time Dafoe is given as the apple-eating Shinigami is well-acted and feels authentic

to the character.

There's just not enough of his presence or his motivations to make him important to

the story, except as a special effect.

Wingard's film misunderstands what makes this series great on a fundamental level.

The plot moves at breakneck speed, at times making it feel like a recap of the original

story, rather than its own narrative.

It bastardizes the basic elements of the series to better serve its empty-calorie interpretation.

It's Death Note by way of Final Destination, a film more focused on cyberpunk-esque visuals

and crunchy synth than on any kind of substance.

For more infomation >> Netflix's Death Note review: Notebook Brings A Killer Demon and Let the Owner Kill Anyone They Wish - Duration: 6:25.

-------------------------------------------

LCA Tejas absolutely on right trajectory and getting better - Duration: 5:38.

Basic functionality to understand, Tejas was / is built to replace Mig-21 for point defence

and interception purposes. Not as an forward strike force or deep strike force fighter.

Coming on to the fact that will Tejas be obsolete by the time Mk.2 enters service ? Answer is

NO. Even though Raptors entered service with USAF has U.S. replaced its entire fleet of

4th Generation Planes with Raptors ? NO. F-15 & F-16 are still getting much needed upgrades

and life of F-16 is extended upto 2048.

Even though Russia has developed PAK-FA why are they inducting more Su-35's ?

It is a fact that IAF is suffering from a depleting squadron strength as Mig-21 and

Mig-27 are retired and Mig-29 and Jaguars will also retire by end of next decade. To

keep up the squadron strength, India has now Su-30s coupled with Rafales and next IAF will

have AMCA and Su-57. Tejas will also fit in this role, but it does not mean that it is

a less potent aircraft and is inducted only to keep a numerical strength.

Tejas was built to replace Mig-21 for point defence and interception purposes so it does

not necessarily becomes obsolete as fifth generation fighters have entered service.

India is actively working on fifth generation projects like PAK-FA and AMCA which will hopefully

enter Indian service by 2030.

Tejas is also developed by keeping adversaries at bay. Now no PAF aircraft except F-16 Bk.52

is as technologically advanced and potent as Tejas Mk.1 & Mk.1A. The newer F-16 Bk.52

with PAF is as advanced as Tejas while Tejas edges out the older F-16 Bk.30 of PAF which

is being upgraded now. Leaving that PAF operates now obsolete upgraded Mirages , technologically

inferior JF-17 and F-7 ( Chinese Mig-21 )

The Latest updates of Tejas MK2 is in good mode and on speed track ::

- Avionics architecture has been finalized. - New cockpit with bigger size (6"x8")

displays designs completed. - Configuration of Active Phased Array based

Unified Electronic Warfare Suite (UEWS) finalized - The number of elements that can be incorporated

with the existing geometry for the Antenna Array unit of AESA Radar has been finalized

and performance parameters like range and Effective Radiated Power (ERP) computed.

- Night Vision Goggle (NVG) compatible L E D lights for Navigation lights and Taxi / Landing

Lights are being developed. - Engineering models have been developed. Performance

is being evaluated. - Conformal antenna developed for V/UHF

- Unified Pylon Interface Computer (UPIC) fixed in place of individual Pylon Interface

Boxes - GE-F414 engine for LCA AF Mk2 and a contract

was signed with GE, USA in September 2012 and due for delivery by 2019.

- Canopy reshaping, outer cowl modification, actuator fairing extension and supersonic

pylons have resulted in approx 20 counts (8%) drag reduction in supersonic regimes.

Trials to offload one hydraulic system to reduce the load on JFS during starting completed.

This will help in cold weather high altitude operations.

Liquid Cooling System configurations, separate for Uttam AESA and UEWS have been finalized.

However not sure if Mk.2 still will have Uttam radar or will got with Israel.

The closest competitors of LCA Tejas Mk.2 are J-10C , JF-17 Bk.3 and F-16 Block 70 along

with Saab Gripen-E in single engine category. Tejas Mk.2 in its features will be far more

superior to JF-17 Bk.3 as Bk.3 will host those technologies which are already available with

Mk.1 and Mk.1A like HMD/S or AESA Radar among others. Bk.3 is not going to offer significant

stealth features like Mk.2.

Tejas Mk.1 can give tough competition to J 10B and is slightly inferior to J10C. Tejas

Mk2 with better aerodynamics and more stealth features, can catch up with J10C. Tejas Mk.2

will be a 4++ gen aircraft with tactical strike, air reconnaissance, air defense, and maritime

roles which is enough for a light fighter and it can continue upto 2055 till it becomes

obsolete.

This means India need not pour billions of dollars for other 4++ gen aircraft, instead

can utilize MK.2 until 2055.

Comparing to its competitor GRIPEN-E, F-16, Tejas Mk-2 will be equally potent or even

better and can definitely be the backbone of light category aircrafts of the IAF.

No comments:

Post a Comment